[freenet-support] setsocket
Hi, I am hoping someone can help me with my problem I am running windows 98SE and when i try to ftp i get the following error message: ESOCKET EXCEPTION ERROR 10038 IN FUNCTION SETSOCKOPT (SO_LINGER) SOCKET OPERATION ON NON-SOCKET When I close and relaunch the FTP app I get this error: 500 ESOCKET EXCEPTION: CONNECT SOCKET ALREADY IN USE Also when using email, the app says it's connecting but nothing's going out to the modem (i.e. the SD and RD leds on the modem don't flash, so I know that nothing has gone out). This happens on send and receive, and I often have to click send/receive several times before it actually connects to the server. And then, still online, if I hit send/receive again, I get the same thing happening. Sometimes it says "Connecting..." but it doesn't, and sometimes it just says "Failed to connect to outgoing/incoming server SMPT/POP3.TELKOMSA.NET". All told, I probably manage to actually connect to the server about 1 in 10 times. Browsers are showing the same sluggishness: clicking on links often only works after several attempts, entering a URL often results in "site not found" errors, but it's the same basic problem, it's not getting through to the modem most of the time. When it does, sometimes sites load completely, sometimes only a portion of the page loads and then it stops. Any help would be appreciated, Thanks Jack.
Re: [freenet-support] setsocket
I suggest you go to http://freenetproject.org and tell us, in all seriousness, what your question has to do with freenetproject... I think you probably just sent your question to the wrong list (sorry). d - Original Message - From: daftjack To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:57 AM Subject: [freenet-support] setsocket Hi, I am hoping someone can help me with my problem I am running windows 98SE and when i try to ftp i get the following error message: ESOCKET EXCEPTION ERROR 10038 IN FUNCTION SETSOCKOPT (SO_LINGER) SOCKET OPERATION ON NON-SOCKET [snip] ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] what happened to http://freenetproject.org ?
I couldn't retrieve it for a week now... [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Antivirus] [http://www.swissworld.com] ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Lamer Help
If new people could download the new seed.ref that would help, but with freenetproject.org down newbies can't get them so they'll all be seeing that message Pete - Original Message - From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 2:08 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Lamer Help ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Lamer Help
Pete Soden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > If new people could download the new seed.ref that would help, but with > freenetproject.org down newbies can't get them so they'll all be seeing that > message Yeah, it's too bad that people never ever put their own seednodes.ref files on their own web sites. I mean, sure, it would be great if one could go to some place like http://wooledge.org/~greg/ and find a seednodes.ref file there for the taking. Or maybe, in some theoretical alternate earth, one could go to Google, search for seednodes.ref, and find sites like http://www.whoopis.com/~mbates/freenet/ whence seednodes.ref files could be retrieved. Granted, these could conceivably be out of date, but an old seednodes.ref file is surely better than one which is known empirically not to work, and it's surely leagues better than none at all. -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | msg02542/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Lamer Help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 15:21:01 -0800 Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Pete Soden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> If new people could download the new seed.ref that would help, > but with >> freenetproject.org down newbies can't get them so they'll all >be seeing that >> message > thats a good idea i'll be sure to put it up since it has my ip in it on my how to build a nuke from radio shack parts website remeber the kid that turned in a fuctioning nuke sans the plutonium made of radio shake parts about 5 years ago for his high school science fair project did you see the footage of the AEC folks taking it away in their high radiation space suits? bet u didnt know the fbi has a live feed off the security cameras from every Radio Shack in the country good thing there isnt a Bagdad or Kabul Radio Shack hun so i can think of a few reason folks might not want to put their seed ref on their freesite though i'd happily put your ref up on that freesite anyway i actually have a question since i havnt been reading everything on a daily basis recently where do we get shapshots now? is freenet at sourceforge still alive the current snaps have been ack hem a tad odd like the anon filter for that breif bit pass nothing but plain text not even links viola security sovled, pretty funny that one Lord have pity on this poor lamer may i hear the word of java and be saved -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Hush 2.2 (Java) Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify wlcEARECABcFAj4grT8QHGthYm9vbUBodXNoLmNvbQAKCRB5zuO1YwPwCUuJAJwJiEz6 qwZq1dw/DLmiW72hsl7ZdgCeOov0xhjWnexBR6JjO6MvAgPlI9A= =RXx9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Big $$$ to be made with the HushMail Affiliate Program: https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427 ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Lamer Help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > i'll be sure to put it up since it has my ip in it > on my how to build a nuke from radio shack parts website Um... what? (1) The seednodes.ref file contains *other* nodes, not yours. If you want to publish your own node reference, you may also do that, but it's not included in seednodes.ref by default. (2) If people go to my web site, they have my IP address. I don't exactly try to hide my identity here, y'know... > so i can think of a few reason folks might not want > to put their seed ref on their freesite I said WEB site. Not freesite. But yes, I do publish my seednodes.ref file on my freesite as well as my web site. Even if I were trying to keep myself anonymous, which I clealy am not, point (1) above would make this a relatively safe practice. Remember the Freedom Seed? (And before that, the Evil Seed.) Of course, a seednodes.ref file on a freesite would not be very helpful to the original poster, since he was reporting RNFs. It would be a bit like giving someone a CD-ROM with drivers on it for their new CD-ROM drive. -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | msg02544/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] Lamer Help
Well gee what a load of help you are to someone who hasn't had the joy and benefit of actually using a fully set up node, this sort of attitude is why people give up after they try the software then when it doesn't work and can't find any help. So why don't we try to be constructive? instead of 1) Mention of these sort of things on freenetproject.org 2) Add a link to a google search that is looking for the seednode.ref from the gateway/failure page? I actually had thought you were a decent helpful guy Greg but obviously your starting to share the dis-illusionment that has affected other freenet authors recently. So if your not going to offer to be helpful (I actually sent the guy my node.ref to help and posted a copy to the mailing list but it was to big and is awaiting administration) don't bother saying anything. Pete Pete Soden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > If new people could download the new seed.ref that would help, but with > freenetproject.org down newbies can't get them so they'll all be seeing that > message Yeah, it's too bad that people never ever put their own seednodes.ref files on their own web sites. I mean, sure, it would be great if one could go to some place like http://wooledge.org/~greg/ and find a seednodes.ref file there for the taking. Or maybe, in some theoretical alternate earth, one could go to Google, search for seednodes.ref, and find sites like http://www.whoopis.com/~mbates/freenet/ whence seednodes.ref files could be retrieved. Granted, these could conceivably be out of date, but an old seednodes.ref file is surely better than one which is known empirically not to work, and it's surely leagues better than none at all. -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." [EMAIL PROTECTED] |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | - Original Message - From: "Greg Wooledge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:21 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Lamer Help ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Lamer Help
On Saturday 11 January 2003 07:07 pm, Pete Soden wrote: > Well gee what a load of help you are to someone who hasn't had the joy > and benefit of actually using a fully set up node, this sort of attitude > is why people give up after they try the software then when it doesn't > work and can't find any help. > > So why don't we try to be constructive? instead of > 1) Mention of these sort of things on freenetproject.org > 2) Add a link to a google search that is looking for the seednode.ref > from the gateway/failure page? I had the privelege of being in #freenet for most of Saturday, and a couple of newbies were confused and frustrated because freenetproject.org was down, and they couldn't get seeds, latest freenet.jar, etc. In trying to help some of these poor souls by asking questions and offering possible options, I was repeatedly flamed on "why is freenetproject.org down? why isn't there a mirror? why, why why..." In the end I don't think I was helpful to anyone; I offered to send someone my jar files, seeds, and whatever they wanted but it wasn't good enough. One person wanted a specific build (5xx or something), and when I could not produce it (I don't keep the old buggy jars) I was met with more complaining and bitching on why everything is screwed up, how freenet has been in development for the last 70 years, etc. Greg just gave you good solid advice, wrapped in a little sarcasm. If you've spent any time working on this project as I have (albeit client tools) you may become sarcastic at times, since it so often feels like a thankless task. Building an application "to ensure true freedom of communication over the Internet" takes more than just a weekend of coffee and pizza. Lucky for me, I code for personal satisfaction. I sincerely wish you good luck :) -- Jay Oliveri "In the land of the blind, GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54 the one-eyed man is king." FCPTools Maintainer www.sf.net/users/joliveri ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Limiting bandwith usage on linux
On 01/08/2003 05:25 PM Jason Lunz rambled on about: [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: How can I limit the bandwith freenet is using WITHOUT the settings in freenet.conf? http://www.lartc.org/ Not simple, but with enough work it'll almost certainly do what you want. It's even possible, with the right setup, to restrict freenet to use all available bandwidth not used by other applications, without noticably impacting their performance. I started w/ the wshaper script http://lartc.org/wondershaper/ but I'm still not there yetare you using cbq or htb? mark ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] llllllll wooooooooowwwwwwwwww lllllllllllllll
ENTER 18+ ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
