Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman

[$B%"%s%H%K!<(B $B%9%F%$%9(B]

How is Poolman better than the database connection manager included with struts?
Speed?
Reliablity?


On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:29:07 -0500
"hemant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Yes, but Iam sure it will be back. It is too good to be shelved. The current
> version (v2.1) works fine for me.
> 

_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman

[@Basebeans.com]

Subject: Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 ===
Poolman is very popular. Don't worry.
Vic

Niall Pemberton wrote:

> I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer
> being developed?
> 
> Niall
> 
> 
>>-Original Message-
>>From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: 01 April 2002 23:12
>>To: struts
>>Subject: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
>>
>>
>>I currently use poolman in my webapp. I was wondering if anyone
>>got a chance to play with the classes in commons-dbcp.jar.
>>
>>How different are these from poolman?. I still dont think that
>>Struts classes provide features such as resultset cache, periodic
>>update of the cache with new data, query cache, Pool Management etc.
>>
>>Regards
>>hemant
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman

[hemant]

Yes, but Iam sure it will be back. It is too good to be shelved. The current
version (v2.1) works fine for me.

Regards
hemant


- Original Message -
From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:56 AM
Subject: RE: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman


> I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer
> being developed?
>
> Niall
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 01 April 2002 23:12
> > To: struts
> > Subject: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
> >
> >
> > I currently use poolman in my webapp. I was wondering if anyone
> > got a chance to play with the classes in commons-dbcp.jar.
> >
> > How different are these from poolman?. I still dont think that
> > Struts classes provide features such as resultset cache, periodic
> > update of the cache with new data, query cache, Pool Management etc.
> >
> > Regards
> > hemant
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman

[Niall Pemberton]

I haven't used poolman, but isn't the problem with it that it is no longer
being developed?

Niall

> -Original Message-
> From: hemant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 April 2002 23:12
> To: struts
> Subject: Struts Basic/Pooling DataSource Vs Poolman
>
>
> I currently use poolman in my webapp. I was wondering if anyone
> got a chance to play with the classes in commons-dbcp.jar.
>
> How different are these from poolman?. I still dont think that
> Struts classes provide features such as resultset cache, periodic
> update of the cache with new data, query cache, Pool Management etc.
>
> Regards
> hemant
>
>
>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: