Re: mails with no Subject: line

2009-11-27 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, November 26, 2009 a las 08:47:16PM -0500, John Bailey escribió:

 It's been threatened before to make all our mailing lists forcibly reject mail
 without proper subject lines, but nothing has come of that yet.  For the 
 record,
 I'm fully in favor of rejecting blank subjects.

Me too, and in addition in favor of rejecting HTML mails to lists;

matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Vote NO to EU The Lisbon Treaty: http://www.no-means-no.eu

___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe?  Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: mails with no Subject: line

2009-11-27 Thread Evan platt
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:14:58 +0100, you wrote:

Me too, and in addition in favor of rejecting HTML mails to lists;

   matthias

And, require someone to join the list prior to posting. I'm all for it
being as simple as possible, ie you send an e-mail message to the
list. you get  a bounce back telling you that you are posting to a
OPEN LIST that anyone can read and join, and that SPAM is not
tolerated. And if you understand these 'rulers' click here and you
will be subscribed to the list and your message will be posted.

This will solve a few problems:

One is the (granted, few) pump and dump spammers.
Two is the people who don't understand this is a list, and ANYONE can
join this list.

I recall a month of two ago someone was under the assumption his
questions for help were sent securely to a few 'high level developers'
and even threatened legal action if his posts didn't get removed from
any and all archives of this list.

If I remember he kept e-mailing (off list) one of the members
DEMANDING the member remove his posts.

Just my .02 :)

___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe?  Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: mails with no Subject: line

2009-11-27 Thread Jesse Palser

Hi,

I think emails with no subject should be automatically banned from the 
mailing list.


I also think that the mailing list should have [Pidgin] prefix in the 
subject line.

(like all other mailing lists I subscribe to)

Jesse




Matthias Apitz wrote:

El día Thursday, November 26, 2009 a las 08:47:16PM -0500, John Bailey escribió:

  

It's been threatened before to make all our mailing lists forcibly reject mail
without proper subject lines, but nothing has come of that yet.  For the record,
I'm fully in favor of rejecting blank subjects.



Me too, and in addition in favor of rejecting HTML mails to lists;

matthias
  


___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe?  Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: mails with no Subject: line

2009-11-27 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Friday, November 27, 2009 a las 07:10:17AM -0500, Jesse Palser escribió:

 Hi,
 
 I think emails with no subject should be automatically banned from the 
 mailing list.
 
 ...

In addition I think top-posting should be automatically banned from the
mailing list;

matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Vote NO to EU The Lisbon Treaty: http://www.no-means-no.eu

___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe?  Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support


RE: mails with no Subject: line

2009-11-27 Thread David Balazic
 
[mailto:support-boun...@pidgin.im] On Behalf Of Jesse Palser

 Hi,
 
 I think emails with no subject should be automatically banned 
 from the 
 mailing list.
 
 I also think that the mailing list should have [Pidgin] prefix in the 
 subject line.
 (like all other mailing lists I subscribe to)

Half of the lists I subscribe to* don't have this. The other half does.

It seems technical (for developers etc) lists do not have it, while
more layman type of lists have it. But there are also exceptions.

* about 20 mail lists


About HTML and other bans:
This is usually not a choice of the user. Punishing them for other
peoples sins is not necessarily a good thing.

Automatically stripping HTML tags on the other hand might work.

Regards,
David

___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe?  Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: mails with no Subject: line

2009-11-27 Thread Ethan Blanton
at 2009-11-26T20:47-0500, John Bailey wrote:
 It's been threatened before to make all our mailing lists forcibly
 reject mail without proper subject lines, but nothing has come of that
 yet.  For the record, I'm fully in favor of rejecting blank subjects.

I wouldn't say threatened.  I have in the past intended to bounce
certain formulaically non-useful emails with a helpful set of
instructions on how to make an email more likely to engender a useful
response, and I'll probably do that at some point.  One such rule
would be an email with no subject, or one of a number of subject
patterns which are entirely useless (help, pidgin, assistance,
one question, etc.).  As someone states elsewhere in this thread, we
can't catch 100% of those, but that doesn't matter, and we don't have
to.

Ethan

-- 
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
for evils].  They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishments, 1764


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe?  Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: mails with no Subject: line

2009-11-27 Thread Ethan Blanton
at 2009-11-27T00:36-0800, Evan platt wrote:
 And, require someone to join the list prior to posting.

We have worked hard to prevent requiring this.  I do not believe we
want to require subscription for users to ask simple questions.

 I recall a month of two ago someone was under the assumption his
 questions for help were sent securely to a few 'high level developers'

We cannot optimize for freakish one-off circumstances.  This has even
happened a few times ... but who cares?




I'm leaving the rest of this thread behind.  Arguing about details of
things that don't happen and don't matter is just going to cause other
people to complain about this list in one way or another.  I
anticipate at least one response to this thread saying, I signed up
for this list expecting it to be support, and it's a bunch of people
crying about email.  ;-)

Ethan

-- 
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
for evils].  They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
determined to commit crimes.
-- Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishments, 1764


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe?  Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: mails with no Subject: line

2009-11-26 Thread John Bailey
Matthias Apitz wrote:
 without Subject: line... Why is this? Are they send by use of
 some MailUserAgent which makes it easy to do this, like this
 one:
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/211.6 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
 
 Or what is the reason for this?

It could be partially the crappy webmail interfaces to blame, but a lot of this
falls squarely on the shoulders of people who don't know how to use e-mail 
properly.

It's been threatened before to make all our mailing lists forcibly reject mail
without proper subject lines, but nothing has come of that yet.  For the record,
I'm fully in favor of rejecting blank subjects.

John



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe?  Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: mails with no Subject: line

2009-11-26 Thread David Woolley

John Bailey wrote:


It could be partially the crappy webmail interfaces to blame, but a lot of this
falls squarely on the shoulders of people who don't know how to use e-mail 
properly.


It basically reflects the market for Pidgin, and particularly that 
segment of the market that can't solve problems, or determine that a 
request is unreasonable, by themselves.




It's been threatened before to make all our mailing lists forcibly reject mail
without proper subject lines, but nothing has come of that yet.  For the record,
I'm fully in favor of rejecting blank subjects.


To do a good job, you would need some good heuristics.  One or two word 
subjects or the use of the word help, should get poor scores, but I 
don't know how you do good AI to recognize all subjects that properly 
summarise a problem or question.


I did try fixing up the subjects of articles to which I replied, but got 
complaints from people using subject only threading.


--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.

___
Support@pidgin.im mailing list
Want to unsubscribe?  Use this link:
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support