Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy
Probably [FEATURE] is enough. Will have a Design discussion anyway. Remember the feature wiki page do not mean will be implemented by magic, somebody need take responsibility of do the work. Also, we will not land more features for 0.102, see our schedule [1] Gonzalo [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.education.sugar.devel/45851 On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: Aloha Already some days ago I read the webpage about the Feature Policy following one of the hints of Gonzalo Odiard. Now I have a little question. On the webpage Feature Policy it is written something about what has to be written in the subject field of related e-mails. So, if somebody wants to publicate a feature that is related with the design, what has to be written in the subject field? [FEATURE][DESIGN] or only [DESIGN] Have fun Christian ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Gonzalo Odiard SugarLabs - Learning Software for children ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy
Hi Gonzalo Before any complaints hit the the mailing list I prefer to ask twice. In this case the question is related with the paragraph 'Propose a feature for addition into the release cycle', point 2 of the webpage Features/Policy that says: If your feature adds UI or changes the current UI please add as well the [DESIGN] tag to the subject. Please add the flag as well if the work flow does change or new ones are added. As I understand this it means [FEATURE] [DESIGN] is correct. Actually, I do not expect that others will implement proposed features of me, so I only propose features that I am interested in for implementation on my side. Christian Probably [FEATURE] is enough. Will have a Design discussion anyway. Remember the feature wiki page do not mean will be implemented by magic, somebody need take responsibility of do the work. Also, we will not land more features for 0.102, see our schedule [1] Gonzalo [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.education.sugar.devel/45851 On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com mailto:stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: Aloha Already some days ago I read the webpage about the Feature Policy following one of the hints of Gonzalo Odiard. Now I have a little question. On the webpage Feature Policy it is written something about what has to be written in the subject field of related e-mails. So, if somebody wants to publicate a feature that is related with the design, what has to be written in the subject field? [FEATURE][DESIGN] or only [DESIGN] Have fun Christian ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Gonzalo Odiard SugarLabs - Learning Software for children ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: Hi Gonzalo Before any complaints hit the the mailing list I prefer to ask twice. In this case the question is related with the paragraph 'Propose a feature for addition into the release cycle', point 2 of the webpage Features/Policy that says: If your feature adds UI or changes the current UI please add as well the [DESIGN] tag to the subject. Please add the flag as well if the work flow does change or new ones are added. As I understand this it means [FEATURE] [DESIGN] is correct. Ok, then both are ok. Gonzalo Actually, I do not expect that others will implement proposed features of me, so I only propose features that I am interested in for implementation on my side. Christian Probably [FEATURE] is enough. Will have a Design discussion anyway. Remember the feature wiki page do not mean will be implemented by magic, somebody need take responsibility of do the work. Also, we will not land more features for 0.102, see our schedule [1] Gonzalo [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.education.sugar.devel/45851 On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: Aloha Already some days ago I read the webpage about the Feature Policy following one of the hints of Gonzalo Odiard. Now I have a little question. On the webpage Feature Policy it is written something about what has to be written in the subject field of related e-mails. So, if somebody wants to publicate a feature that is related with the design, what has to be written in the subject field? [FEATURE][DESIGN] or only [DESIGN] Have fun Christian ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Gonzalo Odiard SugarLabs - Learning Software for children -- Gonzalo Odiard SugarLabs - Learning Software for children ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
