Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-31 Thread Olivier Nicole
sai wrote:
 I just realised that I've been trusting random people I dont know to
 develop my production firewalls

You are right, don't trust them. This is open source, go and read the
source, there is never enough people to help proof reading :)

Olivier

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-31 Thread Paul Mansfield
sai wrote:
 I just realised that I've been trusting random people I dont know to
 develop my production firewalls


you're trusting random people you don't know to run the internet on
which your job depends.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-29 Thread sai
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Vick Khera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello
 Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?

 If you're asking random people you don't know if it is secure enough, then
 yes, it is secure enough for you.  If you really want to know if it is
 secure, you need to do your own testing.

:-)

I just realised that I've been trusting random people I dont know to
develop my production firewalls

sai

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-28 Thread JJB

Chris Buechler wrote:

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Hello
Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?




I think the others who replied may have misunderstood your intent, it
appears you aren't a native English speaker, and may have intended to
ask if it's safe, or a good idea to use 1.2.1 in production. All the
known issues should be resolved as of this weekend, and it has fewer
known bugs than 1.2. At this point, I personally wouldn't deploy
anything but 1.2.1. There are possible issues you may run into if the
known issues aren't resolved, but it's quite safe at this point.

If I'm wrong and your intent truly was to ask whether it's secure,
it's just as secure as 1.2, actually a little more so with some minor
things touched up.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

Hi Chris,

A couple of questions - I'm wondering if we should upgrade:

1. Were all the known 1.2.1 bugs resolved last weekend as you hoped in 
the above message?
2. Would you consider 1.2.1 ready for production as the primary firewall 
for a corporate LAN to protect important intellectual property?


- Joel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-28 Thread Chris Buechler
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:18 PM, JJB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 1. Were all the known 1.2.1 bugs resolved last weekend as you hoped in the
 above message?

As far as we know, yes.  Still one thing with grub to find a solution
for, that's the last remaining 1.2.1 item.


 2. Would you consider 1.2.1 ready for production as the primary firewall for
 a corporate LAN to protect important intellectual property?


Absolutely.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-24 Thread Veiko Kukk

Mikel Jimenez wrote:

Hello
Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?



Is the bge driver bug (blocking iLo shared NIC) solved?



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-21 Thread Curtis LaMasters
Thank you for that, Chris, I was a little hasty with my reply so I
apologize.  Not enough caffeine for 8:45 AM :)

Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com


On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Chris Buechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello
  Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?
 

 I think the others who replied may have misunderstood your intent, it
 appears you aren't a native English speaker, and may have intended to
 ask if it's safe, or a good idea to use 1.2.1 in production. All the
 known issues should be resolved as of this weekend, and it has fewer
 known bugs than 1.2. At this point, I personally wouldn't deploy
 anything but 1.2.1. There are possible issues you may run into if the
 known issues aren't resolved, but it's quite safe at this point.

 If I'm wrong and your intent truly was to ask whether it's secure,
 it's just as secure as 1.2, actually a little more so with some minor
 things touched up.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-21 Thread Chris Buechler
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello
 Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?


I think the others who replied may have misunderstood your intent, it
appears you aren't a native English speaker, and may have intended to
ask if it's safe, or a good idea to use 1.2.1 in production. All the
known issues should be resolved as of this weekend, and it has fewer
known bugs than 1.2. At this point, I personally wouldn't deploy
anything but 1.2.1. There are possible issues you may run into if the
known issues aren't resolved, but it's quite safe at this point.

If I'm wrong and your intent truly was to ask whether it's secure,
it's just as secure as 1.2, actually a little more so with some minor
things touched up.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-20 Thread Curtis LaMasters
It would depend on what your definition of secure is.  For 99.8% of the
world, yes.  For the other .2% who are wackjobs, maybe.  Just remember, like
all firewalls, it's only as secure as the rules YOU enter allow...

Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com


On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello
 Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?

 Thanks
 --
 Mikel Jimenez
 Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - http://www.irontec.com
 +34 94.404.81.82

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-20 Thread Vick Khera
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello
 Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?


If you're asking random people you don't know if it is secure enough, then
yes, it is secure enough for you.  If you really want to know if it is
secure, you need to do your own testing.


[pfSense Support] pfsense 1.2.1 dude

2008-10-20 Thread Mikel Jimenez

Hello
Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?

Thanks
--
Mikel Jimenez
Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - http://www.irontec.com
+34 94.404.81.82

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]