Ill also add this: http://inteleval.ententeweb.com/store.asp

Thats direct from Intel under the "eval" program, they have added several new 
adapters since last time I bought from them. When I purchased my last set 
they were the cheapest I could find!

Quad Port Gig-E card is $287....damn cheap
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 11:18, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 6/21/06, Steve Harman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for that Martin.
> >
> > As it turns out GBit is something we need so I'd be
> > interested if Scott has any comment on support of GBit
> > NICs (Intel or otherwise).
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Steve
> > Cambridge, UK.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:47:34 +0200
> >
> >   "Fuchs, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > no problem !
> > >
> > > I have in use Intel 2-port NICs, namely those:
> > > http://intel.com/network/connectivity/products/pro100dport_adapter.htm
> > >
> > > but it also should work with "more-port" NICs based on
> > >Intel Chipsets
> > > (FXP-driver)
> > > Adapters supported by the fxp(4) driver include:
> > >
> > >    *      Intel EtherExpress PRO/10
> > >    *      Intel InBusiness 10/100
> > >    *      Intel PRO/100B / EtherExpressPRO/100 B PCI
> > >Adapter
> > >    *      Intel PRO/100+ Management Adapter
> > >    *      Intel PRO/100 VE Desktop Adapter
> > >    *      Intel PRO/100 M Desktop Adapter
> > >    *      Intel PRO/100 S Desktop, Server and Dual-Port
> > >Server Adapters
> > >    *      Contec C-NET(PI)-100TX (PC-98)
> > >    *      NEC PC-9821Ra20, Rv20, Xv13, Xv20 internal
> > >100Base-TX (PC-98)
> > >    *      NEC PC-9821X-B06 (PC-98)
> > >    *      Many on-board network interfaces on Intel
> > >motherboards
> > > read it on: http://www.pfsense.com/index.php?id=37
> > > there are also quad Port NICs from Intel but only with
> > >GBit... so I have
> > > no idea how it's supported by FreeBSD...
> > > Perhaps Scott knows how far the support for Intel GBit
> > >is built in
> > > now... ? ;-)
> > > Martin
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > Von: Steve Harman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 18:09
> > > An: support@pfsense.com
> > > Betreff: RE: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry to bother the list again - Martin; are you able to
> > >post the model
> > > number of the Intel multiport NICs you're using please?
> > > Just to improve
> > > my chances of success.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > >From: Fuchs, Martin
> > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:57 PM
> > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, have a look at multiport NIC's.
> > >
> > > I've set up my system with 2-port Intel NICs and tried
> > >out 4-port NICs
> > > too...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > They work well and pfSense supports up to 32 NICs...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > so there should be no problem for you to get it up and
> > >running ! :-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > Von: Steve Harman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2006 17:52
> > > An: support@pfsense.com
> > > Betreff: [pfSense Support] CARP NIC overhead?
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm spec'ing up a couple of machines to buy for running
> > >pfSense in a
> > > CARP-cluster model.  From reading the tutorial, am I
> > >right in thinking
> > > that this would require a NIC dedicated to the CARP
> > >functionality?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We need to provide a number of subnets so combined with
> > >the CARP NIC I'm
> > > trying to work out how many PCI slots (PC NICs) we need
> > >in each box!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Steve
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Intel gigabit devices (em) are pretty good.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to