Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5066 - stable branch network reset, merged rate limiting

2004-02-08 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 02:31:14 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Freenet stable build 5066 is now available. The snapshots have been
This is what 5066 did to my node vs 5065 (uptime 1 hour) :)

Couldn't connect to the network. Are you sure you have configured Freenet  
correctly? Also make sure that you are connected to the internet.

Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)   118 (118/0/512) 
Connections blocked (Transmitting/Receiving)0 (0/0) 
Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving)   0 (0/0) 
Data waiting to be transfered   None
Total amount of data transferred9 MiB
No one in my routing table is usig 5066 .. are they incompatible versions?

(If I'm the only one experiencing this problem I'll start checking things  
here, but all I did was to update Freenet)

regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Stable build 5066 - stable branch network reset, merged rate limiting

2004-02-07 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5066 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users should upgrade. You will also need to reseed your node: get
a new seednodes.ref from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref . This build is not
compatible with older stable builds.

We have merged several weeks' work in this build. Specifically, rate
limiting, which is a new way of balancing load on Freenet, and a bug fix
in the datastore, which could have been quite nasty (causing the LRU
list in the datastore to be wrong, and the node to get jammed for a
while every time a file was committed). Subjectively, the unstable
network seems to work fairly well with this code, although there are a
few concerning stats, so we decided it needs wider testing. Hopefully
the stable branch will work significantly better as a result of the new
code. Of course it will initially as it is small, the test comes when it
gets bigger. Please upgrade and reseed.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]