Re: [pfSense Support] NIC ??
Unless you see it being done here: http://pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/builder_scripts/conf/pfSense.6.diff?r1=1.9;r2=1.10 ... then I have no clue. On 1/22/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just got the current installed > 1.0-PREBETA2-BUG-VALIDATION-VERSION3 > > I noticed that the support for the Intel Dual Port 10/100 card that I've > been using to test with for many versions isn't firing up. I have two other > Intel NICs in the PC and they are working fine. > > These are all OLD Compaq NICs, but in the past they have all been seen by > the system as i82555 cards. I don't see why pfS is seeing the single port > NICs and not the dual port one it has always been recognized by pfS in > the past ... and NO there have been NO system changes since the BETA1 > install ... just the upgrade to BVV3. > > At a loss ... > -- > David L. Strout > Engineering Systems Plus, LLC > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] NIC ??
My bad . some one changed slots busmastering slot.Many appologies--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC- Original Message -Subject: [pfSense Support] NIC ??From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: support@pfsense.comDate: 01-22-2006 9:15 pm I just got the current installed1.0-PREBETA2-BUG-VALIDATION-VERSION3I noticed that the support for the Intel Dual Port 10/100 card that I've been using to test with for many versions isn't firing up. I have two other Intel NICs in the PC and they are working fine.These are all OLD Compaq NICs, but in the past they have all been seen by the system as i82555 cards. I don't see why pfS is seeing the single port NICs and not the dual port one it has always been recognized by pfS in the past ... and NO there have been NO system changes since the BETA1 install ... just the upgrade to BVV3.At a loss ...--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC
[pfSense Support] NIC ??
I just got the current installed1.0-PREBETA2-BUG-VALIDATION-VERSION3I noticed that the support for the Intel Dual Port 10/100 card that I've been using to test with for many versions isn't firing up. I have two other Intel NICs in the PC and they are working fine.These are all OLD Compaq NICs, but in the past they have all been seen by the system as i82555 cards. I don't see why pfS is seeing the single port NICs and not the dual port one it has always been recognized by pfS in the past ... and NO there have been NO system changes since the BETA1 install ... just the upgrade to BVV3.At a loss ...--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC
Re: [pfSense Support] /var fills up
This appears to be a bug. Congrats! I'll take a look. Thanks for the heads up. On 1/22/06, Anders D. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > Pfsense 1.0 Beta embedded(Soekris). > > I have setup a syslogd server to receive messages from my firewall > and disabled logging to local disk but still /var fills up. > I can tell that the file /var/log/pflog is the one being filled... > > Is this normal behavior or a bug which I shuld be concerned of? > > Thank you very much. > > Regards, > Anders > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] more VoIP issues
At 09:24 AM 1/22/2006, you wrote: On 1/22/06, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I wonder how many others are bit by this. Also, can you ellaborate > >on you're changes from the wizard for anyone else to try? IE: > >changing rules for voips, etc. > > All I did was take my real up&downstream and subtract 20% (more like > 25% to be safe...) Probably a lot of folks... Hows the optional interfaces and the ability to assign use an IP address in the VOIP screen working out (besides for the obvious oops that I made 6 months ago)? The IP feature is nice. I didn't use the OPT interface since I don't really care about the bittorrent crap except insofar as it hoses the VOIP :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: [pfSense Support] Problems with upgrading BETA version
Upgrade for embedded builds are not working yet. The available mini updates only upgrade webgui files. atm you still have to reflash. Holger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Anders D. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2006 15:09 > An: support@pfsense.com > Betreff: [pfSense Support] Problems with upgrading BETA version > > > Hi list, > > Pfsense 1.0 Beta built on Mon Dec 26 03:23:52 UTC 2005 embedded > (Soekris). > > When I try to upgrade the firewall it seems that pfsense > receives the > file but fails to rewrite flash and reboot. > Is this a problem in the version I'm runnning so I need to reflash? > > One more thing: > The 'access NAT'ed devices via public IP' fix - in what release is > this incorporated? > > Thank you! > > Regards, > Anders > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] more VoIP issues
On 1/22/06, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I wonder how many others are bit by this. Also, can you ellaborate > >on you're changes from the wizard for anyone else to try? IE: > >changing rules for voips, etc. > > All I did was take my real up&downstream and subtract 20% (more like > 25% to be safe...) Probably a lot of folks... Hows the optional interfaces and the ability to assign use an IP address in the VOIP screen working out (besides for the obvious oops that I made 6 months ago)? --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Problems with upgrading BETA version
Hi list, Pfsense 1.0 Beta built on Mon Dec 26 03:23:52 UTC 2005 embedded (Soekris). When I try to upgrade the firewall it seems that pfsense receives the file but fails to rewrite flash and reboot. Is this a problem in the version I'm runnning so I need to reflash? One more thing: The 'access NAT'ed devices via public IP' fix - in what release is this incorporated? Thank you! Regards, Anders - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] more VoIP issues
At 01:08 AM 1/22/2006, you wrote: On 1/22/06, Dan Swartzendruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well, that did it for me, for sure! it's been so bad lately,i had to > change my asterisk config to not use VOIP at all, since my kids were > saying that no-one they called could understand what they were > saying! i changed my outbound from 384kb to 300kb and reran > testmyvoip.net tests and it went from horrible to 4.2 (just about perfect...) Thats really a nice jump! I wonder how many others are bit by this. Also, can you ellaborate on you're changes from the wizard for anyone else to try? IE: changing rules for voips, etc. All I did was take my real up&downstream and subtract 20% (more like 25% to be safe...) Probably a lot of folks... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] /var fills up
Hi list, Pfsense 1.0 Beta embedded(Soekris). I have setup a syslogd server to receive messages from my firewall and disabled logging to local disk but still /var fills up. I can tell that the file /var/log/pflog is the one being filled... Is this normal behavior or a bug which I shuld be concerned of? Thank you very much. Regards, Anders - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Freebsd version
Thank you ! That solved it ! From: Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: support@pfsense.com To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Freebsd version Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:11:11 -0500 On Jan 19, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Jörgen Haraldsson wrote: I don't know if it's just me that have missed something but why is the Freebsd version in Pfsense only Freebsd 6.0 - Beta 5. I have upgraded to Pfsense Beta 1 version but still Freebsd is only Beta 5. Answered this one yesterday. Eliminate all traces of the old kernel. The new kernel boots from a compressed image, but the old one is found first. rm `find . \! -newer kernel.gz | grep -v kernel.gz` in /boot/kernel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chatt: Träffa nya nätkompisar på Habbo Hotel http://habbohotel.msn.se/habbo/sv/channelizer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
