Help Seamonkey 2.31 is refusing to put anything in sent box in W7
Hi folks Seamonkey 2.31 is refusing to put anything in sent box after emailing, I wonder what to do to keep a sent email in the sent box. This is happening on Windows 7 running seamonkey 2.31, any help much appreciated. Previously it worked fine but all configs I tried no luck with this problem and no answers last post just a scrub, for perhaps sending it to ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey2.0.2 and debian 64 bit, no flash
Thanx NoOp, followed your link and that did the trick, Seamonkey 64 2.0.3 pre works with flash fine now in debian 64 bit, many thanks. I'll keep an eye on the nightly builds now . Cheers Rod ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey2.0.2 and debian 64 bit, no flashplayer
Hi I installed seamonkey 2.0.2 in Debian Lenny 64 bit, and it runs, so- is it both 32 and 64 bit compatible. However it will not run the 64 bit libflashplayer.so file downloaded from adobe in the plugins folder as the 32 bit seamonkey will with the 32 bit file. I then tried the 32 bit libflashplayer.so, and seamonkey promptly crashed. I looked on the seamonkey website but nothing terribly helfpul revealed itself. So I wonder how to get 64 bit flash working, or even 64 bit java going or is this still a work in progress. Would symlinks help. Any non MS folk have any ideas I wonder? Regards Rod ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian and ubuntu I really miss the installer!
Hi, Seamonkey 2.0 does not take mail settings, and others with it any more in Linux when it is decompressed, like all Seamonkey versions up till SM 1.1.18. So this is a real pest and inconvenience. I know Linux is a poor relation to MS windows, which SM 2.0 installer does take all the settings. The installer was really great in the Linux version, and transcended all the uncertainty waiting for an up to date packaged version that usually never happens with SM. I am staying with 1.1.18 for now, and hoping either an installer is reconsidered, or I must decide what to do, as this is not good enough to lose your old mail. I wonder if someone has a solution for the poor old Linux version. Here's hoping Regards Rod ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey 2.0 in Debian, poor fonts
Hi, I know you guys are very windows centric, but I am having font rendering issues with seamonkey 2.0 in Debian Linux. It is indeed like firefox, which also has poor font rendering in Debian, despite tweaking appearance. I know there are branding issues issues with Debian which is dumb, and they do not even provide the Iceape package now, dumber still. Seamonkey 1.18 looks much better, and implements the system fonts well. This may because it had an installer like previous versions, and picked up font rendering, and up till now has been my browser of choice, a great browser too. No more is the case, and despite lots of tweaking, seamonkey 2.0 fonts are thin and less attractive, despite ostensibly using system fonts and settings. The gtk engines etc are installed too, with no great improvement. Perhaps I am missing some configuration that will help. I would appreciate any suggestions. Cheers Rod ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey mail better in Linux than in Windows 7?
Hi Bill, this may be dumb, but in what menu is this checkbox for including the image found in SM, so far I have had no luck, and am now using SM 2.0 in Windows 7 Cheers Rod Rod Lovett wrote: Hi, I notice that in Linux composing mail in Seamonkey mail, and copying and pasting images to the main body of the message is easy. This fails in XP, Vista and Windows 7 especially, no image is transferred to the main body of the message on copying and pasting. Why is this so, is it an OS thing, or a Seamonkey thing under MS windows. This nuisance certainly makes me use Seamonkey in Linux for mail most of the time now, which is arguably safer anyway. While I'm tempted to say everything is better in Linux, when you compose there's a checkbox on including the image in the message, and the default may be different. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey mail better in Linux than in Windows 7
Hi, I notice that in Linux composing mail in Seamonkey mail, and copying and pasting images to the main body of the message is easy. This fails in XP, Vista and Windows 7 especially, no image is transferred to the main body of the message on copying and pasting. Why is this so, is it an OS thing, or a Seamonkey thing under MS windows. This nuisance certainly makes me use Seamonkey in Linux for mail most of the time now, which is arguably safer anyway. Regards Rod ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Why does seamonkey.tgz for linux use deprecated libstdc++5 instead of libstdc++6 which is up to date
Hi Why does seamonkey.tgz for linux use deprecated libstdc++5 instead of libstdc++6 which is up to date. This would make for easier installs. Instead it never changes the old file. Regards Rod ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Why does seamonkey.tgz for linux use deprecated libstdc++5 instead of libstdc++6 which is up to date
Hi Why does seamonkey.tgz for linux use deprecated libstdc++5 instead of libstdc++6 which is up to date. This would make for easier installs. Instead it never changes the old file. Regards Rod ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
