Re: Browser unsupported ?

[Ray_Net]

W3BNR wrote:

On 3/31/2011 5:45 PM Ray_Net wrote:

W3BNR wrote:

On 3/31/2011 11:32 AM David E. Ross wrote:

On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr


Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string. The fails with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



Did not work for me using 'NOT FireFox/3.6.12' but DID work using
'NOT FireFox/4/0b8pre' in the string.


So i modify accordingly:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT FireFox/4/0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.0.10
and this is not working ...


Try:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101127 Firefox/4.0b8pre



I did not prefer to change
from general.useragent.extra.seamonkey value = "SeaMonkey/2.0.10"
to general.useragent.extra.seamonkey value = ""

because it's the default. when i decide to upgrade from 
"SeaMonkey/2.0.10" to "SeaMonkey/2.0.13" ... i prefer that

general.useragent.extra.seamonkey
 value became = "SeaMonkey/2.0.13"
Just i case i do a bug reporting with a correct UA.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't send mail out of 2.0.13

[DoctorBill]

DoctorBill wrote:

I am using 1.1 to write and send this.

When I use 2.0.13 and try to send an E-Mail (I receive fine),
I get this message that I cannot use SMTP and have to change
to something else.

Where do I go to do that and what do I put in there ?

DoctorBill


Found it

"Uncheck the Use name and password box"

Works now.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Can't send mail out of 2.0.13

[DoctorBill]

I am using 1.1 to write and send this.

When I use 2.0.13 and try to send an E-Mail (I receive fine),
I get this message that I cannot use SMTP and have to change
to something else.

Where do I go to do that and what do I put in there ?

DoctorBill
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't send E-Mail out of 2.2

[DoctorBill]

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 3/31/2011 11:40 PM, DoctorBill wrote:

I am using 1.1 to write and send this.

When I use 2.2 and try to send an E-Mail (I receive fine),
I get this message that I cannot use SMTP and have to change
to something else.

Where do I go to do that and what do I put in there ?


2.2a1pre is known to have issues; and is not what our developers are 
using primarily. This could certainly be one of them.


Please use 2.1b3pre instead (latest-comm-2.0) for the time being.



I am an idiot.

It is 2.0.13

I will repost this.Lord !

DoctorBill
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Ray_Net wrote:

> This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
> https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

More about this profiles thing...  I just read this news item:


"Google is working on a mobile application that would allow users to
snap pictures of people's faces in order to access their personal
information, a director for the project said this week."

"Google's Profiles product includes a user's name, phone number and
e-mail address. Google has not said what personal data might be
displayed once a person is identified by its facial-recognition system."

Maybe it is a *good* thing to be blocked from the site!!

-- 
   -bts
   -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't send E-Mail out of 2.2

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

On 3/31/2011 11:40 PM, DoctorBill wrote:

I am using 1.1 to write and send this.

When I use 2.2 and try to send an E-Mail (I receive fine),
I get this message that I cannot use SMTP and have to change
to something else.

Where do I go to do that and what do I put in there ?


2.2a1pre is known to have issues; and is not what our developers are 
using primarily. This could certainly be one of them.


Please use 2.1b3pre instead (latest-comm-2.0) for the time being.

--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Can't send E-Mail out of 2.2

[DoctorBill]

I am using 1.1 to write and send this.

When I use 2.2 and try to send an E-Mail (I receive fine),
I get this message that I cannot use SMTP and have to change
to something else.

Where do I go to do that and what do I put in there ?

DoctorBill
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

autoloading of SM 1.1.18

[Norvin]

Just had to format and reload Win XP, SP3 and using SM 1.1.18. My 
problem is that after a power up and sitting idle at the desktop, SM 
will do an autoload without any action on my part. I remember having 
this problem some years ago and was able to make a minor change to 
correct it, but, alas, my memory recall is not what it used to be. I did 
remember that a process (Skmail) in the task manager could be deleted 
and it would take care of it for the session until another power on 
sequence. Hopefully someone can remember or recall what I can't.


Thanks in advance.
Norvin
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Don't advance to next newsgroup!

[Monkey Sea]

dominique wrote:

Monkey Sea wrote, On 3/31/2011 4:24 AM:

How do I configure SeaMonkey to stop asking me, after I've read all the
posts in a newsgroup, if I want to read the first unread post in the
next newsgroup?


mailnews.nav_crosses_folders = 0 (zero)

in about:config

Dom,


Thank you.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[NoOp]

On 03/31/2011 11:07 AM, W3BNR wrote:
> On 3/31/2011 11:32 AM David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
>>> J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
 Ray_Net wrote:
> This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
> https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/
>
> my browser signature is:
> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10

 Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW
>>>
>>> May be, may be :-)
>>>
>>> You can test your configuration using this link:
>>> https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr
>>
>> Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
>> string.  The  fails with
>>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
>>   Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
>> but works okay with
>>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
>>   Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16
>>
> 
> Did not work for me using 'NOT FireFox/3.6.12'  but DID work using
> 'NOT FireFox/4/0b8pre' in the string.
> 

Seems to like 2.1:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b11)
Gecko/20110209 Firefox/4.0b11 SeaMonkey/2.1b2

and these:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b11)
Gecko/20110205 NOT Firefox/4.0b11 SeaMonkey/2.1b2

general.useragent.extra.firefox;Firefox/3.6.16
(from standard FF 3.6.16)

But not:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3)
Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3



Profiles overview: Supported browsers

Google profiles are supported in the following browsers:

Windows: Chrome, Firefox 3.6, Internet Explorer 8, Internet Explorer 9
Linux : Chrome, Firefox 3.6
Mac: Chrome, Firefox 3.6, Safari 4

Maybe they changed due to the security changes between FF 3.5 and 3.6.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[W3BNR]

On 3/31/2011 5:45 PM Ray_Net wrote:

W3BNR wrote:

On 3/31/2011 11:32 AM David E. Ross wrote:

On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr


Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string. The fails with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



Did not work for me using 'NOT FireFox/3.6.12' but DID work using
'NOT FireFox/4/0b8pre' in the string.


So i modify accordingly:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT FireFox/4/0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.0.10
and this is not working ...


Try:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101127 Firefox/4.0b8pre


--
Ed
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1zhwu/
Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

Support bacteria.  They're the only culture some people have.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Outbox

[Michael Gordon]

JohnW-Mpls wrote:

On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:44:37 -0500, JohnW-Mpls  wrote:



On my SM Mail page, the Local Folder has an Outbox.  Is the operation
of that Outbox described anywhere?  I did not find it in Help.

A few weeks ago I started to send 4 messages with similar content to 4
different addresses every day and the Outbox is handy for mailing all
four about the same time each day.  To separate things, I copied the
Outbox icon from under the Local Folder to under the "4 massage"
account so releasing affects only that 4.   Well, the Outbox looks
pretty there but it's totally worthless - can't get anything into it,
or out of it, nor even delete the dumb icon.

So help: any way to use an Outbox per account?  Or, how can I delete
that excess Icon?



Nobody offered Help or any Answer on using an Outbox under an account other
than Local Folder.

I did find out that I could delete the extra Outbox Icon.  I used Windows
Explorer in the profile: deleted Outbox titled files under the extra
account.  Simple - and safe (so far).


John,

This is the way I understand how the "Outbox" works for SM.
1. If you have several mail accounts configured as one the Outbox folder 
will contain all the messages you have sent.  This is the default setting.


2. If you have configured all your mail accounts as separate accounts 
and included specific folders for each account you will not have an 
Outbox for any accounts.  This is normal.


3. If you have subscribed to any newsgroups you will have an Outbox for 
all newsgroups you have subscribed to, this is like the Sent Folder for 
mail accounts.


Michael


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0.13 Security Update

[Chris Ilias]

On 11-03-30 8:59 PM, Daniel wrote:

Chris Ilias wrote:

On 11-03-30 5:49 AM, Daniel wrote:

S. Beaulieu wrote:

Daniel a écrit :


However, when I start up, I'm in the Mail & Newsgroup and Chatzilla
screens only. When I then clicked the browser icon in the bottom left,
it showed the seamonkey-projects page, rather than my normal (three
page) home page. I 'x'ed out of the screen, re-clicked in the bottom
left and all was well.



AFAIK, that's normal behaviour. Whenever you update SM, it shows
seamonkey-project.org on its first launch (and only its first
launch) so
you can see what changes have been implemented since the last version
and so on.


So, the first time round, the "Home" setting is *NOT* the "Home" page!!

I can see the sense in directing someone to a page notifying of the
changes,but, then again, I cannot see the logic!!


The first time round, the Home setting is the same. (If you click on the
Home button you'll see.) There is just a page that comes up the first
time your run a new version, to introduce you to the new version.


Sorry, Chris, as I explained up above, I start in the Mail & Newsgroup
screen. There is no "Home" button to click until I click the button in
the bottom left which should take me to my "Home" page, but doesn't.


If when you do click on the home button, it takes you to a home page 
that is different than the one you have set, that is not intended 
behaviour.


The welcome page is a one-time start page, not home page.
--
Chris Ilias 
Mailing list/Newsgroup moderator
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[Ray_Net]

W3BNR wrote:

On 3/31/2011 11:32 AM David E. Ross wrote:

On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr


Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string. The fails with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



Did not work for me using 'NOT FireFox/3.6.12' but DID work using
'NOT FireFox/4/0b8pre' in the string.


So i modify accordingly:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; 
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT FireFox/4/0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.0.10

and this is not working ...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Outbox

[JohnW-Mpls]

On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:44:37 -0500, JohnW-Mpls  wrote:

>
>On my SM Mail page, the Local Folder has an Outbox.  Is the operation
>of that Outbox described anywhere?  I did not find it in Help.
>
>A few weeks ago I started to send 4 messages with similar content to 4
>different addresses every day and the Outbox is handy for mailing all
>four about the same time each day.  To separate things, I copied the
>Outbox icon from under the Local Folder to under the "4 massage"
>account so releasing affects only that 4.   Well, the Outbox looks
>pretty there but it's totally worthless - can't get anything into it,
>or out of it, nor even delete the dumb icon.
>
>So help: any way to use an Outbox per account?  Or, how can I delete
>that excess Icon?


Nobody offered Help or any Answer on using an Outbox under an account other
than Local Folder.

I did find out that I could delete the extra Outbox Icon.  I used Windows
Explorer in the profile: deleted Outbox titled files under the extra
account.  Simple - and safe (so far).

-- 
 JohnW-Mpls
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Can I import a profile that the installation routine doesn't see?

[Bill Spikowski]

Can I import a profile that the installation routine doesn't see?
Either in SM 1.18 or version 2?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[Arnie Goetchius]

David E. Ross wrote:

On 3/31/11 8:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr


Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string.  The   fails with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
   Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
   Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



So the only way is to use IE  grrr...


No, you merely have to spoof Firefox without mentioning SeaMonkey.

However, your complaints here will do no good unless you also complain
directly to Google.



In about:config I have

general.useragent.extra.seamonkey

with the following modification

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16) 
Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16


and it is still not working on the Google site. Any ideas?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Installing an Extension When Internet Connection Is Disabled

[cyberzen]

David E. Ross a écrit :

On 3/30/11 11:49 PM, cyberzen wrote:

David E. Ross a écrit :

On 3/30/11 12:59 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

Because I prefer to archive all software that I install, I download the
.xpi files for extensions and then install them from my local hard
drive.  Because I log the changes made when I install software, I
disable my Internet connection prior to doing the installation in order
to prevent extraneous changes to my system (e.g., resynchronization of
my clock, downloading of E-mail).

Today, I tried to install the 1.3.5 update to AdBlock Plus.  It failed
to install, with the message:
 SeaMonkey could not install the file at
 file:///D:/downloads/software/...
 because: Signing could not be verified.
 -260

When I retried the installation with my Internet connection enabled, it
worked without any problems.

How can I install extensions and other add-ons without an Internet
connection?

Three days ago, I cross-posted this here and to mozilla.dev.extensions
with Followup-to set to the latter.  I received no replies.  This time,
I'm not cross-posting this.  Can anyone help me?


Could this

http://groups.google.com/group/FFToolbar-Group-Bugs/browse_thread/thread/4c7a3b740f316f88

help ?


This is described as a "dirty solution".  It is indeed too dirty for me.   \



or this:
http://www.microdevsys.com/WordPress/2009/02/16/firefox-firefox-could-not-install-the-file-at-because-signing-could-not-be-verified/


I will try suppressing OCSP-checking the next time I install an
extension update.

However, the Ad-ons Manager should recognize that the .xpi file is local
and not from the Internet and that there is no Internet connection.  In
that case, the Ad-ons Manager should bypass signature verification.



I was happy to know about a point I was ignoring
by the way what is the advantage of being off Internet while installing
an extension (or whatever piece of software) that is of interest only if
being on-line ?
if it should be compromised isn't it better to have it verified even if
on-line is needed ?



I am logging changes to my Windows registry and to the files on my
C-drive.  I don't want my clock to synchronize to external time servers,
my E-mail client to download messages, etc, all of which would introduce
extraneous changes to the log.

I generally download software from sources that I trust.  If I download
from a new source, I check the downloaded file with TWO different
anti-virus applications, after updating their virus databases.


thank you for explaining
you seem to be very organized
I do thing differently, so there is no discussion to have
for example I synchronize time on the ntp servers pool with ntpd from 
meinberg
so I can synchronize files on a local network, and even the pc of my 
daughter with a foolish clock remains synchronized
all points could be commented except taking the software directly from 
the producer.



--
cyberzen
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[David E. Ross]

On 3/31/11 8:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
>>> J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
 Ray_Net wrote:
> This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
> https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/
>
> my browser signature is:
> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10

 Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW
>>>
>>> May be, may be :-)
>>>
>>> You can test your configuration using this link:
>>> https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr
>>
>> Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
>> string.  The  fails with
>>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
>>   Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
>> but works okay with
>>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
>>   Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16
>>
> 
> So the only way is to use IE  grrr...

No, you merely have to spoof Firefox without mentioning SeaMonkey.

However, your complaints here will do no good unless you also complain
directly to Google.

-- 

David E. Ross


On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[W3BNR]

On 3/31/2011 11:32 AM David E. Ross wrote:

On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr


Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string.  The  fails with
   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
  Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
  Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



Did not work for me using 'NOT FireFox/3.6.12'  but DID work using
'NOT FireFox/4/0b8pre' in the string.

--
Ed
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1zhwu/
Powered by SeaMonkey: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/

"A clever warrior is one who not only wins,
 but excels at winning with ease."  -Sun Tzu (544BC- 496BC)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Ray_Net wrote:

> David E. Ross wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
 Ray_Net wrote:
> This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
> https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/
>
> my browser signature is:
> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
> rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10

 Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW
>>>
>>> May be, may be :-)
>>>
>>> You can test your configuration using this link:
>>> https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr
>>
>> Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
>> string.  The  fails with
>>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
>>   Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
>> but works okay with
>>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
>>   Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16
> 
> So the only way is to use IE  grrr...

Much better:  install the User Agent Switcher and *pretend* to be IE.
I just tested this spoofing as "IE8 on Windows 7", and that profiles
link thinks it is okay. The page failed for me using Firefox 3.6.15 with
Ubuntu. I'd previously added this UA string to the app and it works:

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0;
SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media
Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; FDM)



There is no IE on my computers.

-- 
   -bts
   -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[Ray_Net]

David E. Ross wrote:

On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr


Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string.  The  fails with
   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
  Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
   Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
  Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16



So the only way is to use IE  grrr...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[Ray_Net]

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[David E. Ross]

On 3/31/11 7:20 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
> J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
>>> https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/
>>>
>>> my browser signature is:
>>> Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
>>> rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
>>
>> Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW
> 
> May be, may be :-)
> 
> You can test your configuration using this link:
> https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr

Apparently the server is not only sniffing but also parsing the UA
string.  The  fails with
  Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18)
 Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13, NOT Firefox/3.6.16
but works okay with
  Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16)
 Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16

-- 

David E. Ross


On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Don't advance to next newsgroup!

[PhillipJones]

WLS wrote:

Monkey Sea wrote:

How do I configure SeaMonkey to stop asking me, after I've read all the
posts in a newsgroup, if I want to read the first unread post in the
next newsgroup?


Wow! The things you learn. I didn't even know you could advance to the
first unread post in the next newsgroup. But then I'm usually using a
mouse to navigate.

Thanks for the lesson! :)

WLS


I've been using that for ages. the quickest way to do that  (on a Mac) 
after reading the last item in a given newsgroup simply hit the "n" for 
new. and it asks whether you want to read next message I such and such 
group.  I usually use down arrow to go to next message and when get to 
last post I type N which brings up this message.


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Installing an Extension When Internet Connection Is Disabled

[David E. Ross]

On 3/30/11 11:49 PM, cyberzen wrote:
> David E. Ross a écrit :
>> On 3/30/11 12:59 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
>>> David E. Ross wrote:
 Because I prefer to archive all software that I install, I download the
 .xpi files for extensions and then install them from my local hard
 drive.  Because I log the changes made when I install software, I
 disable my Internet connection prior to doing the installation in order
 to prevent extraneous changes to my system (e.g., resynchronization of
 my clock, downloading of E-mail).

 Today, I tried to install the 1.3.5 update to AdBlock Plus.  It failed
 to install, with the message:
 SeaMonkey could not install the file at
 file:///D:/downloads/software/...
 because: Signing could not be verified.
 -260

 When I retried the installation with my Internet connection enabled, it
 worked without any problems.

 How can I install extensions and other add-ons without an Internet
 connection?

 Three days ago, I cross-posted this here and to mozilla.dev.extensions
 with Followup-to set to the latter.  I received no replies.  This time,
 I'm not cross-posting this.  Can anyone help me?

>>> Could this
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/FFToolbar-Group-Bugs/browse_thread/thread/4c7a3b740f316f88
>>>
>>> help ?
>>
>> This is described as a "dirty solution".  It is indeed too dirty for me.   \
>>
>>
>>> or this:
>>> http://www.microdevsys.com/WordPress/2009/02/16/firefox-firefox-could-not-install-the-file-at-because-signing-could-not-be-verified/
>>
>> I will try suppressing OCSP-checking the next time I install an
>> extension update.
>>
>> However, the Ad-ons Manager should recognize that the .xpi file is local
>> and not from the Internet and that there is no Internet connection.  In
>> that case, the Ad-ons Manager should bypass signature verification.
>>
> 
> I was happy to know about a point I was ignoring
> by the way what is the advantage of being off Internet while installing 
> an extension (or whatever piece of software) that is of interest only if 
> being on-line ?
> if it should be compromised isn't it better to have it verified even if 
> on-line is needed ?
> 

I am logging changes to my Windows registry and to the files on my
C-drive.  I don't want my clock to synchronize to external time servers,
my E-mail client to download messages, etc, all of which would introduce
extraneous changes to the log.

I generally download software from sources that I trust.  If I download
from a new source, I check the downloaded file with TWO different
anti-virus applications, after updating their virus databases.

-- 

David E. Ross


On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages
posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent
because of spam from that source.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[PhillipJones]

I went there no problem. however got a Line about "Your browser 
Configuration is not supported", in red background blue type come up 
which I was able to dismiss. But no problems showed up.


Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10



--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[Ray_Net]

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6". -JW


May be, may be :-)

You can test your configuration using this link:
https://profiles.google.com/u/0/me?tab=mr
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser unsupported ?

[J. Weaver Jr.]

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10


Apparently, they now want to see "Firefox 3.6".  -JW
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Browser unsupported ?

[Ray_Net]

This is what i got when i try to go on my google/gmail profile.
https://profiles.google.com/not-supported/

my browser signature is:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; 
rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.10

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Current nightlies & ChatZilla, venkman, DOM Inspector and DebugQA

[Robert Kaiser]

Hi everyone,

Last night I landed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627240 
which makes us install ChatZilla, venkman, DOM Inspector and DebugQA 
into user profiles instead of directly using them from the application 
folder. They now reside in distribution/extensions in the application 
folder and get copied over to the profile 1) if the application version 
has changed (or the profile is new) and 2) (AFAIK) if the add-on version 
in the profile is older then the one in the application.


For normal users (of betas and final versions), this means that starting 
with 2.1 Beta 3, they can handle those extensions just like every other 
add-on they install, they can update those from AMO without problems if 
they like, they can even uninstall them from their profiles just like 
every other add-on. And if they don't update them and we ship a newer 
version with a SeaMonkey update, they actually get that add-on update 
from our version.


So far, so good. For nightly users, this means that you might end up 
with that copy into your profile not happening as it should and not 
seeing the add-ons at all. When this happens, you can trigger the 
add-ons check that also triggers the copy into your profile by going to 
about:config and setting extensions.lastAppVersion to something else 
than the current version, then restarting SeaMonkey.


Doing that, the add-ons should be back and working normally.

Unfortunately, making things better for beta/release users does in this 
instance cause small inconveniences for nightly users. We have some 
ideas on how this could be mitigated, but that probably will need fixes 
in toolkit's add-ons manager backend.


Robert Kaiser

--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never 
meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible 
arguments that we as a community needs answers to. And most of the time, 
I even appreciate irony and fun! :)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Don't advance to next newsgroup!

[WLS]

Monkey Sea wrote:

How do I configure SeaMonkey to stop asking me, after I've read all the
posts in a newsgroup, if I want to read the first unread post in the
next newsgroup?


Wow! The things you learn. I didn't even know you could advance to the 
first unread post in the next newsgroup. But then I'm usually using a 
mouse to navigate.


Thanks for the lesson! :)

WLS
--
openSUSE 11.3(x86_64) - Gnome2.30 - SeaMonkey 2.1b3pre
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Don't advance to next newsgroup!

[dominique]

Monkey Sea wrote, On 3/31/2011 4:24 AM:

How do I configure SeaMonkey to stop asking me, after I've read all the
posts in a newsgroup, if I want to read the first unread post in the
next newsgroup?


mailnews.nav_crosses_folders = 0 (zero)

in about:config

Dom,
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Installing an Extension When Internet Connection Is Disabled

[cyberzen]

David E. Ross a écrit :

On 3/30/11 12:59 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

Because I prefer to archive all software that I install, I download the
.xpi files for extensions and then install them from my local hard
drive.  Because I log the changes made when I install software, I
disable my Internet connection prior to doing the installation in order
to prevent extraneous changes to my system (e.g., resynchronization of
my clock, downloading of E-mail).

Today, I tried to install the 1.3.5 update to AdBlock Plus.  It failed
to install, with the message:
SeaMonkey could not install the file at
file:///D:/downloads/software/...
because: Signing could not be verified.
-260

When I retried the installation with my Internet connection enabled, it
worked without any problems.

How can I install extensions and other add-ons without an Internet
connection?

Three days ago, I cross-posted this here and to mozilla.dev.extensions
with Followup-to set to the latter.  I received no replies.  This time,
I'm not cross-posting this.  Can anyone help me?


Could this

http://groups.google.com/group/FFToolbar-Group-Bugs/browse_thread/thread/4c7a3b740f316f88

help ?


This is described as a "dirty solution".  It is indeed too dirty for me.   \



or this:
http://www.microdevsys.com/WordPress/2009/02/16/firefox-firefox-could-not-install-the-file-at-because-signing-could-not-be-verified/


I will try suppressing OCSP-checking the next time I install an
extension update.

However, the Ad-ons Manager should recognize that the .xpi file is local
and not from the Internet and that there is no Internet connection.  In
that case, the Ad-ons Manager should bypass signature verification.



I was happy to know about a point I was ignoring
by the way what is the advantage of being off Internet while installing 
an extension (or whatever piece of software) that is of interest only if 
being on-line ?
if it should be compromised isn't it better to have it verified even if 
on-line is needed ?


--
cyberzen
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Outbox

[Ray_Net]

Daniel wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Daniel wrote:

Tony Mechelynck wrote:

On 29/03/11 17:44, JohnW-Mpls wrote:


On my SM Mail page, the Local Folder has an Outbox. Is the operation
of that Outbox described anywhere? I did not find it in Help.

A few weeks ago I started to send 4 messages with similar content to 4
different addresses every day and the Outbox is handy for mailing all
four about the same time each day. To separate things, I copied the
Outbox icon from under the Local Folder to under the "4 massage"
account so releasing affects only that 4. Well, the Outbox looks
pretty there but it's totally worthless - can't get anything into it,
or out of it, nor even delete the dumb icon.

So help: any way to use an Outbox per account? Or, how can I delete
that excess Icon?



Take what I say below with a grain of salt: I'm certain of nothing.

I *think* that the Outbox is used to store temporarily messages on
which
you have clicked "Send" but whose sending has not yet either succeeded
or failed. Maybe it is needed, but only for internal use by the mailer.

I *think* that a folder (which may be called Outbox if your locale is
English, but also something else if you're in a different locale) is
"an
outbox" is marked by flags set on that folder. Perhaps there is some
extension to help you see those flags, or even manipulate them.


Best regards,
Tony.


Tony, I had to go and expand my "Local Folders" account to see if it
actually had an "Outbox", as I thought the o/p may have been mis-naming
the sent folder, or maybe the "sent" folder was being mis-named the
"Outbox" in a different language version of SM.

But the "Local Folders" does have an "Outbox"and my normal mail
account doesn't have one, just the "Sent" box.

So why would I need an "Outbox" in my "Local Folders" account but not in
my normal mail account??

(Note: at work I use Outlook or Outlook Express, and it does have an
"Outbox" which does hold the outgoing messages until it is sent.)


I have only *one* outbox, and is located under the Local Folder.
If instead of "Sent Now" but "Send Later" is used ... the message goes
and stay there until i decide to later send it.


You're absolutely right, Ray!! Normally, if I want to "Send Later", I
save it as a draft and then send.

This is my thing for the day, thanks.


Glad to help you ... 2 ways to be able to send later ...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey