[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[bbac...@googlemail.com]

Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^

I referred to the mail from Peter J. in the "Version 1179?" thread.
He said the temporary files bug could be fixed.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:54, Dennis Nezic  
wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
>
>> This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
>> some reason we get no online update
>> and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
>> works on Linux...
>
> Are you sure? From what I'm hearing in the IRC channel (freenode,
> #freenet), I think it's still out there, and a tricky bug to debug--for
> example I haven't been able to reproduce the errors. Others found that
> disabling logging fixed/reduced the problem, while logging minor errors
> made it more prevalent--but upon closer inspection, I think that turned
> out to be wishful thinking. I think they're waiting to fix this, and
> other serious problems, before pushing out another release :/.
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>



-- 
__
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[bbac...@googlemail.com]

This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
some reason we get no online update
and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
works on Linux...



On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:33, Ulrich Koepping  wrote:
> I have the same problem as described in Bug ID 0002694, after updating to 
> latest freenet version, downloads fail - this happened with multiple keys.
>
> Klicking on restart in downloads menu does result in the same error 
> immediately : "Temporary files error: invalid block type".
>
> I deleted the persistent-temp-* directory, after that the setup wizzard 
> showed up (?), and all downloads were reset. I re-requested the download 
> keys, and for the keys that failed before, the download failed again with the 
> same error.
>
> I have not had a successfull downlaod after the update.
>
> This is the FIRST sever bug in freenet after my use of it for quite a while 
> now. Although beeing beta it worked so far all the time. Functionality is 
> fundamentally impacted.
>
> In case you need more info, reply.
>
>
>
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>



-- 
__
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

[Peter J.]

On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
> Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
> like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
> I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.
>

Yes had that also with 1178 but with 1179 these errors are gone.

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

[bbac...@googlemail.com]

Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya  
wrote:
> Volodya wrote:
>> bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
>>> Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice
>>> about this version via mailing list,
>>> and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update.
>>> Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my previous
>>> mail that was completely ignored ^^
>>>
>>
>> Same here.
>
> Sorry, just tried ./update.sh again, and it worked.
>
> --
> http://freedom.libsyn.com/   Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
> http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal
> http://www.freedomporn.org/  Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut
>
>  "None of us are free until all of us are free."~ Mihail Bakunin
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>



-- 
__
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

[bbac...@googlemail.com]

Ok, thanks for your answer... update.CMD now downloaded 1178 (said it
was a new version, but I had 1178 before)
and since then update.CMD thinks I'm current enough. Still no online
update offering.

I keep waiting, maybe it works when 1180 is there...

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya  
wrote:
> Volodya wrote:
>> bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
>>> Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice
>>> about this version via mailing list,
>>> and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update.
>>> Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my previous
>>> mail that was completely ignored ^^
>>>
>>
>> Same here.
>
> Sorry, just tried ./update.sh again, and it worked.
>
> --
> http://freedom.libsyn.com/   Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
> http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal
> http://www.freedomporn.org/  Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut
>
>  "None of us are free until all of us are free."~ Mihail Bakunin
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>



-- 
__
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[Ulrich Koepping]

I have the same problem as described in Bug ID 0002694, after updating to 
latest freenet version, downloads fail - this happened with multiple keys.

Klicking on restart in downloads menu does result in the same error immediately 
: "Temporary files error: invalid block type". 

I deleted the persistent-temp-* directory, after that the setup wizzard showed 
up (?), and all downloads were reset. I re-requested the download keys, and for 
the keys that failed before, the download failed again with the same error. 

I have not had a successfull downlaod after the update.

This is the FIRST sever bug in freenet after my use of it for quite a while 
now. Although beeing beta it worked so far all the time. Functionality is 
fundamentally impacted.

In case you need more info, reply. 

[freenet-support] (no subject)

[Peter J.]

On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> > you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> > that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be
> > told if it happens after Sunday.
>
> 
>
> Ok Matthew,
>
> Seems to be still there even with version 1179.
>
> 11 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
> after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report
> it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at
> support at freenetproject.org. Please include this message and what version of
> the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include
> this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
> 70.72.215.120:40858
> 212.202.31.3:43592
> 217.196.213.98:24330
> 88.175.66.28:52590
> 87.179.226.176:50173
> 217.153.12.122:50554
> 212.75.37.89:53150
> 85.229.124.96:13598
> 96.250.239.134:64676
> 86.54.216.133:53061
> 79.202.89.5:39002
>
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or
> mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Also, node uptime is 3 hours now.

[freenet-support] (no subject)

[Peter J.]

On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be
> told if it happens after Sunday.
>



Ok Matthew, 

Seems to be still there even with version 1179.

11 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even 
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report 
it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at 
support at freenetproject.org. Please include this message and what version of 
the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include 
this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
70.72.215.120:40858
212.202.31.3:43592
217.196.213.98:24330
88.175.66.28:52590
87.179.226.176:50173
217.153.12.122:50554
212.75.37.89:53150
85.229.124.96:13598
96.250.239.134:64676
86.54.216.133:53061
79.202.89.5:39002

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[Dennis Nezic]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:59:20 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:

> Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^

You should be able to download the snapshot jar from
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ ... 1179 = r23606, and
replace the one you're currently using.

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[Dennis Nezic]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:

> This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
> some reason we get no online update
> and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
> works on Linux...

Are you sure? From what I'm hearing in the IRC channel (freenode,
#freenet), I think it's still out there, and a tricky bug to debug--for
example I haven't been able to reproduce the errors. Others found that
disabling logging fixed/reduced the problem, while logging minor errors
made it more prevalent--but upon closer inspection, I think that turned
out to be wishful thinking. I think they're waiting to fix this, and
other serious problems, before pushing out another release :/.

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[Dennis Nezic]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:59:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^

You should be able to download the snapshot jar from
http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ ... 1179 = r23606, and
replace the one you're currently using.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[bbackde]

Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^

I referred to the mail from Peter J. in the "Version 1179?" thread.
He said the temporary files bug could be fixed.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:54, Dennis Nezic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
>> some reason we get no online update
>> and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
>> works on Linux...
>
> Are you sure? From what I'm hearing in the IRC channel (freenode,
> #freenet), I think it's still out there, and a tricky bug to debug--for
> example I haven't been able to reproduce the errors. Others found that
> disabling logging fixed/reduced the problem, while logging minor errors
> made it more prevalent--but upon closer inspection, I think that turned
> out to be wishful thinking. I think they're waiting to fix this, and
> other serious problems, before pushing out another release :/.
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



-- 
__
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[Dennis Nezic]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
> some reason we get no online update
> and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
> works on Linux...

Are you sure? From what I'm hearing in the IRC channel (freenode,
#freenet), I think it's still out there, and a tricky bug to debug--for
example I haven't been able to reproduce the errors. Others found that
disabling logging fixed/reduced the problem, while logging minor errors
made it more prevalent--but upon closer inspection, I think that turned
out to be wishful thinking. I think they're waiting to fix this, and
other serious problems, before pushing out another release :/.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[bbackde]

This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for
some reason we get no online update
and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh
works on Linux...



On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 21:33, Ulrich Koepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same problem as described in Bug ID 0002694, after updating to 
> latest freenet version, downloads fail - this happened with multiple keys.
>
> Klicking on restart in downloads menu does result in the same error 
> immediately : "Temporary files error: invalid block type".
>
> I deleted the persistent-temp-* directory, after that the setup wizzard 
> showed up (?), and all downloads were reset. I re-requested the download 
> keys, and for the keys that failed before, the download failed again with the 
> same error.
>
> I have not had a successfull downlaod after the update.
>
> This is the FIRST sever bug in freenet after my use of it for quite a while 
> now. Although beeing beta it worked so far all the time. Functionality is 
> fundamentally impacted.
>
> In case you need more info, reply.
>
>
>
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



-- 
__
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

[Ulrich Koepping]

I have the same problem as described in Bug ID 0002694, after updating to 
latest freenet version, downloads fail - this happened with multiple keys.

Klicking on restart in downloads menu does result in the same error immediately 
: "Temporary files error: invalid block type". 

I deleted the persistent-temp-* directory, after that the setup wizzard showed 
up (?), and all downloads were reset. I re-requested the download keys, and for 
the keys that failed before, the download failed again with the same error. 

I have not had a successfull downlaod after the update.

This is the FIRST sever bug in freenet after my use of it for quite a while 
now. Although beeing beta it worked so far all the time. Functionality is 
fundamentally impacted.

In case you need more info, reply. 


  
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Version 1179?

[Peter J.]

On Monday 17 November 2008 20:55:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
> like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
> I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.
>

Yes had that also with 1178 but with 1179 these errors are gone.


___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Version 1179?

[bbackde]

Another thing: anyone also noticed that starting with 1178 freesites
like the Frost freesite or Toads blog are not longer retrievable?
I get a temporary files error ... maybe this is already fixed with 1179.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Volodya wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice
>>> about this version via mailing list,
>>> and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update.
>>> Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my previous
>>> mail that was completely ignored ^^
>>>
>>
>> Same here.
>
> Sorry, just tried ./update.sh again, and it worked.
>
> --
> http://freedom.libsyn.com/   Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
> http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal
> http://www.freedomporn.org/  Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut
>
>  "None of us are free until all of us are free."~ Mihail Bakunin
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



-- 
__
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Version 1179?

[bbackde]

Ok, thanks for your answer... update.CMD now downloaded 1178 (said it
was a new version, but I had 1178 before)
and since then update.CMD thinks I'm current enough. Still no online
update offering.

I keep waiting, maybe it works when 1180 is there...

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46, Volodya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Volodya wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice
>>> about this version via mailing list,
>>> and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update.
>>> Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my previous
>>> mail that was completely ignored ^^
>>>
>>
>> Same here.
>
> Sorry, just tried ./update.sh again, and it worked.
>
> --
> http://freedom.libsyn.com/   Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
> http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal
> http://www.freedomporn.org/  Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut
>
>  "None of us are free until all of us are free."~ Mihail Bakunin
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



-- 
__
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Peter J.]

On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> > you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> > that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be
> > told if it happens after Sunday.
>
> 
>
> Ok Matthew,
>
> Seems to be still there even with version 1179.
>
> 11 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
> after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report
> it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of
> the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include
> this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
> 70.72.215.120:40858
> 212.202.31.3:43592
> 217.196.213.98:24330
> 88.175.66.28:52590
> 87.179.226.176:50173
> 217.153.12.122:50554
> 212.75.37.89:53150
> 85.229.124.96:13598
> 96.250.239.134:64676
> 86.54.216.133:53061
> 79.202.89.5:39002
>
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Also, node uptime is 3 hours now.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Peter J.]

On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be
> told if it happens after Sunday.
>



Ok Matthew, 

Seems to be still there even with version 1179.

11 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even 
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report 
it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of 
the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include 
this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
70.72.215.120:40858
212.202.31.3:43592
217.196.213.98:24330
88.175.66.28:52590
87.179.226.176:50173
217.153.12.122:50554
212.75.37.89:53150
85.229.124.96:13598
96.250.239.134:64676
86.54.216.133:53061
79.202.89.5:39002

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] (no subject)

[Markus Hahn]

Dear Supporters,

I am a total newbie in freenet. Every time I start freenet I get the alert that 
my node lies behind a NAT-device or a Firewall and that I should forward my 
port-Number 11833. After some discovery-attempts in the administration tool of 
my router I found out that there is actually a firewall running. 
I am able to reach and open some of the sites I want to, but frequently I get 
the message that a site seems to be unreachable, sometimes concerning a site 
that opens some minutes later.
I am totally new in this subject and all my real-world-friends are no-techies 
and no-nerds, so I still have no "firends" in the sense of trustworthy nodes to 
connect with or in the sense of darknet-members. Might this be the reason why 
some sites are closed for me?
Should I try to manipulate the router in order to "forward" or should I turn 
off the firewall?
Or is freenet running properly and the seemingly closed doors seem so due to 
the restrictions a newbie in darknet with a fresh node has to come around with?


Thank you a lot for the support


  ___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Bug Report

[Ted Hexter]

2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ 
or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what
version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not
want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
* 24.213.86.235:29470
* 217.236.111.120:25601___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Probably a bug: please report: 2 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets.

[d...@darkn3t.net]

2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report
it to us at the bug tracker at
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/or
at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of
the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include
this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:

   - 85.25.130.157:9134
   - 81.209.35.6:10232


 Version du noeud

   - Freenet 0.7 version #1178 r23592M
   - Freenet-ext version #24 r23199

  Informations sur la JVM

   - Mémoire utilisée par Java : 29.4 MiB
   - Mémoire allouée par Java : 59.6 MiB
   - Mémoire maximum pour Java : 254 MiB
   - Processus en cours : 223/500
   - Processeurs disponibles : 1
   - Version de Java : 1.6.0_07
   - Distributeur de la JVM : Sun Microsystems Inc.
   - Version de la JVM : 10.0-b23
   - Nom de l'OS : Linux
   - Version de l'OS : 2.6.24.5-grsec--grs-ipv6-32
   - Architecture de l'OS : i386


 Load limiting

   - Global window: 20.192453353961174
   - Real global window: 1.3461635569307449
   - CHK Request RTT=6,763s delay=0,334s bw=98107B/sec
   - SSK Request RTT=46,709s delay=2,313s bw=442B/sec
   - CHK Insert RTT=24,976s delay=1,236s bw=26511B/sec
   - SSK Insert RTT=20,472s delay=1,013s bw=1010B/sec
   - CHK window: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w:
   2.5080165060084187, d:0.64041173=47719/74513, SSK window:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: 0.7387861074483295,
   d:0.6570007=52156/79385
   - Request window: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w:
   0.9491558356793726, d:0.8450394=4608/5453, Insert window:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: 2.9888353678397963,
   d:0.27093595=55/203
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] bug

[dalej8]

Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not
acknowledging packets.
1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
Please report it to us at the bug tracker at
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/

or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what
version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not
want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:

* 83.250.207.180:30547

Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not
acknowledging packets.
1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code.
Please report it to us at the bug tracker at
https://bugs.freenetproject.org/

or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what
version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not
want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:

* 75.172.65.161:55979

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] bugs

[Dupuy Claude]

3 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even 
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it 
to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node you are 
running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your bug 
report if they are darknet peers) are:
  a.. 78.43.183.216:64821
  b.. 12.202.88.205:10223
  c.. 98.203.234.35:37281

Freenet 0.7 version #1178 r23592M
Freenet-ext version #24 r23199___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

[Volodya]

Volodya wrote:
> bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
>> Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice
>> about this version via mailing list,
>> and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update.
>> Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my previous
>> mail that was completely ignored ^^
>>
> 
> Same here.

Sorry, just tried ./update.sh again, and it worked.

-- 
http://freedom.libsyn.com/   Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal
http://www.freedomporn.org/  Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut

  "None of us are free until all of us are free."~ Mihail Bakunin

[freenet-support] Version 1179?

[Volodya]

bbackde at googlemail.com wrote:
> Many of my peers seem to run 1179 since this morning. I got no notice
> about this version via mailing list,
> and my node (1178) doesn't offer me this new version for update.
> Is something broken? update.cmd also doesn't work, see my previous
> mail that was completely ignored ^^
> 

Same here.


-- 
http://freedom.libsyn.com/   Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal
http://www.freedomporn.org/  Freedom Porn, anarchist and activist smut

  "None of us are free until all of us are free."~ Mihail Bakunin