Unless there is a good reason, I would say no.
Maintaining an upstream release date is an important planning tool for
all of Sugar Labs' downstream partners and users.
david
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Shall we re-adjust our schedule accordingly?
Original Message
Subject: One week slip of Fedora 11 Release
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:29:23 -0700
From: Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com
Reply-To: fedora-l...@redhat.com
Organization: Red Hat
To: fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com, fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com,
fedora-test-l...@redhat.com
In a meeting today between Release Engineering, QA, and various team
leads, we decided to enact a 7 day slip of the Fedora 11 release date.
The primary reason behind this slip is the state of our blocker bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F11Blockerhide_resolved=1
We cannot begin Release Candidate phase until the blocker bugs are
closed or at least in MODIFIED state. We are not there today, which
would be our last day to enter RC phase and still have enough time to
release on the 26th. We hope to enter RC phase in the next couple days,
and hit our new target, June 2nd.
Freeze breaks for critical bugs will still be accepted, however trivial
bug fixes should be pushed as updates via bodhi. Thanks!
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
