Re: Where's the settings for history and cache?

2012-07-16 Thread »Q« 
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:31:45 -0700
"David E. Ross"  wrote:
 
> It's not the number of entries but the size of the SQLite file.  The
> file is places.sqlite, which contains both bookmarks and history and
> is 10 MB.  This is the result of a very strange design that closely
> links bookmarks and history.
> 
> The more bookmarks you have, the less history is allowed.  The user
> has no control -- even with hidden preferences -- over the size of
> the file. It's fixed at 10MB.  When the file gets full, history is
> deleted.

Do you know of a bug filed for making the size configurable by the
user? The last few comments on bug 581606, in which the 10MB size was
set, raise the issue but I couldn't find anything else in bugzilla for
it.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SM won't handle rtsp protocol

2012-07-16 Thread Stan 
I don't use YouTube a lot but all of a sudden today it isn't working. 
The message I get is "rtsp is not a registered protocol.  Did a lot of 
Googling but I can't understand the best way to solve this problem.


I downloaded a new version of Adobe Flash Player 11 Plugin.

Thanks for any help.
Stan

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: youtube

2012-07-16 Thread Larry 

Ed Mullen wrote:

A Williams wrote:

I came on here this evening to see if the "issues" with the newest Flash
version and Mizilla-based browsers had been resolved (old Flash works,
new does not).  Looks like the ball is still with Adobe.



Dave and Colette Hirsh wrote:

I guess no one uses seamonkey for videos on youtube. Kinda sad that
seamonkey with its rich history can't play videos.  I feel like its 1982
all over again. If I wanted to use IE I would not be trying to use
seamonkey so that is not really helpful.  Videos on firefox are not
working either.







I updated Shockwave Flash plugin on July 12 to version 11.3.300.265.
Windows 32-bit.  Works fine on You Tube and elsewhere.



I updated today to 11.3.300.265 for SeaMonkey.  Still cannot play you 
tube videos.  OS is Vista Home Premium 32-bit


Larry

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Reconnecting and Existing PRofiles

2012-07-16 Thread David E. Ross 
On 7/16/12 9:19 AM, Rob Steinmetz wrote:
> I have a problem, a user somehow lost the configuration of SeaMonkey and 
> their profile is not listed in the profile manager. The actual profile 
> exists but if I try to recreate the profile using Profile Manager it 
> refuses to make a profile with the same name to use the existing 
> profile. How can I reconnect to the existing profile?
> 
> In past version that was possible and occasionally very helpful.
> 

This is for a Windows XP (and possibly other Windows) installation.  Try
the following, but only after doing a complete backup of the user's
complete system.

Locate the file profiles.ini, which might be at .  Open profiles.ini in
an ASCII text editor.  You should see something such as

[General]
StartWithLastProfile=0

[Profilex]
Name=pname
IsRelative=0
Path=ploc
Default=1

where "Profilex" is Profile with a numeric suffix (e.g., Profile0,
Profile1), "pname" is the name of the profile, and "ploc" is the path to
the profile.  The entries for "Profilex" are consecutively numbered from
zero.  (The "StartWithLastProfile=0" setting determines which profile is
used at startup, in this case Profile0.)

If an entry does not exist for the lost profile, edit the file to insert
such an entry with a unique "Profilex".  If the file itself does not
exist, create it with Profile0 pointing to the loast profile.  Note that
ploc (the path to the profile) does not require quotes even if there are
blanks in folder names.

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: youtube

2012-07-16 Thread Ed Mullen 

A Williams wrote:

I came on here this evening to see if the "issues" with the newest Flash
version and Mizilla-based browsers had been resolved (old Flash works,
new does not).  Looks like the ball is still with Adobe.



Dave and Colette Hirsh wrote:

I guess no one uses seamonkey for videos on youtube. Kinda sad that
seamonkey with its rich history can't play videos.  I feel like its 1982
all over again. If I wanted to use IE I would not be trying to use
seamonkey so that is not really helpful.  Videos on firefox are not
working either.







I updated Shockwave Flash plugin on July 12 to version 11.3.300.265. 
Windows 32-bit.  Works fine on You Tube and elsewhere.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
"How good bad music and bad reasons sound when we march against an 
enemy." -  Friedrich Nietzsche



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reconnecting and Existing PRofiles

2012-07-16 Thread Rob Steinmetz 
I have a problem, a user somehow lost the configuration of SeaMonkey and 
their profile is not listed in the profile manager. The actual profile 
exists but if I try to recreate the profile using Profile Manager it 
refuses to make a profile with the same name to use the existing 
profile. How can I reconnect to the existing profile?


In past version that was possible and occasionally very helpful.

--
rob
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Finally dumping my old v2.0.14 installations on my old Windows machines... Memory usages.

2012-07-16 Thread WLS 
On 07/16/2012 11:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
> WLS wrote:
>> Daniel wrote:
>>> Ant wrote:
 On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:

> Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
> find out what is using up the memory!
>
> Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
> Part of it could be new memory cache stuff, part of it could be
> related
> to Places Bookmark/History cache, part of it could be new web features
> that some of the pages take advantage of (an were unable to do so in
> 2.0.14)
>
> If anything specific looks odd there, or if you don't feel like you
> can
> identify "odd" there, feel free to post its contents to list (warning:
> if you do so its a privacy leak -- slightly -- since it shows
> hostnames
> which use memory)

 Verbose results:

 Main Process

>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> What does "inner-window(id=" followed by what looks like a website
>>> address mean?? Are these indications of the tabs that Ant had open??
>>>
>>> If so, well, I gave up counting after about 150 inner-window's (I'm
>>> guessing about 600 tabs total!!), so I would guessany wonder Ant's
>>> SM is using so much memory!!
>>>
>>
>> I have 16 "inner-windows" listed in about memory, and only about:memory
>> loaded, but looking at the other URL's in his "Verbose Results" they
>> probably are tabs.
>>
>> The 11 http://nerdapproved.com pages all appear to be the same content.
>> I didn't open them all, just random samples
>>
>> Stopped counting at 12 YouTube pages.
>>
>> My memory usage is,
>>
>> Explicit Allocations
>> 227.05 MB (100.0%) ++  -- explicit
>>
> 
> I thought approx 600 tabs was getting a bit strange,
> 
> My memory usage (for three tabs + about:memory tab) 191.86 MB (100.0%)
> -- explicit
> 
> Interesting.as I said I have three tabs + about:memory tab open, but
> nowhere in the structure do I see the listings for the three active tabs
> I do have open...but I do see information for a tab (i.e. web
> address!!) which I closed a while ago, even after re-loading the
> about:memory tab!!
> 
> So no listing of open, active tabs but listing for previously closed
> tab!! I understandNot!.
> 

Did you try the Minimize memory usage, and Update buttons at the bottom
of about:memory.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Finally dumping my old v2.0.14 installations on my old Windows machines... Memory usages.

2012-07-16 Thread WLS 
On 07/15/2012 02:55 PM, Ant wrote:
> On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
> 
>> Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
>> find out what is using up the memory!
>>
>> Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
>> Part of it could be new memory cache stuff, part of it could be related
>> to Places Bookmark/History cache, part of it could be new web features
>> that some of the pages take advantage of (an were unable to do so in
>> 2.0.14)
>>
>> If anything specific looks odd there, or if you don't feel like you can
>> identify "odd" there, feel free to post its contents to list (warning:
>> if you do so its a privacy leak -- slightly -- since it shows hostnames
>> which use memory)
> 
> Verbose results:
> 
> Main Process
> 
> Explicit Allocations
> 1,191,068,833 B (100.0%) ++  -- explicit




> I closed a bunch to avoid the sensitive ones and memory usages went down
> a bit. Must be too many tabs/web pages I guess? ;)

Looks like it!

At the very bottom of about:memory there are several buttons, Update GC,
CC, and Minimize memory usage. Click on the Minimize memory usage
button, and Update, that will clean up your memory a bit.

If I understand correctly the Minimize memory usage button, does the
same thing as a GC followed by a CC, 3 times.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Finally dumping my old v2.0.14 installations on my old Windows machines... Memory usages.

2012-07-16 Thread Daniel 

WLS wrote:

Daniel wrote:

Ant wrote:

On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:


Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!

Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
Part of it could be new memory cache stuff, part of it could be related
to Places Bookmark/History cache, part of it could be new web features
that some of the pages take advantage of (an were unable to do so in
2.0.14)

If anything specific looks odd there, or if you don't feel like you can
identify "odd" there, feel free to post its contents to list (warning:
if you do so its a privacy leak -- slightly -- since it shows hostnames
which use memory)


Verbose results:

Main Process





What does "inner-window(id=" followed by what looks like a website
address mean?? Are these indications of the tabs that Ant had open??

If so, well, I gave up counting after about 150 inner-window's (I'm
guessing about 600 tabs total!!), so I would guessany wonder Ant's
SM is using so much memory!!



I have 16 "inner-windows" listed in about memory, and only about:memory
loaded, but looking at the other URL's in his "Verbose Results" they
probably are tabs.

The 11 http://nerdapproved.com pages all appear to be the same content.
I didn't open them all, just random samples

Stopped counting at 12 YouTube pages.

My memory usage is,

Explicit Allocations
227.05 MB (100.0%) ++  -- explicit



I thought approx 600 tabs was getting a bit strange,

My memory usage (for three tabs + about:memory tab) 191.86 MB (100.0%) 
-- explicit


Interesting.as I said I have three tabs + about:memory tab open, but 
nowhere in the structure do I see the listings for the three active tabs 
I do have open...but I do see information for a tab (i.e. web 
address!!) which I closed a while ago, even after re-loading the 
about:memory tab!!


So no listing of open, active tabs but listing for previously closed 
tab!! I understandNot!.


--
Daniel


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Finally dumping my old v2.0.14 installations on my old Windows machines... Memory usages.

2012-07-16 Thread WLS 

Daniel wrote:

Ant wrote:

On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:


Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!

Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
Part of it could be new memory cache stuff, part of it could be related
to Places Bookmark/History cache, part of it could be new web features
that some of the pages take advantage of (an were unable to do so in
2.0.14)

If anything specific looks odd there, or if you don't feel like you can
identify "odd" there, feel free to post its contents to list (warning:
if you do so its a privacy leak -- slightly -- since it shows hostnames
which use memory)


Verbose results:

Main Process





What does "inner-window(id=" followed by what looks like a website
address mean?? Are these indications of the tabs that Ant had open??

If so, well, I gave up counting after about 150 inner-window's (I'm
guessing about 600 tabs total!!), so I would guessany wonder Ant's
SM is using so much memory!!



I have 16 "inner-windows" listed in about memory, and only about:memory 
loaded, but looking at the other URL's in his "Verbose Results" they 
probably are tabs.


The 11 http://nerdapproved.com pages all appear to be the same content. 
I didn't open them all, just random samples


Stopped counting at 12 YouTube pages.

My memory usage is,

Explicit Allocations
227.05 MB (100.0%) ++  -- explicit

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Finally dumping my old v2.0.14 installations on my old Windows machines... Memory usages.

2012-07-16 Thread Ant 

On 7/16/2012 7:20 AM PT, Daniel typed:


Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!

Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
Part of it could be new memory cache stuff, part of it could be related
to Places Bookmark/History cache, part of it could be new web features
that some of the pages take advantage of (an were unable to do so in
2.0.14)

If anything specific looks odd there, or if you don't feel like you can
identify "odd" there, feel free to post its contents to list (warning:
if you do so its a privacy leak -- slightly -- since it shows hostnames
which use memory)


Verbose results:

Main Process





What does "inner-window(id=" followed by what looks like a website
address mean?? Are these indications of the tabs that Ant had open??

If so, well, I gave up counting after about 150 inner-window's (I'm
guessing about 600 tabs total!!), so I would guessany wonder Ant's
SM is using so much memory!!


Nah, not 600. Maybe about 50.
--
"I don't understand them anymore, these people that travel the 
commuter-trains to their dormitory towns. These people call themselves 
human, but, by a pressure they do not feel, are forced to do their work 
like ants. With what do they fill their time when they are free of work 
on their silly little Sundays?" --Antoine de saint-Exupéry, 'Wind, Sand, 
and Stars,' 1939

   /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
  / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
 | |o   o| |
\ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
 ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Finally dumping my old v2.0.14 installations on my old Windows machines... Memory usages.

2012-07-16 Thread Daniel 

Ant wrote:

On 7/15/2012 10:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:


Hard to say, *but* unlike in 2.0.14 we do have a new way to (try) and
find out what is using up the memory!

Try loading about:memory in a new tab, and you should see a breakdown.
Part of it could be new memory cache stuff, part of it could be related
to Places Bookmark/History cache, part of it could be new web features
that some of the pages take advantage of (an were unable to do so in
2.0.14)

If anything specific looks odd there, or if you don't feel like you can
identify "odd" there, feel free to post its contents to list (warning:
if you do so its a privacy leak -- slightly -- since it shows hostnames
which use memory)


Verbose results:

Main Process





What does "inner-window(id=" followed by what looks like a website 
address mean?? Are these indications of the tabs that Ant had open??


If so, well, I gave up counting after about 150 inner-window's (I'm 
guessing about 600 tabs total!!), so I would guessany wonder Ant's 
SM is using so much memory!!


--
Daniel


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 1)Lesezeichen,2) Email-Filter

2012-07-16 Thread denewton 

guten Tag,
Wir haben Problem mit die Filters. Es ist zwei bug (bug 618527 and 
594756) fur das. Es ist schade das ist nicht gut gemacht bis 2.0.7.
Entschuldigund, ich kan deutch ein bischen. Hier wir schreiben in 
englisch if sie können, naturlisch...

gruss
Bertrand (ich bin französe)

Norbert Esch a écrit :

Win XP prof de mit SP3 & letzte SM Version
Seit dem Umstieg auf die neuen SM Version haben sich folgende
Verschlimm-Besserungen eingeschlichen, 1)es werden zuvor angelegte
Lesezeichen-Ordner (Kategorien) nicht angezeigt bzw nur teilweise im
Fenster angezeigt und 2) Fehler beim Email Filter-Handling:
1a) Lesezeichen =>Lesezeichenablegen: erscheint Fenster:   "
Lesezeichen anlegen"
im Auswahl-Bereich => ORDNER : Lesezeichen-Menü:  liefert der  nur 5 Kategorien-Ansichten zur Auswahl (:
zeigt aber noch alle an!!)
1b)wie oben , aber  entschwindet und läßt keinen Namen
eintragen ,statt dessen erscheint  am Ende aller Kategorienlisten der
neue Ordner als Ordner mit dem Namen :"NEUER ORDNER" d.h. er muß
nachträglich erst nochmals über das Menu > Bearbeiten Eigenschaften
erst zu dem umbenannt werden wie es beim Button  gleich
hätte möglich sein sollen.
2a) neu angelegte Email Filter fallen am Listenende einfach raus und
verschwinden im Nirwana
und müssen somit  erneut angelegt werden
2b)Beim Verschieben ganzer Email -Listen -Filter-Zweige und deren
Inhalten unter EMAILS> EXTRAS> Nachrichten-Filter werden alle Filter
mit dem Verschobenen Listenzweig als Ziel für die  Email-Filterung auf
den Wert (Inhalt)der verschobenen
Position geändert.d.h. verschiebe ich von den Filter-Zweigen
A,B,C,D,E den Komplettinhalt von D durch up/down Sortier-Button ,
zwischen die  Ablage-Folder A-B sodaß die Filter-Reihenfolge: A-C-D
entsteht, so ändern sich alle dazwischen und danach-liegenden Filter
auf die Abfrage-Email-Adresse von D und alle Filter müssen einzeln
nachbearbeitet und auf Ihre korrekte email-filter Adresse entsprechend
dem jeweilen Filter zurückkorrigiert werden
die o.g. Probleme wurden mehrfach reproduziert und ich weiß aber nicht
ob hier die richtige  Stelle bzw Ansprechpartner dafür  überhaupt zu
finden sind.
Sorry  bin eben Anfänger
Gruß Norbert Esch




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey