Re: html:text disable attribute invalid.

[rms]

Rob, I'm assuming that the confusion arises with the description of the
attribute unavailable in this context.  The way I read this is that it is the
description of the attribute rather than a note saying its unavailable for the
INPUT tag.

Or is there something else on the page that says otherwise?

Richard. 

Quoting David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I must be missing something. What in that link indicates disabled is not
 valid for a text input?
  
 David
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.4
 
 Looking at the above reference it appears that the disable attribute
 is illegal for type=text, is this correct ? 
 
 If so should we remove this attribute, as opposed to deprecating it ?
 
 -Rob
 
 
 
 --- --
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  -
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26647] New: - srcKey in html:img/ tag needs matching size keys.

[rms]

Quoting Paul Sundling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I originally thought it said html:image instead of html:img . I 
 noticed that html:image does not have height and width. When I look 
 at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for 
 input type=image..., but from testing I know that height and width 
 work for that tag in both mozilla and IE. Would it be worth adding 
 height and width to the html:image tag?

Just as a matter of note, height and width should work with Netscape 4+  IE 4+
for input type=image.  Looks like your pocket reference skimped on the
details  :)

In terms of adding the two attributes to the html:image tag, I personally
think it would make a useful addition...

Richard.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]