[SR-Users] xlogl and pseudo variables

[Bucur Marius]

Hello,


From my opinion, the logging itself will be a performance killer, not appending 
the pseudo variables to the log string - which should consist just in fast 
memory operations.
Make sure you have "-" before the filename though for asynchronous writing to 
the log file (syslog.conf).
Finally, you might want to consider turning lowering the debug  level (e.g. set 
debug level to 2) when you switch to production.

Best regards,
Marius




From: Bernhard Suttner 
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Sat, January 29, 2011 11:02:40 PM
Subject: [SR-Users] xlogl and pseudo  variables

Hi,

I am using xlogl for debugging and logging the most important actions within 
the 
kamailio script. Does it take much resources if I use the pseudo variables with 
the xlogl statements? Example:

xlogl("L_NOTICE", "Route $rm to destination! F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si \n");

I´m planning to do this in all the xlogl statements to be able to debug / "see 
whats going on" on the system.

Thanks in advance.

Best regard,
Bernhard

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


  ___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] xlogl and pseudo variables

[Bernhard Suttner]

Hi,

I am using xlogl for debugging and logging the most important actions within 
the kamailio script. Does it take much resources if I use the pseudo variables 
with the xlogl statements? Example:

xlogl("L_NOTICE", "Route $rm to destination! F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si \n");

I´m planning to do this in all the xlogl statements to be able to debug / "see 
whats going on" on the system.

Thanks in advance.

Best regard,
Bernhard

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route

[Bernhard Suttner]

Hi,

that was _really_ fast. Thanks. :-)

One more question: Could I somehow test with the route[NAT] for example, if the 
request was from the main route { ... } or from the onreply_route[] ?

Best regards,
Bernhard 

- Original Message -
From: Alex Balashov [mailto:abalas...@evaristesys.com]
To: Bernhard Suttner [mailto:bernhard.sutt...@winet.ch]
Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org]
Sent: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:37:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route


> Yes.
> 
> --
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 260 Peachtree Street NW
> Suite 2200
> Atlanta, GA 30303
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
> Fax: +1-404-961-1892
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
> 
> On Jan 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, "Bernhard Suttner"   > wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I  
> > mean, within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route 
> > [NAT]. Is this also possible for this "special" routes? If this is  
> > possible, is it also allowed to call a route which will normally  
> > called from the main route { ... }
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bernhard
> >
> > ___
> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing  
> > list
> > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> 

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route

[Alex Balashov]

Yes.

--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

On Jan 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, "Bernhard Suttner" > wrote:



Hi,

is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I  
mean, within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route 
[NAT]. Is this also possible for this "special" routes? If this is  
possible, is it also allowed to call a route which will normally  
called from the main route { ... }


Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Bernhard

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing  
list

sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route

[Bernhard Suttner]

Hi,

is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I mean, 
within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route[NAT]. Is this also 
possible for this "special" routes? If this is possible, is it also allowed to 
call a route which will normally called from the main route { ... }

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Bernhard

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] planning release of v3.1.2

[Bernhard Suttner]

Hi,

whats about: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=108 I 
think that some users are trying to register to an asterisk system. Or does 
somebody have a solution for that?

A new release would be nice!!!

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Bernhard



- Original Message -
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
To: kamailio [mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org], sr-dev 
[mailto:sr-...@lists.sip-router.org]
Sent: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:15:50 +0100
Subject: [sr-dev] planning release of v3.1.2


> Hello,
> 
> I think it is time to release v3.1.2, first date that comes in my mind 
> is next Thursday if everyone feels it is enough time to take care of 
> backporting any fix he/she did and it is not yet there. That will 
> provide us a fresh release for the FOSDEM event. If not, then maybe the 
> other week, Tuesday, so the participants at the Kamailio Devel training 
> in Barcelona can practice on it.
> 
> Soon after we should plan also a release for previous stable, branch 3.0.
> 
> Anyone having other options?
> 
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://www.asipto.com
> 
> 
> ___
> sr-dev mailing list
> sr-...@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
> 

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Joining strings

[Lee Archer]

Thanks for the help.  I thought I had tried this way but I will try again.
 
Regards
 
Lee



From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sat 29/01/2011 17:16
To: Lee Archer
Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Joining strings


Hello,

On 1/29/11 6:26 AM, Lee Archer wrote: 

Hi, is it possible to join strings?  I'd like to prepend a number to a 
string prior to processing it to an int?


using + with variables/values holding strings results in concatenation:

$var(x) = "123";

$var(y) = "abc" + $var(x);

Then the $var(y) will be "abc123";

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com  
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Can you use a bigint with Kamailio?

[Lee Archer]

Thanks for the help.  I decided to cut the number down further instead.
 
Regards
 
Lee



From: Brandon Armstead [mailto:bran...@cryy.com]
Sent: Sat 29/01/2011 17:32
To: Lee Archer
Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Can you use a bigint with Kamailio?


Lee,

  You will need to cast this to a string / varchar.

Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead


On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Lee Archer  wrote:


Hi, I am trying to run dispatcher based on the inbound number called.  
This works fine for some numbers but not all.  Is there a bigint string 
function as this would solve my problems?  The numbers I am receiving are 14 
digits long which s.int   is returning as something completely 
different to what it should be.

Thanks

Lee


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users




___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address

[Alex Balashov]

Also, I don't believe force_send_socket() accepts PVs as arguments. 
But $fs accomplishes the same end, and is a mutable PV.


--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address

[Graham Wooden]

Ah ­ I didn’t have the same routine in branch_route ­ I think that’s the
key.  Seems to be working now.
I see now that I am sourcing out the IP addy that I need to be.

Thanks for that extra hint Stagg.

-graham

On 1/29/11 11:45 AM, "Stagg Shelton"  wrote:

>I have the force send socket in the branch route too.  So assume the first
> attempt fails and the call makes it to the failure route that I setup.  Once
> it gets to the branch route then it executes the following where you can
> perform your logic again.
>  
>  branch_route[2] {
>  xlog("new branch at $ru\n");
>  if($rd=="aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa")
>  {
>xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for A Plan");
>force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
>  }
>  else
>  {
>xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for another plan");
>force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
>  };
>  }
>  
>  
>  Stagg
>  
>  
>  On 1/29/11 12:32 PM, Graham Wooden wrote:
>>  Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
>> Well, ran into another wall  I can’t seem to do the force_send_socket at
>> the point of when next_gw() is called in the failure  route.
>>  
>>  Is there anyway to clear and/or re-assign the data that is making it where I
>> can’t re-write the transaction to come from another IP addy?
>>  
>>  
>>  On 1/29/11 11:01 AM, "Graham Wooden"  wrote:
>>  
>>   
>>> Stagg, 
>>>  
>>>  While the Ips are the same, the suggestion to use “rd” along with an entry
>>> in the “hostname” column appears to be what I want.
>>>  
>>>  I assigned in my DNS some testing hostnames to the single IP in question.
>>> When debugging, I see that rd contains the hostname, not the IP.  I believe
>>> with that, I can differentiate between the two... And when I see hostname of
>>> blah.blah.tld, then go ahead and do the force_send_socket.
>>>  
>>>  This definitely solves the issue for the time being. However, I am
>>> wondering if/when call volume increases if the call-setup time be delayed
>>> because of these look ups.  Everything that I have read so far is that the
>>> gw_name is just information, the module doesn’t actually have access to it.
>>> Boo.
>>>  
>>>  -graham
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  On 1/29/11 8:36 AM, "GP Wooden"  wrote:
>>>  
>>>   
 Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by something else,
 like the gw_name.
  
  - Reply message -
  From: "Stagg Shelton" 
  Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
  Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP
 address
  To: 
  
  Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate
  plans?  If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.
  
 if (next_gw()) {
   # prepare for lcr failover
   t_on_failure("2");
   if($rd=="aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa")
   {
 xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for Some Rate
 Plan");
force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
   }
   else
   {
 xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for another rate
  plan");
force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
   };
   route(2);
 } else {
   xlog("No gateways found!");
  
  
  Stagg
  
  On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
>  > Hi there,
>  >
>  > I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
>  > sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the
> carrier).
>  > This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
>  >
>  > I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
>  >
>  > failure_route [2] {
>  > .
>  > .
>  >  if (next_gw()) {
>  >  if ( name = 'gw_name') {
>  >  force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
>  >  } else {
>  >  # just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for
> everyone
>  > else.
>  >  }
>  >  t_on_failure("2");
>  >  route(19);
>  >  }
>  > .
>  > .
>  > .
>  > }
>  >
>  > What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't
go
>  > by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between
> the
>  > two ratedecks.
>  >
>  > Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
>  >
>  > Thanks all,
>  >
>  > -graham
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > ___
>  > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>  > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org

Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address

[Stagg Shelton]

I have the force send socket in the branch route too. So assume the
first attempt fails and the call makes it to the failure route that I
setup. Once it gets to the branch route then it executes the following
where you can perform your logic again.

branch_route[2] {
xlog("new branch at $ru\n");
if($rd=="aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa")
{
xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for A Plan");
force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
}
else
{
xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for another plan");
force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
};
}


Stagg


On 1/29/11 12:32 PM, Graham Wooden wrote:
> Well, ran into another wall  I can’t seem to do the
> force_send_socket at the point of when next_gw() is called in the
> failure route.
>
> Is there anyway to clear and/or re-assign the data that is making it
> where I can’t re-write the transaction to come from another IP addy?
>
>
> On 1/29/11 11:01 AM, "Graham Wooden"  wrote:
>
> Stagg,
>
> While the Ips are the same, the suggestion to use “rd” along with
> an entry in the “hostname” column appears to be what I want.
>
> I assigned in my DNS some testing hostnames to the single IP in
> question. When debugging, I see that rd contains the hostname, not
> the IP. I believe with that, I can differentiate between the
> two... And when I see hostname of blah.blah.tld, then go ahead and
> do the force_send_socket.
>
> This definitely solves the issue for the time being. However, I am
> wondering if/when call volume increases if the call-setup time be
> delayed because of these look ups. Everything that I have read so
> far is that the gw_name is just information, the module doesn’t
> actually have access to it. Boo.
>
> -graham
>
>
> On 1/29/11 8:36 AM, "GP Wooden"  wrote:
>
> Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by
> something else, like the gw_name.
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "Stagg Shelton" 
> Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
> Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from
> other IP address
> To: 
>
> Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the
> different rate
> plans? If the gateways are different then the following may be
> relevant.
>
> if (next_gw()) {
> # prepare for lcr failover
> t_on_failure("2");
> if($rd=="aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa")
> {
> xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for Some Rate Plan");
> force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
> }
> else
> {
> xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for another rate
> plan");
> force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
> };
> route(2);
> } else {
> xlog("No gateways found!");
>
>
> Stagg
>
> On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR,
> needs to be
> > sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks
> with the carrier).
> > This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
> >
> > I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
> >
> > failure_route [2] {
> > .
> > .
> > if (next_gw()) {
> > if ( name = 'gw_name') {
> > force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
> > } else {
> > # just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
> > else.
> > }
> > t_on_failure("2");
> > route(19);
> > }
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > }
> >
> > What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name
> column? I can't go
> > by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the
> same between the
> > two ratedecks.
> >
> > Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
> >
> > Thanks all,
> >
> > -graham
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
> mailing list
> > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
> mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>
> 
> 
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
> mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> 

Re: [SR-Users] Can you use a bigint with Kamailio?

[Brandon Armstead]

Lee,

  You will need to cast this to a string / varchar.

Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Lee Archer wrote:

>  Hi, I am trying to run dispatcher based on the inbound number called.
> This works fine for some numbers but not all.  Is there a bigint string
> function as this would solve my problems?  The numbers I am receiving are
> 14 digits long which s.int is returning as something completely different
> to what it should be.
>
> Thanks
>
> Lee
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address

[Graham Wooden]

Well, ran into another wall  I can’t seem to do the force_send_socket at
the point of when next_gw() is called in the failure  route.

Is there anyway to clear and/or re-assign the data that is making it where I
can’t re-write the transaction to come from another IP addy?


On 1/29/11 11:01 AM, "Graham Wooden"  wrote:

> Stagg, 
> 
> While the Ips are the same, the suggestion to use “rd” along with an entry in
> the “hostname” column appears to be what I want.
> 
> I assigned in my DNS some testing hostnames to the single IP in question.
> When debugging, I see that rd contains the hostname, not the IP.  I believe
> with that, I can differentiate between the two... And when I see hostname of
> blah.blah.tld, then go ahead and do the force_send_socket.
> 
> This definitely solves the issue for the time being. However, I am wondering
> if/when call volume increases if the call-setup time be delayed because of
> these look ups.  Everything that I have read so far is that the gw_name is
> just information, the module doesn’t actually have access to it. Boo.
> 
> -graham
> 
> 
> On 1/29/11 8:36 AM, "GP Wooden"  wrote:
> 
>> Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by something else,
>> like the gw_name.
>> 
>> - Reply message -
>> From: "Stagg Shelton" 
>> Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
>> Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
>> To: 
>> 
>> Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate
>> plans?  If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.
>> 
>>if (next_gw()) {
>>  # prepare for lcr failover
>>  t_on_failure("2");
>>  if($rd=="aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa")
>>  {
>>xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for Some Rate Plan");
>>force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
>>  }
>>  else
>>  {
>>xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for another rate
>> plan");
>>force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
>>  };
>>  route(2);
>>} else {
>>  xlog("No gateways found!");
>> 
>> 
>> Stagg
>> 
>> On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
>>> > Hi there,
>>> >
>>> > I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
>>> > sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the
>>> carrier).
>>> > This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
>>> >
>>> > I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
>>> >
>>> > failure_route [2] {
>>> > .
>>> > .
>>> >  if (next_gw()) {
>>> >  if ( name = 'gw_name') {
>>> >  force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
>>> >  } else {
>>> >  # just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
>>> > else.
>>> >  }
>>> >  t_on_failure("2");
>>> >  route(19);
>>> >  }
>>> > .
>>> > .
>>> > .
>>> > }
>>> >
>>> > What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
>>> > by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between
>>> the
>>> > two ratedecks.
>>> >
>>> > Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks all,
>>> >
>>> > -graham
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ___
>>> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>>> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> 
>> ___
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> 

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] Joining strings

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 1/29/11 6:26 AM, Lee Archer wrote:


Hi, is it possible to join strings?  I'd like toprepend a number to a 
string prior to processing it to an int?




using + with variables/values holding strings results in concatenation:

$var(x) = "123";

$var(y) = "abc" + $var(x);

Then the $var(y) will be "abc123";

Cheers,
Daniel

--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address

[Graham Wooden]

Stagg, 

While the Ips are the same, the suggestion to use “rd” along with an entry
in the “hostname” column appears to be what I want.

I assigned in my DNS some testing hostnames to the single IP in question.
When debugging, I see that rd contains the hostname, not the IP.  I believe
with that, I can differentiate between the two... And when I see hostname of
blah.blah.tld, then go ahead and do the force_send_socket.

This definitely solves the issue for the time being. However, I am wondering
if/when call volume increases if the call-setup time be delayed because of
these look ups.  Everything that I have read so far is that the gw_name is
just information, the module doesn’t actually have access to it. Boo.

-graham


On 1/29/11 8:36 AM, "GP Wooden"  wrote:

> Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by something else,
> like the gw_name.
> 
> - Reply message -
> From: "Stagg Shelton" 
> Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
> Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
> To: 
> 
> Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate
> plans?  If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.
> 
>if (next_gw()) {
>  # prepare for lcr failover
>  t_on_failure("2");
>  if($rd=="aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa")
>  {
>xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for Some Rate Plan");
>force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
>  }
>  else
>  {
>xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for another rate
> plan");
>force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
>  };
>  route(2);
>} else {
>  xlog("No gateways found!");
> 
> 
> Stagg
> 
> On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
>> > sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the
>> carrier).
>> > This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
>> >
>> > I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
>> >
>> > failure_route [2] {
>> > .
>> > .
>> >  if (next_gw()) {
>> >  if ( name = 'gw_name') {
>> >  force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
>> >  } else {
>> >  # just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
>> > else.
>> >  }
>> >  t_on_failure("2");
>> >  route(19);
>> >  }
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > }
>> >
>> > What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
>> > by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between the
>> > two ratedecks.
>> >
>> > Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
>> >
>> > Thanks all,
>> >
>> > -graham
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> > sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
>> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> 
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address

[GP Wooden]

Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by something else, 
like the gw_name. 

- Reply message -
From: "Stagg Shelton" 
Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
To: 

Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate 
plans?  If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.

   if (next_gw()) {
 # prepare for lcr failover
 t_on_failure("2");
 if($rd=="aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa")
 {
   xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for Some Rate Plan");
   force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
 }
 else
 {
   xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for another rate 
plan");
   force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
 };
 route(2);
   } else {
 xlog("No gateways found!");


Stagg

On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
> sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the carrier).
> This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
>
> I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
>
> failure_route [2] {
> .
> .
>  if (next_gw()) {
>  if ( name = 'gw_name') {
>  force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
>  } else {
>  # just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
> else.
>  }
>  t_on_failure("2");
>  route(19);
>  }
> .
> .
> .
> }
>
> What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
> by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between the
> two ratedecks.
>
> Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
>
> Thanks all,
>
> -graham
>
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address

[Stagg Shelton]

Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate 
plans?  If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.


  if (next_gw()) {
# prepare for lcr failover
t_on_failure("2");
if($rd=="aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa")
{
  xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for Some Rate Plan");
  force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
}
else
{
  xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for another rate 
plan");

  force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
};
route(2);
  } else {
xlog("No gateways found!");


Stagg

On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:

Hi there,

I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the carrier).
This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...

I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:

failure_route [2] {
.
.
 if (next_gw()) {
 if ( name = 'gw_name') {
 force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
 } else {
 # just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
else.
 }
 t_on_failure("2");
 route(19);
 }
.
.
.
}

What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between the
two ratedecks.

Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?

Thanks all,

-graham



___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] Joining strings

[Lee Archer]

Hi, is it possible to join strings?  I'd like to prepend a number to a
string prior to processing it to an int?

Thanks

Lee
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address

[Graham Wooden]

Hi there,

I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the carrier).
This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...

I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:

failure_route [2] {
.
.
if (next_gw()) {
if ( name = 'gw_name') {
force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
} else {
# just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
else.
}
t_on_failure("2");
route(19);
}
.
.
.
}

What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between the
two ratedecks.

Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?

Thanks all,

-graham



___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

[SR-Users] Can you use a bigint with Kamailio?

[Lee Archer]

Hi, I am trying to run dispatcher based on the inbound number called.
This works fine for some numbers but not all.  Is there a bigint string
function as this would solve my problems?  The numbers I am receiving
are 14 digits long which s.int is returning as something completely
different to what it should be.

Thanks

Lee
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users