Re: [Standards] [XEP-0097] reviving iCal in XMPP
On 9/9/16 8:15 AM, Goffi wrote: Le vendredi 9 septembre 2016, 09:00:48 CEST Sam Whited a écrit : On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Goffi wrote: > but the bad side is that it is not XML, so a client would > need a specific parser (the basic information are not difficult to parse > though). I'm unsure of the state of this, but it may be worth a look: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6321 (although it's probably easier to use normal iCal format because many libraries already exist to prase it) —Sam Oh thanks, didn't knew about it, it may make more sense in XMPP context. So I'm not sure now which version suit the best, I actually think standardised XML version make more sense. If we go this way would it be better to do a new XEP and deprecate the former one or to update the XEP-0097? I think a new one would actually be better. Yes, I think that would be the right path. Peter ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
Re: [Standards] [XEP-0097] reviving iCal in XMPP
Le vendredi 9 septembre 2016, 09:00:48 CEST Sam Whited a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Goffi wrote: > > but the bad side is that it is not XML, so a client would > > need a specific parser (the basic information are not difficult to parse > > though). > > I'm unsure of the state of this, but it may be worth a look: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6321 > > (although it's probably easier to use normal iCal format because many > libraries already exist to prase it) > > —Sam Oh thanks, didn't knew about it, it may make more sense in XMPP context. So I'm not sure now which version suit the best, I actually think standardised XML version make more sense. If we go this way would it be better to do a new XEP and deprecate the former one or to update the XEP-0097? I think a new one would actually be better. Goffi ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
Re: [Standards] [XEP-0097] reviving iCal in XMPP
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Goffi wrote: > but the bad side is that it is not XML, so a client would > need a specific parser (the basic information are not difficult to parse > though). I'm unsure of the state of this, but it may be worth a look: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6321 (although it's probably easier to use normal iCal format because many libraries already exist to prase it) —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
