subject:"\[SR\-Users\] CRITICAL ERROR in data

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-13 Thread Mojtaba

Great, thanks!

On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, 11:47 Daniel-Constantin Mierla  Ok, good it was sorted out.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 12.06.19 12:51, Mojtaba wrote:
> > I solved it,too.
> > All issue was from didn't allocate pkg memory.
> > Thank you.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:04 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> >  wrote:
> >> What crash with htable api? I can't see anything related in this
> discussion.
> >>
> >> On 11.06.19 17:15, Mojtaba wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >> And what about the crash when using it with htable api module?
> >>
> >> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 18:18 Daniel-Constantin Mierla  wrote:
> >>> Yes, you must allocate with pkg, because at the end those chunks are
> freed, once the new message is built. You can also look at how other
> operations with data lumps are done inside the textops module.
> >>>
> >>> On 11.06.19 14:44, Mojtaba wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I assigned a const sdp string to it just for checking. Does it matter
> to allocate new memory for newbody?
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla  wrote:
>  Hello,
> 
>  how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len?
> 
>  Daniel
> 
>  On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote:
> > Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here right
> away.
> >
> > {
> >  .
> >  .
> >  .
> > body.s = get_body(msg);
> > if (body.s == 0) {
> > LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
> > //body.len = strlen(body.s);
> > if (body.len == 0) {
> > LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
> > if (!l) {
> > LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
> > LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > }
> > I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum,
> > before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process function
> > is above code.
> > In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
> > strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for
> > save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to
> > save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:
> >
> > if (SIP_REQUEST _INVITE) {
> >   insert_data_htable("some data");
> >   other_process(msg);
> > }else if(SIP_REPLY){
> >  get_data_htable("some data");
> >  other_process(msg);
> > }
> > In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with
> message lump.
> > But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was
> crashed.What
> > is it's problem?
> > In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or
> > othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
> > With best regards.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> >  wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list.
> Is
> >> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
> >>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
> >>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
> >>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188
> (out
> >>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c:
> free_lump(466) -
> >>> aborting
> >>>
> >>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in
> Kamailio?
> >>> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
> >>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new
> module)
> >>> in Kamailio developer forum 
> >>> With Best Regards.
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> >> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> >>
> > --
> > --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S
>  --
>  Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>  www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> 
> >>> --
> >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> >>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> >> --
> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> >> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> >
> >
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
___

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-13 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Ok, good it was sorted out.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 12.06.19 12:51, Mojtaba wrote:
> I solved it,too.
> All issue was from didn't allocate pkg memory.
> Thank you.
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:04 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>  wrote:
>> What crash with htable api? I can't see anything related in this discussion.
>>
>> On 11.06.19 17:15, Mojtaba wrote:
>>
>> Thank you.
>> And what about the crash when using it with htable api module?
>>
>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 18:18 Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> Yes, you must allocate with pkg, because at the end those chunks are freed, 
>>> once the new message is built. You can also look at how other operations 
>>> with data lumps are done inside the textops module.
>>>
>>> On 11.06.19 14:44, Mojtaba wrote:
>>>
>>> I assigned a const sdp string to it just for checking. Does it matter to 
>>> allocate new memory for newbody?
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> wrote:
 Hello,

 how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len?

 Daniel

 On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote:
> Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here right away.
>
> {
>  .
>  .
>  .
> body.s = get_body(msg);
> if (body.s == 0) {
> LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
> return -1;
> }
> body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
> //body.len = strlen(body.s);
> if (body.len == 0) {
> LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
> return -1;
> }
> l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
> if (!l) {
> LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
> LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
> return -1;
> }
> }
> I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum,
> before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process function
> is above code.
> In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
> strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for
> save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to
> save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:
>
> if (SIP_REQUEST _INVITE) {
>   insert_data_htable("some data");
>   other_process(msg);
> }else if(SIP_REPLY){
>  get_data_htable("some data");
>  other_process(msg);
> }
> In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with message 
> lump.
> But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was crashed.What
> is it's problem?
> In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or
> othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
> With best regards.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>  wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list. Is
>> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
>>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
>>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out
>>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) -
>>> aborting
>>>
>>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio?
>>> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
>>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module)
>>> in Kamailio developer forum 
>>> With Best Regards.
>>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
> --
> --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S
 --
 Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
 www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda


___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-12 Thread Mojtaba

I solved it,too.
All issue was from didn't allocate pkg memory.
Thank you.

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:04 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
 wrote:
>
> What crash with htable api? I can't see anything related in this discussion.
>
> On 11.06.19 17:15, Mojtaba wrote:
>
> Thank you.
> And what about the crash when using it with htable api module?
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 18:18 Daniel-Constantin Mierla >
>> Yes, you must allocate with pkg, because at the end those chunks are freed, 
>> once the new message is built. You can also look at how other operations 
>> with data lumps are done inside the textops module.
>>
>> On 11.06.19 14:44, Mojtaba wrote:
>>
>> I assigned a const sdp string to it just for checking. Does it matter to 
>> allocate new memory for newbody?
>>
>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla >>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len?
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote:
>>> > Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here right away.
>>> >
>>> > {
>>> >  .
>>> >  .
>>> >  .
>>> > body.s = get_body(msg);
>>> > if (body.s == 0) {
>>> > LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
>>> > return -1;
>>> > }
>>> > body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
>>> > //body.len = strlen(body.s);
>>> > if (body.len == 0) {
>>> > LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
>>> > return -1;
>>> > }
>>> > l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
>>> > if (!l) {
>>> > LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
>>> > return -1;
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> > if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
>>> > LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
>>> > return -1;
>>> > }
>>> > }
>>> > I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum,
>>> > before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process function
>>> > is above code.
>>> > In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
>>> > strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for
>>> > save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to
>>> > save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:
>>> >
>>> > if (SIP_REQUEST _INVITE) {
>>> >   insert_data_htable("some data");
>>> >   other_process(msg);
>>> > }else if(SIP_REPLY){
>>> >  get_data_htable("some data");
>>> >  other_process(msg);
>>> > }
>>> > In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with message 
>>> > lump.
>>> > But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was crashed.What
>>> > is it's problem?
>>> > In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or
>>> > othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
>>> > With best regards.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>> >  wrote:
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list. Is
>>> >> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Daniel
>>> >>
>>> >> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
>>> >>> Hello,
>>> >>> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
>>> >>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
>>> >>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
>>> >>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out
>>> >>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) -
>>> >>> aborting
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio?
>>> >>> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
>>> >>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module)
>>> >>> in Kamailio developer forum 
>>> >>> With Best Regards.
>>> >>>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>>> >> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda



-- 
--Mojtaba Esfandiari.S

___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-12 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla

What crash with htable api? I can't see anything related in this discussion.

On 11.06.19 17:15, Mojtaba wrote:
> Thank you.
> And what about the crash when using it with htable api module?
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 18:18 Daniel-Constantin Mierla   wrote:
>
> Yes, you must allocate with pkg, because at the end those chunks
> are freed, once the new message is built. You can also look at how
> other operations with data lumps are done inside the textops module.
>
> On 11.06.19 14:44, Mojtaba wrote:
>> I assigned a const sdp string to it just for checking. Does it
>> matter to allocate new memory for newbody?
>>
>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> mailto:mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len?
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote:
>> > Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it
>> here right away.
>> >
>> > {
>> >  .
>> >  .
>> >  .
>> >     body.s = get_body(msg);
>> >     if (body.s == 0) {
>> >                 LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
>> >         return -1;
>> >     }
>> >     body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
>> > //    body.len = strlen(body.s);
>> >     if (body.len == 0) {
>> >                 LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
>> >         return -1;
>> >     }
>> >     l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
>> >     if (!l) {
>> >                 LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
>> >         return -1;
>> >     }
>> >
>> >     if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
>> >                 LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
>> >         return -1;
>> >     }
>> > }
>> > I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer
>> forum,
>> > before. let me paste it at below. The means of
>> other_process function
>> > is above code.
>> > In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
>> > strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked
>> list for
>> > save some temporary data during call process.dependencies
>> module to
>> > save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:
>> >
>> > if (SIP_REQUEST _INVITE) {
>> >           insert_data_htable("some data");
>> >           other_process(msg);
>> > }else if(SIP_REPLY){
>> >          get_data_htable("some data");
>> >          other_process(msg);
>> > }
>> > In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body
>> with message lump.
>> > But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was
>> crashed.What
>> > is it's problem?
>> > In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable
>> function or
>> > othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
>> > With best regards.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> > mailto:mico...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data
>> lump list. Is
>> >> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Daniel
>> >>
>> >> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
>> >>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]:
>> {1 1 INVITE
>> >>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL:
>> 
>> >>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer
>> 0xa3c188 (out
>> >>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c:
>> free_lump(466) -
>> >>> aborting
>> >>>
>> >>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module
>> in Kamailio?
>> >>> In module we have to change some message's body with
>> data_lump.
>> >>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing
>> new module)
>> >>> in Kamailio developer forum > >
>> >>> With Best Regards.
>> >>>
>> >> --
>> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> 
>> >> www.twitter.com/miconda 
>> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> 
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S
>>
>> -- 
>>

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-11 Thread Mojtaba

Thank you.
And what about the crash when using it with htable api module?

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 18:18 Daniel-Constantin Mierla  Yes, you must allocate with pkg, because at the end those chunks are
> freed, once the new message is built. You can also look at how other
> operations with data lumps are done inside the textops module.
> On 11.06.19 14:44, Mojtaba wrote:
>
> I assigned a const sdp string to it just for checking. Does it matter to
> allocate new memory for newbody?
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len?
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote:
>> > Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here right
>> away.
>> >
>> > {
>> >  .
>> >  .
>> >  .
>> > body.s = get_body(msg);
>> > if (body.s == 0) {
>> > LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
>> > return -1;
>> > }
>> > body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
>> > //body.len = strlen(body.s);
>> > if (body.len == 0) {
>> > LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
>> > return -1;
>> > }
>> > l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
>> > if (!l) {
>> > LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
>> > return -1;
>> > }
>> >
>> > if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
>> > LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
>> > return -1;
>> > }
>> > }
>> > I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum,
>> > before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process function
>> > is above code.
>> > In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
>> > strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for
>> > save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to
>> > save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:
>> >
>> > if (SIP_REQUEST _INVITE) {
>> >   insert_data_htable("some data");
>> >   other_process(msg);
>> > }else if(SIP_REPLY){
>> >  get_data_htable("some data");
>> >  other_process(msg);
>> > }
>> > In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with
>> message lump.
>> > But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was crashed.What
>> > is it's problem?
>> > In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or
>> > othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
>> > With best regards.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> >  wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list. Is
>> >> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Daniel
>> >>
>> >> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
>> >>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
>> >>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
>> >>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out
>> >>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) -
>> >>> aborting
>> >>>
>> >>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio?
>> >>> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
>> >>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module)
>> >>> in Kamailio developer forum 
>> >>> With Best Regards.
>> >>>
>> >> --
>> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> >> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- 
> www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Yes, you must allocate with pkg, because at the end those chunks are
freed, once the new message is built. You can also look at how other
operations with data lumps are done inside the textops module.

On 11.06.19 14:44, Mojtaba wrote:
> I assigned a const sdp string to it just for checking. Does it matter
> to allocate new memory for newbody?
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla   wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len?
>
> Daniel
>
> On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote:
> > Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here
> right away.
> >
> > {
> >  .
> >  .
> >  .
> >     body.s = get_body(msg);
> >     if (body.s == 0) {
> >                 LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
> >         return -1;
> >     }
> >     body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
> > //    body.len = strlen(body.s);
> >     if (body.len == 0) {
> >                 LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
> >         return -1;
> >     }
> >     l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
> >     if (!l) {
> >                 LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
> >         return -1;
> >     }
> >
> >     if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
> >                 LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
> >         return -1;
> >     }
> > }
> > I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum,
> > before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process
> function
> > is above code.
> > In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
> > strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for
> > save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to
> > save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:
> >
> > if (SIP_REQUEST _INVITE) {
> >           insert_data_htable("some data");
> >           other_process(msg);
> > }else if(SIP_REPLY){
> >          get_data_htable("some data");
> >          other_process(msg);
> > }
> > In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with
> message lump.
> > But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was
> crashed.What
> > is it's problem?
> > In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or
> > othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
> > With best regards.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> > mailto:mico...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump
> list. Is
> >> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
> >>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1
> INVITE
> >>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
> >>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer
> 0xa3c188 (out
> >>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c:
> free_lump(466) -
> >>> aborting
> >>>
> >>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in
> Kamailio?
> >>> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
> >>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new
> module)
> >>> in Kamailio developer forum  >
> >>> With Best Regards.
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com 
> >> www.twitter.com/miconda  --
> www.linkedin.com/in/miconda 
> >>
> >
> > --
> > --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com 
> www.twitter.com/miconda  --
> www.linkedin.com/in/miconda 
>
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-11 Thread Mojtaba

I assigned a const sdp string to it just for checking. Does it matter to
allocate new memory for newbody?

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla  Hello,
>
> how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len?
>
> Daniel
>
> On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote:
> > Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here right
> away.
> >
> > {
> >  .
> >  .
> >  .
> > body.s = get_body(msg);
> > if (body.s == 0) {
> > LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
> > //body.len = strlen(body.s);
> > if (body.len == 0) {
> > LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
> > if (!l) {
> > LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
> > LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > }
> > I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum,
> > before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process function
> > is above code.
> > In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
> > strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for
> > save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to
> > save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:
> >
> > if (SIP_REQUEST _INVITE) {
> >   insert_data_htable("some data");
> >   other_process(msg);
> > }else if(SIP_REPLY){
> >  get_data_htable("some data");
> >  other_process(msg);
> > }
> > In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with message
> lump.
> > But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was crashed.What
> > is it's problem?
> > In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or
> > othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
> > With best regards.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> >  wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list. Is
> >> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
> >>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
> >>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
> >>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out
> >>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) -
> >>> aborting
> >>>
> >>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio?
> >>> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
> >>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module)
> >>> in Kamailio developer forum 
> >>> With Best Regards.
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> >> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> >>
> >
> > --
> > --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello,

how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len?

Daniel

On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote:
> Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here right away.
>
> {
>  .
>  .
>  .
> body.s = get_body(msg);
> if (body.s == 0) {
> LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
> return -1;
> }
> body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
> //body.len = strlen(body.s);
> if (body.len == 0) {
> LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
> return -1;
> }
> l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
> if (!l) {
> LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
> LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
> return -1;
> }
> }
> I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum,
> before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process function
> is above code.
> In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
> strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for
> save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to
> save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:
>
> if (SIP_REQUEST _INVITE) {
>   insert_data_htable("some data");
>   other_process(msg);
> }else if(SIP_REPLY){
>  get_data_htable("some data");
>  other_process(msg);
> }
> In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with message lump.
> But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was crashed.What
> is it's problem?
> In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or
> othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
> With best regards.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>  wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list. Is
>> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
>>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
>>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out
>>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) -
>>> aborting
>>>
>>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio?
>>> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
>>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module)
>>> in Kamailio developer forum 
>>> With Best Regards.
>>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>
> --
> --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda


___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-11 Thread Mojtaba

Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here right away.

{
 .
 .
 .
body.s = get_body(msg);
if (body.s == 0) {
LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
return -1;
}
body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
//body.len = strlen(body.s);
if (body.len == 0) {
LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
return -1;
}
l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
if (!l) {
LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
return -1;
}

if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
return -1;
}
}
I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum,
before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process function
is above code.
In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for
save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to
save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:

if (SIP_REQUEST _INVITE) {
  insert_data_htable("some data");
  other_process(msg);
}else if(SIP_REPLY){
 get_data_htable("some data");
 other_process(msg);
}
In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with message lump.
But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was crashed.What
is it's problem?
In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or
othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
With best regards.

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list. Is
> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
> > Hello,
> > What does this CRITICAL error mean?
> > Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
> > Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
> > [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out
> > of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) -
> > aborting
> >
> > I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio?
> > In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
> > I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module)
> > in Kamailio developer forum 
> > With Best Regards.
> >
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>

--
--Mojtaba Esfandiari.S

___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello,

likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list. Is
the code using data lumps available to look at on git?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
> Hello,
> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out
> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) -
> aborting
>
> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio?
> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module)
> in Kamailio developer forum 
> With Best Regards.
>
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda


___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

2019-06-11 Thread Mojtaba

Hello,
What does this CRITICAL error mean?
Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: 
[core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out
of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) -
aborting

I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio?
In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module)
in Kamailio developer forum 
With Best Regards.

-- 
--Mojtaba Esfandiari.S

___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Re: [SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

[SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

11 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information