[Standards] pubsub: leaf or collection but not both!
Hello, I have a small question. In the XEP-0060, one can read in section 5.3: > > Note: If a node has an identity type of "leaf", then it MUST NOT > contain other nodes or collections (only items); if a node has an > identity type of "collection", then it MUST NOT contain items (only > other nodes or collections). > So a node cannot be both a leaf and a collection. Yet I discovered a case in ejabberd (last version: 2.0.1) where a node is both. If I make a query "disco#info" on this node, I get: Code: ... [a lot of features] ... As one can see, there are 2 lines of "identity", one leaf and one collection. This is obviously a bug. I was going to report this, but then I was wondering: what is the reason exactly of this? Why a node could not contain both items and other nodes? Thanks. Jehan -- Jehan Jehan's Profile: http://www.jabberforum.org/member.php?userid=16911 View this thread: http://www.jabberforum.org/showthread.php?t=311
Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: XMPP Transport Layer Security
On 06/18/2008 2:14 PM, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 06/17/2008 11:31 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote: >>> I have some questions about IBB: I should use if I have >>> AMP. But to detect that I need to ask both servers involved and the >>> peer if they all support it, right? >> Yeah. AMP is not yet widely deployed at all. Better to use IQ for now, I >> think. > > Too bad. IMHO AMP and Stanza Acknowledgements are a must have for > reliable communication. Well, for IBB you have IQ, so use it. :) >> We'll have another XMPP Summit at FOSDEM 2009 in Brussels. I was just >> hoping we could put together an XTLS hackathon in July, but we could do >> that online, too. > > So that is a "No" to an IETF meeting. Too bad, Dublin is nice :). There is no XMPP Working Group at the IETF and hasn't been since 2004. That doesn't mean we might not form an "XMPP Extensions" WG of some kind in the future (e.g., to formalize things like disco, muc, and pubsub). > Brussels sound much better for me and if someone else implements this, > I'm ready for an online session. I have XTLS (the old version) and > Jingle-Streams implemented -- at least opening and using the stream, > my implementation does not like such a stream ending :) I hope we'll have more implementations in the near future, as in the next few months. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Standards] NEW: XEP-0245 (The /me Command)
Hey Sir ,,, what is this , i m not capable to open it ,,how to open it ..is it for my matter? On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 06/19/2008 12:51 AM, Rachel Blackman wrote: > > > Hopefully this helps! :) > > Gosh Rachel, you are a sweet person. > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > >
Re: [Standards] NEW: XEP-0245 (The /me Command)
On 06/19/2008 12:51 AM, Rachel Blackman wrote: > Hopefully this helps! :) Gosh Rachel, you are a sweet person. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Standards] NEW: XEP-0245 (The /me Command)
Atulesh, I am sorry I was going to put the link in my previous email. Here is a list of all Jabber mailing lists: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists Artur On 19 Jun 2008, at 07:40, Atulesh MORE wrote: I m sorry Mr Artur, But can u please suggest me the Jabber forum. On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Artur Hefczyc <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Atulesh, Your posts to this list are off-topic. They are in fact spam here. This is STANDARDS discussion list, please stop posting your messages here. If you really don't want to contact Ignitesoftware (Jive Software) directly please, at least use Jabber development list for your posts. Artur On 19 Jun 2008, at 06:24, Atulesh MORE wrote: Hey friends, I have use xiff flash api, and i just want to know about the way to understand flow in openfire server code when flash chat api request to openfire, Thanks From Atulesh On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:18 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Version 0.1 of XEP-0245 (The /me Command) has been released. Abstract: This specification defines recommended handling of the / me command in XMPP instant messaging clients. Changelog: Initial published version. (psa) Diff: N/A URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0245.html Artur -- Artur Hefczyc http://www.tigase.org/ http://artur.hefczyc.net/ Artur -- Artur Hefczyc http://www.tigase.org/ http://artur.hefczyc.net/
