date:20120615


Works here (tested).
Philip Taylor

no...@nonospam.org wrote:
Since I upgraded SeaMonkey from v2.9.1 to v 2.10, I am unable to save 
individual messages as .txt files.


When I try to do so, I get the message "Unable to save the message. 
Please check your file name and try again later."


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported



Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/

Today first occurence

And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release 
..grrr.


IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1

Why on earth are you still on SP1, Ray; you should be on SP3,
for many many reasons.

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Retract : Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported


Philip Taylor would like to retract this message
(he read "XP" where he should have read "7").

Philip TAYLOR wrote:


Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/

Today first occurence

And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release 
..grrr.


IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1

Why on earth are you still on SP1, Ray; you should be on SP3,
for many many reasons.

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported

2012-06-15 Thread Paul B. Gallagher


Philip TAYLOR wrote:


Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/

Today first occurrence

And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
..grrr.

IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1

Why on earth are you still on SP1, Ray; you should be on SP3,
for many many reasons.


Perhaps he meant to say 64 bits? For us, SP 1 is the latest.

And BTW, no error message for me, just congratulations.

The latest public release (nonbeta) version is 2.10, which runs fine 
here on Win7/64 SP1.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported

Ray_Net wrote:

> This is what i got on my home page which is:
> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/
> 
> Today first occurence
> 
> And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
> ..grrr.
> 
> IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1
> 
> UNSUPPORTED for SM 2.10 
> 
> Currently i am using:Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
> rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8

I'm not using Windows at all, but am using Ubuntu with the same version 
as yourself:

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 
SeaMonkey/2.8

..and here is what I see at that page:

"Warning! You're using an old stable version of SeaMonkey (2.8), while we 
offer a newer version which contains important security fixes. "

It does not say "UNSUPPORTED." In the green box at the right, it advises 
that I can download the latest version. "Download Now SeaMonkey 2.10"

My interpretation of your post is that you see exactly what you should 
see. Do note, that if you don't see this green box, you may have 
JavaScript disabled.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: hbo site problems

2012-06-15 Thread Jim Taylor


Ken Rudolph wrote:

I seem to be unable to load http://www.hbogo.com in SeaMonkey. All I
get is a spinning logo and the site never loads.  I'm having no
problem accessing that site using Google Chrome.  For that matter,
even http://www.hbo.com just shows a white screen in SM, but loads in
Chrome (at least on my computer...last week I had no problems).
Anybody else having this problem?  Any ideas how to make it work in SM?

I'm running SM 2.10 on Win-7 Ult.  I did an automatic install of a new
version of Shockwave Flash this morning...it's listed in Enabled
plugins as File: NPSWF32_3_300_257.DLL, Version: 11.3.300.257,
Shockwave Flash 11.3 r300 .  Could that be a problem?



It works for me on SM 2.10 Windows 7 Home Premium Build identifier: 
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 
Firefox/13.0 SeaMonkey/2.10 using that version of flash (File: 
NPSWF32_11_3_300_257.dll Version: 11.3.300.257 Shockwave Flash 11.3 
r300).  Both of those URL's are very slow to load, but they both load 
and run for me.


You can try troubleshooting using the information from 
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Macromedia_flash particularly the section on 
Flash Player 11.3 Protected Mode - Windows.


--
Jim




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: hbo site problems


Jim Taylor wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:

I seem to be unable to load http://www.hbogo.com in SeaMonkey. All I
get is a spinning logo and the site never loads.  I'm having no
problem accessing that site using Google Chrome.  For that matter,
even http://www.hbo.com just shows a white screen in SM, but loads in
Chrome (at least on my computer...last week I had no problems).
Anybody else having this problem?  Any ideas how to make it work in SM?

I'm running SM 2.10 on Win-7 Ult.  I did an automatic install of a new
version of Shockwave Flash this morning...it's listed in Enabled
plugins as File: NPSWF32_3_300_257.DLL, Version: 11.3.300.257,
Shockwave Flash 11.3 r300 .  Could that be a problem?



It works for me on SM 2.10 Windows 7 Home Premium Build identifier:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Firefox/13.0
SeaMonkey/2.10 using that version of flash (File:
NPSWF32_11_3_300_257.dll Version: 11.3.300.257 Shockwave Flash 11.3


I give up.  I can't get any flash videos to play in SM (they all play in 
Chrome).  I even uninstalled SM and all Adobe flash stuff and 
reinstalled them.  I'm still showing the correct plug-in info for 
Shockwave Flash.  Everything tells me it is up to date.  But now, even 
in Facebook or the IMDb when I try to run any videos in SM I just get a 
blank white screen.  I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for all 
web browsing.  This is very, very disturbing to me (I've been a 
Netscape/Mozilla Suite user since the beginning and have never had a 
problem like this.)


--
Ken Rudolph


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: hbo site problems

Ken Rudolph wrote:

> I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for all web browsing.

Have you tried Firefox?  IMO, much better, and more private than Chrome. 
You don't want to sell your soul to Google, do you?

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: hbo site problems


Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:


I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for all web browsing.


Have you tried Firefox?  IMO, much better, and more private than Chrome.
You don't want to sell your soul to Google, do you?

I just downloaded Firefox and tried it.  #1, it asked me if I wanted to 
import bookmarks from IE or Chrome or none.  So much for my SeaMonkey 
bookmarks.  #2, I had the SAME EXACT PROBLEM with Flash videos, just got 
a white screen on the IMDb and Facebook and "An error occurred.  Please 
try again later" on You Tube (which is exactly what happens in SM). 
I'm still not having the problem with Chrome.  I'm at my wits end.


--
Ken Rudolph

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: hbo site problems

Ken Rudolph wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> Ken Rudolph wrote:
>>> I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for all web browsing.
>>
>> Have you tried Firefox?  IMO, much better, and more private than
>> Chrome. You don't want to sell your soul to Google, do you?
>>
> I just downloaded Firefox and tried it.  #1, it asked me if I wanted to
> import bookmarks from IE or Chrome or none.  So much for my SeaMonkey
> bookmarks.  #2, I had the SAME EXACT PROBLEM with Flash videos, just got
> a white screen on the IMDb and Facebook and "An error occurred.  Please
> try again later" on You Tube (which is exactly what happens in SM). I'm
> still not having the problem with Chrome.  I'm at my wits end.

Did you make sure Flash was installed/recognized in/by Firefox? Check the 
Add-Ons/Plugins page (I guess you're familiar with that by now.  )

A wit is a long way... you have plenty left!

I have no problem with those videos in Firefox, SeaMonkey, Chromium, 
Opera, Dillo. Are you allowing JavaScript and cookies? ..might have 
something to do with it.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Profile Manager seems not to create new profile in Windows 7 x 64

2012-06-15 Thread mmech mmech

Hi everyone,
I am transitioning from Vista to Windows 7. I've been using Seamonkey
for years now and migrating from XP, Vista, etc quite successfuly.
Overall, Seamonkey browser seems to be working fine. I do not have any
issue.

The problem that I am facing  is with the Profile Manager (again under
Windows 7 x64). For sake of discussion, I am using Seamonkey 2.10 and
I have also tried the new 2.11 beta. No difference in what I am
describing below.

I am trying to generate a new profile to add to the default profile
you get. As example, I am using "Test". I went through the "All
Program --> Seamonkey -- Profile Manager" route. Then, go to Create
Profile. Then, I can enter the new name. But, when I click Finish,
nothing refresh (I can keep pressing Finish but there is no reaction,
that windows remains there). Then, I have to click Cancel to skip that
window. After clicking Cancel, I am back to Profile Manager window,
but no profile is generated under Available Profiles. Nevertheless,
and curiously, I can see that a new folder has been created under
AppData/Roaming/Mozilla/Seamonkey/Profiles. But, this new profile is
not available through the Profile manager. I tried to close and open
Seamonkey to see if it will refresh, but it is not there.

Then, I tried using Tools-->Switch Profile and then create a new
profile. The same problem happens when you reach Finish buttom. That
windows does not react and you do not see a new Profile being created.
You get stick in the Finish windows and the only using Cancel you can
get back to Profile Manager windows. In the Profile Manager windows no
new profile appears. However, in this case, if I close the Profile
Manager window and I reopen it again (through Tools-->Switch Profile),
I can see a new Profile being created. This was promising. HOWEVER, if
I close Seamonkey and I check if the new profile is available through
All Program -->Seamonkey-->Profile Manager, I cannot see the new
profile at all. Furthermore, after re-opening Seamonkey, if now Ii go
back again to Tools-Switch Profile the new profile is not being shown
anymore. Once again, if I check on AppData/Roaming/Mozilla/Seamonkey/
Profiles I can see that a neww folder has been opened, simply is not
being shown as part of the available profiless.

Because, it seems to me that this problem is related to x64 or Windows
7 (I used Windows Vista x32 in a different machine without problem to
create new profile), I decided to use the Windows Virtual PC on the
same computer. I downloaded the Seamonekey and installed under the
Windows Virtual PC. Then, I went to All Program -->Seamonkey-->Profile
Manager. The Profile Manager opened and I click Create New Profile. I
typed the new profile name and click "Finish". And immediatly, the new
Profile was added in the Profile Manager. The "Finish" buttom worked
perfectly under the Windows Virtual PC . Also, the new profile was
created and was available after closing and opening Seamonkey again.
All this, once again, under Windows Virtual PC.

So, it seems that something in the Profile Manager is not working well
under Windows 7 or, alternative, it is a 64 bits issue. As far as I
understand, the Windows Virtual PC runs in XP mode and 32 bits.

My temporal fix is to use Seamonkey through the Windows Virtual PC,
but this is annoying as I need to be switching windows and I would
like to migrate completely to Windows 7 and x64 bits.

So, I would like too know if this is a know issue by Seamonkey and if
there is a fix too go through and create a new Profile that is
available after opening or closing Seamonkey. Thanks.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: hbo site problems


Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:


Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:

I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for all web browsing.


Have you tried Firefox?  IMO, much better, and more private than
Chrome. You don't want to sell your soul to Google, do you?


I just downloaded Firefox and tried it.  #1, it asked me if I wanted to
import bookmarks from IE or Chrome or none.  So much for my SeaMonkey
bookmarks.  #2, I had the SAME EXACT PROBLEM with Flash videos, just got
a white screen on the IMDb and Facebook and "An error occurred.  Please
try again later" on You Tube (which is exactly what happens in SM). I'm
still not having the problem with Chrome.  I'm at my wits end.


Did you make sure Flash was installed/recognized in/by Firefox? Check the
Add-Ons/Plugins page (I guess you're familiar with that by now.  )


Firefox Plugins show Shockwave Flash 11.3.300.257.  And checking to see 
if it is up to date shows Shockwave Flash is up to date.  Still, I am 
not able to run ANY flash videos in Firefox OR SeaMonkey.


A wit is a long way... you have plenty left!


No, I'm running out.


I have no problem with those videos in Firefox, SeaMonkey, Chromium,
Opera, Dillo. Are you allowing JavaScript and cookies? ..might have
something to do with it.


I'm allowing all cookies.  I can't find JavaScript...but I know that I 
never disabled it.


I didn't have this problem with SeaMonkey 2.9.  Is it possible to go 
back?  Would that even help?  I'm scared to even try.


--
Ken Rudolph



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey 2.9

Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me 
(multiple problems with Flash & e-mail composer)?  If it is possible, 
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?


--
Ken Rudolph
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9


Ken Rudolph wrote:

Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash & e-mail composer)?  If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?

About the Flash problems.  Using YouTube I found a window called "Flash 
Player Settings Manager".  It says:  "ActiveX Version:  Not 
installed...Plug-in Version:  11.3.300.257".  Could it be possible that 
what I need is to install an "ActiveX Version"?  If so, where can I find 
this?


In the meantime, no videos run in YouTube, Facebook, IMDb etc. in SM or 
in Facebook.  Just a white-out screen.  This problem didn't exist three 
days ago.  SM 2.10, Win-7 Ult.


Yes, I know, nobody else seems to have this problem; but I can run 
videos in IE and Chrome.  The problem only seems to exist in SM and Firefox.


--
Ken Rudolph


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9



Ken Rudolph wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:

Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash & e-mail composer)?  If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?

About the Flash problems.  Using YouTube I found a window called 
"Flash Player Settings Manager".  It says:  "ActiveX Version:  Not 
installed...Plug-in Version:  11.3.300.257".  Could it be possible 
that what I need is to install an "ActiveX Version"?  If so, where can 
I find this?



Try "Start /Run /DXdiag"; it may provide a useful lead.
Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9


Philip TAYLOR wrote:


Ken Rudolph wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:

Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash & e-mail composer)?  If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?


About the Flash problems.  Using YouTube I found a window called
"Flash Player Settings Manager".  It says:  "ActiveX Version:  Not
installed...Plug-in Version:  11.3.300.257".  Could it be possible
that what I need is to install an "ActiveX Version"?  If so, where can
I find this?



Try "Start /Run /DXdiag"; it may provide a useful lead.
Philip Taylor


I don't even know what to look for.  However, I just found another 
problem.  I tried to stream an audio at 
http://www.radiolab.org/2009/oct/19/ .  In IE I get a box which plays an 
hour audio file.  Nothing shows up in SM except for a "Stream" link. 
When I click on it I get http://www.radiolab.org/audio/m3u/91693/ which 
is a black screen titled "(audio/x-mpegurl Object)" and nothing.  I have 
the feeling that all these problems are connected, that something is 
wrong somewhere.  Again, all these pages work in IE and Chrome.  But 
they don't work in both SeaMonkey and Firefox.


Please, somebody tell me what to do!

--
Ken Rudolph

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9



Ken Rudolph wrote:

Philip TAYLOR wrote:

I don't even know what to look for. 


Any errors or problems that DxDiag reports.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9


Philip TAYLOR wrote:


Ken Rudolph wrote:

Philip TAYLOR wrote:

I don't even know what to look for.


Any errors or problems that DxDiag reports.


Every tab says:  no problems found

--
Ken Rudolph

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Problem saving emails in v2.10

2012-06-15 Thread Jens Hatlak


no...@nonospam.org wrote:

Since I upgraded SeaMonkey from v2.9.1 to v 2.10, I am unable to save
individual messages as .txt files.

When I try to do so, I get the message "Unable to save the message.
Please check your file name and try again later."

(...)

I hope this will be fixed in the next update!


It will (SM 2.10.1, ETA tomorrow).

HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Problem saving emails in v2.10



Jens Hatlak wrote:

no...@nonospam.org wrote:


I hope this will be fixed in the next update!


It will (SM 2.10.1, ETA tomorrow).


What is the nature of the bug such that some of us (e.g., I) can do
this already, pre-2.10.1 ?

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported

2012-06-15 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj


Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/

Today first occurence

And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release ..grrr.

IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1

UNSUPPORTED for SM 2.10 

Currently i am using:Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0)
Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8



Yes.
I think that there is something 'out of kilter' about what is presented on that 
page as I also get:


--
Welcome to SeaMonkey

Thanks for using SeaMonkey. Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported 
by the latest stable version of our product so we cannot offer you an upgrade 
unless you upgrade your operating system.

---
My OS is Windows 7 ultimate (64bit) with SP1,  build 7601
last updated yesterday June 14
and my SM Build identifier/User-Agent is:
 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120429 Firefox/12.0 
SeaMonkey/2.9.1


Now as to whether the page is likely to be repaired,  Well???
Or perhaps we should all be upgrading our operating systems to some WIN 8 beta 
:)
--
Rostyk
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9

2012-06-15 Thread Jim Taylor


Ken Rudolph wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:

Snip

About the Flash problems.  Using YouTube I found a window called
"Flash Player Settings Manager".  It says:  "ActiveX Version:  Not
installed...Plug-in Version:  11.3.300.257".  Could it be possible
that what I need is to install an "ActiveX Version"?  If so, where can
I find this?


Snip


The ActiveX version is for IE, it's not used for SeaMonkey or Firefox. 
 Did you upgrade to 2.10?  If so I would download the full version 
and reinstall.  You can get it at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ . 
 If you really want to go back to 2.9.1 you can get it from 
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.9.1 .  I think I would 
uninstall SeaMonkey, uninstall Flash, reinstall Flash, and then 
reinstall SeaMonkey.


--
Jim


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Poor performance with profile on SD card

2012-06-15 Thread David Wilkinson


David Wilkinson wrote:

I tested this card on my Windows 7 x64 desktop machine (using an external card
reader) and got very similar results:

---
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
---
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read :18.171 MB/s
   Sequential Write :11.250 MB/s
  Random Read 512KB :17.789 MB/s
 Random Write 512KB : 0.356 MB/s
 Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 3.058 MB/s [   746.6 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.003 MB/s [ 0.8 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 4.018 MB/s [   981.0 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.003 MB/s [ 0.8 IOPS]

   Test : 1000 MB [I: 24.4% (7.3/29.8 GB)] (x5)
   Date : 2012/06/13 9:28:28
 OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

-

So I guess it is the card...


After considerable research, I bought a new card:

SanDisk 32GB Extreme SDHC Memory Card (SDSDRX3-032G-A21) - 45MB/s

and got dramatically better results for the 4KB writes (on my Windows 7 
machine):

---
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
   Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
---
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

   Sequential Read :18.063 MB/s
  Sequential Write :17.264 MB/s
 Random Read 512KB :17.653 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 1.591 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 2.721 MB/s [   664.2 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.194 MB/s [   291.6 IOPS]
   Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 2.422 MB/s [   591.3 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.928 MB/s [   226.5 IOPS]

  Test : 1000 MB [I: 0.0% (0.0/29.7 GB)] (x5)
  Date : 2012/06/15 13:51:56
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

Next step: try it in my Windows 8 tablet and put my SeaMonkey profile on it.

Question: if you were me, would you format it as NTFS? Or just leave well alone 
and hope I do not want to copy files bigger than 4GB onto it.


--
David Wilkinson


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9


Ken Rudolph wrote:


Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash & e-mail composer)? If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?


OK, I was desperate.  I did a Windows restore back to the point where I 
had no problems (which was 6/5/2012).  Right now I have none of the 
latest Windows updates, and it restored to Seamonkey 2.9.1.  Shockwave 
Flash is restored to NPSWF32_11_2_202_235.dll, Version:  11.2.202.235, 
Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202.


And you know what?  YouTube, hbogo.com all the things that *didn't* work 
before are working now.


I'm not sure where the problem happened, which update screwed the 
system.  Was it SeaMonkey 2.10?  Flash?  Windows Update?  My feeling is 
that I have to do the Windows Update first, then see what happens.  Then 
update SeaMonkey, finally Flash.


I'm almost afraid to try anything.

--
Ken Rudolph


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9

2012-06-15 Thread Bryan Morris




In message , Jim Taylor 
 writes


I think I would uninstall SeaMonkey, uninstall Flash, reinstall 
Flash, and then reinstall SeaMonkey.




Wouldn't uninstalling 2.10 and then re-installing lose all bookmarks 
passwords etc?


BTW for other reasons I've installed 2.91 over 2.10 with no problems

--
Bryan Morris
Public Keyhttp://www.pgp.uk.demon.net - 0xCC6237E9
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9


Jim Taylor wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:

Snip

About the Flash problems. Using YouTube I found a window called
"Flash Player Settings Manager". It says: "ActiveX Version: Not
installed...Plug-in Version: 11.3.300.257". Could it be possible
that what I need is to install an "ActiveX Version"? If so, where can
I find this?


Snip



The ActiveX version is for IE, it's not used for SeaMonkey or Firefox.
Did you upgrade to 2.10? If so I would download the full version and
reinstall. You can get it at http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ . If you
really want to go back to 2.9.1 you can get it from
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.9.1 . I think I would
uninstall SeaMonkey, uninstall Flash, reinstall Flash, and then
reinstall SeaMonkey.


By the way, before doing the Windows restore to 6/5/12, I did uninstall 
SM 2.10 and uninstalled all the Flash stuff and re-installed them from 
fresh downloads (though I did the re-install in the opposite order). 
That didn't change anything.


--
Ken Rudolph


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Poor performance with profile on SD card

2012-06-15 Thread Jim Taylor


David Wilkinson wrote:

David Wilkinson wrote:

I tested this card on my Windows 7 x64 desktop machine (using an
external card
reader) and got very similar results:

---
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World :
http://crystalmark.info/
---
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read :18.171 MB/s
   Sequential Write :11.250 MB/s
  Random Read 512KB :17.789 MB/s
 Random Write 512KB : 0.356 MB/s
 Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 3.058 MB/s [   746.6 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.003 MB/s [ 0.8 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 4.018 MB/s [   981.0 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.003 MB/s [ 0.8 IOPS]

   Test : 1000 MB [I: 24.4% (7.3/29.8 GB)] (x5)
   Date : 2012/06/13 9:28:28
 OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

-

So I guess it is the card...


After considerable research, I bought a new card:

SanDisk 32GB Extreme SDHC Memory Card (SDSDRX3-032G-A21) - 45MB/s

and got dramatically better results for the 4KB writes (on my Windows
7 machine):

---
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
---
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read :18.063 MB/s
   Sequential Write :17.264 MB/s
  Random Read 512KB :17.653 MB/s
 Random Write 512KB : 1.591 MB/s
 Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 2.721 MB/s [   664.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.194 MB/s [   291.6 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 2.422 MB/s [   591.3 IOPS]
   Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.928 MB/s [   226.5 IOPS]

   Test : 1000 MB [I: 0.0% (0.0/29.7 GB)] (x5)
   Date : 2012/06/15 13:51:56
 OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

Next step: try it in my Windows 8 tablet and put my SeaMonkey profile
on it.

Question: if you were me, would you format it as NTFS? Or just leave
well alone and hope I do not want to copy files bigger than 4GB onto it.

Good question, and I don't know the answer.  Theoretically if you 
format NTFS and retest and performance is bad you can use the SD 
Formatter from the SD Association ( 
https://www.sdcard.org/downloads/formatter_3/ ) to format it back to 
Fat32 for optimal performance, but I have never done it and don't know 
that it would get it back to the same performance it has now.  It 
might be worth using it to format the poor performing one back to 
Fat32 and retest to see if it makes a difference.  That might give you 
a hint what you want to do with the new one.


--
Jim

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.10 under Linux does not find its shared libraries

2012-06-15 Thread Peter Nieman


On 15/06/12 00:33, MCBastos wrote:

Well, I couldn't reproduce the behavior you describe. It worked
perfectly for me, with no undesired borders at all. Code below:

http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd";>



   

   Testcase
   

   



   




Hm. I do see the bug with your test case, with any image size. When I 
resize the browser window in small steps the thin black lines around the 
image appear and disappear.


As I said, the problem first appeared years ago after improvements to 
Gecko had been announced (faster rendering), and I also think I saw bug 
reports about it at that time.


Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 SeaMonkey/2.10
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9


Ken Rudolph wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:


Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash & e-mail composer)? If it is possible,
where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?


OK, I was desperate. I did a Windows restore back to the point where I
had no problems (which was 6/5/2012). Right now I have none of the
latest Windows updates, and it restored to Seamonkey 2.9.1. Shockwave
Flash is restored to NPSWF32_11_2_202_235.dll, Version: 11.2.202.235,
Shockwave Flash 11.2 r202.

And you know what? YouTube, hbogo.com all the things that *didn't* work
before are working now.

Windows update went ok, no change, still getting videos.  I'm tempted to 
leave well enough alone and not change anything else.


Is there any way to avoid an automatic update to SM 2.10?  I think that 
in the past it was updated without my explicit permission.  I know that 
the Flash update does ask me before it does anything.  I'm not sure why 
I should do any more updating at all.  Things are working fine now, why 
tempt fate?


--
Ken Rudolph

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Loss of focus

2012-06-15 Thread George

Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) 
Gecko/20120612 SeaMonkey/2.11


This is SeaMonkey 2.11b2 running under Windows 7 64bit.

Has anyone else noticed SeaMonkey losing focus when a link in a web
page is opened with the middle mouse key to open a new tab?

George
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported

2012-06-15 Thread Jens Hatlak


Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/

Today first occurence

And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
...grrr.

IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1

UNSUPPORTED for SM 2.10 

Currently i am using:Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8


While fixing bug 728726 I failed to correctly parse User Agent strings 
which contain "Windows NT". I thought I had tested this (since I'm on 
Win7 myself), but I forgot to test with an old build (only used a 
current nightly build).


The problem should be fixed now (if not, try Shift+Reload to skip the 
cache).


Greetings,

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak 
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Problem saving emails in v2.10

2012-06-15 Thread NoOp

On 06/14/2012 05:12 PM, no...@nonospam.org wrote:
> Since I upgraded SeaMonkey from v2.9.1 to v 2.10, I am unable to save 
> individual messages as .txt files.
> 
> When I try to do so, I get the message "Unable to save the message. 
> Please check your file name and try again later."
> 
> The exact procedure I am using is:
> Right-click in message window->Save as
> Change name shown from xxx.eml to xxx.txt
> 
> I have been doing this for years and it has never failed to work before.
> 
> I can save the file as xxx.eml and then change the name to xxx.txt but 
> then I find it has saved all the header lines, which it didn't used to 
> do and which I don't want.
> 
> I hope this will be fixed in the next update!
> 
> John

Looks like it will:


 Saving a local message as .txt or .html on Windows failed (bug 763319).
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763319

If you like, you can try 2.11b2 and see if that resolves your problem:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.11b2
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported

2012-06-15 Thread NoOp

On 06/15/2012 02:32 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> Ray_Net wrote:
> 
>> This is what i got on my home page which is:
>> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/
>> 
>> Today first occurence
>> 
>> And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
>> ..grrr.
>> 
>> IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1
>> 
>> UNSUPPORTED for SM 2.10 
>> 
>> Currently i am using:Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
>> rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8
> 
> I'm not using Windows at all, but am using Ubuntu with the same version 
> as yourself:
> 
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 
> SeaMonkey/2.8
> 
> ..and here is what I see at that page:
> 
> "Warning! You're using an old stable version of SeaMonkey (2.8), while we 
> offer a newer version which contains important security fixes. "
> 
> It does not say "UNSUPPORTED." In the green box at the right, it advises 
> that I can download the latest version. "Download Now SeaMonkey 2.10"
> 
> My interpretation of your post is that you see exactly what you should 
> see. Do note, that if you don't see this green box, you may have 
> JavaScript disabled.
> 

:-)

I like this message when I switch the uri to:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0pre)
Gecko/20110406 NOT Firefox/4.0pre SeaMonkey/2.1b3pre

Hey! Your copy of SeaMonkey is more than four weeks old. Unless you are
using the latest release or nightly build, bug reports get rapidly less
useful the older your copy is.

So if you're not running the latest release (SeaMonkey 2.10), we could
use your help testing either that or the latest nightly build. (Be
warned that nightly builds are development software, and there is no
guarantee that they won't fry your processor, insult your mother, or
cause you to break out in a nasty rash.)

Setting my uri to Ray's:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312
Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8
results in:

Warning! You're using an old stable version of SeaMonkey (2.8), while we
offer a newer version which contains important security fixes.

We encourage you to download the newer version linked in the download
box at the right to be safe from known vulnerabilities and be able to
use the newest features in a stable SeaMonkey release.

If you get this message despite having installed SeaMonkey 2.10 already,
you might want to try resetting your user agent string to the default.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported

2012-06-15 Thread Ray_Net


Jens Hatlak wrote, On 15/06/2012 20:55:

Ray_Net wrote:

This is what i got on my home page which is:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/

Today first occurence

And this page did not tell me which is the current stable release
...grrr.

IS ... Windows 7 professionnal 32 bits SP 1

UNSUPPORTED for SM 2.10 

Currently i am using:Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8


While fixing bug 728726 I failed to correctly parse User Agent strings 
which contain "Windows NT". I thought I had tested this (since I'm on 
Win7 myself), but I forgot to test with an old build (only used a 
current nightly build).


The problem should be fixed now (if not, try Shift+Reload to skip the 
cache).


Greetings,

Jens


It's fixed now - THANKS !
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: hbo site problems

2012-06-15 Thread NoOp

On 06/15/2012 07:55 AM, Ken Rudolph wrote:
...
> 
> I'm allowing all cookies.  I can't find JavaScript...but I know that I 
> never disabled it.
> 
> I didn't have this problem with SeaMonkey 2.9.  Is it possible to go 
> back?  Would that even help?  I'm scared to even try.
> 

Restart with add-on disabled: Help|Restart With Addons Disabled
and see if it works then. If so enable your addons 1 by 1 until you find
the one creating the problem.

Just yesterday my wife brought me her Win7 notebook and complained that
she couldn't see the flash section & images on bigfishgames.com (using
Firefox 13). I could get it to appear properly on the notebook with IE,
SeaMonkey, and Chrome. So I restarted with addons disabled & it turns
out that (yet again) something she had downloaded and installed also
installed (what I consider to be) a malware toolbar: qwiklinx. Disabling
the toolbar fixed the problem.
  Out of curiosity, I left the program installed (it puts a directory in
the firefox directory - qwiklinx) and reinstalled Firefox. Of course the
toolbar addon remained persistent. The only was to get rid of it was to
delete the quiklinx directory, uninstall from Programs, and go through
the register & rip out traces of it there.

So, even if you reinstall: 1) your profile remains intact, and 2) a
malware toolbar (or similar) will remain as well.

The next step after restarting with addon disabled still not working, is
to create a new test profile and try with that. Tools|Switch Profiles -
create new 'Test' profile and restart in that new clean profile. Install
_only_ Flash & try again.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Unfortunately, your platform is no longer supported

NoOp wrote:

> I like this message when I switch the uri to: Build identifier:
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0pre) Gecko/20110406 NOT
> Firefox/4.0pre SeaMonkey/2.1b3pre

There are so many web sites that can be fooled by simply changing the UA 
string. It can be a sport...

A couple of the favorites I use from time to time:

Mozilla/5.0 (I-Am-Robot; i686; rv:31.0) Robot/20120101

Borgzilla/31.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.1.2) Resistance is futile

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: hbo site problems

2012-06-15 Thread JAS

Ken Rudolph wrote:
> Jim Taylor wrote:
>> Ken Rudolph wrote:
>>> I seem to be unable to load http://www.hbogo.com in SeaMonkey. All I
>>> get is a spinning logo and the site never loads.  I'm having no
>>> problem accessing that site using Google Chrome.  For that matter,
>>> even http://www.hbo.com just shows a white screen in SM, but loads in
>>> Chrome (at least on my computer...last week I had no problems).
>>> Anybody else having this problem?  Any ideas how to make it work in SM?
>>>
>>> I'm running SM 2.10 on Win-7 Ult.  I did an automatic install of a new
>>> version of Shockwave Flash this morning...it's listed in Enabled
>>> plugins as File: NPSWF32_3_300_257.DLL, Version: 11.3.300.257,
>>> Shockwave Flash 11.3 r300 .  Could that be a problem?
>>>
>>
>> It works for me on SM 2.10 Windows 7 Home Premium Build identifier:
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 Firefox/13.0
>> SeaMonkey/2.10 using that version of flash (File:
>> NPSWF32_11_3_300_257.dll Version: 11.3.300.257 Shockwave Flash 11.3
>
> I give up.  I can't get any flash videos to play in SM (they all play
> in Chrome).  I even uninstalled SM and all Adobe flash stuff and
> reinstalled them.  I'm still showing the correct plug-in info for
> Shockwave Flash.  Everything tells me it is up to date.  But now, even
> in Facebook or the IMDb when I try to run any videos in SM I just get
> a blank white screen.  I guess I'll just have to revert to Chrome for
> all web browsing.  This is very, very disturbing to me (I've been a
> Netscape/Mozilla Suite user since the beginning and have never had a
> problem like this.)
>
I am using SM 2.9.1 With Windows XP and it works fine for me. I do not
have any flash block.

Shockwave Flash
Version: 11.3.300.257

  Silverlight plug-in
  Version: 5.1.10411.0

  Adobe Flash
  Version 11.3.300.257


-- 
   You either teach people to treat you with dignity and respect, or you don't. 
This means you are partly responsible for the mistreatment that you get at the 
hands of someone else. 

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: hbo site problems

2012-06-15 Thread David E. Ross

On 6/14/12 7:07 PM, Ken Rudolph wrote:
> I seem to be unable to load http://www.hbogo.com in SeaMonkey. All I get 
> is a spinning logo and the site never loads.  I'm having no problem 
> accessing that site using Google Chrome.  For that matter, even 
> http://www.hbo.com just shows a white screen in SM, but loads in Chrome 
> (at least on my computer...last week I had no problems).  Anybody else 
> having this problem?  Any ideas how to make it work in SM?
> 
> I'm running SM 2.10 on Win-7 Ult.  I did an automatic install of a new 
> version of Shockwave Flash this morning...it's listed in Enabled plugins 
> as File: NPSWF32_3_300_257.DLL, Version: 11.3.300.257, Shockwave Flash 
> 11.3 r300 .  Could that be a problem?
> 

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120604 SeaMonkey/2.10

I see this problem at  while
running SeaMonkey in Safe Mode.  I got a white page with no content.
When I selected [View] on the menu bar, [Source] was disabled.  No
errors, warnings, or messages appeared in the Error Console.

It might have something to do with the URI pointing to a Flash file
instead of an HTML file.  All other Web pages containing Flash that I
visited seem to be okay, but they are HTML or XHTML files with embedded
Flash.

When I tried , the return
header indicated "Content-Type: application/x-shockwave-flash".  When I
tested my Flash installation at
, there were no
"Content-Type" lines in the return headers for three Flash files.  If
this is working in non-Gecko browsers, the problem might be in a failure
of Gecko to handle "Content-Type: application/x-shockwave-flash".

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SM 2.10 Mail Only Maximum or on Task Bar

2012-06-15 Thread Brooke Clarke


Hi:

When the SM 2.10 mail window is maximized and you click on the double box in the upper right to shrink it a little is 
minimizes. Then the only option is to maximize thus filling the screen.  How to get SM 2.10 to a sizable window?


--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.10 Mail Only Maximum or on Task Bar



Brooke Clarke wrote:

Hi:

When the SM 2.10 mail window is maximized and you click on the double 
box in the upper right to shrink it a little is minimizes. Then the 
only option is to maximize thus filling the screen.  How to get SM 
2.10 to a sizable window?


Does not happen here; reduces to a window as expected.
Philip Taylor


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

I feel deprived

2012-06-15 Thread Gerald Ross

I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey.  I am 
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems.  It ain't 
broke so I will keep it.

--
G.W. Ross

How do you get holy water?... Boil the
hell out of it!






___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: I feel deprived

2012-06-15 Thread Ken


Gerald Ross wrote:

I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey.  I am
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems.  It ain't
broke so I will keep it.


	I understand your concern, but I have constantly upgraded my version 
and have NOT experienced the problems others have.  That is not to say 
they don't have problems, but that I did NOT experience them.  I suspect 
that some of the problems might be attributed to something other than 
the SeaMonkey browser.  Who knows??


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.10 Mail Only Maximum or on Task Bar

2012-06-15 Thread David E. Ross

On 6/15/12 3:24 PM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
> Hi:
> 
> When the SM 2.10 mail window is maximized and you click on the
> double box in the upper right to shrink it a little is
> minimizes. Then the only option is to maximize thus filling the
> screen. How to get SM 2.10 to a sizable window?

By "double box", I assume you mean the middle icon between the _ and the
X.  When you select it, is the window minimized to the task bar as if
you selected the _ icon?   Or does it become a very tiny and useless
window on your desktop?

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: I feel deprived

2012-06-15 Thread Rufus


Gerald Ross wrote:

I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey.  I am
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems.  It ain't
broke so I will keep it.


I did much the same...skipped a lot of them between 2.0.14 and 2.9 
because of what I'd been reading, and I still keep a copy of 2.0.14 and 
it's pristine Profile folder around.  I agree - it's about what works 
for ya.


--
 - Rufus


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

These files are the crash report.

2012-06-15 Thread Paul Bergsagel

These two files are created when Seamonkey has crashed and a crash
report has been sent to Mozilla developers.

I opened the file with the extension .extra and this is what I could read:

Theme=classic/1.0
StartupTime=1301702970
ServerURL=https://crash-reports.mozilla.com/submit
Add-ons=en...@dictionaries.addons.mozilla.org:2.0.0,{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}:0.9.86.1,inspec...@mozilla.org:2.0.9,{3d7eb24f-2740-49df-8937-200b1cc08f8a}:1.3.17,{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}:0.9.88.1,nosqu...@urandom.ca:1.93.2.1,{972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}:1.0,mod...@themes.mozilla.org:1.0
BuildID=20110320134435
ProductName=SeaMonkey
Vendor=Mozilla
Version=2.0.13
InstallTime=1301015866
URL=http://community.livejournal.com/fatshionista/
CrashTime=1301716901
SecondsSinceLastCrash=4233308

The other file with the extension .dmp could be opened but only
contained meaningless text (at least to me). I believe the file with
.dmp is a dump of the state of Mozilla at the time of the crash which is
useful to developers when debugging SeaMonkey.

~~~
David E. Ross wrote:

On 6/13/12 1:15 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote, On 13/06/2012 17:06:

On 6/12/12 10:22 AM, Bob Fleischer wrote:

With the latest versions of Firefox and SeaMonkey, I note that my
profiles have new folders names "minidumps" each containing some files.

What are these?

Bob

I see the folders in all four of my profiles, but they are all empty.

Just before my folder began to have files - the first one is dated
10/06/2012 11:23

Could this caused by this windows update ?

Update for Windows 7 (KB2718704)
Installation date: ‎09/‎06/‎2012 22:41
Installation status: Successful
Update type: Important
Install this update to resolve an issue which requires an update to the
certificate revocation list on Windows systems and to keep your systems
certificate list up to date. After you install this update, you may have
to restart your system.
More information:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2718704

Okay. I dusted off my software test engineer hat -- which I put aside 9
years ago when I retired -- and did some investigating.

On my PC, the minidumps folders were created in my four SeaMonkey
profiles on 24 November 2011. I installed the Windows XP KB2718704 fix
on 4 June 2012, more than six months later. Thus, I do not think
minidumps has anything to do with the KB2718704 fix for any Windows
version.

The minidumps folder first appeared in my Thunderbird profile with TBird
3.0, which I installed on 10 December 2010. However, the folder now has
a creation date of 28 September 2011, which is when I installed TBird
7.0. I'm now at TBird 13.0.

I installed SeaMonkey 2.0.11 on 11 December 2010 (the day after TBird
3.0), but minidumps does not appear in my installation log for that
date. I installed SM 2.5 on 23 November 2011, the day before the
current creation date for the folder in my SM profiles. I'm now at SM
2.10.

I can't find any installation log for any software for 24 November 2011.
However, my logging sometimes fails, leaving me without any log.

My current software inventory also shows no installation done on that
date. My inventory only shows the most recent installation of a
software version, not a history. Thus, an installation on 24 November
2011 would be replaced in my inventory if I then install a later version
of the same software.

I just now deleted folder minidumps from my "guest" profile (not my
primary profile). I then switched to that profile. When I switched
back to my primary profile, the folder reappeared in my "guest" profile.
Thus, this folder appears to be a Mozilla artifact.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: I feel deprived

2012-06-15 Thread Chris Ilias


On 12-06-15 6:35 PM, Gerald Ross wrote:

I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey.  I am
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems.  It ain't
broke so I will keep it.


Most SeaMonkey newsgroup subscribers are presumably using the latest 
version, which is why most posts in here are in regards to the latest 
version. For instance, if you read posts in this newsgroup from April 
28, 2011 to June 10, 2011 (the time period when 2.0.14 was the latest 
version), you;ll find that most posts are in regards to 2.0.14.


Plus 2.0.14 as known public security vulnerabilities, which is why it is 
not recommended.


Don't forget that the users who don't have problems have no reason to 
post; so if I were you, I wouldn't worry about updating. Especially 
considering you have people in here to help you if you have any issues.


--
Chris Ilias 
Newsgroup moderator
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9

2012-06-15 Thread Robert Kaiser


Ken Rudolph schrieb:

Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me
(multiple problems with Flash & e-mail composer)?


The Flash problems are not caused by the SeaMonkey update, they will 
happen in 2.9 as well if you update to the newer Flash version (Adobe is 
working on fixing those).


Robert Kaiser
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: I feel deprived

2012-06-15 Thread Ant


On 6/15/2012 3:35 PM PT, Gerald Ross typed:


I see all the posts about problems and troubles with Seamonkey.  I am
using 2.0.14 and it does everything I need with no problems. It ain't
broke so I will keep it.


Ditto for me as well. One day, I will dump it. My extensions, plugins, 
etc. still work. Yes, I know support and security issues but I will take 
the risks.

--
"I made my list for my birthday." --Christopher. "Yeah, what'd you put 
on there? - A basketball or an ant farm." and "This could be an ant 
farm. This could be a microscope or anything." --Chris from The Pursuit 
of Happyness movie.

   /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
  / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
 | |o   o| |
\ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
 ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9

2012-06-15 Thread MCBastos

Interviewed by CNN on 15/06/2012 12:28, Ken Rudolph told the world:
> Is it possible to go back to SM 2.9 since SM 2.10 isn't working for me 
> (multiple problems with Flash & e-mail composer)?  If it is possible, 
> where can I find it, and should I uninstall SM 2.10 first?
> 

Apparently Flash 11.3 does have issues -- and some of those are related
to RealPlayer:

http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/flash-113-doesnt-load-video-firefox

http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/flash-113-crashes

The links above are for Firefox, but they should be useful for Seamonkey
users too.

I haven't noticed any misbehavior. But then, I haven't used Real Player
for, oh, at least two computers. That's right: neither this computer nor
its predecessor have *ever* had RealPlayer installed. And I don't
upgrade that often -- this machine is twenty months old and I still
think of it as my "new" computer.
-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.



-=-=-
... Sent from my R2 Unit.
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.9 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.9