Re: Seamonkey crash - still

2011-02-26 Thread Walter 



NoOp wrote:

On 02/26/2011 09:24 AM, Walter wrote:
...

My apologies for not including additional information on the bug report.
This is first time to submit a bug report and obviously another instance
of "knowing just enough to be dangerous".

I will continue running SM when it will run without crashes and restart
when it does crash in hopes somebody will look at all the information I
have posted in this forum and make sense of it.


Walter, I'll add information to the report for you.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636797





NOOP,

I truly appreciate that.

w.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey crash - still

2011-02-26 Thread NoOp 
On 02/26/2011 09:24 AM, Walter wrote:
...
> My apologies for not including additional information on the bug report. 
> This is first time to submit a bug report and obviously another instance 
> of "knowing just enough to be dangerous".
> 
> I will continue running SM when it will run without crashes and restart 
> when it does crash in hopes somebody will look at all the information I 
> have posted in this forum and make sense of it.

Walter, I'll add information to the report for you.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636797


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [linux] SeaMonkey certificate issues

2011-02-26 Thread NoOp 
On 02/26/2011 04:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
> When attempting to view:
> 
> https://libreoffice.org
> 
> I get a cert error:
> http://img841.imageshack.us/f/screenshot5di.png/
> This initially occured while viewing the site with a standard http url.
> Afterwards, hover the mouse over any link and the urls are https:
> http://img638.imageshack.us/f/screenshot6z.png/
> 
> I have tested in SM 2.0.12 (32bit) and SM 2.1b2 (64bit) - same results.
> Both are from the mozilla (not distro) installs).
> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.17)
> Gecko/20110123 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.12
> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b11)
> Gecko/20110209 Firefox/4.0b11 SeaMonkey/2.1b2
> 
> If I view the same https://libreoffice.org with FF 4.x I get a cert for
> libreoffice.org instead of the incorrect documentfoundation.org:
> http://img191.imageshack.us/f/screenshot8eo.png/
> I have tested in FF 3.1
> Nor do I get an error in Opera, Chromium, Chrome, or Evince.
> 
> Now the interesting part is that if I try from 2.1b2 with Windows, I get a:
> 
> You have requested an encrypted page that contains some unencrypted
> information. Information that you see or enter on this page could easily
> be read by a third party.
> 
> click OK and the page loads showing the broken lock icon (meaning not
> fully encrypted). Switch to (again with Windows 2.1b2) to:
> https://www.libreoffice.org/download
> and the page loads just fine with the complete security lock. If I
> select View|Page Info|Security|View Certificate the page clearly shows
> the same as FF: *.libereoffice.org
> 
> Can anyone else verify w/linux & Windows? Thanks
> 

Screenshot from WinXP (virtual machine) 2.1b2:
http://img402.imageshack.us/f/seamonkeycertwindows1.png/
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0b11) Gecko/20110209
Firefox/4.0b11 SeaMonkey/2.1b2


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

[linux] SeaMonkey certificate issues

2011-02-26 Thread NoOp 
When attempting to view:

https://libreoffice.org

I get a cert error:
http://img841.imageshack.us/f/screenshot5di.png/
This initially occured while viewing the site with a standard http url.
Afterwards, hover the mouse over any link and the urls are https:
http://img638.imageshack.us/f/screenshot6z.png/

I have tested in SM 2.0.12 (32bit) and SM 2.1b2 (64bit) - same results.
Both are from the mozilla (not distro) installs).
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.17)
Gecko/20110123 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.12
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b11)
Gecko/20110209 Firefox/4.0b11 SeaMonkey/2.1b2

If I view the same https://libreoffice.org with FF 4.x I get a cert for
libreoffice.org instead of the incorrect documentfoundation.org:
http://img191.imageshack.us/f/screenshot8eo.png/
I have tested in FF 3.1
Nor do I get an error in Opera, Chromium, Chrome, or Evince.

Now the interesting part is that if I try from 2.1b2 with Windows, I get a:

You have requested an encrypted page that contains some unencrypted
information. Information that you see or enter on this page could easily
be read by a third party.

click OK and the page loads showing the broken lock icon (meaning not
fully encrypted). Switch to (again with Windows 2.1b2) to:
https://www.libreoffice.org/download
and the page loads just fine with the complete security lock. If I
select View|Page Info|Security|View Certificate the page clearly shows
the same as FF: *.libereoffice.org

Can anyone else verify w/linux & Windows? Thanks

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [!! SPAM] Re: Error Truncating The Inbox

2011-02-26 Thread Richard Lee Holbert 

Danny Kile wrote:

Richard Lee Holbert wrote:

I am running SeaMonkey 1.1.18 and when I turn my computer back on
after returning from work and check my e-mail, I get a message about
90% of the time stating:

"There was an error truncating the Inbox after filtering a message to
folder XYZ ( Insert name on one of my folders for XYZ ) . You may 
need to

shutdown SeaMonkey and delete inbox.msf ".

This hangs up my e-mail until I click on the OK Box in the message and
when download over 2000 e-mails when SeaMonkey starts back up, it
get's OLD Fast.

I have searched for this inbox.msf and cannot locate this folder.

After I first start SeaMonkey I still get the error about once every 50
or so messages.


In Seamonkey click on Edit > Mail & Newsgroup Account Settings > 
Server Settings for the Account in question. Then at the bottom of the 
window is a Local Directory, listing the path to your e-mail folder on 
the hard drive. You will find inbox.msf here.


Danny


Ok still there after I deleted file. An more suggestions ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Message: Your browser is not supported at this time.

2011-02-26 Thread Paul B. Gallagher 

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:


Most "developers" (or so they think themselves) these days write and
test with three or four browsers:  IE (either 7 or 8), Firefox,
Chrome, and possibly Opera. They do not understand that writing
*standard, compliant code* will work in *all* modern browsers.

BTW, the,  and  elements are
_not_ required with any browser, nor by the W3C. I'm quite familiar
with the W3C and CSS validators. For an example, see:


Some years ago, a young fellow did his doctoral thesis on "validity
of web pages." He found at that time that approximately 7% of
millions of pages were valid.


That's a pretty good result, if "valid" means "free of errors." The 
world would be a much better place if the human race could achieve that 
high standard.


My guess is that millions more pages have only minor slip-ups with 
minimal effect on usability. The most egregious cases, as with humans, 
are only a small minority.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Message: Your browser is not supported at this time.

2011-02-26 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty 
upscope wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
 hapihakr wrote:
> Use the user agent string option to masquerade as Firefox. The
> following command will execute on Linux. Windows may be slightly
> different (both executable program and user agent string). 
> 
> google-chrome --user-agent="Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64;
> en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 Linux Mint/9 (Isadora)
> Firefox/3.6.13"
 
 Instead of changing to the Firefox UA string (which will reduce
 SeaMonkey's market share), just add the following to the original:
 
NOT Firefox/3.6.13 
 
 The sniffers just look in the string for the word "Firefox".
 Better yet, notify the web site to stop sniffing completely. If an
 author builds a proper web site, it will/should work in any
 browser.
>>> 
>>> But what will they do with all that money they save by building
>>> only one version of their site? And how will their webmaster
>>> survive on only a third of his former pay?
>> 
>> I'm guessing your post is tongue-in-cheek humor. That's okay.
>> However, it is not necessary to build multiple versions, not even
>> for multiple languages. If one writes code adhering to W3C
>> standards, browser *sniffing* is not required at all. This is not
>> difficult. 
>> 
>> (Re the languages, the content is contained in a database and the
>> particular content is read and displayed by server-side scripts and
>> based on user choice of the language.)
> 
> One of the reasons they write for only one browser (ususlly IE) is Ms
> does not require the  or  part of the line. W3C does.
> It's called laziness. Just run a browser page thru the W3C verifier
> and you will see.

Most "developers" (or so they think themselves) these days write and
test with three or four browsers:  IE (either 7 or 8), Firefox, Chrome,
and possibly Opera. They do not understand that writing *standard,
compliant code* will work in *all* modern browsers.

BTW, the ,  and  elements are
_not_ required with any browser, nor by the W3C. I'm quite familiar with
the W3C and CSS validators. For an example, see:


Some years ago, a young fellow did his doctoral thesis on "validity of
web pages." He found at that time that approximately 7% of millions of
pages were valid.

-- 
   -bts
   -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: mozbackup and discussions of same

2011-02-26 Thread Mike C 

sean bean wrote:

On 2/24/2011 6:56 AM, Joe Rotello previously wrote the following...::

RE: mozbackup

Seeing that Mozbackup, in this case for Windows, is being mentioned more
often in the Digest...

We might be advised that Mozbackup, locations at:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/MozBackup

and the Download Homepage:

http://mozbackup.jasnapaka.com/

I have queried Mozbackup HQ, but it really has to now support at LEAST
going from the likes of Thunderbird 3.1.8 over to the same level of
Thunderbird, which is it's main use, and of course at least Firefox 3.6
and SeaMonkey (if it works with SeaMonkey as it should(?)), over to as
much as Firefox 4.0, for those that have to use Mozbackup, or do not
have any other recourse other than Mozbackup to copy over profiles, and
of course emails, to newer SeaMonkey, other machines (copy from machine
to machine), etc.

Reasoning being that people will HAVE to go from these soon-to-bve older
Thunderbird, Firefox, SeaMonkey, Netscape versions, over to what are or
will become the newest versions of especially Thunderbird, Firefox,
SeaMonkey,

Refreshing us by quoting from http://mozbackup.jasnapaka.com/ ...:

Current Version Mozbackup: *1.4.10*

"*MozBackup* is a simple utility for creating backups of Mozilla Firefox
, Mozilla Thunderbird
, Mozilla Sunbird
, Flock
, SeaMonkey ,
Mozilla Suite , Spicebird
, Songbird  and
Netscape  profiles.

*It allows you to backup and restore* bookmarks, mail, contacts,
history, extensions, passwords, cache etc. It's an easy way to do
Firefox backup, Thunderbird backup ..."


Hope this "refresh" is of assistance!

Any additions or correction, please direct them to the list.

Joe / WindowGroup / Knoxville, TN / USA
Skype: joerotello


it has always rather astonished me that the built in "import"
functionality has never offered to import mail from earlier installs of
previous mozilla products...

makes things confusing for the casual e'mail user...

sean


I used MoxBackup when I switched from SM1 to SM2
It worked without a problem.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Message: Your browser is not supported at this time.

2011-02-26 Thread upscope 
On Friday, February 25, 2011 04:30:23 AM Beauregard T. Shagnasty 
wrote:
> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> 
> > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> >> hapihakr wrote:
> >>> Use the user agent string option to masquerade as Firefox. The
> >>> following command will execute on Linux. Windows may be slightly
> >>> different (both executable program and user agent string). 
> >>> 
> >>> google-chrome --user-agent="Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64;
> >>> en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 Linux Mint/9 (Isadora)
> >>> Firefox/3.6.13"
> >> 
> >> Instead of changing to the Firefox UA string (which will reduce
> >> SeaMonkey's market share), just add the following to the 
original:
> >>
> >>NOT Firefox/3.6.13
> >>
> >> The sniffers just look in the string for the word "Firefox". 
Better
> >> yet, notify the web site to stop sniffing completely. If an 
author
> >> builds a proper web site, it will/should work in any browser.
> > 
> > But what will they do with all that money they save by building 
only
> > one version of their site? And how will their webmaster survive on
> > only a third of his former pay?
> 
> I'm guessing your post is tongue-in-cheek humor. That's okay. 
However,
> it is not necessary to build multiple versions, not even for 
multiple
> languages. If one writes code adhering to W3C standards, browser
> *sniffing* is not required at all. This is not difficult.
> 
> (Re the languages, the content is contained in a database and the
> particular content is read and displayed by server-side scripts and
> based on user choice of the language.)
> 
> -- 
>-bts
>-Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
> ___
> support-seamonkey mailing list
> support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
> 
One of the reasons they write for only one browser (ususlly IE) is Ms 
does not require the  or  part of the line. W3C does. 
It's called laziness. Just run a browser page thru the W3C verifier 
and you will see.
-- 
Russ
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey crash - still

2011-02-26 Thread Walter 



NoOp wrote:

On 02/25/2011 02:22 PM, Walter wrote:



NoOp wrote:

On 02/25/2011 11:36 AM, Walter wrote:



NoOp wrote:

...

Seems to be sufficent infor for a bug report. Go to the first one above
&click on 'Bugzilla - Report this Crash'.



Bug # 636797 reported.


You should include the crash report information/links in that&   and also
include the weather url that you were viewing when it kept crashing.
However, see Roberts info that F signatures are Flash related. So you
might check to see if you have the latest flash version&   perhaps try
clearing your cache (memory&   disk) to see if that has any effect.

What flash version do you have installed? You can check in
'about:plugins' and also:
http://flash.com



Flash is current, weather URL is part of information included in crash
report.

At this point, I will just live with it and hope that next SM update
will have found and fixed it.

A big thanks for all the help and suggestions. I know just enough about
computers to be dangerous.

w


My point is that this is the entirety of your bug report:

Walter  2011-02-25 11:32:35 PST

User-Agent:   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.16)
Gecko/20101123 SeaMonkey/2.0.11
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.16)
Gecko/20101123 SeaMonkey/2.0.11

Crashes with crash message and automatically reported to Mozilla. Results
posted to mozilla.support.seamonkey

Reproducible: Sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Cannot reproduce the problem.
2.
3.


You *need* to provide, as a minimum, the about:crashes info that you've
provided in this thread. No one will be able to determine what your
report is about with the information you provided.




My apologies for not including additional information on the bug report. 
This is first time to submit a bug report and obviously another instance 
of "knowing just enough to be dangerous".


I will continue running SM when it will run without crashes and restart 
when it does crash in hopes somebody will look at all the information I 
have posted in this forum and make sense of it.


Again, thanks for your assistance.

w
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Extension on Dual Boot system

2011-02-26 Thread Stéphane Grégoire 
Daniel a tapoté, le 25/02/2011 14:08:
> But isn't the code words used (whatever) for Windows going to be 
> different to the code words used for Linux (whatever)??

Search C: and D: in profiles.js I had it when I passed from XP to
ubuntu6.06 and I tooks months for understand what happened!

Do you have wine and ntfs3g installed?


-- 
Stéphane
http://pasdenom.info

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey crash - still

2011-02-26 Thread Rick Merrill 

NoOp wrote:
...

You should include the crash report information/links in that&   and also
include the weather url that you were viewing when it kept crashing.
However, see Roberts info that F signatures are Flash related. So you
might check to see if you have the latest flash version&   perhaps try
clearing your cache (memory&   disk) to see if that has any effect.

What flash version do you have installed? You can check in
'about:plugins'


Fascinating!  Glad to know about this.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Extension on Dual Boot system

2011-02-26 Thread cyberzen 

Daniel a écrit :

cyberzen wrote:

Daniel a écrit :

I dual boot my HP6730b Laptop with both Win7 and Mandriva Linux 2009.0
and have SM 2.0.11 on both.

Last Sunday evening, I deliberately booted into my Win7 system and
started up SeaMonkey to give it a chance to download any System and AV
updates.

Then I went looking, my SM was plain vanilla installation, so I went to
addons.mozilla.org (or whatever the site is) and installed about a half
dozen extensions like AdBlockPlus, BeeFree, Display mail route, Ghostery
and KaiRo.at Mandelbrot (whatever this does???).

The installations all went without a problem, so on Monday, when I
booted into my Linux SeaMonkey, I was expecting to have to install the
same extensions, but no, they were showing up there in my Linux SM
already.

At first I thought "What the heck", but then I thought the Win7 SM
extensions would have been installed in the plug-ins folder {or
whatever} of my SM profile (which is, naturally, on a Win7 drive) and my
Linux SM uses the same profile, and, it would seem, the same plug-ins
folder {or whatever} of my SM profile (which is, naturally, on a Win7
drive because Linux can "see" Windows drives but Windows cannot "see"
Linux mount points.).

But isn't the code words used (whatever) for Windows going to be
different to the code words used for Linux (whatever)??

Anyone??

Daniel


do you have the profile of Seamonkey in the same location for both
linux/windows ?
the extensions are in the profile



Quote
Linux SM uses the same profile, and, it would seem, the same plug-ins
folder {or whatever} of my SM profile (which is, naturally, on a Win7
drive because Linux can "see" Windows drives but Windows cannot "see"
Linux mount points.)
End Quote

Daniel


this was done in order to make the extensions remain after uninstall / 
reinstall


--
cyberzen
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Coming back to: my very useful form-filler/password storer won't work with SM 2x

2011-02-26 Thread cyberzen 

Ken a écrit :

cyberzen wrote:

form history control



Hi, cybercitizen. I'm mainly interested in an integrated
password-remembering tool, one that instantly makes the relevant
Password and User Name ready to enter when one goes to a particular site
(e.g., my banking site, my emails program after a reboot). Nothing beats
RoboCop if it's working, I suspect. I WOULD love to have it working again!

Thanks - Ken (in Oz)


I suppose that roboform team would be the best to make it work on SM2X
as it is not open source

--
cyberzen
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Error Truncating The Inbox

2011-02-26 Thread Daniel 

Paul wrote:

Richard Lee Holbert wrote:

I am running SeaMonkey 1.1.18 and when I turn my computer back on
after returning from work and check my e-mail, I get a message about
90% of the time stating:

"There was an error truncating the Inbox after filtering a message to
folder XYZ ( Insert name on one of my folders for XYZ ) . You may
need to shutdown SeaMonkey and delete inbox.msf ".

This hangs up my e-mail until I click on the OK Box in the message
and when download over 2000 e-mails when SeaMonkey starts back up, it
get's OLD Fast.

I have searched for this inbox.msf and cannot locate this folder.

After I first start SeaMonkey I still get the error about once every
50 or so messages.


Mine is here in v1119: Yours may be somewhere similar.
"C:\Documents and Settings\somenamehere\Application Data\Mozilla\Default
User\ynpmfpg6.slt\Mail\pop.att.yahoo.com\inbox.msf"


Alternatively, you could have a look at Edit->Mail&Newsgroup Account 
Settings and look at Server Settings on your Mail account. At the bottom 
of the screen you should see "Local directory", which points you to 
where your mail accounts should be.


You are using Windows so your sub-folders may be hidden. If so, check on 
the Microsoft site for how to expose all your sub-folders.


HTH

Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Error Truncating The Inbox

2011-02-26 Thread Daniel 

Daniel wrote:

Paul wrote:

Richard Lee Holbert wrote:

I am running SeaMonkey 1.1.18 and when I turn my computer back on
after returning from work and check my e-mail, I get a message about
90% of the time stating:

"There was an error truncating the Inbox after filtering a message to
folder XYZ ( Insert name on one of my folders for XYZ ) . You may
need to shutdown SeaMonkey and delete inbox.msf ".

This hangs up my e-mail until I click on the OK Box in the message
and when download over 2000 e-mails when SeaMonkey starts back up, it
get's OLD Fast.

I have searched for this inbox.msf and cannot locate this folder.

After I first start SeaMonkey I still get the error about once every
50 or so messages.


Mine is here in v1119: Yours may be somewhere similar.
"C:\Documents and Settings\somenamehere\Application Data\Mozilla\Default
User\ynpmfpg6.slt\Mail\pop.att.yahoo.com\inbox.msf"


Alternatively, you could have a look at Edit->Mail&Newsgroup Account
Settings and look at Server Settings on your Mail account. At the bottom
of the screen you should see "Local directory", which points you to
where your mail accounts should be.

You are using Windows so your sub-folders may be hidden. If so, check on
the Microsoft site for how to expose all your sub-folders.

HTH

Daniel


And, of course, I should have read Danny's post before I posted my reply!!

If nothing else, it's provided a bit of support for Danny's suggestion!!

Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Extension on Dual Boot system

2011-02-26 Thread Daniel 

Terry R. wrote:

On 2/25/2011 5:08 AM On a whim, Daniel pounded out on the keyboard


I dual boot my HP6730b Laptop with both Win7 and Mandriva Linux 2009.0
and have SM 2.0.11 on both.

Last Sunday evening, I deliberately booted into my Win7 system and
started up SeaMonkey to give it a chance to download any System and AV
updates.

Then I went looking, my SM was plain vanilla installation, so I went to
addons.mozilla.org (or whatever the site is) and installed about a half
dozen extensions like AdBlockPlus, BeeFree, Display mail route, Ghostery
and KaiRo.at Mandelbrot (whatever this does???).

The installations all went without a problem, so on Monday, when I
booted into my Linux SeaMonkey, I was expecting to have to install the
same extensions, but no, they were showing up there in my Linux SM
already.

At first I thought "What the heck", but then I thought the Win7 SM
extensions would have been installed in the plug-ins folder {or
whatever} of my SM profile (which is, naturally, on a Win7 drive) and my
Linux SM uses the same profile, and, it would seem, the same plug-ins
folder {or whatever} of my SM profile (which is, naturally, on a Win7
drive because Linux can "see" Windows drives but Windows cannot "see"
Linux mount points.).

But isn't the code words used (whatever) for Windows going to be
different to the code words used for Linux (whatever)??

Anyone??

Daniel


Hi Daniel,

I don't use SM, but I have TB installed on multiple OS's. I would create
another partition and move your profile there to share data between. I
have all OS's each on a partition, data on another, and programs on
another. I separated all the mail/news data out of the profile into a
separate folder, and that is what was shared with Linux. The rest
(add-ons etc) needs to be installed into each OS, unless you have many
Windows OS's as I do. With those I can point to the same profile on each
one.


but, Terry, as I say, I use the one profile for both Win7 and Linux, set 
up on my Win7 D drive.



I don't hardly use Linux at all any more (as no clients or friends ever
used it and I only installed it for support purposes), but the above
worked fine for sharing between them.


Terry R.


I do share the one profile for both OS's.

Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Extension on Dual Boot system

2011-02-26 Thread Daniel 

cyberzen wrote:

Daniel a écrit :

I dual boot my HP6730b Laptop with both Win7 and Mandriva Linux 2009.0
and have SM 2.0.11 on both.

Last Sunday evening, I deliberately booted into my Win7 system and
started up SeaMonkey to give it a chance to download any System and AV
updates.

Then I went looking, my SM was plain vanilla installation, so I went to
addons.mozilla.org (or whatever the site is) and installed about a half
dozen extensions like AdBlockPlus, BeeFree, Display mail route, Ghostery
and KaiRo.at Mandelbrot (whatever this does???).

The installations all went without a problem, so on Monday, when I
booted into my Linux SeaMonkey, I was expecting to have to install the
same extensions, but no, they were showing up there in my Linux SM
already.

At first I thought "What the heck", but then I thought the Win7 SM
extensions would have been installed in the plug-ins folder {or
whatever} of my SM profile (which is, naturally, on a Win7 drive) and my
Linux SM uses the same profile, and, it would seem, the same plug-ins
folder {or whatever} of my SM profile (which is, naturally, on a Win7
drive because Linux can "see" Windows drives but Windows cannot "see"
Linux mount points.).

But isn't the code words used (whatever) for Windows going to be
different to the code words used for Linux (whatever)??

Anyone??

Daniel


do you have the profile of Seamonkey in the same location for both
linux/windows ?
the extensions are in the profile



Quote
Linux SM uses the same profile, and, it would seem, the same plug-ins 
folder {or whatever} of my SM profile (which is, naturally, on a Win7 
drive because Linux can "see" Windows drives but Windows cannot "see" 
Linux mount points.)

End Quote

Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey crash - still

2011-02-26 Thread Daniel 

Walter wrote:



Glen wrote:

Walter wrote:



Chris Ilias wrote:

On 11-02-24 10:42 PM, Michael Gordon wrote:

Robert Kaiser wrote:

Walter schrieb:

Still crashing occasionally. Below are details that are displayed.


Have you sent crash reports through our system? If so, can you
please go
to about:crashes and tell us the the crash IDs on those?


Try these with SM 2.0.x


The about:crashes page is going to list different crash IDs for each
person. So the crash IDs on your about:crashes page are not the ones in
Walter's.



Here are my crash reports from about:crashes
w




Remove Reports
Submitted Crash Reports






Report ID
Date Submitted




bp-e9c346b1-d2d2-4761-90f3-20ebb2110225 2/25/2011 10:47 AM
bp-d37e52eb-03d5-4c82-84ee-a9cdc2110224 2/24/2011 4:40 PM
bp-7dedc188-d492-43cf-b412-b8ba22110220 2/20/2011 6:07 PM
bp-f580f00e-0e4c-4554-8313-f112a2110217 2/17/2011 2:37 PM
bp-8379840a-9265-4d7d-8929-6701b2110215 2/15/2011 6:09 PM
bp-3dd7ab4c-2e21-4df9-ba10-9daba2110213 2/13/2011 3:57 PM
bp-45b59743-7b84-4522-bf9a-ad0ff2110213 2/13/2011 1:46 PM
bp-859a558c-8538-4dad-a60b-8dd852110212 2/12/2011 11:22 AM
bp-e8b481db-e5e3-41fe-8ea1-1a0222110211 2/11/2011 10:23 AM
bp-75f12d6f-4536-42a9-b8ed-4d0ff2110210 2/10/2011 2:45 PM
bp-76d7348c-d169-43f0-aed4-4ef442110209 2/9/2011 10:32 AM
bp-4a5d0b33-27b2-4901-b542-83cdd2110207 2/7/2011 4:46 PM
bp-3e05bc61-f2a4-42e3-985b-006b42110206 2/6/2011 1:08 PM
bp-0c8bd6d2-dfc8-4502-8e2d-cbbef2110205 2/5/2011 10:28 AM
bp-4810658d-38a9-4ea4-8992-325a62110203 2/3/2011 11:08 AM
bp-ebdd162a-d0ab-412c-8bd0-614412110201 2/1/2011 12:51 PM
bp-7c2e47ef-1aff-4871-8dd3-a91bc2110201 2/1/2011 11:45 AM
bp-02d84ae2-25cb-4b90-94f6-2a2952110131 1/31/2011 12:01 PM
bp-b49b0020-d8ad-45a8-8d4d-34e4a2110130 1/30/2011 2:57 PM
bp-730103dd-af72-46f0-a7c9-602e42110126 1/26/2011 10:36 AM
bp-a57a21ea-f27c-463d-9fca-cd1fc2110125 1/25/2011 11:32 AM
bp-9d8ba440-08e6-440b-b72f-268352110122 1/22/2011 11:12 AM
bp-a44511ae-c916-4016-b7db-2803c2110119 1/19/2011 1:23 PM
bp-4856865a-79d8-46b9-b888-c21892110119 1/19/2011 10:17 AM
bp-4dcf964c-7cea-48c5-a1b6-e17cc2110118 1/18/2011 3:08 PM
bp-9bf2f74f-e2a6-4daa-8881-4e1e42110111 1/11/2011 11:12 AM
bp-8ca831b4-3c60-4a98-a74a-d66732110110 1/10/2011 10:59 AM
bp-955000e7-f3f5-44bd-89d5-855da2101231 12/31/2010 11:11 AM
bp-a02878d9-322f-4b68-85aa-8f9132101230 12/30/2010 1:59 PM
bp-6ccdce26-640d-4e1b-8a85-4ef762101229 12/29/2010 11:31 AM
bp-055e734b-0b86-4c63-bc4e-2138a2101228 12/28/2010 11:41 AM
bp-7b019cfa-556b-45e9-ace9-6f59b2101227 12/27/2010 5:32 PM
bp-7eeed46c-692f-4071-856c-e867d2101226 12/26/2010 1:40 PM
bp-d57bb9d7-752a-4ed1-ab10-e0f772101225 12/25/2010 8:57 PM
bp-d2ce9c93-259c-4f29-9c8c-7b4332101224 12/24/2010 1:16 PM
bp-b299d413-816d-4ced-9f25-bccce2101220 12/20/2010 12:25 PM
bp-5546d42f-9526-4ee9-b359-2382e2101220 12/20/2010 11:47 AM
bp-41340ad5-fd9d-46f0-a18c-06a572101218 12/18/2010 2:09 PM
bp-eab755d9-f78c-425f-ab9f-f44952101216 12/16/2010 11:31 AM
bp-1916c33b-fb14-491b-82dd-18fc52101215 12/15/2010 5:47 PM
bp-6fd2eb75-ffc9-462b-ab40-e98612101212 12/12/2010 5:07 PM
bp-3c6613fc-7297-4db3-a2bb-d67b52101212 12/12/2010 4:47 PM
bp-e5f46306-0878-4fa0-ac10-2e7db2101207 12/7/2010 2:32 PM
bp-2a75c1a3-5ded-4133-bd79-adbb32101205 12/5/2010 4:41 PM
bp-6fe1b4e7-be0b-4b33-b86a-4f8d22101201 12/1/2010 10:13 AM
bp-987e6731-585f-4d0f-b131-26a262101130 11/30/2010 3:37 PM
bp-fb9e1e17-ca9d-4b3d-845b-66eb82101130 11/30/2010 3:04 PM
bp-19e786fa-ece5-4960-8849-ad5df2101129 11/29/2010 10:54 AM
bp-1868cb51-7b97-4075-9309-cb4662101129 11/29/2010 10:52 AM
bp-54b969b1-142c-49bb-9d3a-009852101129 11/29/2010 10:22 AM
bp-d6c29b3a-11c4-4cce-9917-d41492101128 11/28/2010 8:47 PM
bp-652d61bf-16ec-40bc-9323-1fbe92101025 10/25/2010 2:31 PM
bp-4cc23be8-8983-48e5-a5a0-2b2922100627 6/27/2010 1:44 PM
bp-cf71e4a4-b0b1-461e-ae03-e5c432100616 6/16/2010 1:42 PM




No crash reports have been submitted.

This application has not been configured to display crash reports. The
preference breakpad.reportURL must be set.



So it still crashes while trying to go into safe mode?



Have not tried safe mode yet. As long as I am running, "if it ain't
broke, keep on truckin'"

w.


...but, Walter, you are telling us that it is brokeat least very 
regularly!!.


Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey