Re: torque 3.0 vs. torque 3.1
Thanx for all answers. Dominique "Mark Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > The 3.1 distribution of torque is divided into generator and runtime. > > Other than that works just like 3.0. > > On 16 Nov 2003, at 13:41, Caoilte O'Connor wrote: > > > some bugfixes that may or may not affect you. I updated my > > runtime jar to 3.1 but left the generation of java files > > (in a separate project) using 3.0 as I had enough trouble > > just getting that to work. > > > > Anyway that seems to be working well, though if I was > > starting from scratch today I'd try and use a different > > persistance framework. > > > > c > > > > > > On Saturday 15 November 2003 09:11, Dominique Kraus-Ahma > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> i am trying to get torque 3.1 running. Since i am quit > >> new to persistent frameworks i fugured that i just had no > >> clue of how to get it to work. But now i start getting > >> confused about the distribution. > >> > >> I downloaded the zip-file from > >> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-turbine/torque/r > >> elease/3.1/, but obviously, the tree structure is > >> different from version 3.0. I am missing /schema, besides > >> i can't find the build-torque.xml. > >> > >> The only thing, version 3.1 offers, is a quit nice > >> build.xml to generate a properties-file for torque. But > >> that's all, IMHO! > >> > >> Is there something wrong with the 3.1 zip-Distribution of > >> torque? Or am i just very, very tired from sitting in > >> front of my computer? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Dominique > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional > >> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: torque 3.0 vs. torque 3.1
The 3.1 distribution of torque is divided into generator and runtime. Other than that works just like 3.0. On 16 Nov 2003, at 13:41, Caoilte O'Connor wrote: some bugfixes that may or may not affect you. I updated my runtime jar to 3.1 but left the generation of java files (in a separate project) using 3.0 as I had enough trouble just getting that to work. Anyway that seems to be working well, though if I was starting from scratch today I'd try and use a different persistance framework. c On Saturday 15 November 2003 09:11, Dominique Kraus-Ahma wrote: Hi, i am trying to get torque 3.1 running. Since i am quit new to persistent frameworks i fugured that i just had no clue of how to get it to work. But now i start getting confused about the distribution. I downloaded the zip-file from http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-turbine/torque/r elease/3.1/, but obviously, the tree structure is different from version 3.0. I am missing /schema, besides i can't find the build-torque.xml. The only thing, version 3.1 offers, is a quit nice build.xml to generate a properties-file for torque. But that's all, IMHO! Is there something wrong with the 3.1 zip-Distribution of torque? Or am i just very, very tired from sitting in front of my computer? Regards, Dominique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: torque 3.0 vs. torque 3.1
some bugfixes that may or may not affect you. I updated my runtime jar to 3.1 but left the generation of java files (in a separate project) using 3.0 as I had enough trouble just getting that to work. Anyway that seems to be working well, though if I was starting from scratch today I'd try and use a different persistance framework. c On Saturday 15 November 2003 09:11, Dominique Kraus-Ahma wrote: > Hi, > > i am trying to get torque 3.1 running. Since i am quit > new to persistent frameworks i fugured that i just had no > clue of how to get it to work. But now i start getting > confused about the distribution. > > I downloaded the zip-file from > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-turbine/torque/r >elease/3.1/, but obviously, the tree structure is > different from version 3.0. I am missing /schema, besides > i can't find the build-torque.xml. > > The only thing, version 3.1 offers, is a quit nice > build.xml to generate a properties-file for torque. But > that's all, IMHO! > > Is there something wrong with the 3.1 zip-Distribution of > torque? Or am i just very, very tired from sitting in > front of my computer? > > Regards, > Dominique > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional > commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: torque 3.0 vs. torque 3.1
Hello, I think you are in the wrong list because there is a Torque user list than can help you in this way. For your pb, be sure you have downloaded the torque-3.1.zip (for execution) and the torque-3.1-gen.zip for generation. >From the 3.1 version, Torque separated execution and generation into two files. You might find the missing files in the torque-3.1-gen.zip Regards -Message d'origine- De : news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Dominique Kraus-Ahma Envoyé : samedi 15 novembre 2003 09:12 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : torque 3.0 vs. torque 3.1 Hi, i am trying to get torque 3.1 running. Since i am quit new to persistent frameworks i fugured that i just had no clue of how to get it to work. But now i start getting confused about the distribution. I downloaded the zip-file from http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-turbine/torque/release/3.1/, but obviously, the tree structure is different from version 3.0. I am missing /schema, besides i can't find the build-torque.xml. The only thing, version 3.1 offers, is a quit nice build.xml to generate a properties-file for torque. But that's all, IMHO! Is there something wrong with the 3.1 zip-Distribution of torque? Or am i just very, very tired from sitting in front of my computer? Regards, Dominique - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
