Re: [pfSense Support] Auto-update Check fails

2010-12-23 Thread Jim Pingle
On 12/23/2010 10:17 AM, Oliver Hansen wrote:
> I needed to upgrade a few routers that were 1.2.2 to 1.2.3 this week and
> I found the auto-update check failed with the following message:
> 
> "Could not contact pfSense update server
> http://updates.pfSense.com/_updaters.";
> 
> 
> Am I the only one seeing this? Is there an issue with the update server?
> I also tried from a 1.2.3 box just to see if maybe 1.2.2 was looking at
> the wrong URL but I get the same message.

This should be working again now. If it doesn't, let me know. There was
an issue with the update server, but it should be fixed now.

Jim

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 : IPv6?

2010-12-23 Thread Sean Cavanaugh

?Update::

I have IPv6 successfully running up to the pfsense box and I can ping out as 
far as the Server IPv6 address but cannot get anything beyond that.


"Destination Net Unreachable"

I will dig deeper into it this afternoon . 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Auto-update Check fails

2010-12-23 Thread stephen at stephenjc
mine does that also.

Thanks,
Stephen C
-All of my email addresses go to the same place
-Save Paper, think before you print



On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Oliver Hansen wrote:

> I needed to upgrade a few routers that were 1.2.2 to 1.2.3 this week and I
> found the auto-update check failed with the following message:
>
> "Could not contact pfSense update server
> http://updates.pfSense.com/_updaters.";
>
>
> Am I the only one seeing this? Is there an issue with the update server? I
> also tried from a 1.2.3 box just to see if maybe 1.2.2 was looking at the
> wrong URL but I get the same message.
>
> --
> Oliver Hansen
>


[pfSense Support] Auto-update Check fails

2010-12-23 Thread Oliver Hansen
I needed to upgrade a few routers that were 1.2.2 to 1.2.3 this week and I
found the auto-update check failed with the following message:

"Could not contact pfSense update server
http://updates.pfSense.com/_updaters.";


Am I the only one seeing this? Is there an issue with the update server? I
also tried from a 1.2.3 box just to see if maybe 1.2.2 was looking at the
wrong URL but I get the same message.

--
Oliver Hansen


Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 : IPv6?

2010-12-23 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
?-Original Message- 
From: Seth Mos

Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:13 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 : IPv6?

Hi Sean,

Op 23-12-2010 14:01, Sean Cavanaugh schreef:

?>-Original Message-

From: Sean Cavanaugh Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:39 PM To:
support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 :
IPv6?



Verified with wireshark that the DHCPv6 requests are going out but I am
not seeing any response from pfsense for them. DHCP Log shows (blanked
out part of address):

Dec 23 07:18:36 dhcpd: Listening on Socket/14/em1/2001:470:7:XXXx::/64
Dec 23 07:18:36 dhcpd: Sending on Socket/14/em1/2001:470:7:::/64


Thanks for helping out with this, I've had a heck of a time
troubleshooting this in my test setup and had been unable to verify it's
operation.

I do have rtadvd configured to tell the hosts to use "managed" e.g. dhcp
for ipv6 configuration, but it always falls back to autoconfig.


and no other DHCPv6 entries


I think I need to add other firewall rules for traffic to leave the
pfsense box, specifically for dhcp v6.

I am not sure what rules I exactly need for that. What I have not tried
yet is disabling pf using "pf -d". Maybe that dhcp succeeds without pf
in between.

I think that dhcp v6 uses port 567 but I'm unsure.

Your help in troubleshooting is greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Seth

--
--

I did realize that by default there is a LAN rule to allow all IPv4 out.
I created an equivalent IPv6 rule and BAM I got DHCP to work. now I am just 
verifying the rest of the setup.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 : IPv6?

2010-12-23 Thread Seth Mos

Hi Sean,

Op 23-12-2010 14:01, Sean Cavanaugh schreef:

?>-Original Message-

From: Sean Cavanaugh Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:39 PM To:
support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 :
IPv6?



Verified with wireshark that the DHCPv6 requests are going out but I am
not seeing any response from pfsense for them. DHCP Log shows (blanked
out part of address):

Dec 23 07:18:36 dhcpd: Listening on Socket/14/em1/2001:470:7:XXXx::/64
Dec 23 07:18:36 dhcpd: Sending on Socket/14/em1/2001:470:7:::/64


Thanks for helping out with this, I've had a heck of a time 
troubleshooting this in my test setup and had been unable to verify it's 
operation.


I do have rtadvd configured to tell the hosts to use "managed" e.g. dhcp 
for ipv6 configuration, but it always falls back to autoconfig.



and no other DHCPv6 entries


I think I need to add other firewall rules for traffic to leave the 
pfsense box, specifically for dhcp v6.


I am not sure what rules I exactly need for that. What I have not tried 
yet is disabling pf using "pf -d". Maybe that dhcp succeeds without pf 
in between.


I think that dhcp v6 uses port 567 but I'm unsure.

Your help in troubleshooting is greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Seth

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 : IPv6?

2010-12-23 Thread Sean Cavanaugh
?>-Original Message- 
From: Sean Cavanaugh Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:39 PM To: 
support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 2.0 BETA4 : 
IPv6?
?that helped out a lot. now I at the point of where it is fully set up but 
I cannot seem to get any response from the DHCPv6 server. I am installing 
wireshark on another comp to make sure my desktop is even sending out the 
requests.


Verified with wireshark that the DHCPv6 requests are going out but I am not 
seeing any response from pfsense for them. DHCP Log shows (blanked out part 
of address):


Dec 23 07:18:36 dhcpd: Listening on Socket/14/em1/2001:470:7:XXXx::/64
Dec 23 07:18:36 dhcpd: Sending on Socket/14/em1/2001:470:7:::/64

and no other DHCPv6 entries

em1 is my LAN connection 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] PCI Ethernet switch?

2010-12-23 Thread Bob Gustafson
Soekris has a 4 port 100 mb PCI card that I have working in a Linux box 
(but not a Net 5501). It was around $100 a couple of years ago. This 
might fill your need.


On 12/22/2010 2:40 PM, Karl Fife wrote:

Does anyone have a recommended PCI-attached Ethernet switch that would
in essence put 4 or 5 bridged interfaces right on the router itself (In
our case, a Soekris Net5501)? Something kind of like what's depicted here:
http://uk.level1.com/product_d.php?id=290
...except one that you have had success with in pfSense.
Recommendations?

Thanks
-Karl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org