Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

[Gonzalo Odiard]

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Christian Stroetmann  wrote:

>  Hi Gonzalo
>
> Before any complaints hit the the mailing list I prefer to ask twice.
>
> In this case the question is related with the paragraph 'Propose a feature
> for addition into the release cycle', point 2 of the webpage
> Features/Policy that says:
> "If your feature adds UI or changes the current UI please add as well the
> [DESIGN] tag to the subject. Please add the flag as well if the work flow
> does change or new ones are added."
> As I understand this it means [FEATURE] [DESIGN] is correct.
>

Ok, then both are ok.

Gonzalo


>
> Actually, I do not expect that others will implement proposed features of
> me, so I only propose features that I am interested in for implementation
> on my side.
>
>
>
> Christian
>
>
>  Probably [FEATURE] is enough. Will have a Design discussion anyway.
>
>  Remember the feature wiki page do not mean will be implemented by magic,
> somebody need take responsibility of do the work.
>
> Also, we will not land more features for 0.102, see our schedule [1]
>
>  Gonzalo
>
>  [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.education.sugar.devel/45851
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Christian Stroetmann <
> stroetm...@ontolab.com> wrote:
>
>> Aloha
>>
>> Already some days ago I read the webpage about the Feature Policy
>> following one of the hints of Gonzalo Odiard.
>> Now I have a little question.
>>
>> On the webpage Feature Policy it is written something about what has to
>> be written in the subject field of related e-mails.
>>
>> So, if somebody wants to publicate a feature that is related with the
>> design, what has to be written in the subject field?
>> [FEATURE][DESIGN]
>> or only
>> [DESIGN]
>>
>>
>>
>> Have fun
>> Christian
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
>
>  --
> Gonzalo Odiard
>
> SugarLabs - Learning Software for children
>
>


-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Learning Software for children
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

[Christian Stroetmann]

Hi Gonzalo

Before any complaints hit the the mailing list I prefer to ask twice.

In this case the question is related with the paragraph 'Propose a 
feature for addition into the release cycle', point 2 of the webpage 
Features/Policy that says:
"If your feature adds UI or changes the current UI please add as well 
the [DESIGN] tag to the subject. Please add the flag as well if the work 
flow does change or new ones are added."

As I understand this it means [FEATURE] [DESIGN] is correct.

Actually, I do not expect that others will implement proposed features 
of me, so I only propose features that I am interested in for 
implementation on my side.




Christian


Probably [FEATURE] is enough. Will have a Design discussion anyway.

Remember the feature wiki page do not mean will be implemented by magic,
somebody need take responsibility of do the work.
Also, we will not land more features for 0.102, see our schedule [1]

Gonzalo

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.education.sugar.devel/45851




On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Christian Stroetmann 
mailto:stroetm...@ontolab.com>> wrote:


Aloha

Already some days ago I read the webpage about the Feature Policy
following one of the hints of Gonzalo Odiard.
Now I have a little question.

On the webpage Feature Policy it is written something about what
has to be written in the subject field of related e-mails.

So, if somebody wants to publicate a feature that is related with
the design, what has to be written in the subject field?
[FEATURE][DESIGN]
or only
[DESIGN]



Have fun
Christian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




--
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Learning Software for children

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Probably [FEATURE] is enough. Will have a Design discussion anyway.

Remember the feature wiki page do not mean will be implemented by magic,
somebody need take responsibility of do the work.

Also, we will not land more features for 0.102, see our schedule [1]

Gonzalo

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.education.sugar.devel/45851




On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Christian Stroetmann  wrote:

> Aloha
>
> Already some days ago I read the webpage about the Feature Policy
> following one of the hints of Gonzalo Odiard.
> Now I have a little question.
>
> On the webpage Feature Policy it is written something about what has to be
> written in the subject field of related e-mails.
>
> So, if somebody wants to publicate a feature that is related with the
> design, what has to be written in the subject field?
> [FEATURE][DESIGN]
> or only
> [DESIGN]
>
>
>
> Have fun
> Christian
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>



-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Learning Software for children
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

[Christian Stroetmann]

Aloha

Already some days ago I read the webpage about the Feature Policy 
following one of the hints of Gonzalo Odiard.

Now I have a little question.

On the webpage Feature Policy it is written something about what has to 
be written in the subject field of related e-mails.


So, if somebody wants to publicate a feature that is related with the 
design, what has to be written in the subject field?

[FEATURE][DESIGN]
or only
[DESIGN]



Have fun
Christian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel