Re: Lost in beans
I was actually looking for an easy way to do just this
(nest Dynas) for 4 hours today..
The easiest hack(at least in my mind a hack) is to write a
beanutils Converter to convert from a string to
DynaActionFrom.
Then when DynaActionFormClass.newInstance() sets the
inital property values have your converter registered, and
make sure the inital property in the XML for you nested
DynaForm it set to the DynaForm you want to use. Then just
implement the converter to do
public Object convert(Class type, Object value){
return
DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass((String)value).newInstance();
}
I have not tested this yet as I would like a better way
but I would call it a decent 'HACK'.
Matt,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:32:03 -0600
Mike Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess its time to look at contributing...geez more coding
outside of
work...wife is going to love it
-Original Message-
From: J Beginner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Lost in beans
Yes, I am back to extending ActionForm and
ValidatorForm.
I hope that nested DynaForms will be supported in the
near future.
--- Pani, Gourav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can extend the ValidatorForm and use the
validator framework.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:25 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Lost in beans
So if your not using dynaforms are you back to
extending actionform? If so
are you not using the validator framework either?
-Original Message-
From: J Beginner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:19 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Lost in beans
This is exactly the same as to what I am trying to
do...no luck so far.
I reverted back to using no DynaForms.
--- Mike Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible or is there a better way to do
something like
form-beans
form-bean
name=User
type=org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorForm
form-property name=fname
type=java.lang.String /
form-property name=lname
type=java.lang.String /
form-bean
name=Addredd
type=org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorForm
form-property name=street
type=java.lang.String /
form-property name=city
type=java.lang.String /
/form-bean
/form-bean
form-beans
Basically looking for a way to nest beans in the
struts config and use them
in forms/actions/validation.
Thanks
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lost in beans
I was thinking about this more on my way home from work.. :) As far as
doing it as a hack I would simply implement and register the converter as
anonymous class.
form-bean
name=NestedTestForm
type=org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm
form-property name=value type=java.lang.String /
/form-bean
form-bean
name=TestForm
type=org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm
form-property name=nested
type=org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm initial=NestedTestForm/
/form-bean
Then in your initServlet()...
import org.apache.commons.beanutils.ConvertUtils;
import org.apache.commons.beanutils.Converter;
ConvertUtils.register(new Converter(){
public Object convert(Class type, Object value){
return
DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass((String)value).newInstance();
}
}, DynaActionForm.Class);
Then when the app initialized DynaActionFormClass.newInstance() is called
for a TestForm it looks for a converter for the class DynaActionForm to set
the initial value an passes it the name NestedTestForm.
Like I said before though didn't have time to test this today you might run
into other problems, and it would be much better if there was a permanent
solution..
Matt,
- Original Message -
From: Mike Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:36 PM
Subject: RE: Lost in beans
Now its getting interesting, I was starting to look at a converter
solution
as well but didn't get anywhere, got some concrete example I could admire?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:29 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Lost in beans
I was actually looking for an easy way to do just this
(nest Dynas) for 4 hours today..
The easiest hack(at least in my mind a hack) is to write a
beanutils Converter to convert from a string to
DynaActionFrom.
Then when DynaActionFormClass.newInstance() sets the
inital property values have your converter registered, and
make sure the inital property in the XML for you nested
DynaForm it set to the DynaForm you want to use. Then just
implement the converter to do
public Object convert(Class type, Object value){
return
DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass((String)value).newInstance();
}
I have not tested this yet as I would like a better way
but I would call it a decent 'HACK'.
Matt,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:32:03 -0600
Mike Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess its time to look at contributing...geez more coding
outside of
work...wife is going to love it
-Original Message-
From: J Beginner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Lost in beans
Yes, I am back to extending ActionForm and
ValidatorForm.
I hope that nested DynaForms will be supported in the
near future.
--- Pani, Gourav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You can extend the ValidatorForm and use the
validator framework.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:25 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Lost in beans
So if your not using dynaforms are you back to
extending actionform? If so
are you not using the validator framework either?
-Original Message-
From: J Beginner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:19 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Lost in beans
This is exactly the same as to what I am trying to
do...no luck so far.
I reverted back to using no DynaForms.
--- Mike Ash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible or is there a better way to do
something like
form-beans
form-bean
name=User
type=org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorForm
form-property name=fname
type=java.lang.String /
form-property name=lname
type=java.lang.String /
form-bean
name=Addredd
type=org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorForm
form-property name=street
type=java.lang.String /
form-property name=city
type=java.lang.String /
/form-bean
/form-bean
form-beans
Basically looking for a way to nest beans in the
struts config and use them
in forms/actions/validation.
Thanks
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: socket write error when using tiles
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:32:30 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have socket write error when using tiles. I suppose it is because users click on other action before the last tile is displayed. I have so many of these that I suspect this can cause performance issues. Anyone can explain or knows how to correct this. The pages display fine. I am using WSAD and WebSphere. Thank you. Stephan I am having this same problem. I'm running 1.1b2 in WTE. I'm sure that all of that exception handeling is causing some performance problems. Is this fixed in b3 or is this something we are doing wrong as developers? Matt, - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hashmaps and hash tables in JSPs
You might looks at useing roles to acomplish this external to the JSP, AKA leave to logic out of the view, but otherwise a Hashmap can be checked as a map backed property like so.. logic:present name='permissionsHashMap' property='Manage Countires' although I don't know how it will handle spaces in the property names.. On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:02:02 +0100 Jordan Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI, I have a hastable or Hashmap of permissions that I want to use in my JSP pages to determine what info is displayed to the user. For instance I want to have the following logic if permissionsHashMap has key Manage Countires then display this if permissionsHashMap has key Manage Logins then display this etc Is there a way to do this with the struts logic tags? thanks Jordan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: hashmaps and hash tables in JSPs
you can access hashmap values by name without the map(val)
notation.. this helps alot if you don't want to wrap the
mapback property in a bean. for example..
logic:present name='wraperBean' property='map(val)'
can be done with the same map but without the wrapper bean
like..
logic:present name='map' property='val'
I'm not sure if it's suppoed to work with way but it does,
at least in 1.1b2
Matt,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:34:30 -0500
Jerome Jacobsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Woops, that logic:notEmpty example isn't right! Not sure
how you'd do it
with logic:notEmpty without the permissionsHashMap being
a property of
another bean, say permissionsBean. In that case it would
look like this:
logic:notEmpty name=permissionsBean
property=permissionsHashMap(Manage
Countries)
... User has the Manage Countries permission
/logic:notEmpty
-Original Message-
From: Jerome Jacobsen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: hashmaps and hash tables in JSPs
logic:notEmpty name=session
property=permissionsHashMap(Manage
Countries)
... User has the Manage Countries permission
/logic:notEmpty
Or with JSTL
c:if test=${permissionsHashMap['Manage Countries']}
... User has the Manage Countries permission
/c:if
-Original Message-
From: Jordan Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Struts User List
Subject: hashmaps and hash tables in JSPs
HI,
I have a hastable or Hashmap of permissions that I
want to use in my JSP
pages to determine what info is displayed to the user.
For instance I want to have the following logic
if permissionsHashMap has key Manage Countires
then display this
if permissionsHashMap has key Manage Logins
then display this
etc
Is there a way to do this with the struts logic tags?
thanks
Jordan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: one desing question, Revisited
What you will want to is make your commonFunctions an
interface. Next write a class to implement all of your
common functions. Then Write your action extending Action
and implementing your commonFunctions interface. Make your
common funtions an instance variable of your action and
then simply delegate all the commonFunction messages your
action recieves to your commonFunction instance variable
like so:
public method(..., ) {
return commonFuntionInstance.method(, );
}
Hope this helps you out...
Matt,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 07:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Ashish Kulkarni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I know java does not allow multiple inheritance, but I
gave that example so i can make it clear what i want
to do,
So i want to find out a work around to achieve what i
have explanned in the example
Ashish
--- Jacob Hookom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to save you from getting flamed java
does not allow multiple
inheritance. You can only extend from a single
Object.
-Jacob
| -Original Message-
| From: Ashish Kulkarni
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:34 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: one desing question, Revisited
|
| Hi,
|
| When i was thinking about my problem, I think what
i
| want to do in multiple inhereteance
| I want to define a class called CommonFunctions ,
this
| call will have methods which are common, (As name
| suggest)
| now i have to do some thing like
| public class MyAction extends Action,
CommonFuntions
|
| and public class MyDisptachAction extends
| DispatchAction, CommonFuntions
|
| By doing this i will be able to access all the
methods
| in the class which sybclasses MyAction or
| MyDispatchAction
| I know the code above is not possible to do, but i
| want to do some thing like that..
| So what are the ways of achieving it
|
| =
| A$HI$H
|
| __
| Do you Yahoo!?
| Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
now.
| http://mailplus.yahoo.com
|
|
-
| To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
A$HI$H
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: one desing question, Revisited
The interface provides both flexability in the
delegation(aka different versions of the common funtions
can exist), and it enforces an API.
Interfaces don't need to be logically functional objects.
When was the last time you cast an object to Serializable
and manipulated it?
Matt,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:23:29 +0100
Malik Recoing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I Ask : What the real apport of implementing
CommonFunctionInterface in
each classes rather than just using common.aFunction()
where you need it ?
(but maintaining more code).
Malik.
Friday, January 31, 2003 5:17 PM , Ashish Kulkarni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hi
Thanx for the all the mails, this is what i plan to do
public interface CommonFunctionInterface{
// all my common methods;
public Connection getConnection();
}
public class CommonFunction implements
CommonFunctionInterface{
public Connection getConnection(){
// provide the implementation here
}
}
public class MyAction extends Action implements
CommonFunctionInterface{
private final CommonFunction common;
public MyAction(){
common = new CommonFunction();
}
public Connection getConnnection(){
return common.getConnection();
}
}
public MyClass extends MyAction{
// now you should inherit getConnection()
without problem }
Ashish
--- John Espey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry, the action wouldn't pass itself, it would
pass its class.
-Original Message-
From: John Espey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: one desing question, Revisited
You could create a CommonFunctionsFactory, with a
method:
CommonFunctions getCommonFunctionsByClass(Class)
Your action could pass itself to this call to
retrieve a CommonFunctions
implementation, determined by the Factory, which
could look up in a
properties file which implementation to create for
the specified class. You
wouldn't really need to have your action implement
CommonFunctions. If you
needed to modify the behavior of your
CommonFunctionsImpl for a given action
class, you could extend CommonFunctionsImpl, and
then map the action class
to that new subclass.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:00 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: one desing question, Revisited
What you will want to is make your commonFunctions
an
interface. Next write a class to implement all of
your
common functions. Then Write your action extending
Action
and implementing your commonFunctions interface.
Make your
common funtions an instance variable of your action
and
then simply delegate all the commonFunction messages
your
action recieves to your commonFunction instance
variable
like so:
public method(..., ) {
return commonFuntionInstance.method(,
);
}
Hope this helps you out...
Matt,
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 07:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Ashish Kulkarni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I know java does not allow multiple inheritance,
but I
gave that example so i can make it clear what i
want
to do,
So i want to find out a work around to achieve what
i
have explanned in the example
Ashish
--- Jacob Hookom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to save you from getting flamed
java
does not allow multiple
inheritance. You can only extend from a single
Object.
-Jacob
-Original Message-
From: Ashish Kulkarni
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: one desing question, Revisited
Hi,
When i was thinking about my problem, I think
what
i
want to do in multiple inhereteance
I want to define a class called CommonFunctions
,
this
call will have methods which are common, (As
name
suggest)
now i have to do some thing like
public class MyAction extends Action,
CommonFuntions
and public class MyDisptachAction extends
DispatchAction, CommonFuntions
By doing this i will be able to access all the
methods
in the class which sybclasses MyAction or
MyDispatchAction
I know the code above is not possible to do,
but i
want to do some thing like that..
So what are the ways of achieving it
=
A$HI$H
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign
up
now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Re: log4j problem
I am having a simmilar problem. I'm useing Struts 1.1b2 within WTE 3.5. The digester and requestProcessor refuse to quit logging not matter what I set the log levels at. I'm guessing I'm just not finding the correct configuration file, but it's really getting annoying. Matt, On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:09:10 +0100 De Cesco, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I was using Log4J with struts1.0 with no problem. When I updated to struts1.1b3, messages from Struts like RequestProcessor Processing a POST request for path url are logged using my webapp log4j configuration file. The problem is I don't want struts to log these messages but it keeps using my log4J configuration once it finds it. anyone - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to instantiate a DynaValidatorForm
Your Action gets passed a copy of the actionForm object that it is useing. So specify the name of your DynaValidatorForm in the name property of your action's definition. Then populate the actionForm oject in your action and forward to the JSP that expects a populated DynaValidatorForm.. Matt } On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:23:47 +0100 Boris Folgmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've defined a DynaValidatorForm in struts-config.xml without any classfile in WEB-INF/classes. A JSP using this Form for data input and validation works well. But how can I instantiate an object of this DynaValidatorForm? I need to generate an array of form objects so that I can print them using logic:iterate in a table. Using new org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorForm() is wrong, because I need an object of the derived class and not the base class. So what's the class name of the Form? Hope somebody can help. tnx, boris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TEXTAREA NAME=Signature ROWS=4 COLS=60TEXTAREA NAME=Signature ROWS=4 COLS=60TEXTAREA NAME=Signature ROWS=4 COLS=60TEXTAREA NAME=Signature ROWS=4 COLS=60TEXTAREA NAME=Signature ROWS=4 COLS=60TEXTAREA NAME=Signature ROWS=4 COLS=60TEXTAREA NAME=Signature ROWS=4 COLS=60TEXTAREA NAME=Signature ROWS=4 COLS=60 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to instantiate a DynaValidatorForm
If you are useing the DynaForm to hold the list just make
sure you put the array into the DynaForm, under a
predifined property name that has the same type(Array,
List, ..) Then:
logic:iterate name='dynaFormName'
property='indexedProtertiesName'
id='nameToUseForElements'
bean:write name='nameToUseForElements'
property='userName'/
bean:write name='nameToUseForElements'
property='email'/
/logic:iterate
or even better nested within approprite form tags:
nested:iterate property='indexedProtertiesName'
nested:write property='userName'/
nested:write property='email'/
/nested:iterate
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 18:18:01 +0100
Boris Folgmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Meyer wrote:
Your Action gets passed a copy of the actionForm object
that it is useing. So specify the name of your
DynaValidatorForm in the name property of your action's
definition. Then populate the actionForm oject in your
action and forward to the JSP that expects a populated
DynaValidatorForm..
That seems to be the right method for e.g. editing one
record in a
database. Tnx, that's what I need next.
But what should I use as the data source for
logic:iterate, when I need
multiple objects? Here's how I did it with a simples
ActionForm, a static
Function of the Form returning an array:
/** Query all users from db
*/
public static UserEditForm[] getUserList() throws
SQLException
{
UserEditForm[] users = null;
...
users = new UserEditForm[num_users];
for (int i = 0; rs.next(); i++)
{
UserEditForm u = new UserEditForm();
u.setUsername(rs.getString(username));
u.setEmail(rs.getString(email));
users[i] = u;
...
}
...
return users;
}
--
Dipl.-Inf. Boris Folgmann mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folgmann IT-Consulting http://www.folgmann.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: logic:empty AND logic:notEmpty Both executing?
I saw this once and couldn't figure it out. Then I reaized that the taglibs weren't defined in the JSP and that they were being evaluated.. Do a view source from your browser, to verify this.. Hope This solves your problem, because it's nice when they are easy to fix. Matt, On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:41:17 -0500 (EST) Michael P. Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello- I have an object that is null (that is what the log says) however the logic:empty and logic:notEmpty tags are both executing the nested body. JSP code: logic:notEmpty name=pageBean property=tripReport.currentTripPage.currentImage/ NOT EMPTY br /logic:notEmpty logic:empty name=pageBean property=tripReport.currentTripPage.currentImage/ EMPTY br /logic:empty I have a log message in my currentTripPage.getCurrentImage() method. The log message says that currentImage is null and that is what it is returning when the method is getting called. I am running jakarta-struts-1.1-b3 and Apache Tomcat/4.0.6. Any ideas? Thanks in advance- Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nesting DynaValidatorForms
I was wondering if there was a way to either nest DynaValidatorForms, or any other way to use more than one DynaValidatorForm in the same view/action? The big gotcha if that I still need validation to function. Can I use nested property notation in the validation.xml? Any help or experience on this would be apreciated.. Thanks, Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??
Is there any reason that none of the books, or docs
discuss writeing javascript pluggable validators. I wrote
my own xorDependency pluggable javascript validator, one
field or the other field required but not both. It takes
one var named secondField that tells it the other field in
the ValidatorForm to check.
I also wrote a andDependancy, that check to that a second
and an optional third field are exist, if any one othe the
three exist nice for things like optional three field
phone numbers. Takes one var named secondField and an
optional var thirdField.
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:29:55 -0500
Sri Sankaran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Man, that looks convoluted.
Sri
-Original Message-
From: PILGRIM, Peter, FM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:03 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??
In the Struts User Guide there is a large example with
indexed properties.
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/dev_validator.html
PS: I spend today resurrecting an old programmatical
validation
from a previous project.
--
Peter Pilgrim,
Struts/J2EE Consultant, RBoS FM, Risk IT
Tel: +44 (0)207-375-4923
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 January 2003 17:41
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [VALIDATOR] requiredif ??
I'm Still struggling with requiredif... there doesn't
seem to
be a working
example of it included with 1.1b3. I've gone through
the
documentation and
come up with this. I'm trying to say that address is
required only if
1. prospect is null
2. prospectNameOrId is not null
3. action is not equal to Add Prospect
field property=address depends=requiredif
arg0 key=label.prospect.address/
var
var-namefield[0]/var-name
var-valueprospect/var-value
/var
var
var-namefield-test[0]/var-name
var-valueNULL/var-value
/var
var
var-namefield[1]/var-name
var-valueprospectNameOrId/var-value
/var
var
var-namefield-test[1]/var-name
var-valueNOTNULL/var-value
/var
var
var-namefield[2]/var-name
var-valueaction/var-value
/var
var
var-namefield-test[2]/var-name
var-valueNOTEQUAL/var-value
/var
var
var-namefield-value[2]/var-name
var-valueAdd Prospect/var-value
/var
var
var-namefield-join/var-name
var-valueAND/var-value
/var
/field
Thanks,
--
Wendy Smoak
Applications Systems Analyst, Sr.
Arizona State University PA Information Resources
Management
Visit our Internet site at
http://www.rbsmarkets.com
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named
above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged
information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not
authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any
part of it.
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc is registered in Scotland
No 90312
Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2
2YB
Regulated by the Financial Services Authority
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
validator name=andDependency
classname=org.glhec.fastadminas.util.StrutsValidator
method=validateAndDependency
methodParams=java.lang.Object,
org.apache.commons.validator.ValidatorAction,
org.apache.commons.validator.Field,
org.apache.struts.action.ActionErrors,
javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest
msg=errors.andRequired
javascript![CDATA[
function validateAndDependency(form) {
var bValid = true;
var focusField = null;
var i = 0;
var fields = new Array();
oDependant = new andDependency();
for (x in oDependant) {
if ((
((form[oDependant[x][0]].type == 'text' ||
form[oDependant[x][0]].type == 'textarea' ||
form[oDependant[x][0]].type == 'select-one' ||
form[oDependant[x][0]].type == 'radio' ||
form[oDependant[x][0]].type == 'password')
form[oDependant[x][0]].value != '') ||
((form[oDependant[x][2](secondField)].type == 'text' ||
form[oDependant[x][2](secondField)].type == 'textarea' ||
