Re: [Standards] help! reviews needed in XMPP WG
> On 2-Mar-2015, at 17:54, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote: > > The IETF's XMPP Working Group is finishing up several documents, and reviews > from folks here would be very helpful in these late stages! > > The documents in question are: > > 1. XMPP Address Format - the fundamental definition of JIDs, now updated to > be forward-compatible with newer versions of Unicode (Working Group Last Call > ends March 12) > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis/ I’ve had a look over this and have a couple of comments: - In the ABNF describing resourcepart, 1023(resourcebyte) is referred to on the RHS, but the comment uses “opaquebyte”. - Table 2, example 15 appears to be valid by my reading of FreeformClass and OpaqueString. Further, the comment given for it being invalid refers to the resourcepart mapping to IdentifierClass, not FreeformClass/OpaqueString. - Not necessary, but it may be worth calling out Unicode Normalization Form C as what’s used, even though that’s specified in the the SASL prep module. Otherwise, it looks good to me! -bjc
[Standards] help! reviews needed in XMPP WG
The IETF's XMPP Working Group is finishing up several documents, and reviews from folks here would be very helpful in these late stages! The documents in question are: 1. XMPP Address Format - the fundamental definition of JIDs, now updated to be forward-compatible with newer versions of Unicode (Working Group Last Call ends March 12) http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xmpp-6122bis/ 2. Domain Name Associations (DNA) - a more extensible "framework" defining prooftypes for verifying server identity (Working Group Last Call ends March 6) http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xmpp-dna/ 3. PKIX over Secure HTTP - a DNA prooftype in which verification material is obtained over HTTPS (Working Group Last Call has ended but IETF Last Call has not yet started) http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-xmpp-posh/ There are several other related documents in the DANE and PRECIS working groups, but those are a good start. Thanks for your time! Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/
