On 06/18/2008 2:14 PM, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 06/17/2008 11:31 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote: >>> I have some questions about IBB: I should use <message> if I have >>> AMP. But to detect that I need to ask both servers involved and the >>> peer if they all support it, right? >> Yeah. AMP is not yet widely deployed at all. Better to use IQ for now, I >> think. > > Too bad. IMHO AMP and Stanza Acknowledgements are a must have for > reliable communication.
Well, for IBB you have IQ, so use it. :) >> We'll have another XMPP Summit at FOSDEM 2009 in Brussels. I was just >> hoping we could put together an XTLS hackathon in July, but we could do >> that online, too. > > So that is a "No" to an IETF meeting. Too bad, Dublin is nice :). There is no XMPP Working Group at the IETF and hasn't been since 2004. That doesn't mean we might not form an "XMPP Extensions" WG of some kind in the future (e.g., to formalize things like disco, muc, and pubsub). > Brussels sound much better for me and if someone else implements this, > I'm ready for an online session. I have XTLS (the old version) and > Jingle-Streams implemented -- at least opening and using the stream, > my implementation does not like such a stream ending :) I hope we'll have more implementations in the near future, as in the next few months. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
