Ping: Ralph Fox

[Mikhail Smirnov]

Thunderbird/45.4.0  and/or  SeaMonkey/2.40  Windows NT 6.1; WOW64

Is there an equivalent setting (about:config / prefs.js) in TB / SM as in 
agent.ini?

GMTDates2=1  ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 23:17:59 +   ;(preferred)

  instead of:

GMTDates2=0  ; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:17:59 -0500   ;(default)


Thank you.
 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 (latest stable) uses NSS 3.20.1 - possible security vulnerability

[seemonkey]

On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 2:49:48 AM UTC+2, Edward wrote:
> TCW wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey
> > wrote:
> >
> >> There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS 
> >> version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
> >>
> >> There was a bugfix in NSS 
> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1245528 to solve this issue 
> >> but unfortunately it seems that this bugfix is not in 3.20.x according to 
> >> the developer entries. I didn't check the code yet if the bugfix is really 
> >> missing!
> >>
> >> So my question is why seamonkey uses still this outdated NSS version? It 
> >> should use at least 3.21.1 (that is in latest firefox esr /45.4.0/ and 
> >> also in latest thunderbird /45.4.0/)
> >>
> >> As a workaround i can copy the nss libraries from firefox esr to seamonkey 
> >> until a security release of seamonkey let's say 2.40.1 arrives. I tried 
> >> this end i can start seamonkey with newer NSS library because they're 
> >> compatible.
> >
> > You can graft the NSS dlls, sure. I have done that in the past with
> > success. But, there is a build of 2.46 that's stable enough to use if
> > you want to test.
> 
> Just curious... Does the Linux version of SeaMonkey use the nss package 
> that is included with the Linux distribution being used? The currently 
> installed version here is 3.23.0-1 (Fedora 24).
> 
> Thanks in advance.

No, seamonkey/firefox/thunderbird look for their .so ONLY in their own 
directory ignoring to search in /usr/lib. That why it is not enough to install 
a separate nss package but one need to place symbolic links into each mozilla 
product.
You can check with strace which .so is loaded on startup of seamonkey. If the 
one from nss lib 3.23.0-1 then you are lucky and don't have to do anything.

I just wanted to point out that we immediately need a seemonkey update.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 (latest stable) uses NSS 3.20.1 - possible security vulnerability

[seemonkey12345]

On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 3:10:42 PM UTC+2, TCW wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey
> 
> >There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS 
> >version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
> >
> >There was a bugfix in NSS 
> >https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1245528 to solve this issue but 
> >unfortunately it seems that this bugfix is not in 3.20.x according to the 
> >developer entries. I didn't check the code yet if the bugfix is really 
> >missing!
> >
> >So my question is why seamonkey uses still this outdated NSS version? It 
> >should use at least 3.21.1 (that is in latest firefox esr /45.4.0/ and also 
> >in latest thunderbird /45.4.0/)
> >
> >As a workaround i can copy the nss libraries from firefox esr to seamonkey 
> >until a security release of seamonkey let's say 2.40.1 arrives. I tried this 
> >end i can start seamonkey with newer NSS library because they're compatible.
> 
> You can graft the NSS dlls, sure. I have done that in the past with
> success. But, there is a build of 2.46 that's stable enough to use if
> you want to test.

I tried with firefox's/thunderbirds 3.21.1 and it works. I trust this version 
of nss (at the moment)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey 2.40 (latest stable) uses NSS 3.20.1 - possible security vulnerability

[Edward]

TCW wrote:

On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey12...@gmail.com
wrote:


There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS 
version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950

There was a bugfix in NSS https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1245528 
to solve this issue but unfortunately it seems that this bugfix is not in 
3.20.x according to the developer entries. I didn't check the code yet if the 
bugfix is really missing!

So my question is why seamonkey uses still this outdated NSS version? It should 
use at least 3.21.1 (that is in latest firefox esr /45.4.0/ and also in latest 
thunderbird /45.4.0/)

As a workaround i can copy the nss libraries from firefox esr to seamonkey 
until a security release of seamonkey let's say 2.40.1 arrives. I tried this 
end i can start seamonkey with newer NSS library because they're compatible.


You can graft the NSS dlls, sure. I have done that in the past with
success. But, there is a build of 2.46 that's stable enough to use if
you want to test.


Just curious... Does the Linux version of SeaMonkey use the nss package 
that is included with the Linux distribution being used? The currently 
installed version here is 3.23.0-1 (Fedora 24).


Thanks in advance.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

[NoOp]

On 10/13/2016 12:42 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
> Mark Bourne wrote:
>> Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my
>>> unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1  (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
>>> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 Build 20160930004545  (Default Classic
>>> Theme) on German WIN7 64bit with my normal User Profile automatically
>>> replaces "http" in URL by "https".
>>>
>>> Example:
>>> 1. In Browser visit 
>>> 2. In page contents heading line
>>> ˋclick downloads - Firmwareˊ
>>> Expected:  opens
>>> Actual:    will
>>>   not open because it does not exist. So Error 404.
>>>
>>> I see that after a short moment in URL bar "http" becomes replaced by
>>> "https"
>>>
>>> This also happens in Safe Mode without add-ons
>>> No problem in a newly created User Profile.
>>> So this problem seems to be caused by my preferences, but I can't find
>>> the responsible one.
>>
>> On first trying, that didn't happen for me. Visiting
>>  stayed on the http: version.
>>
>> However, I then changed http: to https:, i.e.
>> , and got a 404 Not Found
>> page. Now, when I try going back to the http: version, it automatically
>> redirects to the https: version.
>>
>> Visiting the https: version returns a strict-transport-security header.
>> That indicates to the browser that, from now on, it should only access
>> that pages on that domain via https:, not http:, to protect against
>> attacks which attempt to force use of http:. So when you attempt to
>> access the page via http:, the browser instead accesses it via https:.
>>
>> Since the site can serve the content in question via http: but not
>> https:, it looks like a misconfiguration of that site's server to me -
>> either it should be prepared to serve all content via https:, or it
>> shouldn't send a strict-transport-security header instructing the
>> browser to only use https:!
> 
> I should have mentioned I was using SeaMonkey 2.40 on Windows Vista:
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 
> SeaMonkey/2.40
> 
> You can clear SeaMonkey's memory of having seen the 
> strict-transport-security header as follows:
> - Close SeaMonkey
> - Use a text editor to open SiteSecurityServiceState.txt from your 
> profile folder
> - Search for the line containing "myvigoreu.draytek.com"
> - Delete that line
> - Save the file
> - Open SeaMonkey
> - You should now be able to visit 
>  and see the list of downloads

Appears that these bugs are most related:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1123971
'HSTS entry in SiteSecurityServiceState.txt blocks me from visiting site'

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1119778
'Forget about this site does not clear HSTS setting'
  Fixes Firefox so that you can select: History|Show All History| -
right click on the Draytek https link and select 'Forget about this
site' from the dropdown. I cannot find any such option in SeaMonkey, so
perhaps Rainer can file a bug report requesting the ability to clear
sites in SiteSecurityServiceState.txt from the 'History' UI.

> 
> If at any time you visit anything under 
> , SeaMonkey will get the 
> strict-transport-security header again and from then on only access that 
> domain via https:.
> 

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Save HTML5 Video

[Gerry Hickman]

David E. Ross wrote:

Try the Download YouTube Videos as MP4 extension from
.


Thanks, that extension works well, and is able to download a youtube 
video, even if it uses ranges.


However, I'm more interested in how it's supposed to work with the 
browser's built-in video player? If this type of video adheres to open 
standards, which appears to be the case, then it should be possible for 
the video player within the browser to detect the ranges and download 
the full video...


--
Gerry Hickman (London UK)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

[NoOp]

On 10/14/2016 01:07 PM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>>> Mark Bourne wrote:
 Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my
> unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1  (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
> Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 Build 20160930004545  (Default Classic
> Theme) on German WIN7 64bit with my normal User Profile automatically
> replaces "http" in URL by "https".
>
> Example:
> 1. In Browser visit 
> 2. In page contents heading line
>  ˋclick downloads - Firmwareˊ
>  Expected:  opens
>  Actual:    will
>not open because it does not exist. So Error 404.
>
> I see that after a short moment in URL bar "http" becomes replaced by
> "https"
>
> This also happens in Safe Mode without add-ons
> No problem in a newly created User Profile.
> So this problem seems to be caused by my preferences, but I can't find
> the responsible one.

 On first trying, that didn't happen for me. Visiting
  stayed on the http: version.

 However, I then changed http: to https:, i.e.
 , and got a 404 Not Found
 page. Now, when I try going back to the http: version, it automatically
 redirects to the https: version.

 Visiting the https: version returns a strict-transport-security header.
 That indicates to the browser that, from now on, it should only access
 that pages on that domain via https:, not http:, to protect against
 attacks which attempt to force use of http:. So when you attempt to
 access the page via http:, the browser instead accesses it via https:.

 Since the site can serve the content in question via http: but not
 https:, it looks like a misconfiguration of that site's server to me -
 either it should be prepared to serve all content via https:, or it
 shouldn't send a strict-transport-security header instructing the
 browser to only use https:!
>>
>> Here's somthing interesting/odd: I was experimenting with the url &
>> found that if you enter  it will
>> redirect to 
>> which is the 'Draytek File Server'. Tested in Firefox, Chrome & Opera
>> (Windows 2.46).
>> And now if I go to  I can select
>> Download|Firmware and it brings up a proper download page (again tested
>> in SeaMonkey 2.46, Firefox, Chrome, Opera (Windows)).
> 
> That's true, but  is not the same as 
> , and Download > Firmware links to a different 
> domain (www.draytek.com. rather than myvigoreu.draytek.com.).
> 
> Download > Firmware from  links to 
>  which. If you've previously 
> visited anything under  and got the 
> strict-transport-security header, accessing that URL leads to SeaMonkey 
> (correctly) loading  
> instead, and that returns a 404 Not Found error. The server at 
> myvigoreu.draytek.com. is basically informing clients that they should 
> only use HTTPS, yet there is some content which it serves only via HTTP 
> and not via HTTPS.
> 

Thanks Mark, I was just pointing out some of the odd link behaviour on
the site

 if you enter  it will
redirect to 
which is the 'Draytek File Server'.

I probably should have pointed out that the link to draytek.com was from
my clicking the 'Draytek Corp' link at the bottom of the file server page.

Gary

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: mailbox problems

[NFN Smith]

Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

If Inbox does have subfolders, you're looking for a /folder/ named
"Inbox.sbd," /as well as/ the files "Inbox" and "Inbox.msf." After
deleting "Inbox.msf," rename both the folder and the file analogously
("Bad_Inbox" and "Bad_Inbox.sbd") and then move the corresponding backup
files to the mail folder.



That's the part that I needed.

I've restored individual folders before, but I wasn't making any 
progress when I tried to restore an inbox.  I do have sub-folders in the 
inbox, and the thing I needed to account for was renaming Inbox.sbd. 
Once I did that (and copied in the older inbox.sbd), everything is 
working the way I need.


Thanks for the feedback.

Smith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Browser: unwanted https instead of http

[mozilla-lists . mbourne]

NoOp wrote:

Mark Bourne wrote:

Rainer Bielefeld wrote:

Hi,

on some (few) web pages I can not reach the linked contents because my
unofficial en-US SeaMonkey 2.49a1  (NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 Build 20160930004545  (Default Classic
Theme) on German WIN7 64bit with my normal User Profile automatically
replaces "http" in URL by "https".

Example:
1. In Browser visit 
2. In page contents heading line
 ˋclick downloads - Firmwareˊ
 Expected:  opens
 Actual:    will
   not open because it does not exist. So Error 404.

I see that after a short moment in URL bar "http" becomes replaced by
"https"

This also happens in Safe Mode without add-ons
No problem in a newly created User Profile.
So this problem seems to be caused by my preferences, but I can't find
the responsible one.


On first trying, that didn't happen for me. Visiting
 stayed on the http: version.

However, I then changed http: to https:, i.e.
, and got a 404 Not Found
page. Now, when I try going back to the http: version, it automatically
redirects to the https: version.

Visiting the https: version returns a strict-transport-security header.
That indicates to the browser that, from now on, it should only access
that pages on that domain via https:, not http:, to protect against
attacks which attempt to force use of http:. So when you attempt to
access the page via http:, the browser instead accesses it via https:.

Since the site can serve the content in question via http: but not
https:, it looks like a misconfiguration of that site's server to me -
either it should be prepared to serve all content via https:, or it
shouldn't send a strict-transport-security header instructing the
browser to only use https:!


Here's somthing interesting/odd: I was experimenting with the url &
found that if you enter  it will
redirect to 
which is the 'Draytek File Server'. Tested in Firefox, Chrome & Opera
(Windows 2.46).
And now if I go to  I can select
Download|Firmware and it brings up a proper download page (again tested
in SeaMonkey 2.46, Firefox, Chrome, Opera (Windows)).


That's true, but  is not the same as 
, and Download > Firmware links to a different 
domain (www.draytek.com. rather than myvigoreu.draytek.com.).


Download > Firmware from  links to 
 which. If you've previously 
visited anything under  and got the 
strict-transport-security header, accessing that URL leads to SeaMonkey 
(correctly) loading  
instead, and that returns a 404 Not Found error. The server at 
myvigoreu.draytek.com. is basically informing clients that they should 
only use HTTPS, yet there is some content which it serves only via HTTP 
and not via HTTPS.


--
Mark.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 2.46 updates?

[NoOp]

On 10/13/2016 12:47 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote:
> W dniu 10/12/2016 o 06:51 PM, NoOp pisze:
>> Yeah, I was as my download history shows that I downloaded 2.46 on 9/9
>> from Adrian Kalla's (wave to Adrian) directory:
>> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
>> (latest-comm-release-<>).
>> 
>> I was just surprised that the update notice actually worked, however...
>> Prior to the update I was running the 32bit version:
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0
>> SeaMonkey/2.46
>> and the update changed my install to 64bit. I had purposely switched
>> back to 32bit because of plugin problems (Shockwave Flash is the only
>> plugin that shows up in about:plugins with 64bit. Plus the 64bit update
>> borked my Lightning calendar & I had to reinstall to 5.1 to get my
>> calendar back. Now I have to go back and download the 32bit version &
>> reinstall so that I can get my plugins to work again :-(
>> 
>> Note: on the linux update all is OK as that was running 64bit and all
>> the plugins work.
>> 
>> I'll post back after I revert back to 32bit...
> 
> Mozilla recently changed the parameters attached to the update-URL and
> it looks like I've configured the update server incorrectly...
> I hope I've fixed it now for the RELEASE branch. Please check, if the
> the upgrade to 64bit from 32bit still happens on Windows.
> If it should really work, then I'll fix it for the other branches too
> (please be so kind to send me an email, as I don't check the groups on a
> regular basis).
> 
> Best,
> Adrian
> 

Sent you an email yesterday -- I do not have an older 2.46 RELEASE
version to test. I only was able to find an August 2.46 DEFAULT version
& that will not update.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 2.46 updates?

[NoOp]

On 10/13/2016 12:47 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote:
> W dniu 10/12/2016 o 06:51 PM, NoOp pisze:
>> Yeah, I was as my download history shows that I downloaded 2.46 on 9/9
>> from Adrian Kalla's (wave to Adrian) directory:
>> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
>> (latest-comm-release-<>).
>> 
>> I was just surprised that the update notice actually worked, however...
>> Prior to the update I was running the 32bit version:
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0
>> SeaMonkey/2.46
>> and the update changed my install to 64bit. I had purposely switched
>> back to 32bit because of plugin problems (Shockwave Flash is the only
>> plugin that shows up in about:plugins with 64bit. Plus the 64bit update
>> borked my Lightning calendar & I had to reinstall to 5.1 to get my
>> calendar back. Now I have to go back and download the 32bit version &
>> reinstall so that I can get my plugins to work again :-(
>> 
>> Note: on the linux update all is OK as that was running 64bit and all
>> the plugins work.
>> 
>> I'll post back after I revert back to 32bit...
> 
> Mozilla recently changed the parameters attached to the update-URL and
> it looks like I've configured the update server incorrectly...
> I hope I've fixed it now for the RELEASE branch. Please check, if the
> the upgrade to 64bit from 32bit still happens on Windows.
> If it should really work, then I'll fix it for the other branches too
> (please be so kind to send me an email, as I don't check the groups on a
> regular basis).
> 
> Best,
> Adrian
> 

Sent you an email yesterday -- I do not have an older 2.46 RELEASE
version to test. I only was able to find an August 2.46 DEFAULT version
& that will not update.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 2.46 updates?

[NoOp]

On 10/13/2016 12:47 PM, Adrian Kalla wrote:
> W dniu 10/12/2016 o 06:51 PM, NoOp pisze:
>> Yeah, I was as my download history shows that I downloaded 2.46 on 9/9
>> from Adrian Kalla's (wave to Adrian) directory:
>> https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/
>> (latest-comm-release-<>).
>> 
>> I was just surprised that the update notice actually worked, however...
>> Prior to the update I was running the 32bit version:
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0
>> SeaMonkey/2.46
>> and the update changed my install to 64bit. I had purposely switched
>> back to 32bit because of plugin problems (Shockwave Flash is the only
>> plugin that shows up in about:plugins with 64bit. Plus the 64bit update
>> borked my Lightning calendar & I had to reinstall to 5.1 to get my
>> calendar back. Now I have to go back and download the 32bit version &
>> reinstall so that I can get my plugins to work again :-(
>> 
>> Note: on the linux update all is OK as that was running 64bit and all
>> the plugins work.
>> 
>> I'll post back after I revert back to 32bit...
> 
> Mozilla recently changed the parameters attached to the update-URL and
> it looks like I've configured the update server incorrectly...
> I hope I've fixed it now for the RELEASE branch. Please check, if the
> the upgrade to 64bit from 32bit still happens on Windows.
> If it should really work, then I'll fix it for the other branches too
> (please be so kind to send me an email, as I don't check the groups on a
> regular basis).
> 
> Best,
> Adrian
> 

Sent you an email yesterday -- I do not have an older 2.46 RELEASE
version to test. I only was able to find an August 2.46 DEFAULT version
& that will not update.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: mailbox problems

[NFN Smith]

EE wrote:

You should not be using the inbox for permanent storage.  It was not
meant to be used that way, and you are likely to have more problems if
you keep on doing that.  Instead, move messages that you want to keep to
another folder.  You can create new folders in your account.  See this
page:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Keep_it_working_-_Thunderbird
It says Thunderbird, but the same thing applies to SeaMonkey, which has
the core of Thunderbird.



Trust me, I don't use for permanent storage.  Before my glitch, I had 
only 160 messages there, and I'm very aggressive about moving stuff to 
other folders. I do make a measure of use of sub-folders in the inbox, 
but that's a sorting function, that allows me to defer and group 
lower-priority stuff.


Smith


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Adobe updated FLASH for Linux...

[sean . nathan]

Good News for or those of us who run Seamonkey on Linux there are now 
updated flash plugins for any of your Mozilla based browsers...


I updated late last night with instructions in my peppermintOS distro's 
forums. I'm a linux n00b so I assume most of you will know where to find 
what you need for your particular distro.


sean
--
missing tagzilla

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Win 10 More Problems

[Mozillian]

More problems identified.  Previous identified not fixed.

Have several newsgroups from a provider e.g.AIOE.
I go through and read and the Bold Type goes to normal indicating I read 
the post.


When I restart Seamonkey at a later date some of those previously read 
posts are again Bold.  I have to click again to clear.


This doe not happen on other PC I have which are Win XP and Win 7.

What causes this and how to fix ?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: BCC broken? [re SOLVED]

[sean . nathan]

David E. Ross wrote:

On 10/2/2016 12:45 PM, sean wrote:

Richard Alan wrote on 10/01/2016 04:02 PM:

sean wrote:


Richard Alan wrote on 10/01/2016 02:02 PM:

sean wrote:

i just sent out an apology e'mail addressed BCC to myself and two
others... it apprived in my inbox with all three BCCed e'mail
addresses switched from BCC: to TO:


Read the source header of the received message to confirm they are
"TO:"
and it is not the fault of your theme. Also, specifically ask your
recipients how *they* see it.


they see it as a long list of TO:
while the e'mail i sent out has a long list of BCC:


Again, how about you in your received copy's _source_.

How are you separating the addresses in your Compose window? Manually on
one line, or separate clicks from an Address Book?


FWIW, this does not happen in the new profile with no addons...


Oh. Well then, which addon is causing it?  :-)   Might be your address
book.


having trouble locating it, it was under discussion recently by David
Ross because he didn't like the rounded apple-esque scroll bars, nor the
fact that the themes had a separate download for those scroll bars...
metal in the name, a dark and light version... not turning up in my
search of the theme addons...

guessing David didn't receive my BCC: from this thread as they'd be
screen out as spam...


I have to assume you mean a different David Ross since I do not recall
ever commenting about scroll bars.



the same problem does not occur when I use my cox or gmail smtp 
servers... so am in the process of closing out the live.com accounts as 
Microsoft seems to be making a mess of their e'mail transition into the 
Office365 environment... which I will never use since I run Linux.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey release?

[sean . nathan]

WaltS48 wrote:

On 10/12/2016 01:38 AM, sean.nat...@invalid.knights.nee wrote:

Stephan Thiele wrote:

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I don't really understand why
there still is no Seamonkey update after the 2.40 release in March,
almost half a year ago.
I am quite confused that there a nightlies with version numbers
increasing to 2.48 while there is not even a beta.
Seamonkey is my default browser and mail and news program, so I don't
like to take any risk of losing my data and mails by using a buggy
nightly. On the other hand, I see a lot of security updates of Firefox
and Thunderbird which have been published in the meantime and therefore
I'm concerned about unfixed vulnerabilities in Seamonkey.

Any hope?


I'm a dedicated PeppermintOS Linux user... Anyone else find a newer
than 2.40 that works well on Linux Mint based distributions?

sean



There isn't any newer official release.



unofficial or nightlies are fine... i see folks mentioning newer build 
numbers...


just checking in...

sean
--
good ol'tagzilla
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: mailbox problems

[EE]

NFN Smith wrote:

Over the last week, I've had a couple of problems with folders on my
primary account. I'm running Seamonkey 2.40 on Windows 7, and the
mailbox in question is a POP account.

1) A few days ago, I found that in one of my folders, most (but not all)
the messages in the folder got duplicated, including read/unread status,
folder icons that show forwarding and/or reply, and tags. The folder was
only a couple hundred messages, and cleaning up was only a mild
irritant, but I've seen this kind of thing happen 2 or 3 times
previously over 3 or 4 years.

Any idea of what's going on?

2) About an hour ago, I found that a bunch of messages have gone missing
from my inbox, and I haven't purged or deleted anything en masse
(although I was doing maintenance work and deleted a handful of messages
one at a time).

Nothing in my trash folder that I can't account for having deleted. This
morning there were about 160 messages in the inbox, and now there's
about 40. An odd thing is that for the messages that are still there,
nearly everything is dated October 2016, but there are two messages with
timestamps of October 2013.

After making a backup of the entire profile, I did delete the MSF file
and re-indexed, on the odd chance that the problem is indexing, but that
didn't accomplish anything.

I have my mail profile backed up (something that I do daily), and it's
easy enough to recover the Inbox file and the accompanying index file,
but I've forgotten how to restore just a single folder.

What I want to do is take just a copy of the backed up inbox, and copy
the messages from the recovered inbox and put them into a folder, where
I can then manually merge back into my regular inbox.

Can anybody remind me how to do this?

Smith
You should not be using the inbox for permanent storage.  It was not 
meant to be used that way, and you are likely to have more problems if 
you keep on doing that.  Instead, move messages that you want to keep to 
another folder.  You can create new folders in your account.  See this page:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Keep_it_working_-_Thunderbird
It says Thunderbird, but the same thing applies to SeaMonkey, which has 
the core of Thunderbird.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey