Re: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Steve Harman

Thanks for that Martin.

As it turns out GBit is something we need so I'd be 
interested if Scott has any comment on support of GBit 
NICs (Intel or otherwise).


Regards,

Steve
Cambridge, UK.


On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:47:34 +0200
 Fuchs, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

no problem !

I have in use Intel 2-port NICs, namely those:
http://intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro100dport_adapter.htm

but it also should work with more-port NICs based on 
Intel Chipsets

(FXP-driver)
Adapters supported by the fxp(4) driver include:

   *  Intel EtherExpress PRO/10
   *  Intel InBusiness 10/100
   *  Intel PRO/100B / EtherExpressPRO/100 B PCI 
Adapter

   *  Intel PRO/100+ Management Adapter
   *  Intel PRO/100 VE Desktop Adapter
   *  Intel PRO/100 M Desktop Adapter
   *  Intel PRO/100 S Desktop, Server and Dual-Port 
Server Adapters

   *  Contec C-NET(PI)-100TX (PC-98)
   *  NEC PC-9821Ra20, Rv20, Xv13, Xv20 internal 
100Base-TX (PC-98)

   *  NEC PC-9821X-B06 (PC-98)
   *  Many on-board network interfaces on Intel 
motherboards

read it on: http://www.pfsense.com/index.php?id=37
there are also quad Port NICs from Intel but only with 
GBit... so I have

no idea how it's supported by FreeBSD...
Perhaps Scott knows how far the support for Intel GBit 
is built in

now... ? ;-)
Martin


Von: Steve Harman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 18:09

An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?



Sorry to bother the list again - Martin; are you able to 
post the model
number of the Intel multiport NICs you're using please? 
Just to improve

my chances of success.



Thanks again,



Steve









From: Fuchs, Martin 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:57 PM

To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?



Well, have a look at multiport NIC's.

I've set up my system with 2-port Intel NICs and tried 
out 4-port NICs

too...



They work well and pfSense supports up to 32 NICs...



so there should be no problem for you to get it up and 
running ! :-)




Martin





Von: Steve Harman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 17:52

An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

Hi!



I'm spec'ing up a couple of machines to buy for running 
pfSense in a
CARP-cluster model.  From reading the tutorial, am I 
right in thinking
that this would require a NIC dedicated to the CARP 
functionality?




We need to provide a number of subnets so combined with 
the CARP NIC I'm
trying to work out how many PCI slots (PC NICs) we need 
in each box!




Thanks,



Steve




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Scott Ullrich

On 6/21/06, Steve Harman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Thanks for that Martin.

As it turns out GBit is something we need so I'd be
interested if Scott has any comment on support of GBit
NICs (Intel or otherwise).

Regards,

Steve
Cambridge, UK.


On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:47:34 +0200
  Fuchs, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 no problem !

 I have in use Intel 2-port NICs, namely those:
 http://intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro100dport_adapter.htm

 but it also should work with more-port NICs based on
Intel Chipsets
 (FXP-driver)
 Adapters supported by the fxp(4) driver include:

*  Intel EtherExpress PRO/10
*  Intel InBusiness 10/100
*  Intel PRO/100B / EtherExpressPRO/100 B PCI
Adapter
*  Intel PRO/100+ Management Adapter
*  Intel PRO/100 VE Desktop Adapter
*  Intel PRO/100 M Desktop Adapter
*  Intel PRO/100 S Desktop, Server and Dual-Port
Server Adapters
*  Contec C-NET(PI)-100TX (PC-98)
*  NEC PC-9821Ra20, Rv20, Xv13, Xv20 internal
100Base-TX (PC-98)
*  NEC PC-9821X-B06 (PC-98)
*  Many on-board network interfaces on Intel
motherboards
 read it on: http://www.pfsense.com/index.php?id=37
 there are also quad Port NICs from Intel but only with
GBit... so I have
 no idea how it's supported by FreeBSD...
 Perhaps Scott knows how far the support for Intel GBit
is built in
 now... ? ;-)
 Martin
 

 Von: Steve Harman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 18:09
 An: support@pfsense.com
 Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?



 Sorry to bother the list again - Martin; are you able to
post the model
 number of the Intel multiport NICs you're using please?
 Just to improve
 my chances of success.



 Thanks again,



 Steve







 

From: Fuchs, Martin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:57 PM
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?



 Well, have a look at multiport NIC's.

 I've set up my system with 2-port Intel NICs and tried
out 4-port NICs
 too...



 They work well and pfSense supports up to 32 NICs...



 so there should be no problem for you to get it up and
running ! :-)



 Martin



 

 Von: Steve Harman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 17:52
 An: support@pfsense.com
 Betreff: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

 Hi!



 I'm spec'ing up a couple of machines to buy for running
pfSense in a
 CARP-cluster model.  From reading the tutorial, am I
right in thinking
 that this would require a NIC dedicated to the CARP
functionality?



 We need to provide a number of subnets so combined with
the CARP NIC I'm
 trying to work out how many PCI slots (PC NICs) we need
in each box!



 Thanks,



 Steve



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Intel gigabit devices (em) are pretty good.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Chris Buechler

Steve Harman wrote:
As it turns out GBit is something we need so I'd be interested if 
Scott has any comment on support of GBit NICs (Intel or otherwise).





Look at:

Intel PWLA8492MT (dual port)
Intel PWLA8494MT (quad port)


those should be very common and easy to come by, and will work.  I 
didn't say cheap though.  :)  They aren't too horribly expensive, dual 
port is about $250 USD, quad about $400 USD (from a quick Froogle 
search, you can probably find better than that).  Heck of a lot more 
expensive than 2 or 4 individual gig NIC's though. 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?

2006-06-21 Thread Brad Bendy
Ill also add this: http://inteleval.ententeweb.com/store.asp

Thats direct from Intel under the eval program, they have added several new 
adapters since last time I bought from them. When I purchased my last set 
they were the cheapest I could find!

Quad Port Gig-E card is $287damn cheap
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 11:18, Scott Ullrich wrote:
 On 6/21/06, Steve Harman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks for that Martin.
 
  As it turns out GBit is something we need so I'd be
  interested if Scott has any comment on support of GBit
  NICs (Intel or otherwise).
 
  Regards,
 
  Steve
  Cambridge, UK.
 
 
  On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:47:34 +0200
 
Fuchs, Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   no problem !
  
   I have in use Intel 2-port NICs, namely those:
   http://intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro100dport_adapter.htm
  
   but it also should work with more-port NICs based on
  Intel Chipsets
   (FXP-driver)
   Adapters supported by the fxp(4) driver include:
  
  *  Intel EtherExpress PRO/10
  *  Intel InBusiness 10/100
  *  Intel PRO/100B / EtherExpressPRO/100 B PCI
  Adapter
  *  Intel PRO/100+ Management Adapter
  *  Intel PRO/100 VE Desktop Adapter
  *  Intel PRO/100 M Desktop Adapter
  *  Intel PRO/100 S Desktop, Server and Dual-Port
  Server Adapters
  *  Contec C-NET(PI)-100TX (PC-98)
  *  NEC PC-9821Ra20, Rv20, Xv13, Xv20 internal
  100Base-TX (PC-98)
  *  NEC PC-9821X-B06 (PC-98)
  *  Many on-board network interfaces on Intel
  motherboards
   read it on: http://www.pfsense.com/index.php?id=37
   there are also quad Port NICs from Intel but only with
  GBit... so I have
   no idea how it's supported by FreeBSD...
   Perhaps Scott knows how far the support for Intel GBit
  is built in
   now... ? ;-)
   Martin
   
  
   Von: Steve Harman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 18:09
   An: support@pfsense.com
   Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?
  
  
  
   Sorry to bother the list again - Martin; are you able to
  post the model
   number of the Intel multiport NICs you're using please?
   Just to improve
   my chances of success.
  
  
  
   Thanks again,
  
  
  
   Steve
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
  From: Fuchs, Martin
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:57 PM
   To: support@pfsense.com
   Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?
  
  
  
   Well, have a look at multiport NIC's.
  
   I've set up my system with 2-port Intel NICs and tried
  out 4-port NICs
   too...
  
  
  
   They work well and pfSense supports up to 32 NICs...
  
  
  
   so there should be no problem for you to get it up and
  running ! :-)
  
  
  
   Martin
  
  
  
   
  
   Von: Steve Harman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 17:52
   An: support@pfsense.com
   Betreff: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?
  
   Hi!
  
  
  
   I'm spec'ing up a couple of machines to buy for running
  pfSense in a
   CARP-cluster model.  From reading the tutorial, am I
  right in thinking
   that this would require a NIC dedicated to the CARP
  functionality?
  
  
  
   We need to provide a number of subnets so combined with
  the CARP NIC I'm
   trying to work out how many PCI slots (PC NICs) we need
  in each box!
  
  
  
   Thanks,
  
  
  
   Steve
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Intel gigabit devices (em) are pretty good.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]