Re: BPE safety valve

2003-09-08 Thread PeteH
Here is the reply I recieved from Midwest re purchasing the safety valve:

> Dear Pete,
> This is not a part we carry for replacement.
>
>
> Thanks
> Ruth
> Midwest Products


How do you argue with this kind of logic?

Regards,
PeteH



> Midwest's Heritage series safety valve/filler cap will screw directly onto
the
> threaded filler bush on their "Model VI" boiler.  You might want to
contact
> Midwest and inquire about purchasing one separately.
>
> Mike  (Who really does care about safety)
>
 


Re: BPE safety valve

2003-09-08 Thread Terry Griner
Dan,
  My very first engine was a Midwest Boilered Project engine. After the second run, I 
rebuild the Boiler with 2"  type L copper pipe, and a ½ " type L flue/Chimney. I put 
in a safety valve, and ran the 1/8" steam output line straight to the Oiler, then to 
the engine. the exhaust goes back to the Flue/Chimney. I didn't notice a real change 
in run time.
My advise to you would be, buy the Midwest Kit, but also buy a safety valve and scrap 
the tubing, then ream out the caps to allow ½ " flue/chimney, and finally, use silver 
solder for all joints. Like Harry said,
"brass, soft solder, and  no safety valve are unacceptable in a miniature boiler 
PERIOD"
Terry Griner
Columbus Ohio USA

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/07/2003 8:31:00 PM >>>
I'm still new to live steam and had considered building the Midwest steam engine, now 
I have some serious doubts.   I recognize and agree that Safety is Number 1, I've 
been burned more than once (not in this Hobby) and worked as an aid in a "Debridement 
" ward, no thanks, I can do with out faulty designs and or bad practices around this 
wonderful pastime.  Shortcuts can cost you bigtime, if not you personally, then some 
body else following a bad example    relying on a hose to pop off as a safety 
valve?   Not me Holmes, I'm not crazyI've learned a lot on this site,  thanks 
all  for good input and Good Advice ! Dan McGrath.


 




>From: Harry Wade 
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>To: Multiple recipients of sslivesteam 
>Subject: BPE safety valve 
>Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 15:36:12 -0500 
> 
>At 12:32 PM 9/6/03 -0700, you wrote: 
> >I'm getting a little worried about everyone's safety inasmuch as so many 
> >keystrokes have been devoted to the perils of the Midwest Boiler 
> >Michael 
>At 11:39 AM 9/7/03 -0700, you wrote: 
> >Don't forget, folks... there are two "safety valves" on the Midwest 
> >steam engine... the first being the silicone hose popping off . . . 
> >Jon 
> 
> In other words there are NO safety valves on the Midwest boiler and 
>it has brass as a part of the pressure vessel structure. Why, when doing 
>it right takes so little additional time and effort, some of you continue 
>to recommend as safe and acceptable boiler practices which are directly 
>contrary to long-time world live steam practice and unacceptable in all 
>other major live steaming countries is beyond me. 
> I'm not anti-Midwest or anti-Project per se, and the purpose and 
>goal of the Project is an admirable one, but to me this isn't about having 
>an easily built project which is probably not going to cause an injury this 
>afternoon, . . . this is about what is good safe practice to adopt, and to 
>recommend to others to adopt, as a personal standard of safety for a 
>lifetime in live steam and that when followed will never result in personal 
>injury on account of a structural failure. This should be adopted as Rule 
>#1 for all of us. Those who for some reason can't see fit to adopt Rule #1 
>should IMHO be shown the door. They are a danger to the rest of us. 
> Everyone is of course free to do as they please in their own garden 
>but to the rest of the organized live steam world brass, soft solder, and 
>no safety valve are unacceptable in a miniature boiler PERIOD and aren't 
>even open to discussion. One can't expect to post information to the 
>contrary to an international forum where so many people come to seek sound 
>information and guidance and not have it scrutinized, questioned, and 
>objected to, if only by me. 
> 
> 
>Regards, 
>Harry Wade 
>Nashville, Tn 
> 

Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage. 



Re: BPE safety valve

2003-09-08 Thread Cgnr
Boy, I sure agree with you on this one Harry!
<>
I post to the MLS board and have to constantly advise so many people of 
unsafe practices.  There is a great deal of people new to steam there.
I cannot imagine why the Midwest boiler is what it is except that it was 
originally designed to be in a boat.  I guess their thinking was if gave out it 
would be at some distance from the operator :-).  Certainly have seen many of 
them run just perfectly, tho.
I could certainly, myself, never dream of designing and building any boiler 
without a safety valve or using soft soldering.  Those of you who choose to 
modify the boiler should be very careful.  And in the long run, if you are going 
to all that much trouble, it makes sense to start with the right materials and 
learn techniques in hard silver soldering.
Just my .02 worth,
Bob Starr 


Re: BPE safety valve

2003-09-08 Thread Sam Evans
Seconded.  Remember ill-advised designs can cause accidents which end up
attracting the attention of legislators.  If you want legislators to
keep their noses out, then don't give them cause.  Not putting an
ADEQUATE safety valve on ANY boiler is begging for trouble.

Sam E

  One can't expect to post information to the
> contrary to an international  fourm where so many people come to seek sound
> information and guidance and not have it scrutinized, questioned, and
> objected to, if only by me.
> 
> Regards,
> Harry Wade
> Nashville, Tn
>
 


Re: BPE safety valve

2003-09-07 Thread Daniel McGrath
I'm still new to live steam and had considered building the Midwest steam engine, now I have some serious doubts.   I recognize and agree that Safety is Number 1, I've been burned more than once (not in this Hobby) and worked as an aid in a "Debridement " ward, no thanks, I can do with out faulty designs and or bad practices around this wonderful pastime.  Shortcuts can cost you bigtime, if not you personally, then some body else following a bad example    relying on a hose to pop off as a safety valve?   Not me Holmes, I'm not crazy    I've learned alot on this site,  thanks all  for good input and Good Advice ! Dan McGrath.
 



>From: Harry Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>To: Multiple recipients of sslivesteam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: BPE safety valve 
>Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 15:36:12 -0500 
> 
>At 12:32 PM 9/6/03 -0700, you wrote: 
> >I'm getting a little worried about everyone's safety inasmuch as so many 
> >keystrokes have been devoted to the perils of the Midwest Boiler 
> >Michael 
>At 11:39 AM 9/7/03 -0700, you wrote: 
> >Don't forget, folks... there are two "safety valves" on the Midwest 
> >steam engine... the first being the silicone hose popping off . . . 
> >Jon 
> 
> In other words there are NO safety valves on the Midwest boiler and 
>it has brass as a part of the pressure vessel structure. Why, when doing 
>it right takes so little additional time and effort, some of you continue 
>to recommend as safe and acceptable boiler practices which are directly 
>contrary to long-time world live steam practice and unacceptable in all 
>other major live steaming countries is beyond me. 
> I'm not anti-Midwest or anti-Project per se, and the purpose and 
>goal of the Project is an admirable one, but to me this isn't about having 
>an easily built project which is probably not going to cause an injury this 
>afternoon, . . . this is about what is good safe practice to adopt, and to 
>recommend to others to adopt, as a personal standard of safety for a 
>lifetime in live steam and that when followed will never result in personal 
>injury on account of a structural failure. This should be adopted as Rule 
>#1 for all of us. Those who for some reason can't see fit to adopt Rule #1 
>should IMHO be shown the door. They are a danger to the rest of us. 
> Everyone is of course free to do as they please in their own garden 
>but to the rest of the organized live steam world brass, soft solder, and 
>no safety valve are unacceptable in a miniature boiler PERIOD and aren't 
>even open to discussion. One can't expect to post information to the 
>contrary to an international fourm where so many people come to seek sound 
>information and guidance and not have it scrutinized, questioned, and 
>objected to, if only by me. 
> 
> 
>Regards, 
>Harry Wade 
>Nashville, Tn 
> 
 Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage.   


Re: BPE safety valve

2003-09-07 Thread Michael Martin
Midwest's Heritage series safety valve/filler cap will screw directly onto the
threaded filler bush on their "Model VI" boiler.  You might want to contact
Midwest and inquire about purchasing one separately.

Mike  (Who really does care about safety) 


RE: BPE safety valve

2003-09-07 Thread Chad R Schend
I second that.
Chad
I build stuff for law enforcement throughout the nation and Canada and I've
come to the realization that the only reason we have laws and rules is to
govern those who cannot think for themselves or be considerate of others. In
other words we have laws to govern dummy's.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Harry Wade
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 1:36 PM
To: Multiple recipients of sslivesteam
Subject: BPE safety valve


At 12:32 PM 9/6/03 -0700, you wrote:
>I'm getting a little worried about everyone's safety inasmuch as so many
>keystrokes have been devoted to the perils of the Midwest Boiler
>Michael
At 11:39 AM 9/7/03 -0700, you wrote:
>Don't forget, folks... there are two "safety valves" on the Midwest
>steam engine... the first being the silicone hose popping off . . .
>Jon

In other words there are NO safety valves on the Midwest boiler and
it has brass as a part of the pressure vessel structure.  Why, when doing
it right takes so little additional time and effort, some of you continue
to recommend as safe and acceptable boiler practices which are directly
contrary to long-time world live steam practice and unacceptable in all
other major live steaming countries is beyond me.
I'm not anti-Midwest or anti-Project per se, and the purpose and
goal of the Project is an admirable one, but to me this isn't about having
an easily built project which is probably not going to cause an injury this
afternoon, . . . this is about what is good safe practice to adopt, and to
recommend to others to adopt, as a personal standard of safety for a
lifetime in live steam and that when followed will never result in personal
injury on account of a structural failure.  This should be adopted as Rule
#1 for all of us.  Those who for some reason can't see fit to adopt Rule #1
should IMHO be shown the door.  They are a danger to the rest of us.
Everyone is of course free to do as they please in their own garden
but to the rest of the organized live steam world brass, soft solder, and
no safety valve are unacceptable in a miniature boiler PERIOD and aren't
even open to discussion.  One can't expect to post information to the
contrary to an international  fourm where so many people come to seek sound
information and guidance and not have it scrutinized, questioned, and
objected to, if only by me.


Regards,
Harry Wade
Nashville, Tn

 


Re: BPE safety valve

2003-09-07 Thread J.D. Toumanian
Don't forget, folks... there are two "safety valves" on the Midwest
steam engine... the first being the silicone hose popping off... the
other, which everyone seems to be forgetting, is the spring-loaded
cylinder lifting off of the port face.

Also, the silcone hose would blow up like a balloon before the metal of
the boiler would give out.

The Midwest "Heritage" series engine includes a hard-soldered boiler
(still with brass flue) and "real" screw-in safety valve/filler cap.  I
made a water gauge and added a pressure gauge to mine as well. Also,
there are no zamak castings... the entire engine is brass. 

Jon