Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
Sorry, I just moved from Hawaii to California so I haven't been following struts-dev like I should. About the TLP vote: +0 - no strong feelings one way or another Don - Original Message - From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:47:05 -0800 (PST) To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project The response to this vote has been unanimous, with all proposed PMC members responding except for two: Arron Bates and Don Brown. I have attempted to ping those two directly, but have not yet heard back. The next board meeting is March 17th, which is next Wednesday. I propose to submit our resolution this weekend, for consideration at that meeting. In the absence of responses from Arron and Don before then, I will remove their names from both lists. They will, of course, be welcome to join the PMC at a later time. If anyone has any objections to the above plan, please speak up now. -- Martin Cooper On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Don Brown wrote: Sorry, I just moved from Hawaii to California so I haven't been following struts-dev like I should. Welcome to California! (Did you bring the weather with you? Is that why it's so nice right now? ;) About the TLP vote: +0 - no strong feelings one way or another Excellent. Now I don't have to modify the resolution at all. ;-) -- Martin Cooper Don - Original Message - From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:47:05 -0800 (PST) To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project The response to this vote has been unanimous, with all proposed PMC members responding except for two: Arron Bates and Don Brown. I have attempted to ping those two directly, but have not yet heard back. The next board meeting is March 17th, which is next Wednesday. I propose to submit our resolution this weekend, for consideration at that meeting. In the absence of responses from Arron and Don before then, I will remove their names from both lists. They will, of course, be welcome to join the PMC at a later time. If anyone has any objections to the above plan, please speak up now. -- Martin Cooper On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
The response to this vote has been unanimous, with all proposed PMC members responding except for two: Arron Bates and Don Brown. I have attempted to ping those two directly, but have not yet heard back. The next board meeting is March 17th, which is next Wednesday. I propose to submit our resolution this weekend, for consideration at that meeting. In the absence of responses from Arron and Don before then, I will remove their names from both lists. They will, of course, be welcome to join the PMC at a later time. If anyone has any objections to the above plan, please speak up now. -- Martin Cooper On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 for the TLP +1 for Craig as V-Pres. Arron. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
Ooops, just missed it. :) No worries. Due to life, I've been conspicuous in my absence, and probably wouldn't be a ripple in the PMC decision making anyways. Just as long as I can maintain commit status to support nested tag coders I'm happy. :) If things change and I get more play time, then I'll knock on the PMC door as required. Cheers, Arron. The response to this vote has been unanimous, with all proposed PMC members responding except for two: Arron Bates and Don Brown. I have attempted to ping those two directly, but have not yet heard back. The next board meeting is March 17th, which is next Wednesday. I propose to submit our resolution this weekend, for consideration at that meeting. In the absence of responses from Arron and Don before then, I will remove their names from both lists. They will, of course, be welcome to join the PMC at a later time. If anyone has any objections to the above plan, please speak up now. -- Martin Cooper On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
Since Craig indicated his preference NOT to be VP, how does this impact this proposal ? -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Arron Bates wrote: Ooops, just missed it. :) Not at all. I won't be sending the proposal to the board until the weekend, so now that you've responded, you're in. :-) -- Martin Cooper No worries. Due to life, I've been conspicuous in my absence, and probably wouldn't be a ripple in the PMC decision making anyways. Just as long as I can maintain commit status to support nested tag coders I'm happy. :) If things change and I get more play time, then I'll knock on the PMC door as required. Cheers, Arron. The response to this vote has been unanimous, with all proposed PMC members responding except for two: Arron Bates and Don Brown. I have attempted to ping those two directly, but have not yet heard back. The next board meeting is March 17th, which is next Wednesday. I propose to submit our resolution this weekend, for consideration at that meeting. In the absence of responses from Arron and Don before then, I will remove their names from both lists. They will, of course, be welcome to join the PMC at a later time. If anyone has any objections to the above plan, please speak up now. -- Martin Cooper On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Martin Cooper wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since Craig indicated his preference NOT to be VP, how does this impact this proposal ? I don't believe that's the case. Craig indicated that he *is* willing to be Vice President, but pointed out that his being VP isn't a necessary condition for Struts becoming a TLP. He voted +0, after all. -- Martin Cooper -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 to submit the draft TLP resolution. +1 to nominate Craig as VP. Cedric - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 Struts TLP +1 Craig for President in 2004. (Sorry, VP) Steve -Original Message- From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 6, 2004 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=listName=struts-de [EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22de faultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 Struts TLP +1 Craig for VP quot;Struts Developers Listquot; lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote: +1 Struts TLP +1 Craig for President in 2004. (Sorry, VP) Steve -Original Message- From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 6, 2004 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=listName=struts-de [EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22de faultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Alberto Corona ObjectWave Corp. 312.269.0111x129 Chicago, IL - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 TLP +1 Craig as VP David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 - Original Message - From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sunday, March 7, 2004 4:42 pm Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project +1 TLP +1 Craig as VP David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you?re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com --- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. +1 for Struts as a top level project +1 for Craig as VP Please feel free to add my name to the cover letter. Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody thinks of complaining. -- Jef Raskin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Joe Germuska wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. +1 for Struts as a top level project +1 for Craig as VP Please feel free to add my name to the cover letter. Done. I have also added you to the proposed PMC. I apologise for missing your name off the list - it should have been on both from the start. -- Martin Cooper Joe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 for TLP +1 Craig VP -James -Original Message- From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 2:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED] karta.apache.orgsearchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultFie ld=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 on the TLP proposal. +0 on me as VP (I'm willing, but don't consider this a prerequisite to TLP-ness), although I should point out that this is actually only a *recommendation* to the ASF Board. The Board is free to appoint whomever they wish, although they've historically tended to go along with the community's recommendations in this regard. Craig (And +1 on adding Joe to the list -- sorry about that!) Quoting Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 to submit the draft TLP resolution. +1 to nominate Craig as VP. -Ted. On Sat, 06 Mar 2004 11:20:01 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper wrote: Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=listName=struts- [EMAIL PROTECTED]searchText=%22Why+you+*want* +to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultField=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 - Struts as top level project +1 - Recommend Craig as VP of Apache Struts -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 2:20 PM Subject: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted and I have put together a draft resolution to the board of directors [2], along with a cover letter [3], that would promote Struts to an Apache top-level project (TLP). The main reasons for moving to a TLP are described on the wiki [4]. In Craig's words, The short answer, though, is we will be in charge of our own releases (currently, the Jakarta PMC is the only body legally recognized to vote on releases of *any* software under Jakarta). In practice, we can really just continue doing what we've always done. As most of you are no doubt aware, several Jakarta sub-projects have already made the transition to TLPs, including Ant, Avalon, Gump, James, Log4J, Maven, OJB, and Torque. Most Jakarta PMC members seem to be in favour of the migrations, largely because a single PMC cannot possibly oversee a code base the size of all of Jakarta. If you're OK with Struts being a top-level Apache project, please respond to this thread with either a +1 or +0. Otherwise, please reply with your concerns. When we previously discussed this, it did not seem like anyone was opposed to the idea, but if anyone is, now is the time to speak up. The resolution as drafted lists the Struts Committers who could reasonably be considered active at this time. Of course, we should not put anyone on the PMC without their buy-in, so the final resolution would only list the Committers who responded to the Vote with a +1 or +0. The draft resolution also leaves the name of the Vice President blank. Craig seems like the logical candidate, and is willing to act in this capacity, but we wanted the VP selection to be a community decision. So, please also respond with your nomination for Vice President, Apache Struts. Here's my +1 on the resolution as drafted, and my +1 for Craig as Vice President. -- Martin Cooper [1] http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SearchList?listId=[EMAIL PROTECTED] karta.apache.orgsearchText=%22Why+you+*want*+to+be+on+the+PMC%22defaultFie ld=subjectSearch=Search [2] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/resolution.html [3] http://www.apache.org/~martinc/struts/tlp/cover.html [4] http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPMCPropsedChanges - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
+1 for Struts TLP +1 for Craig as VP -Original Message- For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
