Re: Struts template tag

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Thanks for info,

but i'm in 1.0.2 in my dev.

I will try that i have write :)

Best regards
-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
Membre fondateur de phpFR.org
http://www.phpfr.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Membre fondateur du LUG Béziers
http://www.lug-beziers.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Re: Struts template tag

[David Graham]

The template tags are deprecated in 1.1 in favor of Tiles.

David







From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Struts template tag
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:08:06 +0100

Hello all,

i would like to use template tags.

For exemple, i will define a JSP template like this :

<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-template.tld" prefix="template" %>










In the using JSP, can i use bean in ApplicationResource or in request
scope in put of the template ? like this :

<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-template.tld" prefix="template" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-bean.tld" prefix="bean" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-logic.tld" prefix="logic" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-html.tld" prefix="html" %>


	
	
	
	
	
	


Blablabla






Must i define a template with all html page or can i use two template in
one page like this :


	...


Blablablabla


	...





Actualy, i use , one for the beginning of the JSP and one
for the end of the JSP.

If someone can mail me a sample or help for me :)

Best regards
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
Membre fondateur de phpFR.org
http://www.phpfr.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Membre fondateur du LUG Béziers
http://www.lug-beziers.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Struts template tag

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hello all,

i would like to use template tags.

For exemple, i will define a JSP template like this :

<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-template.tld" prefix="template" %>










In the using JSP, can i use bean in ApplicationResource or in request
scope in put of the template ? like this :

<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-template.tld" prefix="template" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-bean.tld" prefix="bean" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-logic.tld" prefix="logic" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-html.tld" prefix="html" %>










Blablabla






Must i define a template with all html page or can i use two template in
one page like this :


...


Blablablabla


...





Actualy, i use , one for the beginning of the JSP and one
for the end of the JSP.

If someone can mail me a sample or help for me :)

Best regards
-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax)
Membre fondateur de phpFR.org
http://www.phpfr.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Membre fondateur du LUG Béziers
http://www.lug-beziers.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

Problem using nested struts template tag

[Ying Gao]

I use nested template tag as the following:



  

  
 
 
 
 
  

  



template.jsp is a template that contains header, content and footer.
contentTemplate.jsp is a template that contains a title image and a detail
content jsp to which I pass myContent.jsp. It works fine except that the
browser (both IE and Netscape) keeps busy for a while after the page header,
content and footer are loaded. It seems that the browser tries to load
something else.
JavaScript won't work until the browser finish loading. I have no idea what
it is loading.
It only happens when I use template:put tag to pass a content
(myContent.jsp) to the nested
template (contentTemplate.jsp) without using 'direct="true"'. If I use
'direct="true"'
the browser returns immediately but that is not what I want. I want the
content to be
included instead of printed directly.
Does anyone know what the problem is? Is there any solution or workaround?
Thanks.

Iris


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

RE: struts-template tag library vs.

[Troy Hart]

The template custom actions (including "insert", "put", and "get") are
absolutely distinct from the JSP "include" action. I would recommend that
you review the code for the struts-template web application that comes with
struts1.0 beta 1. In a nutshell, the template allows you to define a single
template page that lays out a set of components by referencing the
components by name.

Let's say the following is the contents of a file called
"/somePageLayoutSetup.jsp":
---
<%@ taglib uri='/WEB-INF/tlds/struts-template.tld' prefix='template' %>






---

Now then, here is the template, "/myTemplate.jsp":
---
<%@ taglib uri='/WEB-INF/tlds/struts-template.tld' prefix='template' %>










I can also put any static stuff that I desire directly on this layout
template...

---

This is obviously a simple example but it illustrates the point. Namely, you
have a page that references a layout template and "put"s named components
into a context such that the referenced template can "get" at them.
Obviously, the power here is that for any given page on your site you only
need to know what the components of the layout are, not how they are laid
out. When you want to change the way they are laid out you only need to
change the layout JSP (assuming components don't change). The mechanism that
is used by the  action is (as I understand) functionally
equivalent to, if not exactly the same as, that used by the  (when the named element was "put" with "direct='false'", which is
the default).

Like I said initially, a review of the "struts-template" web app. will clear
this up for you.

Good luck,

Troy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jim Newsham
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: struts-template tag library vs. 



Thank you for your reply, but this didn't really answer my question.  Let me
rephrase.  I am talking about , which is a dynamic templating
mechanism, as opposed to <%@ include %>, which is static.  As I understand
it:

 and  are both dynamic templating
mechanisms
-- they are re-evaluated at runtime whenever referenced.  They allow you to
create a template with placeholders for dynamic values which you will supply
at
runtime.  This is where they are similar.  What I'm interested in hearing is
how they differ.

I assume that struts-template offers some improvement over jsp:include,
otherwise it serves no purpose.  So my question is, what does
struts-template
offer as an improvement over jsp:include?  The answer may be as simple as
"it
provides a consistent and readable syntax", or it may be more substantial.

Thank you,

Jim Newsham


Robert Taylor wrote:

> Although it doesn't discuss struts template tag specifically, the J2EE
> BluePrint has a good section on the comparison of JSP includes and using
> templates. I believe it is in section 10.3 where it discuss the Sample
> Application: View.
> http://java.sun.com/j2ee/blueprints/sample_application/view/index.html
>
> HTH,
>
> Robert
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Jim Newsham
> > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 9:20 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: struts-template tag library vs. 
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > What are the differences between using the struts template tag library
and
> > jsp's include action?  What are the advantages and trade-offs of each?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jim Newsham
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

RE: struts-template tag library vs.

[Troy Hart]

the biggest thing for me is that you limit the potential layout bugs, and
you make it possible to change the layout, site wide, with the editing of a
single file. The alternative (just using ) forces you to
replicate the layout framework (typically this includes a set of nested
tables where you set the header, footer, sidebar, and etc...) on every
single jsp page.

Troy


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jim Newsham
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 7:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: struts-template tag library vs. 



Hi,

What are the differences between using the struts template tag library and
jsp's include action?  What are the advantages and trade-offs of each?

Thanks,

Jim Newsham

Re: struts-template tag library vs.

[Jim Newsham]

Thank you for your reply, but this didn't really answer my question.  Let me
rephrase.  I am talking about , which is a dynamic templating
mechanism, as opposed to <%@ include %>, which is static.  As I understand it:

 and  are both dynamic templating mechanisms
-- they are re-evaluated at runtime whenever referenced.  They allow you to
create a template with placeholders for dynamic values which you will supply at
runtime.  This is where they are similar.  What I'm interested in hearing is
how they differ.

I assume that struts-template offers some improvement over jsp:include,
otherwise it serves no purpose.  So my question is, what does struts-template
offer as an improvement over jsp:include?  The answer may be as simple as "it
provides a consistent and readable syntax", or it may be more substantial.

Thank you,

Jim Newsham


Robert Taylor wrote:

> Although it doesn't discuss struts template tag specifically, the J2EE
> BluePrint has a good section on the comparison of JSP includes and using
> templates. I believe it is in section 10.3 where it discuss the Sample
> Application: View.
> http://java.sun.com/j2ee/blueprints/sample_application/view/index.html
>
> HTH,
>
> Robert
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Jim Newsham
> > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 9:20 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: struts-template tag library vs. 
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > What are the differences between using the struts template tag library and
> > jsp's include action?  What are the advantages and trade-offs of each?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jim Newsham
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

RE: struts-template tag library vs.

[Robert Taylor]

Although it doesn't discuss struts template tag specifically, the J2EE
BluePrint has a good section on the comparison of JSP includes and using
templates. I believe it is in section 10.3 where it discuss the Sample
Application: View.
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/blueprints/sample_application/view/index.html

HTH,

Robert

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jim Newsham
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 9:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: struts-template tag library vs. 
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> What are the differences between using the struts template tag library and
> jsp's include action?  What are the advantages and trade-offs of each?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim Newsham
>
>
>
>
>

struts-template tag library vs.

[Jim Newsham]

Hi,

What are the differences between using the struts template tag library and
jsp's include action?  What are the advantages and trade-offs of each?

Thanks,

Jim Newsham