Re: Struts Chain... seams similar to HiveMind ?EOM
It's possible that there is some overlap. You might be able to register Commands as HiveMind services. But HiveMind has a much broader scope than Commons Chain. Commons Chain is an implementation of the classic Chain of Command pattern. Period. It has no other scope or aspirations. People can drop it in wherever you might want to implement a Chain of Command. No muss, no fuss. HiveMind is a configuration framework that you could use throughout an application and within a Command. You might, for example, register the Catalog as a HiveMind service, and the Commands might use HiveMind to find the Catalog(s). But, that would be up to the developer. Commons Chain does not need to decided how the Catalog is discovered. People might also use HiveMind to load the Chain configuration file as an alternative to the Digester. Struts Chain is whiteboard reimplementation of the Request Processor using Commons Chain. I don't believe that the Request Processor would be easier to implement as a nest of HiveMind services. -Ted. Vic Cekvenich wrote: Struts Chain... seams similar to HiveMind ? Am I wrong? .V - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ted Husted, Junit in Action - http://www.manning.com/massol/, Struts in Action - http://husted.com/struts/book.html, JSP Site Design - http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1861005512. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tiles Advanced Features by Cedric Dumoulin
I've got a copy posted on my poor excuse for a website. Also on my site is a presentation I gave at our Java Users Group on Tiles. I based my presentation on Cedric's examples with some changes to eliminate/minimize scriptlets and rt expressions. You can check out the presentation and the war file that went with the presentation @ http://people.vanderbilt.edu/~norment.deane/ -- Norm Deane MIS Consultant Vanderbilt University (615) 322-7855 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sean Gunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Tiles Advanced Features by Cedric Dumoulin Anyone know of a mirror for tilesAdvancedFeatures.pdf? It is referenced in the tiles guide: http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/dev_tiles.html as being at http://www.lifl.fr/ ~dumoulin/tiles/tilesAdvancedFeatures.pdf but I constantly get no connection. Or, if you could send me a copy to sean(at)downplay(dot)org I would really appreciate it. PS Are there any other good forums for struts and/or tiles development? THANKS!!! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tiles Advanced Features by Cedric Dumoulin
Check here: http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/dev_tiles.html Look at the bottom of the page. Greg Sean Gunn wrote: Anyone know of a mirror for tilesAdvancedFeatures.pdf? It is referenced in the tiles guide: http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/dev_tiles.html as being at http://www.lifl.fr/~dumoulin/tiles/tilesAdvancedFeatures.pdf but I constantly get no connection. Or, if you could send me a copy to sean(at)downplay(dot)org I would really appreciate it. PS Are there any other good forums for struts and/or tiles development? THANKS!!! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Session-scoped forms and synchronization...
- Original Message - From: Bob Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:00 AM Subject: Re: Session-scoped forms and synchronization... Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Well, you can get more than one *created*, but only one will actually be stored as a session attribute if the attribute name is the same. Synchronizing the session.setAttribute() method would be pointless; the container guarantees that this won't break anything. So, exactly what portion of the code would you propose to synchronize? One will overwrite the other in the session, yes, but the RequestProcessor doesn't pull it back out of the session. It uses the instance it created, so both could be used concurrently. The problem you are describing here is a real one. But synchronizing a portion of RequestProcessor would not *cleanly* solve the problem: 1) Two concurrent threads could still corrupt the same session scoped form bean after the threads leave the synchronized section. 2) The problem is due to concurrent threads from ONE user and synchronizing a portion of RequestProcessor might have impact to ALL users' threads. (You do not want to wait because someone else is creating his/her form bean). We just have this considered but our codes have not been released with Carrier yet. The idea is to use a filter to synchronize on a *personal* session scoped object. So nothing need to be changed in the RequestProcessor. But it requires Servlet 2.3 in place and could be *very* application specific due to our requirements. For example, we do not allow the second thread to enter the RequestProcessor if the first one has not been finished yet (very conservative except for cancel event). We also have to deal with cases when the first thread is a long running job. I would suggest people consider filters when solving this problem in proposals. Filters can be used as options to protect system's integrity. Any other alternatives or ideas? Bob Jing Netspread Carrier http://www.netspread.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24263] New: - warn if a form is not declared but later used in struts-config.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24263. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24263 warn if a form is not declared but later used in struts-config.xml Summary: warn if a form is not declared but later used in struts- config.xml Product: Struts Version: 1.0 Final Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: Unknown AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] by a cvs merge, a form declaration dropped out. No complaint while parsing the the config even though a action ... name= later referenced the missing form. Only, once the form is executed, it is found missing. It would save programmers a lot of time if such errors would be raised at load and not only at the end of lenghty, often manual test runs. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24202] - Javascript validation fails for single radio and single checkbox
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24202 Javascript validation fails for single radio and single checkbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 06:10 --- I have fixed the checkbox but not the radio button. For the single checkbox I could see a use such as I have read this license agreement. However, I know of no use case for the radio button. This will be in the Nov 1 Nightly build. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-struts/conf/share validator-rules.xml
rleland 2003/10/30 22:09:13
Modified:conf/share validator-rules.xml
Log:
Add required check for single checkbox,
Bug report by Saul Q Yuan
Revision ChangesPath
1.44 +18 -13jakarta-struts/conf/share/validator-rules.xml
Index: validator-rules.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/conf/share/validator-rules.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -r1.43 -r1.44
--- validator-rules.xml 1 Oct 2003 15:43:11 - 1.43
+++ validator-rules.xml 31 Oct 2003 06:09:13 - 1.44
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
errors.range={0} is not in the range {1} through {2}.
errors.creditcard={0} is an invalid credit card number.
errors.email={0} is an invalid e-mail address.
-
+
Note: Starting in Struts 1.2.0 the default javascript definitions have
been consolidated to commons-validator. The default can be overridden
by supplying a javascript element with a CDATA section, just as
@@ -71,13 +71,14 @@
for (x in oRequired) {
var field = form[oRequired[x][0]];
-
+
if (field.type == 'text' ||
field.type == 'textarea' ||
field.type == 'file' ||
+field.type == 'checkbox' ||
field.type == 'select-one' ||
field.type == 'password') {
-
+
var value = '';
// get field's value
if (field.type == select-one) {
@@ -85,19 +86,23 @@
if (si = 0) {
value = field.options[si].value;
}
-} else {
+} else if (field.type == checkbox) {
+ if (field.checked) {
+ value = field.value;
+ }
+} else {
value = field.value;
}
-
+
if (trim(value).length == 0) {
-
+
if (i == 0) {
focusField = field;
}
fields[i++] = oRequired[x][1];
isValid = false;
}
-} else if (field.type == select-multiple) {
+} else if (field.type == select-multiple) {
var numOptions = field.options.length;
lastSelected=-1;
for(loop=numOptions-1;loop=0;loop--) {
@@ -137,12 +142,12 @@
}
return isValid;
}
-
+
// Trim whitespace from left and right sides of s.
function trim(s) {
return s.replace( /^\s*/, ).replace( /\s*$/, );
}
-
+
]]
/javascript
@@ -194,7 +199,7 @@
depends=
msg=errors.invalid/
-
+
validator name=mask
classname=org.apache.struts.validator.FieldChecks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator ApplicationResources.properties TypeForm.java
rleland 2003/10/30 22:10:17
Modified:src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator
ApplicationResources.properties TypeForm.java
Log:
Bug 24202
Add required check for single checkbox,
Bug report/patch by Saul Q Yuan
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -0
jakarta-struts/src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator/ApplicationResources.properties
Index: ApplicationResources.properties
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-struts/src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator/ApplicationResources.properties,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- ApplicationResources.properties 24 Sep 2003 03:42:03 - 1.5
+++ ApplicationResources.properties 31 Oct 2003 06:10:17 - 1.6
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
# Type form
typeForm.byte.displayname=Byte Field
+typeForm.checkbox.wouldrecommend=I would recommend
typeForm.checkbox.used.languages=Programming Languages used
typeForm.creditCard.displayname=Credit Card
typeForm.date.displayname=Date Field
1.6 +12 -3
jakarta-struts/src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator/TypeForm.java
Index: TypeForm.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/jakarta-struts/src/validator/org/apache/struts/webapp/validator/TypeForm.java,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- TypeForm.java 24 Sep 2003 03:42:03 - 1.5
+++ TypeForm.java 31 Oct 2003 06:10:17 - 1.6
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@
private String sSatisfaction = null;
private String[] sOsList = null;
private String sOverallSatisfaction = null;
+private String sWouldRecommend = null;
private String[] sUsedLanguages = null;
private List lNames = initNames();
@@ -204,6 +205,14 @@
public void setOverallSatisfaction(String anOverallSatisfaction) {
this.sOverallSatisfaction = anOverallSatisfaction;
+}
+
+public String getWouldRecommend() {
+ return sWouldRecommend;
+}
+
+public void setWouldRecommend(String anWouldRecommend) {
+ this.sWouldRecommend = anWouldRecommend;
}
public String[] getUsedLanguages() {
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/validator/WEB-INF validation.xml
rleland 2003/10/30 22:10:49 Modified:web/validator jsType.jsp web/validator/WEB-INF validation.xml Log: Bug 24202 Add required check for single checkbox, Bug report/patch by Saul Q Yuan Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +8 -0 jakarta-struts/web/validator/jsType.jsp Index: jsType.jsp === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/web/validator/jsType.jsp,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- jsType.jsp24 Sep 2003 03:43:17 - 1.6 +++ jsType.jsp31 Oct 2003 06:10:49 - 1.7 @@ -140,6 +140,14 @@ /tr tr th align=left + bean:message key=typeForm.checkbox.wouldrecommend/: +/th +td align=left + html:checkbox property=wouldRecommend / +/td + /tr + tr +th align=left bean:message key=typeForm.checkbox.used.languages/: /th td align=left 1.8 +4 -0 jakarta-struts/web/validator/WEB-INF/validation.xml Index: validation.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/web/validator/WEB-INF/validation.xml,v retrieving revision 1.7 retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 --- validation.xml24 Sep 2003 03:43:17 - 1.7 +++ validation.xml31 Oct 2003 06:10:49 - 1.8 @@ -289,6 +289,10 @@ depends=required arg0 key=typeForm.radio.overall.satisfaction/ /field + field property=wouldRecommend + depends=required + arg0 key=typeForm.checkbox.wouldrecommend/ + /field field property=usedLanguages depends=required arg0 key=typeForm.checkbox.used.languages/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-struts/conf/share validator-rules.xml
rleland 2003/10/30 22:26:26
Modified:conf/share validator-rules.xml
Log:
Bug 24202
Add required check for single checkbox,
Bug report/patch by Saul Q Yuan
Revision ChangesPath
1.45 +7 -7 jakarta-struts/conf/share/validator-rules.xml
Index: validator-rules.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/conf/share/validator-rules.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -r1.44 -r1.45
--- validator-rules.xml 31 Oct 2003 06:09:13 - 1.44
+++ validator-rules.xml 31 Oct 2003 06:26:26 - 1.45
@@ -86,10 +86,10 @@
if (si = 0) {
value = field.options[si].value;
}
-} else if (field.type == checkbox) {
- if (field.checked) {
- value = field.value;
- }
+} else if (field.type == 'checkbox') {
+ if (field.checked) {
+ value = field.value;
+ }
} else {
value = field.value;
}
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
