Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 17:04, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On 06/23/09 11:59, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> On my F11, I don't even have the GConf-dbus package installed, >>> yet the sugar-emulator starts regularly. >> >> You mean sugar-emulator out from jhbuild? That will be using the >> system GConf (using Orbit). > > No, I meant sugar-emulator ran by "sugar-jhbuild run" or within > "sugar-jhbuild shell". Well, if you don't have GConf-dbus then it will be using the system, Orbit one as well. >> In jhbuild we need that so we can launch a second instance of the >> gconf daemon in the jhbuild session bus. > > Interesting, so maybe installing the GConf-dbus package in Jaunty will > work around those problems? Would say so, is it packaged? Regards, Tomeu > -- > // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ > \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On 06/23/09 11:59, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On my F11, I don't even have the GConf-dbus package installed, >> yet the sugar-emulator starts regularly. > > You mean sugar-emulator out from jhbuild? That will be using the > system GConf (using Orbit). No, I meant sugar-emulator ran by "sugar-jhbuild run" or within "sugar-jhbuild shell". > In jhbuild we need that so we can launch a second instance of the > gconf daemon in the jhbuild session bus. Interesting, so maybe installing the GConf-dbus package in Jaunty will work around those problems? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:30, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On 06/23/09 11:16, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> Bah, I'm defeated. Why are we even using this GConf crap? Simple ini >>> files were too easy to work with?!? ;-/ >> >> Wrong mailing list for volunteering for dropping GConf :p > > Heh :P > > >> Is your jhbuild installing GConf-DBus? > > Hmmm no... is it required? > > On my F11, I don't even have the GConf-dbus package installed, > yet the sugar-emulator starts regularly. You mean sugar-emulator out from jhbuild? That will be using the system GConf (using Orbit). In jhbuild we need that so we can launch a second instance of the gconf daemon in the jhbuild session bus. Regards, Tomeu ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On 06/23/09 11:16, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Bah, I'm defeated. Why are we even using this GConf crap? Simple ini >> files were too easy to work with?!? ;-/ > > Wrong mailing list for volunteering for dropping GConf :p Heh :P > Is your jhbuild installing GConf-DBus? Hmmm no... is it required? On my F11, I don't even have the GConf-dbus package installed, yet the sugar-emulator starts regularly. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:54:39AM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >Bah, I'm defeated. Why are we even using this GConf crap? Simple ini >files were too easy to work with?!? ;-/ Because you aim at getting absorbed by Gnome. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAkpAneoACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgGIgCeLEKE/yegkuRnTBP7Q8ONoq1P phAAnRudGCBtXUre3gDCq9D6tA8II3Z0 =Zsc9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:54, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On 06/23/09 09:34, Edward Cherlin wrote: >> I have been warned not to run sugar-jhbuild and Sugar packages on the >> same system. I have not had sugar-jhbuild wreck my system, but I have >> had a lot of issues with sugar-jhbuild working one day and not the >> next when I make other changes to the system. > > We have found one such issues yesterday, while testing the streamlined branch > on Ubuntu Jaunty. > > My laptop usually boots off a Fedora 11 partition with the Sugar packages > installed, where the GConf schemas for Sugar are installed in > /etc/gconf/schemas/sugar.schemas. When Sugar starts, it happily uses the > system GConf. > > When we did the same on Jaunty with _no_ system packages installed, the > schemas were missing and the Sugar shell would crash mysteriously due to a > bad default value for the favourites layout. > > I don't know how to add a locally installed schemas file without > altering the system-wide database. The following commands are > for the system-wide case: > > export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` > gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule install/etc/gconf/schemas/sugar.schemas > > If I change the path to point into the jhbuild install root, > I get these obscure errors: > > -cut- > $ export > GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=/home/bernie/src/sugar/sugar-jhbuild/install/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults > $ gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule install/etc/gconf/schemas/sugar.schemas > > (gconftool-2:3489): GConf-WARNING **: Failed to load source > "/home/bernie/src/sugar/sugar-jhbuild/install/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults": > Couldn't resolve address for configuration source: Bad address > `/home/bernie/src/sugar/sugar-jhbuild/install/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults' > ** > GConf:ERROR:gconftool.c:969:main: assertion failed: (err == NULL) > Aborted > -cut- > > Bah, I'm defeated. Why are we even using this GConf crap? Simple ini > files were too easy to work with?!? ;-/ Wrong mailing list for volunteering for dropping GConf :p Is your jhbuild installing GConf-DBus? Regards, Tomeu ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On 06/23/09 09:34, Edward Cherlin wrote: > I have been warned not to run sugar-jhbuild and Sugar packages on the > same system. I have not had sugar-jhbuild wreck my system, but I have > had a lot of issues with sugar-jhbuild working one day and not the > next when I make other changes to the system. We have found one such issues yesterday, while testing the streamlined branch on Ubuntu Jaunty. My laptop usually boots off a Fedora 11 partition with the Sugar packages installed, where the GConf schemas for Sugar are installed in /etc/gconf/schemas/sugar.schemas. When Sugar starts, it happily uses the system GConf. When we did the same on Jaunty with _no_ system packages installed, the schemas were missing and the Sugar shell would crash mysteriously due to a bad default value for the favourites layout. I don't know how to add a locally installed schemas file without altering the system-wide database. The following commands are for the system-wide case: export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule install/etc/gconf/schemas/sugar.schemas If I change the path to point into the jhbuild install root, I get these obscure errors: -cut- $ export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=/home/bernie/src/sugar/sugar-jhbuild/install/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults $ gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule install/etc/gconf/schemas/sugar.schemas (gconftool-2:3489): GConf-WARNING **: Failed to load source "/home/bernie/src/sugar/sugar-jhbuild/install/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults": Couldn't resolve address for configuration source: Bad address `/home/bernie/src/sugar/sugar-jhbuild/install/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults' ** GConf:ERROR:gconftool.c:969:main: assertion failed: (err == NULL) Aborted -cut- Bah, I'm defeated. Why are we even using this GConf crap? Simple ini files were too easy to work with?!? ;-/ -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:18:23AM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote: > >>> As you probably all know, I do run a certain distribution different from >>> those emphasized above. I do not, however, trust a complex >>> web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. >> >> After the problems I have had before, I agree. Now I would only do >> such a thing in virtualization. > > I certainly agree that a sugar-jhbuild installation will hit a lot of > upstream bugs and thus can be quite hard (or sometimes even impossible) to > work with. > But being afraid of it damaging the rest of the system is something quite > different. If you have any particular reason for not trusting sugar-jhbuild, > I'd very much like to know so I can fix it. I have been warned not to run sugar-jhbuild and Sugar packages on the same system. I have not had sugar-jhbuild wreck my system, but I have had a lot of issues with sugar-jhbuild working one day and not the next when I make other changes to the system. > CU Sascha > > -- > http://sascha.silbe.org/ > http://www.infra-silbe.de/ > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKPnDdAAoJELpz82VMF3Da9TwH/A9JvfjKoBRBLsWUBACQ0BPP > ZNAn86i5c4TOm5RKjD+PliH+2J8xPte9LzCnfT5ILszS3fZ6tAe4UqunQZqilBpR > CpaGMFb3NHCEaPNQuIJlam89Y+ydiBAKcN4gBlrnCPzzApemqBzH30HvtttbAZzJ > HieXmLNQnQ4ywmulCPxH4scVQpXCaCw/3j5l24TXJJWYXXYNR9e1E1eLofgHVJj2 > HUyyJ6T0G98jq6u0KJN/LNwE2GG6BeD1tdgk/Q32sRNYpT9p8VDSwU+ZA0VXt8yi > lBN1SYdNojmS1RYN85ovK2vdA2TAz9b5bpVCYPw8k47DbOMTetjRqlxrhT1g5Ow= > =zJb7 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- Silent Thunder (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) is my name And Children are my nation. The Cosmos is my dwelling place, The Truth my destination. http://earthtreasury.org/worknet (Edward Mokurai Cherlin) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 01:09:38PM -0400, Bobby Powers wrote: >On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> A test run inside a chroot'ed COW (copy-on-write) Debian Sid >> environment with only core development tools installed + git-core and >> python2.5, "sugar-jhbuild update" failes with the following message: >> >> *** Checking out matchbox-window-manager *** [20/45] >> *** Error during phase force_checkout of matchbox-window-manager: svn not >> found *** [20/45] >> >> >> I suspect there is no point testing in Squeeze or Lenny, as I imagine >> it would fail at same point (and would in *any* environment, even on >> Fedora). > >it sounds like you should be able to add subversion to your aptitude >line, run from inside the chroot: >aptitude -y install adduser git-core python wget subversion Ohhh, silly me - so obvious now that you point it out :-P - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAkpAgRkACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgMHQCaAmc/JcvLhIzly0uHhcsrwEBx yJsAmwZ/4H95joLs3juSz5X3c74tqjin =yOSk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:48:39PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >>On 06/18/09 20:02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: If you're running a *recent* distro other than Fedora or Ubuntu, please check out this repository, build, and report back: >>> >>> As you probably all know, I do run a certain distribution different >>> from those emphasized above. I do not, however, trust a complex >>> web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. >>> >>> I run packaged software. Risky too, but cutting the wildest edges, I >>> believe. >> >>Could you run jhbuild with a different uid, in a chroot environment, or >>even in a virtual machine? > > Ah, now that you have lured me out of my cave, I guess I have no excuse > left :-) > > > A test run inside a chroot'ed COW (copy-on-write) Debian Sid environment > with only core development tools installed + git-core and python2.5, > "sugar-jhbuild update" failes with the following message: > > *** Checking out matchbox-window-manager *** [20/45] > *** Error during phase force_checkout of matchbox-window-manager: svn not > found *** [20/45] > > > I suspect there is no point testing in Squeeze or Lenny, as I imagine it > would fail at same point (and would in *any* environment, even on > Fedora). it sounds like you should be able to add subversion to your aptitude line, run from inside the chroot: aptitude -y install adduser git-core python wget subversion yours, bobby > > Kind regards, > > - Jonas > > - -- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEAREDAAYFAko7rp4ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgFgwCgl6oa3AUWwCuXCgThs9d/wv2T > v5UAn1ksf0M76XiPHFKqpcHeal18PbwC > =f2yk > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 07:41:52PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:18:23AM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote: > >>> As you probably all know, I do run a certain distribution different >>> from those emphasized above. I do not, however, trust a complex >>> web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. >> After the problems I have had before, I agree. Now I would only do >> such a thing in virtualization. > I certainly agree that a sugar-jhbuild installation will hit a lot of > upstream bugs and thus can be quite hard (or sometimes even > impossible) to work with. > But being afraid of it damaging the rest of the system is something > quite different. If you have any particular reason for not trusting > sugar-jhbuild, I'd very much like to know so I can fix it. It is not sugar-jhbuild specifically. It is the concept of running large pieces of unknown code. If a lot of people allready runs exact same code, the risk of it exploding in my face is smaller. sugar-jhbuild is just the top of the iceberg: it pulls a lot of external sources and invokes their commands. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAko+lfAACgkQn7DbMsAkQLj3gwCfQnhvXKchwRoFmfTQpQYS3Hdb enIAoIC9nk47UoY3CFh8YH30UviX2VEw =FQYF -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:18:23AM -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote: As you probably all know, I do run a certain distribution different from those emphasized above. I do not, however, trust a complex web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. After the problems I have had before, I agree. Now I would only do such a thing in virtualization. I certainly agree that a sugar-jhbuild installation will hit a lot of upstream bugs and thus can be quite hard (or sometimes even impossible) to work with. But being afraid of it damaging the rest of the system is something quite different. If you have any particular reason for not trusting sugar-jhbuild, I'd very much like to know so I can fix it. CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > Hi Bernie and others, > > [commenting since I was adressed personally] > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:46:25PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >>we'd like to get the streamlined branch merged, but there's doubt that >>many distributions we don't test frequently with would break randomly >>due to older package versions or missing patches. >> >>If you're running a *recent* distro other than Fedora or Ubuntu, please >>check out this repository, build, and report back: > > As you probably all know, I do run a certain distribution different from > those emphasized above. I do not, however, trust a complex > web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. After the problems I have had before, I agree. Now I would only do such a thing in virtualization. If I weren't so far behind on other things, I would test sugar-jhbuild in Caixa Mágica Linux or Debian in VirtualBox OSE. > I run packaged software. Risky too, but cutting the wildest edges, I > believe. > > > - Jonas > > - -- > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEAREDAAYFAko6gSIACgkQn7DbMsAkQLh2dACaAzADG8GjSYz0o2FSc/SvSszR > 0jUAoJLQaYIrDLVUV97ibeIc6PTt37pF > =Z8/+ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Silent Thunder (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) is my name And Children are my nation. The Cosmos is my dwelling place, The Truth my destination. http://earthtreasury.org/worknet (Edward Mokurai Cherlin) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:48:39PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >On 06/18/09 20:02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> If you're running a *recent* distro other than Fedora or Ubuntu, >>> please check out this repository, build, and report back: >> >> As you probably all know, I do run a certain distribution different >> from those emphasized above. I do not, however, trust a complex >> web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. >> >> I run packaged software. Risky too, but cutting the wildest edges, I >> believe. > >Could you run jhbuild with a different uid, in a chroot environment, or >even in a virtual machine? The following - executed as root - should work fully automated in any Debian-based distribution (yes, that includes Ubuntu): #!/bin/sh set -e set -x #aptitude install cdebootstrap cdebootstrap --flavour minimal sid tmproot chroot tmproot apt-get update apt-get -y install aptitude aptitude -y install adduser git-core python wget adduser --disabled-password --gecos "Jonas Smedegaard" jonas su - jonas git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline sugar-jhbuild cd sugar-jhbuild ./sugar-jhbuild update ./sugar-jhbuild depscheck ./sugar-jhbuild build In reality, my environments are slightly different: I use the "build" flavour, and approx and cowdancer packages to speed some things up. But I double-checked just now that above works (until the first sugar-jhbuild command, that is). Inside such chroot you have a very VERY barebones system. No X11, and no access to system devices. Good luck! - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAko7uh8ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLg/KwCfWOO04vj56mz91DnC0WENLX8G SfkAn0JtcXULk7YGjT/nkLisePoX6cVK =x5YZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 04:48:39PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >On 06/18/09 20:02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> If you're running a *recent* distro other than Fedora or Ubuntu, >>> please check out this repository, build, and report back: >> >> As you probably all know, I do run a certain distribution different >> from those emphasized above. I do not, however, trust a complex >> web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. >> >> I run packaged software. Risky too, but cutting the wildest edges, I >> believe. > >Could you run jhbuild with a different uid, in a chroot environment, or >even in a virtual machine? Ah, now that you have lured me out of my cave, I guess I have no excuse left :-) A test run inside a chroot'ed COW (copy-on-write) Debian Sid environment with only core development tools installed + git-core and python2.5, "sugar-jhbuild update" failes with the following message: *** Checking out matchbox-window-manager *** [20/45] *** Error during phase force_checkout of matchbox-window-manager: svn not found *** [20/45] I suspect there is no point testing in Squeeze or Lenny, as I imagine it would fail at same point (and would in *any* environment, even on Fedora). Kind regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAko7rp4ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgFgwCgl6oa3AUWwCuXCgThs9d/wv2T v5UAn1ksf0M76XiPHFKqpcHeal18PbwC =f2yk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
On 06/18/09 20:02, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> If you're running a *recent* distro other than Fedora or Ubuntu, please >> check out this repository, build, and report back: > > As you probably all know, I do run a certain distribution different from > those emphasized above. I do not, however, trust a complex > web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. > > I run packaged software. Risky too, but cutting the wildest edges, I > believe. Could you run jhbuild with a different uid, in a chroot environment, or even in a virtual machine? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi Bernie and others, [commenting since I was adressed personally] On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:46:25PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: >we'd like to get the streamlined branch merged, but there's doubt that >many distributions we don't test frequently with would break randomly >due to older package versions or missing patches. > >If you're running a *recent* distro other than Fedora or Ubuntu, please >check out this repository, build, and report back: As you probably all know, I do run a certain distribution different from those emphasized above. I do not, however, trust a complex web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. I run packaged software. Risky too, but cutting the wildest edges, I believe. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAko6gSIACgkQn7DbMsAkQLh2dACaAzADG8GjSYz0o2FSc/SvSszR 0jUAoJLQaYIrDLVUV97ibeIc6PTt37pF =Z8/+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
