Quoting Paul Sundling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I originally thought it said <html:image> instead of <html:img> . I > noticed that <html:image> does not have height and width. When I look > at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for > <input type="image"..., but from testing I know that height and width > work for that tag in both mozilla and IE. Would it be worth adding > height and width to the <html:image> tag?
Just as a matter of note, height and width should work with Netscape 4+ & IE 4+ for <input type="image">. Looks like your pocket reference skimped on the details :) In terms of adding the two attributes to the <html:image> tag, I personally think it would make a useful addition... Richard. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
