Re: Fonts in e-mails

[G Tod]

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

G Tod wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

The most important setting if your incoming mail looks too small is the
minimum font size. The basic size setting applies when the HTML document
(message or web page) doesn't specify a size; the minimum kicks in if it
does specify a size smaller than the minimum


Thanks for taking the time, Paul.  So...if the minimum is supposed to
kick in if it does specify a smaller size, then there's something wrong
with my SM mail?  Because this is obviously not happening, with my
minimum set to 16 and no serifed fonts selected anywhere, I still get
tiny, serifed fonts...sounds like something's out of whack?

Or, is it possible the authors have somehow specified this particular
tiny font and "locked" it in so the recipient's mail program cannot
change it?


OK, two more questions:

1) What happens if you do CTRL-0 (numeral zero, not letter "O")? That
should reset the size. Doesn't it?


Yes, it does.



2) If you examine the full headers, can you find a line reading
charset=""? For example, if the sender specifies
charset="UTF-8" do you get different results from charset="Western"?


I'm not real sure exactly what I'm looking for here, but I see 
nothing that says charset ="Western".  I checked the "Content-Type" 
lines and found the following:


E-mails with the "tiny text syndrome" had the following Content Types:

text/html; charset="UTF-8"

text/html; charset=utf-8

multipart/alternative; boundary="_--=_MCPart_1593885945"

multipart/alternative; boundary="_--=_MCPart_669633312"

multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_5b0d220a1ea9cbaf6856fe8ef0fb81b5"

multipart/mixed; boundary=4Oz1cemc-VaPAg2ba9qUy7nc-P.mV

E-mails from one source with the following content type show up properly:

multipart/alternative; boundary="=_NextPart_000_02B2_01CD447D.ADE6FE90"

Also, I see some of my plain text messages are showing up in Arial and 
some in Verdana.?  Two fonts I have chosen in Edit - Preferences - 
Appearance - Fonts.  But I can't understand why the same one is not 
being used all the time.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[G Tod]

Stan wrote:

G Tod wrote:

Received e-mail messages, it seems just the html- type, have really
small fonts, too tiny to read, really. It's also some ugly serifed font
that I can't stand. I can't seem to find any way to change thishelp?


These are methods I use for varying font size:

Here are ways to adjust text size:

1. Start/Settings/Control/Personalization/Adjust Font Size


I cannot seem to find this.


2. Start/Settings/Control/Personalization/Display Settings

Nothing there seems to help.


3. Start/Settings/Control/Personalization/Window Color and
Appearance/Advanced. Then try adjusting Message Box and Menu fonts to
larger and possibly different fonts.
This changes some fonts alright, surprising what these settings do do, 
but no effect on my particular problem.


4. In SeaMonkey, Edit/Preferences/Appearance/Fonts.  Then make size
column values 16, 16, 18.  You might also want to change some of fonts
(experiment with them).


Yes, I have experimented with these settings, but nothing seems to help 
this.  Also, I find it rather impossible to determine which of these 
font settings affects what.  Also, does the monospaced setting have to 
be a monospaced font, or can it be just anything on our system?

Thanks for the help.


Stan




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[Paul B. Gallagher]

G Tod wrote:


Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

The most important setting if your incoming mail looks too small is the
minimum font size. The basic size setting applies when the HTML document
(message or web page) doesn't specify a size; the minimum kicks in if it
does specify a size smaller than the minimum


Thanks for taking the time, Paul.  So...if the minimum is supposed to
kick in if it does specify a smaller size, then there's something wrong
with my SM mail?  Because this is obviously not happening, with my
minimum set to 16 and no serifed fonts selected anywhere, I still get
tiny, serifed fonts...sounds like something's out of whack?

Or, is it possible the authors have somehow specified this particular
tiny font and "locked" it in so the recipient's mail program cannot
change it?


OK, two more questions:

1) What happens if you do CTRL-0 (numeral zero, not letter "O")? That 
should reset the size. Doesn't it?


2) If you examine the full headers, can you find a line reading 
charset=""? For example, if the sender specifies 
charset="UTF-8" do you get different results from charset="Western"?


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[G Tod]

G Tod wrote:

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

The most important setting if your incoming mail looks too small is the
minimum font size. The basic size setting applies when the HTML document
(message or web page) doesn't specify a size; the minimum kicks in if it
does specify a size smaller than the minimum


Thanks for taking the time, Paul.  So...if the minimum is supposed to
kick in if it does specify a smaller size, then there's something wrong
with my SM mail?  Because this is obviously not happening, with my
minimum set to 16 and no serifed fonts selected anywhere, I still get
tiny, serifed fonts...sounds like something's out of whack?

Or, is it possible the authors have somehow specified this particular
tiny font and "locked" it in so the recipient's mail program cannot
change it?

Oops.  I forgot to mention...when I click on "edit as new" in these 
e-mails, they show up with the proper fonts.  Also, when I click on 
links in these e-mails that take me to the webpage, my chosen fonts and 
sizes are used.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Fonts in e-mails

[G Tod]

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

The most important setting if your incoming mail looks too small is the
minimum font size. The basic size setting applies when the HTML document
(message or web page) doesn't specify a size; the minimum kicks in if it
does specify a size smaller than the minimum


Thanks for taking the time, Paul.  So...if the minimum is supposed to 
kick in if it does specify a smaller size, then there's something wrong 
with my SM mail?  Because this is obviously not happening, with my 
minimum set to 16 and no serifed fonts selected anywhere, I still get 
tiny, serifed fonts...sounds like something's out of whack?


Or, is it possible the authors have somehow specified this particular 
tiny font and "locked" it in so the recipient's mail program cannot 
change it?


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Noticingcan not sign in to websites I have user Name and password to.

[Philip Chee]

On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:51:18 -0400, PhillipJones wrote:
> To day wasn't able to sign in to Linkedin or Onstar either using 
> SeaMonkey and FireFox. was able to using Chrome. have the developers 
> screwed with javascript on websites so much now you can't sign in. And 
> the other day there was another Web site I couldn't get into with either.
> 
> since this affects FireFox as well I am posting in FF group as well.

I don't know about Onstar but Linkedin just had a few million of it's
users passwords stolen.

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee , 
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Lightning extension version that works with SM 2.11 beta 1?

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Kertesz Laszlo wrote:

I know, according to the release notes and here:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Calendar/Calendar_Versions

it SHOULD be 1.6b1. But the linked folders are all empty and no version
i could find is compatible with SM 2.11b1.


There are compatible builds available right now from the above link, but
they could be gone again any time since they are only temporarily
available.

The real 1.6b1 is still pending. You'll need to ask the Calendar
developers for reasons why.


[I am not a calendar developer but I have some info]

The real 1.6b1 builds are pending, since Mozilla had to close one data 
center, and with the Thunderbird Infra merge to MoCo Infra, that left 
Calendar out in the cold so to speak a bit.


They don't yet have a Windows Machine (VM) that works with their 
automation (I was able to help build said VM for them just within the 
past 2 weeks)


And they just got delivered at the Data Center a new Mac Machine for 
their mac builds. In the meantime here I have loaned them one of the 
VERY FEW SeaMonkey machines we have, to at least get 1.6b1 out.


In the short term it looks like 1.6b1 will be at least a few days out 
(since the build run on SeaMonkeys mac machine failed, because their 
automation assumes at least one piece of software installed, that we 
don't have installed on that machine...)


Me and the calendar devs will work through this, and hopefully have a 
new Lightning Beta up within the next week!


--
~Justin Wood (Callek)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: seamonkey 2.9 and netscape.security.PrivilegeManager.enablePrivilege('UniversalFileRead')

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

ets...@heyne.biz wrote:

Since seamonkey 2.9 update and 2.10 the following statement will not
return ***fully quallified path***:

Up to seamokey 2.8 and firefox >10 this code still works properly !

**

   Choose a file:
 
 
   Show File Location





Due to Bug 713747 which was a *conscious* security change.

--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Poor performance with profile on SD card

[Jim Taylor]

Snip

David Wilkinson wrote:



Hi Jim:

So I finally got around to downloading CrystalDiskMark and testing my
card. These are the results:

Sequential Read : 16.70 MB/s
Sequential Write : 11.37 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 16.41 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 0.433 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 2.588 MB/s
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.003 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 3.456 MB/s
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.004 MB/s

Clearly, the 4KB writes are extremely slow. It is possible that this
poor performance is due to Windows 8 rather than the card itself?

In any case, the poor write performance is probably the cause of the
SeaMonkey slowdown. I also noticed that when I copied the profile onto
the card across my network it took a very long time (which I had
assumed was because I did it via wireless...).



Yes, I think you have found the cause (actually I guess it's the 
source, the cause is still undetermined) of your performance problem. 
 It would be interesting to test the card on Windows 7 or XP or 
another machine.  In any case it's good to know that CrystalDiskMark 
runs on Windows 8.


--
Jim
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Blurry fonts in SeaMonkey - solved (for me at least)

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Anyway, disabling [NVIDIA's] FXAA globally solved the issue for me. YMMV.



I'm working to see if we can get this issue fixed upstream.

--
~Justin Wood (Callek)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey and Ubuntu

[Cruz, Jaime]

Daniel wrote:

Cruz, Jaime wrote:

Daniel wrote:





Jamie, two options:-

1.Right click on your Mail icon and select "Properties", select the
"Application" tab and then click the "Browse" button next to the command
line. Point to where you have the SeaMonkey executable. Then add "
-Mail" (without the quotes, but with the space before the dash). Select
OK and then when you click on this icon, it should start SM in the Mail
& Newsgroup screen.





Unfortunately, when I right click on that mail icon, "Properties" is NOT
one of the options.



Gee, don't know what to suggest then, Jamie. All my dozen or so desktop
icons give me the "Properties" option if I right click on themeven
the "Wastebin" icon!



It's not the icon along the left side of the Unity screen (the 
launchbar?).  It's an icon along the top of the screen.  There are tiny 
little icons up there for mail, wireless connectivity, sound volume, 
date/time, and a "Power" switch.


I don't know how you change the setting for any of those icons.  NONE of 
them have a "Properties" selection when you right-click them.


--
Jaime A. Cruz
Secretary
Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club
http://www.nassauwings.org/

AMA District 34
http://www.AMADistrict34.com/
Pop's Run
http://www.popsrun.org/


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Poor performance with profile on SD card

[David Wilkinson]

Jim Taylor wrote:

I'm certainly no expert but suspect that disk speed may be a major issue.
SeaMonkeys cache is in the profile along with cookies, history, bookmarks and
all the other sqlite databases so it's going to be reading and writing it
frequently. The advertized write speed for that card is 20MB/s and that is
probably for sequential writes of the optimal size so you are probably not
getting anything close to that. At best it will be 5 times slower than you SDD
and may be considerably more than that. Also running a release preview the
drivers may not be fully optimized yet. I suggest downloading CrystalDiskMark
(if it will run on Windows 8) and run it on the SD card and the SDD drive and
compare the random read and write speeds. You could also try moving the cache
back to the SDD drive to see if that makes a
difference(Preferences-Advanced-Cache-Cache Folder Location)


Hi Jim:

So I finally got around to downloading CrystalDiskMark and testing my card. 
These are the results:


Sequential Read : 16.70 MB/s
Sequential Write : 11.37 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 16.41 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 0.433 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 2.588 MB/s
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.003 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 3.456 MB/s
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.004 MB/s

Clearly, the 4KB writes are extremely slow. It is possible that this poor 
performance is due to Windows 8 rather than the card itself?


In any case, the poor write performance is probably the cause of the SeaMonkey 
slowdown. I also noticed that when I copied the profile onto the card across my 
network it took a very long time (which I had assumed was because I did it via 
wireless...).


--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: location bar blank, bookmarks toolbar only has "home"

[Hartmut Figge]

Bob Fleischer:
>Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> Bob Fleischer:

>>> It appears as if some UI information is damaged.  How do I fix it?
>>
>> First step ist trying safe-mode. ;)
>
>OK -- once I do that, does that fix the problem, or is it a work-around, 
>or a diagnostic?

It is a test to show if the problem still exists in safe-mode.

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: location bar blank, bookmarks toolbar only has "home"

[Bob Fleischer]

Hartmut Figge wrote:

Bob Fleischer:


It appears as if some UI information is damaged.  How do I fix it?


First step ist trying safe-mode. ;)

Hartmut

OK -- once I do that, does that fix the problem, or is it a work-around, 
or a diagnostic?


Bob

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: minidumps folder -- what are these files?

[Ray_Net]

Bob Fleischer wrote, On 12/06/2012 19:22:
With the latest versions of Firefox and SeaMonkey, I note that my 
profiles have new folders names "minidumps" each containing some files.


What are these?



I am under SM 2.8 and i see also those files extensions .dmp and .extra

Is those files a trace of SM bugs ?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: location bar blank, bookmarks toolbar only has "home"

[Hartmut Figge]

Bob Fleischer:

>It appears as if some UI information is damaged.  How do I fix it?

First step ist trying safe-mode. ;)

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

location bar blank, bookmarks toolbar only has "home"

[Bob Fleischer]

I seem to have damaged my profile in such a way that browser windows no 
longer show the bookmarks toolbar (the space for the bar is there, as is 
the "Home" icon on the left, and it is selected under "show/hide"). 
Also, the location bar remains blank as I browse.


My profile still has the bookmark data, including the bookmarks for the 
bookmarks toolbar -- I can see them if I go to "Manage Bookmarks".


It appears as if some UI information is damaged.  How do I fix it?

Bob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.10 under Linux does not find its shared libraries

[Hartmut Figge]

Jochen Roderburg:

>Problem solved now, see parallel thread titled "XPCOMGlueLoad error".   :-)

The next one will come. Surely. :)

Hart 'd&r' mut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Noticingcan not sign in to websites I have user Name and password to.

[PhillipJones]

To day wasn't able to sign in to Linkedin or Onstar either using 
SeaMonkey and FireFox. was able to using Chrome. have the developers 
screwed with javascript on websites so much now you can't sign in. And 
the other day there was another Web site I couldn't get into with either.


since this affects FireFox as well I am posting in FF group as well.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.10 under Linux does not find its shared libraries

[Jochen Roderburg]

Problem solved now, see parallel thread titled "XPCOMGlueLoad error".   :-)

Jochen Roderburg
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: XPCOMGlueLoad error

[Jochen Roderburg]

On 2012-06-12, Jens Hatlak  wrote:
> Peter Nieman wrote:
>> Updated to 2.10 and Seamonkey failed to start. Error message:
>>
>> XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/seamonkey-2.0/libxpcom.so:
>> libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>> Couldn't load XPCOM.
>
> Sounds like the following, which will be fixed in SM 2.10.1:
>
>
>
> HTH
>
> Jens
>

Yes, yes, even if it sounds very strange, that is now finally the real
solution of this problem.

I had found the same thing myself over the day independent of this new
Bugzilla entry and just wanted to report my findings here and somewhere on
Bugzilla.;-)

Jochen Roderburg
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

minidumps folder -- what are these files?

[Bob Fleischer]

With the latest versions of Firefox and SeaMonkey, I note that my 
profiles have new folders names "minidumps" each containing some files.


What are these?

Bob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [SM 2.10 ] bug 736811 Mouse changes to drag cursor without clicking any buttons

[Hartmut Figge]

Hartmut Figge:
>Hartmut Figge:

>>Hartmut, happily playing Morrowind
>
>Now while trying backouts in the background because of a new comment of
>Jens.

No luck.

>Well, not too exhausting. ;)

The compilation time depends heavily on the amount of new checkins since
the last compilation, so the first backout may take some time. But the
next ones, even when deleting $OBJDIR what should always be done, are
quick if using ccachen. The last try took

real7m20.223

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Blurry fonts in SeaMonkey - solved (for me at least)

[Jens Hatlak]

Hi all,

As I've already told some people on IRC, I recently experienced a very 
bad degradation of font display quality in SeaMonkey, affecting both 
chrome (menus) and content. I couldn't explain what happened since 
Firefox was unaffected even though it uses the same back-end and font 
settings.


Today I found the issue: I have a very recent NVIDIA graphics card which 
supports FXAA (Fast Approximate Anti-Aliasing) which can be enabled via 
the driver (NVIDIA Control Panel, 3D Settings, Manage 3D settings, 
Global Settings, Antialiasing - FXAA). You can enable or disable it 
globally, but override the choice for certain applications. 
Incidentally, NVIDIA ships a default profile for Mozilla Firefox which 
disables FXAA for that application. Of course there's no SeaMonkey 
profile by default...


Anyway, disabling FXAA globally solved the issue for me. YMMV.

HTH

Jens

P.S.: You might wonder why the NVIDIA driver thinks SM is a 3D 
application. Well, nowadays it uses hardware acceleration (e.g. Direct3D 
10) and supports WebGL, that's why.


--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [SM 2.10 ] bug 736811 Mouse changes to drag cursor without clicking any buttons

[Hartmut Figge]

Hartmut Figge:

>Hartmut, happily playing Morrowind

Now while trying backouts in the background because of a new comment of
Jens. Well, not too exhausting. ;)

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: XPCOMGlueLoad error

[Jens Hatlak]

Peter Nieman wrote:

Updated to 2.10 and Seamonkey failed to start. Error message:

XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/local/seamonkey-2.0/libxpcom.so:
libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Couldn't load XPCOM.


Sounds like the following, which will be fixed in SM 2.10.1:



HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Lightning extension version that works with SM 2.11 beta 1?

[Jens Hatlak]

Kertesz Laszlo wrote:

I know, according to the release notes and here:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Calendar/Calendar_Versions

it SHOULD be 1.6b1. But the linked folders are all empty and no version
i could find is compatible with SM 2.11b1.


There are compatible builds available right now from the above link, but 
they could be gone again any time since they are only temporarily available.


The real 1.6b1 is still pending. You'll need to ask the Calendar 
developers for reasons why.


HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [SM 2.10 ] bug 736811 Mouse changes to drag cursor without clicking any buttons

[Hartmut Figge]

NoOp:

>I'll try to do some additional tests tonight or tomorrow.

If you feel adventurous enough, the responsible checkin should be in
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?startdate=2012-02-07+00%3A30&enddate=2012-02-07+15%3A20%3A00

Not too long, that list, but unfortunately there are also 91 hidden
changesets. Luckily this bug does not hit me, 'Wide View', pffft *g*, so
i can easily ignore it.

Hartmut, happily playing Morrowind

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

seamonkey 2.9 and netscape.security.PrivilegeManager.enablePrivilege('UniversalFileRead')

[etsec2]

Since seamonkey 2.9 update and 2.10 the following statement will not
return ***fully quallified path***:

Up to seamokey 2.8 and firefox >10 this code still works properly !

**

  Choose a file:


  Show File Location


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey and Ubuntu

[Daniel]

Cruz, Jaime wrote:

Daniel wrote:





Jamie, two options:-

1.Right click on your Mail icon and select "Properties", select the
"Application" tab and then click the "Browse" button next to the command
line. Point to where you have the SeaMonkey executable. Then add "
-Mail" (without the quotes, but with the space before the dash). Select
OK and then when you click on this icon, it should start SM in the Mail
& Newsgroup screen.

2.Alternatively, start your SeaMonkey, select
Edit->Preferences->Appearance, and, in the top right section, un-check
everything bar Mail & Newsgroups, if that's what you want.

HTH



Unfortunately, when I right click on that mail icon, "Properties" is NOT
one of the options.



Gee, don't know what to suggest then, Jamie. All my dozen or so desktop 
icons give me the "Properties" option if I right click on themeven 
the "Wastebin" icon!


--
Daniel


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Lightning extension version that works with SM 2.11 beta 1?

[Kertesz Laszlo]

I know, according to the release notes and here:

https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Calendar/Calendar_Versions

it SHOULD be 1.6b1. But the linked folders are all empty and no version
i could find is compatible with SM 2.11b1.

Anyone?


BTW i ask this because SM 2.11 has a (working, unlike in FF 13)
implementation of the click-to-play functionality, something i like very
much (no more flashblock).
-- 
O zi buna,
Kertesz Laszlo

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey