Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Sorry about that, replied to the wrong message.
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Hi - Original Message - From: Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: support@pfsense.com Sent: Fri May 16 14:23:49 2008 Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors On 5/16/08, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not sure, Scott would know. It's probably essentially the same, though > the 500K size diff indicates it's not identical. Use the newer one, I > know it works. Yeah, use the newest image. I am simply copying newer images into the directory similar to how our snapshot server does it. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
On 5/16/08, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not sure, Scott would know. It's probably essentially the same, though > the 500K size diff indicates it's not identical. Use the newer one, I > know it works. Yeah, use the newest image. I am simply copying newer images into the directory similar to how our snapshot server does it. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Sweet thanks. -W On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Wade Blackwell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Chris, >>I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one >> being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I >> pick one over the other? Thanks. > > not sure, Scott would know. It's probably essentially the same, though > the 500K size diff indicates it's not identical. Use the newer one, I > know it works. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Wade Blackwell "Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management" - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Wade Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris, >I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one > being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I > pick one over the other? Thanks. not sure, Scott would know. It's probably essentially the same, though the 500K size diff indicates it's not identical. Use the newer one, I know it works. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Following up to see what the difference in the images are, Thanks all. -W Wade Blackwell "Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management" -Original Message- From: Wade Blackwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 7:48 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors Chris, I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I pick one over the other? Thanks. Wade B On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on FreeBSD 6.3 >> instead of 6.2. A user in the forum said that he experiences much >> less problem with wireless. > > Yeah try this: > http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/p > fSense_RELENG_1_2/ > > and there is also a thread somewhere on the forum with someone who > fixed this adjusting a sysctl, I don't recall the details and don't > have time to look for it for at least a couple days. search and you > should find it. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional > commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Wade Blackwell "Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management" smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Waiting Chris's answer, I tell you I've used the latest one (see date) to do a full update on a box from 1.2rc4 to this special build. I don't know further details, but it seems to work at the moment (note that I haven't done extensive tests yet, so surprise might be behind the corner). Bye! --- Wade Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris, > I noticed there were two images in this > directory. Besides one > being a day newer than the other what is the > difference and should I > pick one over the other? Thanks. > > Wade B > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Chris Buechler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, tester > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on > >> FreeBSD 6.3 instead of 6.2. A user in the forum > said > >> that he experiences much less problem with > wireless. > > > > Yeah try this: > > > http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/ > > > > and there is also a thread somewhere on the forum > with someone who > > fixed this adjusting a sysctl, I don't recall the > details and don't > > have time to look for it for at least a couple > days. search and you > > should find it. > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Wade Blackwell > > "Integrity is often more painful and always more > profitable than > perception management" > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ Sent from Yahoo! Mail. A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Chris, I noticed there were two images in this directory. Besides one being a day newer than the other what is the difference and should I pick one over the other? Thanks. Wade B On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on >> FreeBSD 6.3 instead of 6.2. A user in the forum said >> that he experiences much less problem with wireless. > > Yeah try this: > http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/ > > and there is also a thread somewhere on the forum with someone who > fixed this adjusting a sysctl, I don't recall the details and don't > have time to look for it for at least a couple days. search and you > should find it. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Wade Blackwell "Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management" - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Thanks Guys, I will give it a shot and see how it looks. Very cool if this works, I love the wifi being integrated into PF, cleaner and better control. I will update the group after watching for at least 24 hours, unless it looks really good and I get too excited to restrain myself. -W Wade Blackwell "Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management" -Original Message- From: Chris Buechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 6:01 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on FreeBSD 6.3 instead > of 6.2. A user in the forum said that he experiences much less > problem with wireless. Yeah try this: http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense _RELENG_1_2/ and there is also a thread somewhere on the forum with someone who fixed this adjusting a sysctl, I don't recall the details and don't have time to look for it for at least a couple days. search and you should find it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:56 PM, tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on > FreeBSD 6.3 instead of 6.2. A user in the forum said > that he experiences much less problem with wireless. Yeah try this: http://cvs.pfsense.org/~sullrich/testing_images/6/FreeBSD_RELENG_6_3/pfSense_RELENG_1_2/ and there is also a thread somewhere on the forum with someone who fixed this adjusting a sysctl, I don't recall the details and don't have time to look for it for at least a couple days. search and you should find it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
Hello, there is a special build of pfSense 1.2 based on FreeBSD 6.3 instead of 6.2. A user in the forum said that he experiences much less problem with wireless. I downloaded it (see pfSense blog or the wireless section in the forum to get the link), I installed it on a box, but it is too early for me to say anything. It seems to be promising. I'll test it for at least two weeks 24/24h and I encourage you to do the same thing if you have no worry to test that build and to share your thoughts with us. Regards. --- Wade Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (heeding Gary's warning), > Now on 1.2-RELEASE the box has been up 12 minutes > and the ath0 > interface has 1456 errors. __ Sent from Yahoo! Mail. A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors
I've had the same experience. It caused me to go to an external bridge/sp(Senao). I posted something but never got a response. Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Wade Blackwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 11:32 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] RE: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors (heeding Gary's warning), Now on 1.2-RELEASE the box has been up 12 minutes and the ath0 interface has 1456 errors. Wade B Wade Blackwell "Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management" -Original Message- From: Wade Blackwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:50 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Atheros 5212 throwing tons of errors Good morning all, I have an Atheros 5212 in my PF running 1.2RC2. I am seeing anywhere from 500,000 to 1,000,000 errors on the interface per day. Anyone else see issues like this? It is wreaking havoc with basically all network connections. I have noticed that the auto select on the G channel setting does not work so well. Knowing that I used net stumbler to check out the active channels nearby and used one not currently in use by my neighbors. Still no love. I turned off baby monitors and 2.4Ghz phones and their base stations still no difference. I am not sure if it is a driver level issue, hardware or something else. If anyone has seen issues like this please let me know, thanks! Wade B -- Wade Blackwell "Integrity is often more painful and always more profitable than perception management" - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
