[pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure

2006-11-07 Thread Tortise



Hi 

I am trying to run pfSense from a CF card, have written images 
to various cards. Monowall boots fine and runs from 16M CF card so it 
would seem the IDE CF reader is ok. This is on a Pentium 166 
system.

With pfSense, trying a number of different CF cards 128M and 
256M:

The BTX loader seems to run OK. Then I get:

FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1([EMAIL PROTECTED], 
Sunday Oct 29 01:30:00 UTC 2006)Loading 
/boot/defaults/loader.conf/

The "/" does a couple of circles then stops...

I have tried to get the serial output by connecting 
HyperTerminal to the serial port. It seems it might be too early to get a 
serial output - as I do not get anything?

Any guidance would be appreciated.

David Hingston


Re: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure

2006-11-07 Thread saidy



Hi running pfsense using 1GB CF. No problem so 
far.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Tortise 
  To: support@pfsense.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:37 
  PM
  Subject: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot 
  failure
  
  Hi 
  
  I am trying to run pfSense from a CF card, have written 
  images to various cards. Monowall boots fine and runs from 16M CF card 
  so it would seem the IDE CF reader is ok. This is on a Pentium 166 
  system.
  
  With pfSense, trying a number of different CF cards 128M and 
  256M:
  
  The BTX loader seems to run OK. Then I 
  get:
  
  FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1([EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  Sunday Oct 29 01:30:00 UTC 2006)Loading 
  /boot/defaults/loader.conf/
  
  The "/" does a couple of circles then stops...
  
  I have tried to get the serial output by connecting 
  HyperTerminal to the serial port. It seems it might be too early to get 
  a serial output - as I do not get anything?
  
  Any guidance would be appreciated.
  
  David Hingston


RE: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure

2006-11-07 Thread Holger Bauer
The embedded images have output at com1. There won't be video output
once it started. This is due to some embedded devices only having serial
console and no video. Access your machine at com1, 9600baud using a
terminalprogram.
 
Holger




From: Tortise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 8:37 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure


Hi 
 
I am trying to run pfSense from a CF card, have written images
to various cards.  Monowall boots fine and runs from 16M CF card so it
would seem the IDE CF reader is ok.  This is on a Pentium 166 system.
 
With pfSense, trying a number of different CF cards 128M and
256M:
 
The BTX loader seems to run OK.  Then I get:
 
FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1
([EMAIL PROTECTED], Sunday Oct 29 01:30:00 UTC 2006)
Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
/
 
The / does a couple of circles then stops...
 
I have tried to get the serial output by connecting
HyperTerminal to the serial port.  It seems it might be too early to get
a serial output - as I do not get anything?
 
Any guidance would be appreciated.
 
David Hingston



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure

2006-11-07 Thread Imre Ispánovits
Do you get any serial output on Hyperterminal on your m0n0wall config?
I would suspect on the serial consol output -- Hyperterminal relation.
The boot loader after a few spins switches over to serial consol output. It
seems to me this happens to you. Sorry I don't know hyperterminal so I can't
help with that to you. 

On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 20:37:06 +1300
Tortise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi 
 
 I am trying to run pfSense from a CF card, have written images to various 
 cards.  Monowall boots fine and runs from 16M CF card so it would seem the 
 IDE CF reader is ok.  This is on a Pentium 166 system.
 
 With pfSense, trying a number of different CF cards 128M and 256M:
 
 The BTX loader seems to run OK.  Then I get:
 
 FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED], Sunday Oct 29 01:30:00 UTC 2006)
 Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
 /
 
 The / does a couple of circles then stops...
 
 I have tried to get the serial output by connecting HyperTerminal to the 
 serial port.  It seems it might be too early to get a serial output - as I do 
 not get anything?
 
 Any guidance would be appreciated.
 
 David Hingston


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [pfSense Support] Minimium Hardware 96 MRAM?

2006-11-07 Thread Tommaso Di Donato
On 11/6/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/5/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I store my swapfile on a ram drive!I certainly hope that's a joke, cause it's the daftest thing I've ever
heard otherwise!!! :)--BillMmmh, sorry for the stupid question... but why it is so nasty? I think it depends on what you do with your swap file. I.E. I used a ramdisk for creatind squid temporary dirs, and it works faster Please, let me understand what I should expect from the future :-)
Thank you sooo muchTom


Re: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure

2006-11-07 Thread Tortise
Perhaps I have a null modem connection problem as 5 beeps are eventually heard, 
suggesting it may be running up properly, however I 
can't ping any of the (3) NIC's at 192.168.1.1 as I presume I should be able to 
do on at least one?  (Using 192.168.1.2 255 255 255 
0)

I get no output to HyperTerminal or to Teraterm, tried various cables, 
definitely using COM1 form the motherboard

H


- Original Message - 
From: Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:48 PM
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure


The embedded images have output at com1. There won't be video output
once it started. This is due to some embedded devices only having serial
console and no video. Access your machine at com1, 9600baud using a
terminalprogram.

Holger




From: Tortise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 8:37 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure


Hi

I am trying to run pfSense from a CF card, have written images
to various cards.  Monowall boots fine and runs from 16M CF card so it
would seem the IDE CF reader is ok.  This is on a Pentium 166 system.

With pfSense, trying a number of different CF cards 128M and
256M:

The BTX loader seems to run OK.  Then I get:

FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1
([EMAIL PROTECTED], Sunday Oct 29 01:30:00 UTC 2006)
Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
/

The / does a couple of circles then stops...

I have tried to get the serial output by connecting
HyperTerminal to the serial port.  It seems it might be too early to get
a serial output - as I do not get anything?

Any guidance would be appreciated.

David Hingston



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure

2006-11-07 Thread Holger Bauer
Maybe your nullmodemcable is not ok. You need to assign NICs first from
the console before you can use any of the interfaces (unless you are
using sis nics which are preconfigured for the embedded image). Check
your cable at another box to see if it actually is working.

Holger

 -Original Message-
 From: Tortise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:19 AM
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure
 
 Perhaps I have a null modem connection problem as 5 beeps are 
 eventually heard, suggesting it may be running up properly, 
 however I can't ping any of the (3) NIC's at 192.168.1.1 as I 
 presume I should be able to do on at least one?  (Using 
 192.168.1.2 255 255 255
 0)
 
 I get no output to HyperTerminal or to Teraterm, tried 
 various cables, definitely using COM1 form the motherboard
 
 H
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:48 PM
 Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure
 
 
 The embedded images have output at com1. There won't be video output
 once it started. This is due to some embedded devices only 
 having serial
 console and no video. Access your machine at com1, 9600baud using a
 terminalprogram.
 
 Holger
 
 
 
 
 From: Tortise [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 8:37 AM
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Subject: [pfSense Support] CF 1.0.1 boot failure
 
 
 Hi
 
 I am trying to run pfSense from a CF card, have written images
 to various cards.  Monowall boots fine and runs from 16M CF card so it
 would seem the IDE CF reader is ok.  This is on a Pentium 166 system.
 
 With pfSense, trying a number of different CF cards 128M and
 256M:
 
 The BTX loader seems to run OK.  Then I get:
 
 FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED], Sunday Oct 29 01:30:00 UTC 2006)
 Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf
 /
 
 The / does a couple of circles then stops...
 
 I have tried to get the serial output by connecting
 HyperTerminal to the serial port.  It seems it might be too 
 early to get
 a serial output - as I do not get anything?
 
 Any guidance would be appreciated.
 
 David Hingston
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Minimium Hardware 96 MRAM?

2006-11-07 Thread Bill Marquette

On 11/7/06, Tommaso Di Donato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




On 11/6/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 11/5/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I store my swapfile on a ram drive!

 I certainly hope that's a joke, cause it's the daftest thing I've ever
 heard otherwise!!! :)

 --Bill


Mmmh, sorry for the stupid question... but why it is so nasty? I think it
depends on what you do with your swap file. I.E. I used a ramdisk for
creatind squid temporary dirs, and it works faster Please, let me
understand what I should expect from the future :-)
Thank you sooo much
Tom


Let's see.  The reason you are swapping is because you ran out of ram.
#1 most likely reason you ran out of ram...you made a large ramdisk
so you could put swap on it!  It makes more sense to ADD ram to a box
than to figure out a way to make swap faster (especially when the end
result costs you RAM which you needed to eliminate the swap issue!)
Squid has nothing to do with the OS swap file btw - unrelated
question.  Sure, using a ramdisk for the squid cache will be
faster...until you reboot and lose all the cache (and have to recreate
the cache dir), then your browsing is slow again until the cache is
built back up.  I could see putting a squid cache (or swap) on Craigs
device though :)

--Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Minimium Hardware 96 MRAM?

2006-11-07 Thread Rob Terhaar
On 11/7/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/06, Tommaso Di Donato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/6/06, Bill Marquette 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  On 11/5/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   I store my swapfile on a ram drive!   I certainly hope that's a joke, cause it's the daftest thing I've ever
  heard otherwise!!! :)   --Bill Mmmh, sorry for the stupid question... but why it is so nasty? I think it depends on what you do with your swap file. 
I.E. I used a ramdisk for creatind squid temporary dirs, and it works faster Please, let me understand what I should expect from the future :-) Thank you sooo much TomLet's see.The reason you are swapping is because you ran out of ram.
 #1 most likely reason you ran out of ram...you made a large ramdiskso you could put swap on it!It makes more sense to ADD ram to a boxthan to figure out a way to make swap faster (especially when the end
result costs you RAM which you needed to eliminate the swap issue!)Squid has nothing to do with the OS swap file btw - unrelatedquestion.Sure, using a ramdisk for the squid cache will befaster...until you reboot and lose all the cache (and have to recreate
the cache dir), then your browsing is slow again until the cache isbuilt back up.I could see putting a squid cache (or swap) on Craigsdevice though :)--BillI know not everyone in the world understands jerky american sarcasm, so just to clear things up... i was joking. :D
I don't think freebsd will even let you use a ramfs drive to store swap.


Re: [pfSense Support] Minimium Hardware 96 MRAM?

2006-11-07 Thread Scott Ullrich

LOL

On 11/7/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



On 11/7/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 11/7/06, Tommaso Di Donato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  On 11/6/06, Bill Marquette  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On 11/5/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I store my swapfile on a ram drive!
  
   I certainly hope that's a joke, cause it's the daftest thing I've ever
   heard otherwise!!! :)
  
   --Bill
 
 
  Mmmh, sorry for the stupid question... but why it is so nasty? I think
it
  depends on what you do with your swap file. I.E. I used a ramdisk for
  creatind squid temporary dirs, and it works faster Please, let me
  understand what I should expect from the future :-)
  Thank you sooo much
  Tom

 Let's see.  The reason you are swapping is because you ran out of ram.
 #1 most likely reason you ran out of ram...you made a large ramdisk
 so you could put swap on it!  It makes more sense to ADD ram to a box
 than to figure out a way to make swap faster (especially when the end
 result costs you RAM which you needed to eliminate the swap issue!)
 Squid has nothing to do with the OS swap file btw - unrelated
 question.  Sure, using a ramdisk for the squid cache will be
 faster...until you reboot and lose all the cache (and have to recreate
 the cache dir), then your browsing is slow again until the cache is
 built back up.  I could see putting a squid cache (or swap) on Craigs
 device though :)

 --Bill



I know not everyone in the world understands jerky american sarcasm, so just
to clear things up... i was joking. :D

I don't think freebsd will even let you use a ramfs drive to store swap.





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] Minimium Hardware 96 MRAM?

2006-11-07 Thread Bill Marquette

On 11/7/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I know not everyone in the world understands jerky american sarcasm, so just
to clear things up... i was joking. :D

I don't think freebsd will even let you use a ramfs drive to store swap.


See now you've made a challenge ;-P  I believe it will - not as a swap
partition though.

I don't feel like making a ramdisk, but the principle is the same and
it doesn't matter where the dd takes place (or who owns the swapfile)
;)

dd if=/dev/zero of=swapfile bs=1024 count=1024
sudo mdconfig -a -t vnode -f swapfile
sudo swapctl -a /dev/md1


swapctl -l

Device:   1024-blocks Used:
/dev/da0b   1021256 33960
/dev/md1   1024 0

ls -la swapfile

-rw-r--r--  1 billm  billm  1048576 Nov  7 14:21 swapfile

--Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] How do I relate the logged rule numbers to the rules show in the interface?

2006-11-07 Thread Benson, Chuck
How do I relate the logged rule numbers to the rules show in the interface?


I tried to look in archives and on forum, but did not find a match.

Chuck Benson


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


[pfSense Support] Is there a way to see where the ftp-helper has connected to?

2006-11-07 Thread Benson, Chuck
Is there a way to see where the ftp-helper has connected to? I see the log
entry for the connection to the helper, but no indication of traffic from
there to wherever it goes, nor does there appear to be any indication of
where it was originally directed. Am I missing something?

Chuck Benson



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [pfSense Support] How do I relate the logged rule numbers to the rules show in the interface?

2006-11-07 Thread Scott Ullrich

On 11/7/06, Benson, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

How do I relate the logged rule numbers to the rules show in the interface?


I tried to look in archives and on forum, but did not find a match.



Click on the box to the left of the rule in the firewall log.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] How do I relate the logged rule numbers to the rules show in the interface?

2006-11-07 Thread Benson, Chuck
I am looking at an external log.

Chuck Benson

-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:10 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] How do I relate the logged rule numbers to
the rules show in the interface?

On 11/7/06, Benson, Chuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 How do I relate the logged rule numbers to the rules show in the
interface?


 I tried to look in archives and on forum, but did not find a match.


Click on the box to the left of the rule in the firewall log.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature