Re: A very strange failure ...

2014-01-23 Thread Trane Francks

On 1/24/14 12:45 PM +0900, HenriK wrote:

Philip Taylor wrote:



HenriK wrote:


Last month, I experienced a PC malfunction on my main PC ...


A delayed-write failure indicates that a serious disk error occurred,
and data was/were lost.  Check your Windows logs, identify the
device in question, then disable delayed writes through Control
Panel for that device or its controller.  Use whatever tools
are available to you to attempt to recover the data from that
disk.  Identify from the logs whether it is terminally ill,
and if so, replace it, re-populating the new drive from backups.
Even if it is not terminally ill, replacing it (or at least
putting it into a RAID-0 configuration) would be wise.

Philip Taylor



Now, I am even more puzzled.  The write-back caching feature was NOT enabled,
and so far as I know has never been enabled, for any of the hard drives on the
PC in question.


By default, Windows uses write caching on all drives unless explicitly 
disabled. In any case, your drive would seem to be in the process of 
failing. I would be proactive about replacing it.


--
/
// Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: A very strange failure ...

2014-01-23 Thread HenriK

Philip Taylor wrote:



HenriK wrote:


Last month, I experienced a PC malfunction on my main PC ...


A delayed-write failure indicates that a serious disk error occurred,
and data was/were lost.  Check your Windows logs, identify the
device in question, then disable delayed writes through Control
Panel for that device or its controller.  Use whatever tools
are available to you to attempt to recover the data from that
disk.  Identify from the logs whether it is terminally ill,
and if so, replace it, re-populating the new drive from backups.
Even if it is not terminally ill, replacing it (or at least
putting it into a RAID-0 configuration) would be wise.

Philip Taylor



Now, I am even more puzzled.  The write-back caching feature was NOT enabled, 
and so far as I know has never been enabled, for any of the hard drives on the 
PC in question.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: A very strange failure ...

2014-01-23 Thread Paul B. Gallagher

Philip Taylor wrote:


HenriK wrote:


Last month, I experienced a PC malfunction on my main PC ...


A delayed-write failure indicates that a serious disk error
occurred, and data was/were lost.  Check your Windows logs, identify
the device in question, then disable delayed writes through Control
Panel for that device or its controller.  Use whatever tools are
available to you to attempt to recover the data from that disk.
Identify from the logs whether it is terminally ill, and if so,
replace it, re-populating the new drive from backups. Even if it is
not terminally ill, replacing it (or at least putting it into a
RAID-0 configuration) would be wise.


Good points.

The files with lots of zeroes in their names are likely lost clusters 
recovered by CHKDSK. They're broken pieces of files, but nowadays I find 
myself unable, even with a plain-text editor, to recognize what they are 
or where they go. Oh, for the DOS days when you could patch things back 
together!


If SeaMonkey won't start, that may well be because the disk error(s) 
damaged a critical file. Hard to say which one, though -- probably have 
to reinstall after addressing the hardware issue. If you're lucky, only 
the program itself was damaged and you can restore the profile.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Transfer all SM settings and mail archives to new computer

2014-01-23 Thread John E
Many thanks to Wolfgang for this simple and clear advice.  I have now 
followed it and everything seems to have transferred perfectly.


---
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 at 11:23:54 +0100, Wolfgang Steger wrote:

John E wrote:
[Description about profile deleted]

- there should be no difference where the seamonkey binary is installed.
- make sure seamonkey is closed on both machines (for your accounts).
- just transfer $HOME/.mozilla/seamonkey/profiles.ini and the profile
   (the .default) AS IS, DO NOT RENAME, as the value of 
   is inside profiles.ini. You can delete the current .default.
- I assume that all your mail data is inside your profile. If else,
   also transfer the Mail folders.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Downloads files instead of Opening them

2014-01-23 Thread Trane Francks

On 1/23/14 9:20 AM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Trane Francks wrote:


On 1/23/14 8:14 AM +0900, stan pierce wrote:


Thanks, Trane, but doing this is beyond my expertise. Stan.


Opening a file in Notepad and pasting stuff in is beyond your
expertise? It really shouldn't be much more difficult than that.
There are other MIME types in the file that you can use to confirm
you're in the right area. Each of the RDF:Description blocks I've
entered here are stand-alone descriptors.


The trick, of course, is knowing what to copy/paste and where... If Stan
doesn't know that, the best copy/paste mechanics in the world won't do
him a bit of good. He's reasonable to be cautious when he doesn't
understand the directions.

Of course, which is why one makes a backup copy of the file prior to 
getting all medieval on its contents. It's the safe way of learning. You 
can trash the 'new' file completely, copy the backup over it and start 
afresh until you've sussed out where things went wrong. Rinse and repeat 
as necessary.


It's an XML file, not rocket science. :)

--
/
// Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: A very strange failure ...

2014-01-23 Thread Philip Taylor



HenriK wrote:


Last month, I experienced a PC malfunction on my main PC ...


A delayed-write failure indicates that a serious disk error occurred,
and data was/were lost.  Check your Windows logs, identify the
device in question, then disable delayed writes through Control
Panel for that device or its controller.  Use whatever tools
are available to you to attempt to recover the data from that
disk.  Identify from the logs whether it is terminally ill,
and if so, replace it, re-populating the new drive from backups.
Even if it is not terminally ill, replacing it (or at least
putting it into a RAID-0 configuration) would be wise.

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


A very strange failure ...

2014-01-23 Thread HenriK
Last month, I experienced a PC malfunction on my main PC that I have never 
encountered before.  Although I have been around long enough to have owned PCs 
from the original IBM PC onwards, I have never really understood the Windows OS 
very well.  Today's NT-based Windows OS leaves me utterly confused.  I have no 
idea as to whether my problem is a Windows problem, a SeaMonkey e-mail problem, 
a hardware problem, or some combination of all three.  Accordingly, I need some 
advice, either on-list or off list and at no more than a moderately complex 
level, to assist me in sorting out what happened and how to restore my main PC 
to proper operating condition.


The PC at issue is a 32 bit Dell Precision 650 with dual 3.2 gHz CPUs running 
XP-Pro SP3, fully updated as of 11-30-2013.  My browser/e-mail client is 
SeaMonkey, v.2.21.


Because of advice given to me early in my PC history, I have long had the habit 
of dividing my hard drives into fairly small partitions to facilitate easier 
backup (i.e., I have the SeaMonkey executables and e-mail files in a partition 
shared with nothing else).  Another partition is devoted only to Microsoft 
Office executables and files and my C:\ partition only contains the OS and its 
files plus those application files that must reside in the same partition as the 
OS).


The first hint that something was going wrong came as I logged out of the 
SeaMonkey e-mail client and an error message flashed for an instant saying 
something about '... delayed write ...' (details of the error message were not 
caught) and the PC rebooted.  As the PC rebooted, the OS indicated that two 
partitions (the partition containing the SeaMonkey files and the partition 
containing the Microsoft Office files) needed to be evaluated 'for consistency', 
whatever that means.  When I tried to re-initiate the SeaMonkey e-mail client, 
it didn't work, referring me to the SeaMonkey wizard asking that I establish an 
e-mail account.  As there had been four e-mail accounts just a few minutes prior 
to whatever went wrong, I used Windows Explorer to look at what files were 
actually still in my SeaMonkey partition.  It seemed that everything that should 
have been in the partition, so far as I could remember, was still there 
(including my substantial archive of the actual e-mail messages).  In addition, 
I found a new file with a bunch of zeros in the name which I think I have seen 
on other failure occasions called 'lost chains', whatever that means.  I quickly 
copied all of the e-mail message files to a CD-R and turned the PC off.


In the past couple of days, I have begun trying to sort out what happened.  When 
I start the PC, the OS indicates that two partitions (the partition containing 
the SeaMonkey files and the partition containing the Microsoft Office files) 
need to be evaluated 'for consistency' but doesn't write anything additional to 
the SeaMonkey partition and has never added anything to the Microsoft Office 
partition.  Does this mean that the OS has found something wrong with the file 
indexes in those two partitions?  How do I fix this problem?  Everything else on 
the PC - including the Microsoft Office partition - appears to operate properly. 
 Alternatively, do I have to reformat the two partitions at issue and reinstall 
all of the software in those two partitions or what?  Could this problem be an 
indication of an impending hard drive failure?  Is this really a Microsoft OS 
problem and should I refer my dilemma to a Microsoft forum?  Why are at least 
some of my e-mail initiation [profile (?)] files now apparently missing?  Could 
it have been something that I can't imagine?  Help!

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Body & Attachments

2014-01-23 Thread JohnW-Mpls
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:31:37 -0600, JohnW-Mpls  wrote:

>WinXP, SM 2.22.1
>
>I had sent a copy of a message to myself and when looking at the copy I
>received, the body of the message included text from files attached to the
>message.  How can that happen?
>
>I always thought that the body and attachments are totally separate.

NOTE:  This was a New Message. 

AFAIK: Forwarding's options of  Inline or Attached  not involved.

-- 
 JohnW-MN
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Download Manager propagates slowly

2014-01-23 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 22/01/2014 21:10, stan pierce told the world:
> Used to be that when I selected the Download Manager, it immediately 
> came up with all the entries. Now, when I select the Download Manager, 
> it comes up empty and takes about 15 seconds before it propagates.

How many old entries are there in your Download Manager? If you have a
lot, perhaps purging old entries would help you.

-- 
MCBastos

This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized
use will be prosecuted under the DMCA.

-=-=-
... Sent from my Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator.
* Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.23 *
Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Transfer all SM settings and mail archives to new computer

2014-01-23 Thread Wolfgang Steger
John E wrote:
[Description about profile deleted]

- there should be no difference where the seamonkey binary is installed.
- make sure seamonkey is closed on both machines (for your accounts).
- just transfer $HOME/.mozilla/seamonkey/profiles.ini and the profile
  (the .default) AS IS, DO NOT RENAME, as the value of 
  is inside profiles.ini. You can delete the current .default.
- I assume that all your mail data is inside your profile. If else,
  also transfer the Mail folders.


-- 
Leave bigotry in your quarters; there's no room for it on the bridge.
-- Kirk, "Balance of Terror", stardate 1709.2
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Transfer all SM settings and mail archives to new computer

2014-01-23 Thread John E
Hi,   I've installed SM 2.23 on a new computer with Linux Ubuntu but all 
my currently working settings,  browser history and POP mail archives 
are on an older machine running SM 2.4.1 on an older Ubuntu.


I'd like to transfer all my operations from my old machine to my new one 
as smoothly as possible,  so that my new machine will remember all my 
old browser-stored passwords,  my old browser history,  the UIDLs for 
several current POP e-mail accounts, and will have my quite extensive 
set of archived local mail folders on it.


On my older machine,  much of the data I guess I need appears to in a 
folder with a name like /home/john/.mozilla/seamonkey/.default 
It currently contains 1,787 items totalling 727MB


On my newer machine,  I have a folder with a name like
/home/john/.mozilla/seamonkey/.default which basically only has 
the newly installed default data that comes with SM2.23 on it.


Question is,  if I copy all the data from the /.default folder 
on my old machine and paste it all into the /.default folder on 
my new machine,  is that likely to work? Is there anything else I 
ought to worry about to make my transition go smoothly?


Would it make a difference that on my old machine I've been running SM 
2.4.1 from a  /home/john/seamonkey/seamonkey folder whereas on my new 
computer,  it runs from a /usr/local/seamonkey folder?


I'm also wondering whether any of the default contents of the 
.default folder that came with my SM2.23 contain new features or 
facilities that would be lost if I replace them with my .default 
data derived from SM 2.4.1.


Any warnings or suggestions on this transfer would be much appreciated. 
  Thanks.


   +  John
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey