Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.7 released!
On 3/30/2021 9:44 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.7. Thanks to all involved! Jokes aside, it's been a blast posting here and I'm certainly unhappy that it's going the same way as irc.mozilla.org. But perhaps the new 'thing' will be better? Did I miss what the new 'thing' is? FRG suggested mozillazine, and of course there is the blog. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.6 released!
On 1/22/2021 11:13 AM, Cecil Bankston wrote: I downloaded the X64 version for my Windows 10 system, but it doesn't run when I double-click or use Open Worked fine here, although M$ "helpfully" gives a nasty warning that it was downloaded from the Internet (oh noes!). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Updates: General
On 12/7/2020 4:05 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: What I do know is that there was never an automatic upgrade path from < 2.0 to 2.0. It was always manual. I think the best way is to backup the profile, and upgrade SeaMonkey manually from < 2.0 to 2.0, then 2.0 to 2.1..etc up until 2.24 (while backing up the profile as you go). The release notes of the various versions should offer some guidance. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!
On 11/20/2020 4:01 AM, Dirk Fieldhouse wrote: Speaking of detection - any idea why html5test.com thinks WebP is not supported? It also says No for Firefox, so this is not a SeaMonkey issue (it says Yes for Chrome, so it's detecting something differently). The test for Custom Elements looks for document.registerElement(), which is deprecated, and was supposed to be dropped from Chrome in February. This may give an idea of the quality of the tests. Perhaps a new site html5testtest.com is needed? Thanks for the insight; I have noticed the website hasn't been maintained for a while now. It does still provide some interesting info, though. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!
On 11/20/2020 1:22 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Personally I am not impressed by the format. Looks impressive on paper only. I doubt anyone other than google needs it in the real world and they are now already working on webp2. I found this nice article a while back: https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-really-better-than-jpeg ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!
On 11/19/2020 11:33 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: install 2.52.5.1 and enjoy better/working av1 deteaction Speaking of detection - any idea why html5test.com thinks WebP is not supported? It also says No for Firefox, so this is not a SeaMonkey issue (it says Yes for Chrome, so it's detecting something differently). And yes, WebP samples display just fine: https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/gallery1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5b1 released!
On 10/29/2020 11:51 AM, WaltS48 wrote: the latest PDF.js is supposed to finally work with PDF email attachments! The latest PDF.js extension for SeaMonkey? Yes, linked from the release notes: https://github.com/IsaacSchemm/pdf.js-seamonkey/releases/ Changes since 2.3.233: #2 (cannot open PDFs from attachments pane) should be resolved ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5b1 released!
On 10/28/2020 4:47 PM, Edmund Wong wrote: The SeaMonkey Project is pleased to announce the release of SeaMonkey 2.53.5 Beta 1. AV1 and WebP support, nice! Plus the latest PDF.js is supposed to finally work with PDF email attachments! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.4 released!
On 9/25/2020 8:04 AM, AndrésH wrote: Your graphics drivers are either blacklisted because of known problems or do not support OpenGL 2.0 WebGL2: https://get.webgl.org/webgl2/ AMD has not released new drivers for Windows 10 . AMD refers to the windows update to maintain the drivers for windows 10. The drivers from Windows Update are notorious for excluding OpenGL (and probably Vulkan) support. You really should get them direct, but Frank's advice is also good - integrated graphics are generally not good for much of anything. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.4 released!
On 9/25/2020 8:04 AM, AndrésH wrote: Your graphics drivers are either blacklisted because of known problems or do not support OpenGL 2.0 WebGL2: https://get.webgl.org/webgl2/ AMD has not released new drivers for Windows 10 . AMD refers to the windows update to maintain the drivers for windows 10. The drivers from Windows Update are notorious for excluding OpenGL (and probably Vulkan) support. You really should get them direct, but Frank's advice is also good - integrated graphics are generally not good for much of anything. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.4 released!
On 9/22/2020 6:00 AM, WaltS48 wrote: If you are a Fedora 31 or 32 Linux user you got an update. I was a little surprised when I saw it, since it was prior to the announcement. ;-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.3 released!
On 8/4/2020 1:27 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: I've noticed that Lightning complains about being incompatible when trying to go from 2.53.x+1 beta to 2.53.x final. Downlevel was never supported by SeaMonkey or Gecko so the distributed lightning is not picked up. It is now a packed extension which makes installing it manually pretty easy. Profiles are more or less compatible too with latest versions but might change any time. Sorry if this is a stupid question, but what's the procedure for "removing" the "incompatible" Lightning version and "installing" the "compatible" packed version? I would have expected installing the previous version to fully replace the prior / "newer" one, but I'm guessing it's got a version string in some configuration file that confuses it? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.3 released!
On 8/4/2020 9:05 AM, vij wrote: A case on pc win7: I try 2.53.3 and it doesn't work on some securised site, so I came back to 2.53.2 and Lightning doesn't work at all since... I've noticed that Lightning complains about being incompatible when trying to go from 2.53.x+1 beta to 2.53.x final. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.2 released!
On 6/17/2020 4:50 AM, Gunther Nikl wrote: Maybe my (ancient :-) client cached the post? Does your SeaMonkey/1.1.19 show the post from Ant with subject "Missing newsgroup posts" in this thread? If so, that does point to a bug in newer versions. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.2 released!
On 6/16/2020 4:22 AM, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
That posting of yours has vanished for me as well
I wasn't seeing posts disappear before, but ironically Ant's reply to
this one ("Missing newsgroup posts") is getting the "Article not found"
error in Mail/News for me here. However, it displays just fine in the
browser interface:
news://news.mozilla.org:119/7dednrs4hoqmrxtdnz2dnuu7-uxnn...@mozilla.org
So, I'd say this is probably a bug in the Mail/News code.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.1 released!
On 2/27/2020 4:58 PM, Ant wrote: Hmm, the two links in original post don't show up correctly too. FWIW, you can skip the "pretty face" and go direct: http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.1/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey v2.53.1b1 is Released!
On 1/21/2020 9:04 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: 1) ExchangeCalendar 5.0.0-beta 1 [Exception... "[JavaScript Error: "aUri.pathQueryRef is undefined" Maybe you can fix it up by changing back pathQueryRef to path: Thanks for the hint; if I have issues with TbSync, and/or it looks like ExchangeCalendar will have new releases, I'll try that out. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey v2.53.1b1 is Released!
On 1/20/2020 2:19 PM, Steve Wendt wrote:
Calendaring stuff (i.e. to work with Exchange) seems to be busted also,
but some of that could be due to not aligning with a Thunderbird version.
1) ExchangeCalendar 5.0.0-beta 1; says it dropped support for
Thunderbird 59 and lower, but 4.0.0 wasn't working
either.(https://github.com/ExchangeCalendar/exchangecalendar)
[Exception... "[JavaScript Error: "aUri.pathQueryRef is undefined"
{file:
"file:extensions/exchangecalen...@extensions.1st-setup.nl/calendar/interface/exchangeCalendar/mivExchangeCalendar.js"
line: 574}]'[JavaScript Error: "aUri.pathQueryRef is undefined" {file:
"file:extensions/exchangecalen...@extensions.1st-setup.nl/calendar/interface/exchangeCalendar/mivExchangeCalendar.js"
line: 574}]' when calling method: [mivExchangeCalendar::uri]" nsresult:
"0x80570021 (NS_ERROR_XPC_JAVASCRIPT_ERROR_WITH_DETAILS)" location: "JS
frame :: resource://calendar/calendar-js/calCalendarManager.js ::
createCalendar :: line 447" data: yes]
2) TbSync 1.7.0.2
https://github.com/jobisoft/TbSync
Wasn't working before, but it seems to be now; great!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey v2.53.1b1 is Released!
On 1/20/2020 12:26 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Most add-ons should work fine. Themes probably need an update. Add-ons dealing with bookmarks and downloads too. Calendaring stuff (i.e. to work with Exchange) seems to be busted also, but some of that could be due to not aligning with a Thunderbird version. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.48 released!
On 07/31/2017 08:02 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: The next release will be 2.49.1 which should be up to date with the latest Fx 52 ESR release. Thanks guys - looking forward to it! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: The State of the SeaMonkey Union!
On 5/3/2017 1:21 AM, Iacopo Benesperi wrote: * I have a mac, so I can help with triaging bugs. I don't think I'll have time to actively search for bugs to triage I think this is mainly a question of constructing a good Bugzilla query. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: The State of the SeaMonkey Union! - Get SeaMonkey into Ubuntu and Debian repos
On 5/3/2017 6:06 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Of course it would be great to be listed in the repos FWIW, I'm happy to say that SeaMonkey has been maintained in the Fedora repository. The maintainer accepted my request to enable GStreamer in his build, after it had been enabled for Firefox. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.48 Beta 1 has been released
On 4/18/2017 6:47 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: Doesn't look like it but it took a few hours to do the patch for the website and I looked forward to do something else during the weekend (among them to fix a few bugs in the source code). Non-native English speaker so making sure that not too many typos are in it was a bonus that took time too :) Clarity of writing is not always simple; thus far, the results show you care about your efforts, so thank you. :) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.48 Beta 1 has been released
On 4/17/2017 1:07 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: There are now constant changes in the Gecko engine Fair enough. :-/ And every release breaks more and more add-ons because of removals in Gecko and JS deprecation and so on. I remember when it was a "big deal" to break the API and go from Gecko 1.x to 2.0. Now it's every few weeks. With the imminent removal of aurora this won't get any better. Was news to me; found this: https://www.ghacks.net/2017/04/16/firefox-aurora-end/ The only entity believing that the code became more stable in recent releases is Mozilla corp. For SeaMonkey and the other comm-central apps it just means that the junk is pushed faster down imho :) The "nothing matters but Firefox" attitude is certainly detrimental to the rest of the community, but that slippery slope was well greased long ago. You and I can probably deal with any fallout but I have seen enough bug reports from people without a backup so I put this in as a general warning. If you want to go back backup before upgrading. In this case, one small suggestion - at first glance, it looks like it's the same data loss warning that has been there forever (I just noticed the version bump, and assumed it was accidental). Perhaps more words to the effect of this post (constant changes in Core break all our $#!+) would help make it clear the warning is constantly relevant? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.48 Beta 1 has been released
On 4/17/2017 9:45 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote: check the release notes for known problems. Thanks for updating those; it led me to bug 1305624: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1305624 And a workaround for fixing the password manager being painfully slow to populate since 2.46 (remove webappsstore.sqlite). FWIW, mine was ~33MB. A question about the "data loss warning" there: I think the SeaMonkey version number there has been getting updated, when it should not be? The 2.40 release notes refer to version 2.0, the 2.46 release notes to version 2.40, and the 2.48 release notes to version 2.46. I don't think there were such drastic changes that should have caused it to no longer say version 2.0 there? A regular 2.48 will follow (hopefully) soon. Afterwards we will switch to 2.49 ESR as fast as we can to be on par with Firefox ESR 52. Thanks for the ongoing efforts! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)
On 12/27/2016 11:47 AM, Steve Wendt wrote: I tried PDF viewer, found it fine and straightforward, but I was disappointed to see I cannot open an email attachment with it ? If you find/file a bug for it in Bugzilla, please post a link back here; it annoys me too. :-/ Found it: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977822 Based on the comments in linked bug 810815, it sounds like it needs some hacks to pass it to pdf.js, or pdf.js needs to handle additional protocols (primarily imap). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.46 and PDF file (Linux x86-64)
On 12/26/2016 9:29 AM, cyberzen wrote: I tried PDF viewer, found it fine and straightforward, but I was disappointed to see I cannot open an email attachment with it ? If you find/file a bug for it in Bugzilla, please post a link back here; it annoys me too. :-/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.46 released
On 12/23/2016 3:37 PM, NoOp wrote: Why is it necessary to reboot the computer when the Windows version is installed? Just a guess, but I think that usually means you have some file locked that needs to be replaced (problem does not exist on Linux). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: 2.46
On 12/22/2016 7:44 PM, David E. Ross wrote: Is there a method by which an end-user can determine if a PC has a CPU that is SSE enabled? cat /proc/cpuinfo If you aren't fortunate enough to be on an OS where that works, Windows has msinfo32 and wmic, although you'll have to compare the processor info those give you by looking up the specs online. https://www.windows-commandline.com/get-cpu-processor-information-command/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released
On 10/14/12 12:20 pm, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use the standard HTTP downloads, you get the benefits of the distributed mirrors, so it's pretty quick. If you'll post a link, I'll test that as well. Not sure what you are asking about; this? http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/releases/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.13.1 Released
On 10/14/12 12:15 am, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: So I don't think the SM servers are the issue for you. I can't have received it quickly if they are running slowly. The FTP server gets pretty slow when there is a new release. If you use the standard HTTP downloads, you get the benefits of the distributed mirrors, so it's pretty quick. The primary reason I go to the FTP server is to see *all* the releases, including betas; a lot of stuff gets hidden on the HTTP side (reasonably so). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility
On 06/20/11 10:14 am, Jens Hatlak wrote: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/2.1/AddonCompat Its purpose is to: * tell the average user which add-ons are compatible and where to get them from if they cannot find them on AMO * tell experienced users which add-ons actually work despite claiming compatibility * tell contributors what the state of specific add-ons is so that they can better coordinate their efforts (contact the author, provide modified version etc.) Fair enough; I guess that leaves me only wondering why there is a need for the AMO section, unless it is just a place to see that something hasn't been forgotten from the list. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility
On 06/19/11 01:20 pm, Jens Hatlak wrote: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/2.1/AddonCompat As you can see, it's not pretty and has low usability. (that's what AMO is for!) Right - so what's this wiki page for, exactly? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Wiki Page listing Extension Compatibility
On 06/19/11 04:50 pm, David E. Ross wrote: Preserve Download Modification Timestamp https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/preserve-download-modification is compatible with SeaMonkey 2.1. That extension is compatible only if you tweak the maxVersion in file install.rdf. ??? Works with: SeaMonkey 2.0 - 2.4a1 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: When will SeaMonkey use Firefox v3.6.2's Gecko version?
On 04/06/10 11:50 am, Robert Kaiser wrote: Does SM have a map of its versions? I remember it (and original Mozilla suite) used to, but I couldn't find it a few months ago. The release dates graph. No. We have no firm dates planned for anything, not even a good idea how many alphas and betas we'll do for 2.1, so also no graph. If historical data is what he was after, this is available: http://www-archive.mozilla.org/releases/history.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Disable specific Seamonkey components
On 03/05/10 04:02 am, Philip Chee wrote: Chatzilla is a separate extension so you should be able to package SeaMonkey without Chatzilla or disable it by default. The Composer UI might be a build time configuration setting. The enhancement bug just turned 10 years old, actually: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29838 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Threading don't work for one mail address
On 12/15/09 02:47 am, Martin Freitag wrote: As I don't have TB, so that's not possible for me to do. But that editor could be useful also in SM. Maybe time to file an enhancement bug if it doesn't already exist? ;-) It's the same as about:config ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore the old Form Manager!
On 11/18/09 10:50 am, Philip Chee wrote: 1. The form autofill functionality that fills forms up on a page. The first is more problematic since the code lives somewhere in toolkit and is written mostly in C++. I filed an enhancement bug for what I think is the common case: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525612 2. The Form History Editor used to edit/delete/correct mistakes. The second is possibly solvable (with some restrictions) since it's just front end UI code. We could even crib off the Form History extension there. That was the suggestion here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525791 The main caveat is that the toolkit form history implementation has no concept of a form (!!). In the old XPFE form filler for each unique webpage the component stored the URL and the fieldname/value pairs together. In the toolkit implementation only fieldname/value pairs are stored and these could be used for any webpage that contains those fields. I seem to recall that generic fields like street address just worked on different URLs in the XPFE implementation (?). I think an interim workaround is to port the Firefox Form Autofill extension which (I think) uses it's own storage format and allows autofilling whole forms as well as it's own editor to access stored forms data. Auto-fill of whole forms sounds interesting, but that's not the most common case - usually, you just want to fill in common fields, like street address, email address, etc. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 RC2: will modal window for About:SeaMonkey return?
On 10/28/09 10:26 am, Phillip Jones wrote: Java-script. Must not be too dangerous Adobe acrobat uses it extensively. Acrobat also has a lot of security exploits (!). But related not to Java-script. A quick Google search suggests otherwise: http://www.404techsupport.com/2009/02/20/prevent-the-latest-exploit-in-adobe-acrobat-disable-javascript/ http://www.ca.com/us/securityadvisor/vulninfo/vuln.aspx?id=36838 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 - The Modern Internet Suite is Here!
On 10/28/09 06:21 am, Jay Garcia wrote: Click in the user name field, then click in it again. It should give you a drop-down list of saved items. I think what Ed is talking about is that there is only ONE login/password for each site, not a list of logins/passwords that cover a couple of dozen sites all in one drop down presented at each site. No, I think it does what Ed wants - lists all the logins for the current site. If you want a complete list, the password manager works the same as it always has. Netscape/Flock Champion Isn't Netscape dead? Looks like it is just a AOL Yahoo-style portal, now. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: bookmarks sharing post-places
On 7/30/2009 2:59 PM, Felix Miata wrote: I also seem to have found a solution for the original issue regarding FF: put 'user_pref(browser.places.importBookmarksHTML, true);' in user.js (which I found in bug 385077). Useful info is in comment 70: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385077#c70 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: bookmarks sharing post-places
On 07/09/09 11:52 am, Felix Miata wrote: Has anyone found a practical way to do this, preferably without running any involved Gecko application? Is there any convenient and practical way to share bookmarks without destroying history? I imagine it shouldn't be too hard for someone with the time and inclination to copy the code that imports the bookmarks into a smaller app, that just zaps the existing bookmarks first. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
