Using global forward in custom tag

2001-11-21 Thread Gundars Kulups

Hi!
Is there any way to use global forward in custom tag? For example if I have:

 

Is it possible to implement tag , which would expand to: ?
Or other ideas on how to solve this?
Regards,

Gundars Kulups
Project manager
A/S Dati
Phone: +371-7067713
Mobile: +371-9466055
Fax: +371-7619573


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




OFFT: base for file reading in WEB apps

2001-11-22 Thread Gundars Kulups

Hi!
I know that this is totally off topic, but what is file base for file 
operations for classes running in servlet container (Tomcat in my case). 
For example if I have app.properties file in WEB-INF directory, what should 
be the path I need to use to open this file?

WBR,

Gundars Kulups
Project manager
A/S Dati
Phone: +371-7067713
Mobile: +371-9466055
Fax: +371-7619573


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




Struts+Tiles+Definition file+Tomcat 3.2 running in JBuilder 5.0

2001-12-10 Thread Gundars Kulups

Hi!
Has anyone managed to get mentioned running together?
Regards,
Gundars


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Explanation of problem with Tiles+JBuilder

2001-12-10 Thread Gundars Kulups

Here is little bit of explanaition of problem I have tracked down.
In order for aplication to run in JBuilder with Tomcat and struts I have 
nostrutstomcat32.jar in lib/ext directory of JBuilder. However if I 
substitute ActionServlet definition in web.xml with Tiles ActionServlet I 
get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/struts/action/ActionServlet
exception when starting server. I I remove nostrutstomcat32.jar OpenTool I 
can not access my application classes (FormBean) anymore. Does anyone knows 
solution to this problem?
WBR,
Gundars


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 




Re: Tiles vs. Frames

2002-01-09 Thread Gundars Kulups

Hi,
I'd say, that generally using tiles (or making presentation using single 
frame and tables) leads to less complex application. There might however be 
cases, when using frames could solve a problem or two. We had a system 
where we used hidden frame containing lot of client side information and 
other hidden frame where we reloaded javascripts, which were making changes 
in main frame, where something like 1000 layers where shown and they were 
clickable. I can not imagine how that application could be rewritten 
without using frames (reloading main frame on every click would lead to 
major network load problems). However I must say that to support and extend 
that application, it was nightmare. So, my opinion is that if you can solve 
problem without frames - do it. Besides it might help you, if one day you 
need to port your application do mobile network enabled devices...
Regards,
Gundars
At 15:58 2002.01.08.s +, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've (functionally) prototyped an application using Tiles with no
>frames.  Our 'front end' guy has presented me with the presentation html
>and javascript, and it uses frames.
>
>The application is not portal-like, just a fairly standard app with a
>header, footer and side menu bar.
>
>I've had a search for any information about what would be preferable -
>to use tiles or frames, or some combination of both (I'm struggling a
>bit with this option), but there's not much out there.
>
>Has anyone had to make this decision?  What are the pros and cons of
>frames vs. tiles?  Is it feasible and/or desirable to use them in
>combination?
>
>Any input much appreciated.
>
>Cheers,
>Sean.
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Gundars Kulups
Project manager
A/S Dati
Phone: +371-7067713
Mobile: +371-9466055
Fax: +371-7619573


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>