Re: HTTPClient vs java.net.URLConnection

2001-03-02 Thread Incze Lajos 

On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 06:22:36PM -0600, Eric wrote:
> I was using HTTPClient, but I then switched to the com.mortbay.HTTP
> library (it comes with one of their products or something i believe).
> I forget why I did so, but I think it had something to do with
> limitations in dealing with filenames in HTTPClient.  I advise you to
> compare the two.
> 
> eric.

You can test the "tea" project's http package, too. It has interesting
ideas in a couple of fields, too. (opensource.go.com, some apache style
license).incze

Re: HTTPClient vs java.net.URLConnection

2001-03-01 Thread Eric 

I was using HTTPClient, but I then switched to the com.mortbay.HTTP
library (it comes with one of their products or something i believe).
I forget why I did so, but I think it had something to do with
limitations in dealing with filenames in HTTPClient.  I advise you to
compare the two.

eric.

On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:53:09PM -0500, Maya Muchnik wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anyone use HTTPClient? What do you think about it? I have got this link several
> minutes ago.
> As its document said, in HTTPClient you can set timeout for response, pipelining of
> request. Source code is available. It includes the source code for parsing the
> multiPartRequest.
> 
> HTTPClient can find at:
> http://www.innovation.ch/java/HTTPClient/
> 
> 
> 

-- 
 _  _ 
| |(_) http://ir.iit.edu/~ej
|  _|  | | Page me via ICQ at
| |___ | | http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19022931
|__/ | or by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |__/

 PGP signature

Re: HTTPClient vs java.net.URLConnection

2001-03-01 Thread Paul Hendley - Sun Microsystems 

I've just recently started using HTTPClient with struts on the webserver and it 
seems pretty reliable.  Although I haven't really pushed it much, it was easy to 
get up and running and I haven't found any real issues with it.  (I think I had 
one issue but can't remember what it was...I guess it wasn't that bad.)  

Also, the feature set seemed to be well thought out and organized.

As an example, HTTPClient made it easy to mess with cookies using the provided 
methods.

Anyways, some of my next tasks should be to start pushing it a bit harder.  
We'll have to see what happens then.
 
-Paul




Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Maya Muchnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HTTPClient vs java.net.URLConnection
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Hi,
Does anyone use HTTPClient? What do you think about it? I have got this 
link several
minutes ago.
As its document said, in HTTPClient you can set timeout for response, 
pipelining of
request. Source code is available. It includes the source code for 
parsing the
multiPartRequest.

HTTPClient can find at:
http://www.innovation.ch/java/HTTPClient/

HTTPClient vs java.net.URLConnection

2001-03-01 Thread Maya Muchnik 

Hi,
Does anyone use HTTPClient? What do you think about it? I have got this link several
minutes ago.
As its document said, in HTTPClient you can set timeout for response, pipelining of
request. Source code is available. It includes the source code for parsing the
multiPartRequest.

HTTPClient can find at:
http://www.innovation.ch/java/HTTPClient/