Re: ebay and SeaMonkey Browser Support
Big Jim wrote: As of June 19th, ebay states that they will no longer support the SeaMonkey browser because it is outdated and unsafe. A paste of the message I received is below... eBay Oh No! We noticed that you’re on an outdated web browser that may compromise your security as you shop online. As of June 19, 2018 you will no longer be able to check out on eBay with your current browser. Update to the latest version now so you can continue to check out safely and securely. Why must we continually put up with this! I am using v.2.49.3 and have received the same message from e-Bay. Is the e-Bay technical staff as uninformed as the JP Morgan/Chase Bank staff? What can be done? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
ebay and SeaMonkey Browser Support
As of June 19th, ebay states that they will no longer support the SeaMonkey browser because it is outdated and unsafe. A paste of the message I received is below... eBay Oh No! We noticed that you’re on an outdated web browser that may compromise your security as you shop online. As of June 19, 2018 you will no longer be able to check out on eBay with your current browser. Update to the latest version now so you can continue to check out safely and securely. Why must we continually put up with this! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: why won't SM 2.49.3 remember where local folders are?
sean wrote: WaltS48 wrote: On 6/10/18 3:07 PM, sean wrote: Well... this has been long running. I can't recollect when it started but Seamonkey doesn't like it when I direct it to find Local Folders on a separate sata drive from the main C: drive I have many GB of mail history and really don't want it on my smallish C: drive in my latest re-installation of my desktop... any ideas? am I correct this used to work? sean Don't know what you mean. Need exact steps to reproduce. my machine has a C: drive for programs, and an F: and G: drive for backup storage. In the past I have always directed the local folders to one or the other of the storage drives where all archives are kept. for while now, whenever I reboot the machine, the local folders has lost contact with the path to the storage drive that is selected in Account Settings: /media/sean/7DCF1DCD6715DC30/local folders Which operating system are you attempting to do this from? Mention of C:, F: and G: drives looks like Windows, but /media/sean/... looks like a Linux path. Your user-agent header also indicates that you're posting from Linux, although that may not be the system you're having problems with. If Linux, it may be worth checking that the disk is mounted before starting SeaMonkey. If you're attempting to share a single SeaMonkey profile between both Windows and Linux, that won't work - particularly in this case where there are paths which need to be specified differently on the two systems. -- Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Disabling SSL/TLS protocols to safeguard payment data
On 6/11/18, Mason83 wrote: > On 08/06/2018 21:02, Andy K wrote: > >> June 30, 2018 is the deadline for disabling SSL/early TLS and >> implementing a more secure encryption protocol – TLS 1.1 or higher >> (TLS v1.2 is strongly encouraged) in order to meet the PCI Data >> Security Standard (PCI DSS) for safeguarding payment data. >> >> For Firefox and Seamonkey >> >> In about:config, set security.tls.version.min to 2 to prevent >> protocols lower than TLS 1.1 from being used. >> >> Reference: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Security.tls.version.* > > FWIW, one of the largest banks in France seems to be stuck > using TLS 1.0 > > Trying to connect to https://particuliers.secure.lcl.fr/ > leads to this error message: > > """ > Secure Connection Failed > > An error occurred during a connection to particuliers.secure.lcl.fr. > > Peer using unsupported version of security protocol. > > Error code: title="SSL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_VERSION">SSL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_VERSION > > The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of > the received data could not be verified. > > Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. > """ > > > https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=particuliers.secure.lcl.fr > > This server supports weak Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange parameters. Grade > capped to B. MORE INFO » > The server supports only older protocols, but not the current best TLS 1.2. > Grade capped to C. MORE INFO » > This server accepts RC4 cipher, but only with older protocols. Grade capped > to B. MORE INFO » > This server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers. > Grade capped to B. MORE INFO » > This server does not support Authenticated encryption (AEAD) cipher suites. > Grade capped to B. MORE INFO » > > > When will these people take security seriously? When they're forced to? On a related note, how are the https intercepting anti-virus vendors doing these days? I haven't found anything later than Feb 2017: https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-and-mozillas-message-to-av-and-security-firms-stop-trashing-https/ 'In an evaluation of antivirus products that feature TLS interception, only Avast AV 11 and AV 10 score an A grade, while all others score a C or F. They award a C to products containing a known TLS vulnerability, such as BEAST, FREAK, and Logjam; or an F for products with a severely broken connection due to weak ciphers or not validating certificates." If you're concerned about online banking, it might be worth to checking https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/viewMyClient.html Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
calendar selection on invite
Hello,
When one receives an email with an appointment (ICS), Lightning will
show a blue "banner" to add the appointment.
(In about:config it's necessary to have
calendar.google.enableEmailInvitations = true
to have direct write access to Google Calendar via invitations.)
Unfortunately, after pressing the button in the blue banner only a
selection of possible calendars that SM considers "worthy" is shown.
Although I have two calendars of the same account using Provider for
Google Calendar (once the main calendar and an additional one), only one
of them is "worthy" of this function. (and a local calendar, which is
not the topic here)
Meanwhile I had read that it is because a calendar needs to be linked to
the e-mail account.
Unfortunately, under right-click => properties the GUI offers an e-mail
selection only for the "worthy" calendar (there I cannot select an
e-mail for the target calendar, the option is simply missing).
Therefore I tried manual setting of
calendar.registry.{calender-id}.imip.identity.key
with the ID of the email account, but this brought no change.
Does anyone have any idea if something else is linked or activated
elsewhere?
kind regards
Martin
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
How to move a data folder from hard drive to SD card or to CD-R?
Hi, I have a data folder consisting of over 400 important e-mails, on my hard drive, Windows 7 Pro 64 bit. I want to back up this folder to either a CD-R or an SD card. However, whenever I try and click on either my Roxio CD software or an inserted SD card, clicking on the folder makes the folder disappear from the screen.. Can anyone advise me as to how I can copy this folder to either CD-R or SD card? am running the latest SeaMonkey version. Thanks, Mort Linder --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Disabling SSL/TLS protocols to safeguard payment data
Mason83 wrote on 11/06/18 22:39: On 11/06/2018 14:32, Daniel wrote: Mason83 wrote on 11/06/18 19:31: On 08/06/2018 21:02, Andy K wrote: June 30, 2018 is the deadline for disabling SSL/early TLS and implementing a more secure encryption protocol – TLS 1.1 or higher (TLS v1.2 is strongly encouraged) in order to meet the PCI Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) for safeguarding payment data. For Firefox and Seamonkey In about:config, set security.tls.version.min to 2 to prevent protocols lower than TLS 1.1 from being used. Reference: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Security.tls.version.* FWIW, one of the largest banks in France seems to be stuck using TLS 1.0 Trying to connect to https://particuliers.secure.lcl.fr/ leads to this error message: """ Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection to particuliers.secure.lcl.fr. Peer using unsupported version of security protocol. Error code: SSL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_VERSION The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. """ So that's what it means!! ;-) Each day, when I download my e-mails, SM usually filters most of them into the Trash folder (as I've set things up!). I then go through my Trash folder and send copies of those e-mails to Spamcop.net and, often, SM gives me a screen the same as yours, Mason. When I then re-send the e-mail, things usually work fine!! Last week, I asked my ISP what was going on, and he said it was an error on their server, then I mentioned that it usually worked second time around. He replied that, second time around, it was probably getting to a different server! Mason, did you try logging on again, i.e. clicking the "Resend" button on that Error screen?? If so, does it work, second time around?? I'm afraid there is nothing to "Resend" as I was just trying to load a web page, at URL https://particuliers.secure.lcl.fr/ I suppose I can "Reload" but I suspect it will always fail (until TLS 1.0 is re-enabled). Regards. Ah!! Valid Point! I'm trying to send stuff to a website, you're just trying to get to a website! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Disabling SSL/TLS protocols to safeguard payment data
On 11/06/2018 14:32, Daniel wrote: > Mason83 wrote on 11/06/18 19:31: >> On 08/06/2018 21:02, Andy K wrote: >> >>> June 30, 2018 is the deadline for disabling SSL/early TLS and >>> implementing a more secure encryption protocol – TLS 1.1 or higher >>> (TLS v1.2 is strongly encouraged) in order to meet the PCI Data >>> Security Standard (PCI DSS) for safeguarding payment data. >>> >>> For Firefox and Seamonkey >>> >>> In about:config, set security.tls.version.min to 2 to prevent >>> protocols lower than TLS 1.1 from being used. >>> >>> Reference: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Security.tls.version.* >> >> FWIW, one of the largest banks in France seems to be stuck >> using TLS 1.0 >> >> Trying to connect to https://particuliers.secure.lcl.fr/ >> leads to this error message: >> >> """ >> Secure Connection Failed >> >> An error occurred during a connection to particuliers.secure.lcl.fr. >> >> Peer using unsupported version of security protocol. >> >> Error code: > title="SSL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_VERSION">SSL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_VERSION >> >> The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of >> the received data could not be verified. >> >> Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. >> """ > > So that's what it means!! ;-) > > Each day, when I download my e-mails, SM usually filters most of them > into the Trash folder (as I've set things up!). I then go through my > Trash folder and send copies of those e-mails to Spamcop.net and, often, > SM gives me a screen the same as yours, Mason. When I then re-send the > e-mail, things usually work fine!! > > Last week, I asked my ISP what was going on, and he said it was an error > on their server, then I mentioned that it usually worked second time > around. He replied that, second time around, it was probably getting to > a different server! > > Mason, did you try logging on again, i.e. clicking the "Resend" button > on that Error screen?? If so, does it work, second time around?? I'm afraid there is nothing to "Resend" as I was just trying to load a web page, at URL https://particuliers.secure.lcl.fr/ I suppose I can "Reload" but I suspect it will always fail (until TLS 1.0 is re-enabled). Regards. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Disabling SSL/TLS protocols to safeguard payment data
Mason83 wrote on 11/06/18 19:31: On 08/06/2018 21:02, Andy K wrote: June 30, 2018 is the deadline for disabling SSL/early TLS and implementing a more secure encryption protocol – TLS 1.1 or higher (TLS v1.2 is strongly encouraged) in order to meet the PCI Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) for safeguarding payment data. For Firefox and Seamonkey In about:config, set security.tls.version.min to 2 to prevent protocols lower than TLS 1.1 from being used. Reference: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Security.tls.version.* FWIW, one of the largest banks in France seems to be stuck using TLS 1.0 Trying to connect to https://particuliers.secure.lcl.fr/ leads to this error message: """ Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection to particuliers.secure.lcl.fr. Peer using unsupported version of security protocol. Error code: SSL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_VERSION The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. """ So that's what it means!! ;-) Each day, when I download my e-mails, SM usually filters most of them into the Trash folder (as I've set things up!). I then go through my Trash folder and send copies of those e-mails to Spamcop.net and, often, SM gives me a screen the same as yours, Mason. When I then re-send the e-mail, things usually work fine!! Last week, I asked my ISP what was going on, and he said it was an error on their server, then I mentioned that it usually worked second time around. He replied that, second time around, it was probably getting to a different server! Mason, did you try logging on again, i.e. clicking the "Resend" button on that Error screen?? If so, does it work, second time around?? P.S. Until yesterday, I did have TLS 1.0 enabled, along with 1.1 and 1.2, but de-selected it yesterday, and the spamcop.net site still worked and/or failed today!! -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Disabling SSL/TLS protocols to safeguard payment data
On 08/06/2018 21:02, Andy K wrote: > June 30, 2018 is the deadline for disabling SSL/early TLS and > implementing a more secure encryption protocol – TLS 1.1 or higher > (TLS v1.2 is strongly encouraged) in order to meet the PCI Data > Security Standard (PCI DSS) for safeguarding payment data. > > For Firefox and Seamonkey > > In about:config, set security.tls.version.min to 2 to prevent > protocols lower than TLS 1.1 from being used. > > Reference: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Security.tls.version.* FWIW, one of the largest banks in France seems to be stuck using TLS 1.0 Trying to connect to https://particuliers.secure.lcl.fr/ leads to this error message: """ Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection to particuliers.secure.lcl.fr. Peer using unsupported version of security protocol. Error code: SSL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_VERSION The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. """ https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=particuliers.secure.lcl.fr This server supports weak Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange parameters. Grade capped to B. MORE INFO » The server supports only older protocols, but not the current best TLS 1.2. Grade capped to C. MORE INFO » This server accepts RC4 cipher, but only with older protocols. Grade capped to B. MORE INFO » This server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers. Grade capped to B. MORE INFO » This server does not support Authenticated encryption (AEAD) cipher suites. Grade capped to B. MORE INFO » When will these people take security seriously? Regards. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
