[freenet-support] Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
Why does my stable node have so few connections, but my unstable node has many? When I start my stable node it begins with maybe 2 or 3 connections, but when I start my unstable node I get 20 or more connection. I'm using similar config settings between the two node (not the same .conf file). I've reseeded my stable node, but that doesn't help. Stable Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 7 (0/7/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 39 (29/10) Data waiting to be transferred 4,945 Bytes Total amount of data transferred310 MiB Uptime: 0 days, 16 hours, 44 minutes Current routingTime: 19ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 16 (13.3%) Pooled threads which are idle: 24 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 22.4%. Load due to thread limit = 13.3% Load due to routingTime = 1.9% = 19ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 28.5% = 285ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 22.4% because outputBytes(188378) = limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 2.6% because: 2172.0 req/hr * 0.0021451008122710495 (pTransfer) * 390533.0 bytes = 1819555 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 13.3%. Unstable Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 52 (0/52/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 273 (266/7) Data waiting to be transferred 45 KiB Total amount of data transferredNone Uptime: 0 days, 16 hours, 38 minutes Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 29 (24.2%) Pooled threads which are idle: 4 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 154.3%. Load due to thread limit = 23.3% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (100%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 154.3% = 1543ms / 1000ms overloadLow (100%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) = limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 12.4% because: 1878.0 req/hr * 0.01203536640608 (pTransfer) * 391115.0 bytes = 8840144 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 27.5%. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Why does my stable node have so few connections, but my unstable node has many? When I start my stable node it begins with maybe 2 or 3 connections, but when I start my unstable node I get 20 or more connection. I'm using similar config settings between the two node (not the same .conf file). I've reseeded my stable node, but that doesn't help. My guess is that many stable nodes are behind NATs and or firewalls, that are not set up right (i.e. the node port isn't forwarded or is blocked for incoming conns.). This may not be such an big issue on unstable as the ppl using unstable are more experienced when it comes to setting up their system the right way. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] trouble installing it
hello i just need some help with this issue. When I try to run freenet.sh this is the error message i'm getting : [EMAIL PROTECTED] freenet]$ sh start-freenet.sh Detected freenet-ext.jar Detected freenet.jar Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m freenet.node.Main Done nice: java: No such file or directory Is freenet not recognizing the java environment ??? I downloaded the latest copy from sun.java.com and already installed it. Please . any help will b greatly appreciated. _ Best Restaurant Giveaway Ever! Vote for your favorites for a chance to win $1 million! http://local.msn.com/special/giveaway.asp ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
I thought that it didn't matter now with bidi built into stable. Does this mean that bidi is not working on the stable node like it does on the unstable node? Someone wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Why does my stable node have so few connections, but my unstable node has many? When I start my stable node it begins with maybe 2 or 3 connections, but when I start my unstable node I get 20 or more connection. I'm using similar config settings between the two node (not the same .conf file). I've reseeded my stable node, but that doesn't help. My guess is that many stable nodes are behind NATs and or firewalls, that are not set up right (i.e. the node port isn't forwarded or is blocked for incoming conns.). This may not be such an big issue on unstable as the ppl using unstable are more experienced when it comes to setting up their system the right way. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I thought that it didn't matter now with bidi built into stable. Does this mean that bidi is not working on the stable node like it does on the unstable node? Bidi means that both outgoing and incoming connections will be used for routing. It doesn't help against nodes that don't accept incoming conns. To route to those nodes your node has to wait till they make a connection to you (provided that your node is able to accept incoming connections). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
Thanks for the response. I had closed the port on my firewall since I mistakenly thought that with bidi I wouldn't need to keep it open. I'll open the port, and see what that does. Someone wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I thought that it didn't matter now with bidi built into stable. Does this mean that bidi is not working on the stable node like it does on the unstable node? Bidi means that both outgoing and incoming connections will be used for routing. It doesn't help against nodes that don't accept incoming conns. To route to those nodes your node has to wait till they make a connection to you (provided that your node is able to accept incoming connections). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet through UDP
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 01:39:37AM +0200, Martin Scheffler wrote: On Friday 21 May 2004 22:27, Toad wrote: STUN is used to determine whether you are behind NAT. If you are then you need a third party to start connections to others behind NAT. The third party need not be a single server but can be a network of communicating servers (such as all freenet servers not behind NAT). When the connection is started the third party is no longer needed (i.e. data flows directly between the two parties). How is that possible? Does it involve TCP spoofing? As i understand it, STUN means you send UDP from port X anywhere outside. Following UDP replies to port X are routed back to the originating box. Now, the special point is, when another IP from outside contacts port X, the packets are routed aswell. It is said most cheap NATs do this. That's what I heard but much of the recent thread seems to be contrary to it. So you send UDP outside and voila, others (not only the particular destination) may contact you. mfg The Bishop p.s. hope i didn't mess reality up :-) ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Stable - Unstable COnnection Disparity
I've noticed that the stable build does not open as many connections at the unstable build. When I start the stable build, it will make 3 or 4 connections at first and then just sit there. Slowly it will build more connections. When I launch the unstable build, it will immediately have 20 or more connections open. What could be the problem? Stable 5082 Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 13 (0/13/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 18 (18/0) Data waiting to be transferred 942 Bytes Total amount of data transferred143 MiB Uptime: 0 days, 7 hours, 1 minute Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 2 (1.7%) Pooled threads which are idle: 26 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 10%. Load due to thread limit = 1.7% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) = limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 0% because: 0.0 req/hr * 0.027857298366589584 (pTransfer) * 391846.0 bytes = 0 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 1.7%. Unstable 60106 Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 34 (0/34/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 152 (152/0) Data waiting to be transferred 18 KiB Total amount of data transferredNone Uptime: 0 days, 7 hours, 1 minute Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 2 (1.7%) Pooled threads which are idle: 26 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 10%. Load due to thread limit = 1.7% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) = limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 0% because: 0.0 req/hr * 0.027857298366589584 (pTransfer) * 391846.0 bytes = 0 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 1.7%. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] trouble installing it
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 05:27:41PM +, c enrique wrote: hello i just need some help with this issue. When I try to run freenet.sh this is the error message i'm getting : [EMAIL PROTECTED] freenet]$ sh start-freenet.sh Detected freenet-ext.jar Detected freenet.jar Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m freenet.node.Main Done nice: java: No such file or directory Is freenet not recognizing the java environment ??? I downloaded the latest copy from sun.java.com and already installed it. Please . any help will b greatly appreciated. Sure. On my system, with java installed in /opt/j2sdk1.4.2, execute the following before trying start-freenet.sh (or put in your bashrc): export JAVA_HOME=/opt/j2sdk1.4.2 (or wherever it is installed) export PATH=$JAVA_HOME/bin:$JAVA_HOME/jre/bin/:$PATH -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Stable - Unstable COnnection Disparity
Ignore this message, it is a dupe. . wrote: I've noticed that the stable build does not open as many connections at the unstable build. When I start the stable build, it will make 3 or 4 connections at first and then just sit there. Slowly it will build more connections. When I launch the unstable build, it will immediately have 20 or more connections open. What could be the problem? Stable 5082 Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)13 (0/13/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving)18 (18/0) Data waiting to be transferred942 Bytes Total amount of data transferred143 MiB Uptime: 0 days, 7 hours, 1 minute Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 2 (1.7%) Pooled threads which are idle: 26 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 10%. Load due to thread limit = 1.7% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) = limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 0% because: 0.0 req/hr * 0.027857298366589584 (pTransfer) * 391846.0 bytes = 0 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 1.7%. Unstable 60106 Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)34 (0/34/60) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving)152 (152/0) Data waiting to be transferred18 KiB Total amount of data transferredNone Uptime: 0 days, 7 hours, 1 minute Current routingTime: 0ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 2 (1.7%) Pooled threads which are idle: 26 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 10%. Load due to thread limit = 1.7% Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (50%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 0% because outputBytes(0) = limit (672000.01 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (14000) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 0% because: 0.0 req/hr * 0.027857298366589584 (pTransfer) * 391846.0 bytes = 0 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 108 * 60 * 1.1 = 7128 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 1.7%. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Node not caching keys requested?
I've just started running a freenet node again, it's been up for a few hours (and is getting bombarded by incoming connections :P). However, I'm trying to download FUQID from freenet so I can see the source. The node has actually completed the transfer 4 or 5 times (I had my browser timeout too low :/), but it still has to download it from other nodes. Is this normal? I have a 4GB store, so I would have thought it would have been stored by now... -- Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sitharus.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
