Re: [suggest] optipng

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Huff


On Feb 2, 2010, at 10:31 AM, David Steinbrunner wrote:


Simply requesting a package for this project:

http://optipng.sourceforge.net/



that was pretty straightforward; committed to svn.

-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an  
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v

http://five.sentenc.es



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest


[suggest] optipng

2010-02-02 Thread David Steinbrunner
Hello all,

Simply requesting a package for this project:

http://optipng.sourceforge.net/

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner


___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest


Re: [suggest] geoip and geoip-devel updates?

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Huff


On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Steve Huff wrote:


i'll bump geoip and python-geoip and see if i see any problems.



looks like a smooth upgrade; i've committed the changes.  thanks for  
your request, Michael!


-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an  
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v

http://five.sentenc.es



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest


Re: [suggest] geoip and geoip-devel updates?

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Huff


On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:47 AM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:


Sorry for maybe being unclear. I'm not speaking about the builddeps of
geoip, but about the packages which need geoip to build. In case if
these exist, they will have to be updated accordingly.



a brief survey indicates that the only packages that depend on GeoIP  
are tor, perl-Geo-IP, perl-Geo-IP-PurePerl, python-geoip and ntop, and  
ntop seems to download GeoIP as an additional Source: and do some  
internal shenanigans with it, so that's not really relevant to this  
discussion.


i'll bump geoip and python-geoip and see if i see any problems.

-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an  
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v

http://five.sentenc.es



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest


Re: [suggest] geoip and geoip-devel updates?

2010-02-02 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Hi David,

Sorry for maybe being unclear. I'm not speaking about the builddeps of
geoip, but about the packages which need geoip to build. In case if
these exist, they will have to be updated accordingly.  
 
-- 
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 10:43 +0100, David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 2.2.2010 10:10, Yury V. Zaytsev napsal(a):
> > 
> > Is there anything that depends on them? I'm afraid to just bump the
> > SPECs.
> >  
> 
> Yuri,
> only
> Buildrequires: gzip
> Buildrequires: zlib-devel
> 
> see my package
> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/SRPMS/GeoIP-1.4.6-2.el5.hrb.src.rpm
> Regards,
> David Hrbáč
> ___
> suggest mailing list
> suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
> http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest


Re: [suggest] geoip and geoip-devel updates?

2010-02-02 Thread David Hrbáč
Dne 2.2.2010 10:10, Yury V. Zaytsev napsal(a):
> 
> Is there anything that depends on them? I'm afraid to just bump the
> SPECs.
>  

Yuri,
only
Buildrequires: gzip
Buildrequires: zlib-devel

see my package
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/SRPMS/GeoIP-1.4.6-2.el5.hrb.src.rpm
Regards,
David Hrbáč
___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest


Re: [suggest] geoip and geoip-devel updates?

2010-02-02 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 18:26 +1100, Michael Mansour wrote:
> 
> Is it possible we could update the geoip and geoip-devel packages to 1.4.6?

Is there anything that depends on them? I'm afraid to just bump the
SPECs.
 
-- 
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

___
suggest mailing list
suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest