[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] knownhostsproxy: use all of the getaddrinfo()

2016-08-31 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (31/08/16 10:23), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 08/30/2016 10:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (30/08/16 21:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > > On (30/08/16 13:01), Pavel Březina wrote:
>> > > > On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
>> > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9
>> > > > 
>> > > > Ack.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Solves:
>> > > > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1498
>> > > Denis wrote a comment into BZ
>> > > 
>> > >   in quick testing it works.  fall back is very slow, but it does appear
>> > >   to do  so.
>> > > 
>> > > Current version iterate over all addressed and we can contine with next 
>> > > one
>> > > only if the 1st failed.
>> > > 
>> > > Could we try to connect to all addressed at once and use the fastest
>> > > (pool should use the fastest connection)
>> > 
>> > Feel free to write a patch. I think Nalin's patch is already an
>> > improvement over total breakage we have now.
>> The question is what is better.
>> 
>> The broken version or *very slow* version.
>> IMHO broken version.
>> 
>> LS
>
>Speed depends on error we get. I tested it on in our vm lab by connecting to
>fedorapeople.org and it connected immediately. Without the patch it tries to
>connect through ipv6 which doesn't work and it fails completely.
>
>We should accept this patch and create and defer a ticket for your
>suggestion.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c17

LS
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] knownhostsproxy: use all of the getaddrinfo()

2016-08-31 Thread Pavel Březina

On 08/30/2016 10:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:

On (30/08/16 21:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:

On (30/08/16 13:01), Pavel Březina wrote:

On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:

Hi,

I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9


Ack.

Solves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1498

Denis wrote a comment into BZ

  in quick testing it works.  fall back is very slow, but it does appear
  to do  so.

Current version iterate over all addressed and we can contine with next one
only if the 1st failed.

Could we try to connect to all addressed at once and use the fastest
(pool should use the fastest connection)


Feel free to write a patch. I think Nalin's patch is already an
improvement over total breakage we have now.

The question is what is better.

The broken version or *very slow* version.
IMHO broken version.

LS


Speed depends on error we get. I tested it on in our vm lab by 
connecting to fedorapeople.org and it connected immediately. Without the 
patch it tries to connect through ipv6 which doesn't work and it fails 
completely.


We should accept this patch and create and defer a ticket for your 
suggestion.

___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] knownhostsproxy: use all of the getaddrinfo()

2016-08-30 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (30/08/16 21:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (30/08/16 13:01), Pavel Březina wrote:
>> >On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> 
>> >> I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
>> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9
>> >
>> >Ack.
>> >
>> >Solves:
>> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1498
>> Denis wrote a comment into BZ
>> 
>>  in quick testing it works.  fall back is very slow, but it does appear
>>  to do  so.
>> 
>> Current version iterate over all addressed and we can contine with next one
>> only if the 1st failed.
>> 
>> Could we try to connect to all addressed at once and use the fastest
>> (pool should use the fastest connection)
>
>Feel free to write a patch. I think Nalin's patch is already an
>improvement over total breakage we have now.
The question is what is better.

The broken version or *very slow* version.
IMHO broken version.

LS
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] knownhostsproxy: use all of the getaddrinfo()

2016-08-30 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:51:43PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (30/08/16 13:01), Pavel Březina wrote:
> >On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9
> >
> >Ack.
> >
> >Solves:
> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1498
> Denis wrote a comment into BZ
> 
>  in quick testing it works.  fall back is very slow, but it does appear
>  to do  so.
> 
> Current version iterate over all addressed and we can contine with next one
> only if the 1st failed.
> 
> Could we try to connect to all addressed at once and use the fastest
> (pool should use the fastest connection)

Feel free to write a patch. I think Nalin's patch is already an
improvement over total breakage we have now.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] knownhostsproxy: use all of the getaddrinfo()

2016-08-30 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (30/08/16 13:01), Pavel Březina wrote:
>On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9
>
>Ack.
>
>Solves:
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1498
Denis wrote a comment into BZ

 in quick testing it works.  fall back is very slow, but it does appear
 to do  so.

Current version iterate over all addressed and we can contine with next one
only if the 1st failed.

Could we try to connect to all addressed at once and use the fastest
(pool should use the fastest connection)

LS
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org


[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] knownhostsproxy: use all of the getaddrinfo()

2016-08-30 Thread Pavel Březina

On 08/19/2016 02:03 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:

Hi,

I'm sending this patch on behalf of Nalin, who attached it to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063278#c9


Ack.

Solves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1498
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org