[freenet-support] Re: Comparison of 5100 vs 5101
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 5101 works very fine here, my node was offline for 3 days as I needed my bandwith. And 30 minutes after starting it up again it was back to 40 Connections, after about 3 hours it had it's normal count of 70+ connections. Btw. I suggest you update your jvm to 1.5.0_01, or at least the newest version of 1.4.2 (which is _07). And an win9x based machine is shurely not something to be used for judging the quality of a new build... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/3T15Sa8EyIJhugRAqnJAJ4nfk1/X7UKzDuBTxA7hgcPQPGmygCdEr0/ OmTGz4ff7zjKwg0VIFtdcys= =OwY+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Error When starting
That is DEFINITELY the problem I described. The wierd thing is, it has actually loaded the native support! On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:10:20PM -, Col.Steve Austin Ret. wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- have never seen an error like this one before. Freenet started and ran fine last night. this morning attempted restart after rebooting(NO setting or file changes at all) and came up with this for (so far) three consecutive startup attempts. here is log for the last two tries: Jan 31, 2005 12:44:21 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): Starting Freenet (Fred) 0.5 node, build #5100 on JVM Sun Microsystems Inc.:Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM:1.4.2_05-b04 INFO: Native CPUID library 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/jcpuid-x86-windows.dll' loaded from resource INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library 'net/i2p/util/jbigi-windows-athlon.dll' loaded from resource Jan 31, 2005 12:44:25 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): loading node keys: node Jan 31, 2005 12:44:25 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): Read node file Jan 31, 2005 12:44:26 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): starting filesystem Jan 31, 2005 12:44:30 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): loading data store Jan 31, 2005 12:44:30 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): loading routing table Jan 31, 2005 12:44:31 PM (freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore, main): Removing orphaned property 0x0 : f03d1e33c135009f8b3f0f23f30d5afa3536062d2e6e67723164617461 Jan 31, 2005 12:44:31 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): From input: 640.0 Jan 31, 2005 12:44:31 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): Setting default initTransferRate to 640.0 Jan 31, 2005 12:44:34 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): Unexpected Exception: java.lang.NumberFormatException java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: 5?28eb0 at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Unknown Source) at java.math.BigInteger.init(Unknown Source) at net.i2p.util.NativeBigInteger.init(NativeBigInteger.java:207) at freenet.crypt.DSAPublicKey.init(DSAPublicKey.java:32) at freenet.DSAIdentity.init(DSAIdentity.java:62) at freenet.DSAIdentity.init(DSAIdentity.java:73) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingMemory.init(DataObjectRoutingMemory.java :73) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore.getNode(DataObjectRoutingStore.java: 229) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore.access$000(DataObjectRoutingStore.ja va:19) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore$RoutingMemoryEnumeration.step(DataOb jectRoutingStore.java:202) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore$RoutingMemoryEnumeration.nextElement (DataObjectRoutingStore.java:219) at freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable.loadEstimators(NGRoutingTable.java:324) at freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable.init(NGRoutingTable.java:315) at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:783) java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: 5?28eb0 at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Unknown Source) at java.math.BigInteger.init(Unknown Source) at net.i2p.util.NativeBigInteger.init(NativeBigInteger.java:207) at freenet.crypt.DSAPublicKey.init(DSAPublicKey.java:32) at freenet.DSAIdentity.init(DSAIdentity.java:62) at freenet.DSAIdentity.init(DSAIdentity.java:73) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingMemory.init(DataObjectRoutingMemory.java :73) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore.getNode(DataObjectRoutingStore.java: 229) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore.access$000(DataObjectRoutingStore.ja va:19) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore$RoutingMemoryEnumeration.step(DataOb jectRoutingStore.java:202) at freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore$RoutingMemoryEnumeration.nextElement (DataObjectRoutingStore.java:219) at freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable.loadEstimators(NGRoutingTable.java:324) at freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable.init(NGRoutingTable.java:315) at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:783) and: Jan 31, 2005 1:29:13 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): Starting Freenet (Fred) 0.5 node, build #5100 on JVM Sun Microsystems Inc.:Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM:1.4.2_05-b04 INFO: Native CPUID library 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/jcpuid-x86-windows.dll' loaded from resource INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library 'net/i2p/util/jbigi-windows-athlon.dll' loaded from resource Jan 31, 2005 1:29:14 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): loading node keys: node Jan 31, 2005 1:29:14 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): Read node file Jan 31, 2005 1:29:15 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): starting filesystem Jan 31, 2005 1:29:17 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): loading data store Jan 31, 2005 1:29:17 PM (freenet.node.Main, main): loading routing table Jan 31, 2005 1:29:17 PM (freenet.node.rt.DataObjectRoutingStore, main): Removing orphaned property 0x0 :
[freenet-support] Unable to Load
I am unable to access, well, nearly 100% of anything I try. I am connected to 54 peers and Freenet has been running for over 24 hours now. The furthest I've gotten from the default bookmarks is to the Yoyo main page. Once. Now I cannot even access that page. (Route Not Found for literally every page I try to access). Nearly every one is listead as "cleanly rejected" (somewhere around 90% of the reasons is that one). Earlier I refered to being behind a firewall. I am behind a router (a Corega, which is a Japanese brand) and a DSL modem which for some idiotic reason has routing tables and other router features (but only one ethernet port) for some reason. Do I need to be forwarding ports, even though I am in the DMZ? I cannot understand how to get Freenet to access pages. Furthermore, I went to the Node Status Info page, and was treated to this in bright red: [Rejecting incoming connections and requests!]. I do not know what this means, but it does not look good. Also, somewhere I found the probability of a successful incoming request was 0.004. Well, .4% doesn't look very good to me either. Any ideas? Thanks! -- \Kyle Goetz BS Pure Mathematics, BA Japanese 2006 The University of Texas Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Comparison of 5100 vs 5101
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 13:24:21 +0100, Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5101 works very fine here, my node was offline for 3 days as I needed my bandwith. And 30 minutes after starting it up again it was back to 40 Connections, after about 3 hours it had it's normal count of 70+ connections. You were'nt starting from a blank routing table, were you? And an win9x based machine is shurely not something to be used for judging the quality of a new build... What the hell does it matter what the OS is, as long as it's the same both times? (It doesn't.) -todd ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Comparison of 5100 vs 5101
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Todd Walton schrieb: | You were'nt starting from a blank routing table, were you? As a matter of fact it doesn't matter wheter it is blank or not because the number of outgoing connections is mostly less than 5. My node purely lives from incoming connections. | What the hell does it matter what the OS is, as long as it's the same | both times? (It doesn't.) The TCP/IP stack of Win9x is shit, you can easily overrun or bork it. Most of the time when mass connections fail on Win9x it isn't the app, it is the OS that fucked up. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/7Cn5Sa8EyIJhugRAgXVAJ48KVnUHgy0vh3picbzbqtIDFGyoACffxy4 a9TQo3XyIBovfIUiy5e3FV4= =gZ7s -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Unable to Load
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Victor Denisov schrieb: | Yes, you have to forward ports if you're behind NAT, regardless of the | DMZ. All that DMZ really does is that router doesn't perform any traffic | filtering for it by default, not that it can magically understand that | connections on this certain port should be forwarded to that specific IP | address behind NAT. Actually it does for most home routers. On those setting a machine into the DMZ means that every incoming request, that doesn't fit a configured rule (like a firewall ruleset or an open/forwarded port), will automatically be send to the machine in the DMZ. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/7Gp5Sa8EyIJhugRAr9xAJ4x+BBwQGynXh3Usu0oLhzhDVhmMgCeO5Eu dhW0xXHwp0oYPlPLDP9Hz6E= =A2eM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Unable to Load
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Someone wrote: Victor Denisov schrieb: | Yes, you have to forward ports if you're behind NAT, regardless of the | DMZ. All that DMZ really does is that router doesn't perform any traffic | filtering for it by default, not that it can magically understand that | connections on this certain port should be forwarded to that specific IP | address behind NAT. Actually it does for most home routers. On those setting a machine into the DMZ means that every incoming request, that doesn't fit a configured rule (like a firewall ruleset or an open/forwarded port), will automatically be send to the machine in the DMZ. Hmm. Strange, I was thinking otherwise, but this shouldn't matter. If incoming connections can be established, the node should work reasonably well, regardless. As you've pointed out in another message, your node mostly lives on incoming connections - that's my experience as well, incoming connections are _very_ important. I'd like to advise original poster to still check that his node has incoming connections (or is able to receive them at all). Regards, Victor Denisov. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB/7nE6ORu4LlA94MRAvBSAJ9Dc49VqPf4qWIPt5xIDZCoQbw5kQCgojXs Q3wgQCKTpmxinL2nyfJ6e1U= =sNvm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Unable to Load
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland schrieb: | That would rather mean that only 1 machine can be DMZed, right? Exactly, you can only enter one destination IP as DMZ. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/7zP5Sa8EyIJhugRAoQ2AJ9rDmlzF4oXd3s6dHvNdVECey1AVgCeN/Kv W1q57TJa9nKWUKOfMcTUnaQ= =5Dt9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
