Username / Password Q
How do i get the username / password capture to work for https sites? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
NOTE concerning all kinds of browser e-mail accounts
I have been noticing a lot of traffic concerning e-mail regarding sending, receiving, etc. There is a simple solution that avoids browser-related e-mail clients and solves all of the issues. The solution is radical: do NOT use them in any way, shape, size, form or color! Instead use WEBMAIL; it seems that most (maybe all?) ISPs offer web-mail to / for their customers. Consider: all e-mail travels via their server, they deal with virus and other malware issues before you even know there is an e-mail with issues. If you can configure their webmail for all ASCII or mostly ASCII (ie: NO HTML, NO JAVA, in short no Swiss cheese) then you have virtual protection on par with any firewall. Always as before: Do check subject and from; if you do not recognize it then mark as spam and go to next incoming e-mail. Check headers if need as a part of your filtering. As before, NEVER click on a link that is in an e-mail no matter how legitimate it looks; FIRST verify the e-mail is legitimate by checking the headers. Mark as SPAM e-mails similar to you have won, congratulations, business proposition, confidential, etc and ad-nausea. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks pull-down
Quoting Lucas Levrel lucas.lev...@u-pec.fr: Le 10 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit : Quoting Lucas Levrel lucas.lev...@u-pec.fr: userChrome.css, I find no such file, or even one with a crudely similar name (using SM7.2). It's not there by default. On older versions you had userChrome-example.css and userContent-example.css in a chrome/ folder in your profile. Maybe could you try posting to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey? -- LL STUPID me; i saw the word example and immediately got what seems the false impression that those files were actual examples and thus not used. Will look at them; thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks pull-down
Quoting Lucas Levrel lucas.lev...@u-pec.fr: Le 10 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit : Quoting Lucas Levrel lucas.lev...@u-pec.fr: userChrome.css, I find no such file, or even one with a crudely similar name (using SM7.2). It's not there by default. On older versions you had userChrome-example.css and userContent-example.css in a chrome/ folder in your profile. Maybe could you try posting to mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey? -- LL Oh, this is peachy (NOT)! The file userChrome-example.css names / suggests changes in userChrome.css, and the file userContent-example.css names / suggests changes in userContent.css and neither one of them exists anywhere on the hard drive. And the hard drive has three copies of SeaMonkey (1.1.16 for Win98SE and Win2k, and 2.7 for Win2K). Go figgure.. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: NOTE concerning all kinds of browser e-mail accounts
Quoting Beauregard T. Shagnasty a.nony.mous@example.invalid: robertbaer wrote: I have been noticing a lot of traffic concerning e-mail regarding sending, receiving, etc. There is a simple solution that avoids browser-related e-mail clients and solves all of the issues. The solution is radical: do NOT use them in any way, shape, size, form or color! Instead use WEBMAIL; it seems that most (maybe all?) ISPs offer web-mail to / for their customers. What about those of us who appreciate all the extra features of an email client? What about those who hate webmail? How would you suggest I handle my seventeen email addresses from five different servers? Consider: all e-mail travels via their server, they deal with virus and other malware issues before you even know there is an e-mail with issues. That's false. Email you receive in SeaMonkey or other clients has already been through that server. Why didn't it strip the virus? * Methinks those servers are acting more like relays and just blindly pass the baton on - dirt and fungus still attached. If you can configure their webmail for all ASCII or mostly ASCII (ie: NO HTML, NO JAVA, in short no Swiss cheese) then you have virtual protection on par with any firewall. So is that. You're also confusing Java with JavaScript. The two are unrelated, sharing only the first four letters of their names. * Picky; you darn well know what i mean - NO running of internal scripts, which BTW includes VB scripts.. -- ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: NOTE concerning all kinds of browser e-mail accounts
Quoting question tr...@try.biz: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: robertbaer wrote: I have been noticing a lot of traffic concerning e-mail regarding sending, receiving, etc. There is a simple solution that avoids browser-related e-mail clients and solves all of the issues. The solution is radical: do NOT use them in any way, shape, size, form or color! Instead use WEBMAIL; it seems that most (maybe all?) ISPs offer web-mail to / for their customers. What about those of us who appreciate all the extra features of an email client? What about those who hate webmail? How would you suggest I handle my seventeen email addresses from five different servers? Consider: all e-mail travels via their server, they deal with virus and other malware issues before you even know there is an e-mail with issues. That's false. Email you receive in SeaMonkey or other clients has already been through that server. Why didn't it strip the virus? If you can configure their webmail for all ASCII or mostly ASCII (ie: NO HTML, NO JAVA, in short no Swiss cheese) then you have virtual protection on par with any firewall. So is that. You're also confusing Java with JavaScript. The two are unrelated, sharing only the first four letters of their names. And I like my Email On my Computer and Not on Some Website . ___ Just let all of the virii, trojans, rootkits, and malwareEXEs trod right into the barn and poop the hay out of everything. Have fun. It is not easy discovering a rootkit invasion, much less ripping it out without destroying valuable data and valuable programs. Been there, done that. Changed my modus operandi and never looked back; no problems since then. Perhaps i can recommend something far worse...OE! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: NOTE concerning all kinds of browser e-mail accounts
Quoting Paul p...@main.com: robertb...@localnet.com wrote: ___ Just let all of the virii, trojans, rootkits, and malwareEXEs trod right into the barn and poop the hay out of everything. Have fun. It is not easy discovering a rootkit invasion, much less ripping it out without destroying valuable data and valuable programs. Been there, done that. Changed my modus operandi and never looked back; no problems since then. Perhaps i can recommend something far worse...OE! Web mail is good when traveling. Thats about it. I've been online in some form or fashion since 1977. My computer got a virus once back in 1991 from a floppy. Have never gotten another one. I don't have any active scanners, blockers, etc. I have often wondered how you all get all these nasty things? ___ But i no longer get them; the worst i see are Nigerian scam knock-offs in my spambox competing with Chinese manufacturers wanting business. And i do NOT read them. I look in my spambox for false negatives,which i see on rare occasion - some of those i rescue. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks pull-down
I find no such file, or even one with a crudely similar name (using SM7.2). Any other place to snoop (err..look at)? Quoting Lucas Levrel lucas.lev...@u-pec.fr: Le 8 mars 2012, robertb...@localnet.com a écrit : **In that case, getting back to my original query, how can i alter / trim / remove things from the bookmarks pull-down? I think some parts are hardcoded (maybe something can be done through userChrome.css, but I'm no expert and can test for now). Your best bet is submitting a bug / request for enhancement. -- LL ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks pull-down
Quoting Lucas Levrel lucas.lev...@u-pec.fr: Le 6 mars 2012, Desiree a écrit : If you drag the search bar to the customize area so it is no longer at the end of the address bar, then the address bar becomes extremely long. If the search bar is left at the end of the address bar then the drop down Add New Bookmark window appears right under the search bar. I understand. You could try to use Ctrl-D instead (sometimes it's hard to change one's habits...), which pops up a normal window. I don't have this drop down. All I have in the address bar is an icon that bookmarks the current page into Unsorted Bookmarks. Is this a recently added feature? highlight, say, three tabs I have moved to be next to each other and then tell SM to bookmark all three at once. This ought to be possible. This has been native to Opera for some time, but Opera has gotten so involved with what you can do with tabs that it is actually too much and irritating! That's the point: you can always add more and more features, but it ends up being too much for some users, yet still not enough for others... SM is already greatly customizable through its extensions; thank it for that, and hope someone will make an add-on that fits your need! (Did you look for one already?) -- LL **In that case, getting back to my original query, how can i alter / trim / remove things from the bookmarks pull-down? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks pull-down
OK; have seen various comments concerning extra-large bookmarks and have the following solution suggestion (or at least a start in that direction). Notice that WinDoze has various options for viewing a drive or folder; relevant ones are List and Details. Theseo NEVER eat more than the space of one screen; they gracefully scroll. For some (like me), there would be a problem in that those are ALPHABETICALLY SORTED lists; the good part is that one can jump to a list group or name by typing in a search term. So, to keep both user types happy, keep the lists in USER ORDER and have the search term act like a filter that would display only matching items. As the search term is typed, less and less matching items would be seen. Quoting Desiree melel...@medscape.com: Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au wrote in message news:g_idndabejlhf8jsnz2dnuvz_qidn...@mozilla.org... Desiree wrote: Paul B. Gallagherpau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote in message news:dzwdndeafp3kjcjsnz2dnuvz_oadn...@mozilla.org... Desiree wrote: Paul B. Gallagherpau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote in message news:45-dnfbd97liec3snz2dnuvz_rsdn...@mozilla.org... Desiree wrote: I'm curious. Do you have many bookmarks? I never use Bookmarks in SM from drop down. I have a lot and no way I can access them from drop down. With Fx, I have an extension, Multicolumn Bookmarks, that makes bookmarks from drop down just like the vastly superior bookmarks in Opera. But that extension doesn't work on SM so I always click on Manage Bookmarks if I need a bookmark (or I just rely on the address bar to show me the bookmark in drop down menu after I type the first few letters). The extremely poor bookmarks in SM is barrier to my using it as my default browser. I wouldn't be using Fx as my default browser without Multicolumn Bookmarks. I have 8 columns of bookmarks on Fx and the same on SM except on SM it is one extremely long Unmanageable column. The reason it's one long unmanageable column is that you haven't organized it into folders. You can't just throw everything into Bookmarks and expect to make sense of it. Whenever you save a bookmark, you have to classify it or you'll never find it. Why in the world would you be so presumptuous as to assume that I have no folders for bookmarks? Geez. Uh, because you said so? What did you mean by this? ... except on SM it is one extremely long Unmanageable column. On my machine, if I classify bookmarks into folders, then I have a reasonably short list of folders, each of which opens to a reasonably short list of bookmarks when I mouse over it. If that were your situation, why would you describe it this way? Err...because I have HUNDREDS of folders? About 50 per column and subfolders inside some folders some with with hundreds of bookmarks. I also have some bookmarks that simply don't fit into any folder so they are loose ones. Actually, I have found that the best way to find a bookmark, if you can remember any part of it, is to type a few words in the address bar. The folders are for when you can't recall anything to type to trigger Fx or SM bookmark and history search. My SM history goes back to 2009 but there is a gap of about 1.5 years (2010) when I didn't use SM. My Fx 4 history has every page visited since I installed 4.0 a year ago (I installed it in a separate folder or it would have even more history if I had upgraded on top of my 1.5 version which I probably could not have done anyway as too large a leap between versions). So, the easiest way to find a bookmark, or visited page, is to type a few words that describe it in the address bar. Thus, I don't use bookmarks per se today nearly as much as I did before Mozilla so greatly increased history storage and made it an automatic calculation. But I still am irritated by SM having one very long Bookmarks column instead of multicolumns when I do want to use bookmarks to find a bookmark. War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher Desiree, I would agree with you that it would be nice if there were columns available in the bookmarks screen (I'm getting close to full screen length on a couple of my folders!!) I'll ask the next, logical, question, though..What happens when the columns are created ... and we fill the screen with columns?? Buy wider screens?? Install second/third/etc. screens?? -- Daniel You just get columns on top of columns once the screen is full of columns. It works beautifully in Opera where this setup is native to the browser. In Fx where the extension MultiColumns is needed it works less well (at least on Fx 4.01). I was surprised that after I installed Fx 10 Enterprise on a virtual machine recently that this extension not only installed (even though it has not been updated since June 22, 2011) but actually works better on Fx 10 even though it lacks recent updates. One reason I have not installed Fx 10 Enterprise on my host machine is because I figured this
Re: Bookmarks pull-down
Not too many main folders in the bookmark pulldown which does not quite take up the screen vertically. Sure wish there was a way to get rid of that (to me) extra junk on the top. Quoting Desiree melel...@medscape.com: robertb...@localnet.com wrote in message news:mailman.12395.1330751532.31724.support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org... My bookmark pulldown has looked about the same since NetScrape4.04; it has grown to mostly a list of folders that one sees, and some of those folders have folders in them. There are over a hundred references in the total list; the folders help group them by subject. Only about one hundred main folders (with links and subfolders with more links inside)? That's only two columns. You don't have a lot of bookmarks (unless you have tons of subfolders with lots of bookmarks in each). Example: .. .. Electronic stuff | +--Companies | | | +--Advanced Linear Devices | +--Aerovox | .. | +--Mouser | .. | +--Vishay | .. | +--Kits (shorter folder) +--References(long folder) .. Etc, etc etc (ref Yul Brynner, King and I) Quoting Desiree melel...@medscape.com: robertb...@localnet.com wrote in message news:mailman.12144.1330631412.31724.support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org... Thanks for showing how to get rid of the extra separators; that helps some. So you are saying there is no way to get rid of the subscribe or the personal entries. They are extra garbage as far as i am concerned. It is bad enough to have the File Bookmark (why have it - useless), the Bookmark This Group of Tabs (for some, the OPTION may be useful but allow it to be hidden from this menu), and the Manage Bookmarks (ditto, may be useful but allow it to be hidden from this menu). I want absolute minimum, not (to slightly exaggerate) bloat. I'm curious. Do you have many bookmarks? I never use Bookmarks in SM from drop down. I have a lot and no way I can access them from drop down. With Fx, I have an extension, Multicolumn Bookmarks, that makes bookmarks from drop down just like the vastly superior bookmarks in Opera. But that extension doesn't work on SM so I always click on Manage Bookmarks if I need a bookmark (or I just rely on the address bar to show me the bookmark in drop down menu after I type the first few letters). The extremely poor bookmarks in SM is barrier to my using it as my default browser. I wouldn't be using Fx as my default browser without Multicolumn Bookmarks. I have 8 columns of bookmarks on Fx and the same on SM except on SM it is one extremely long Unmanageable column. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks pull-down
Hmm..I found the link in universe #23, Galaxy 4095, star 7^5-23, planet 3, location 3345/221/79, pulldown 47, folder animals, sub-folder climbing, sub-sub-folder ape, ... DARN! forgot what the heck i was looking for! Quoting Daniel d...@albury.nospam.net.au: Desiree wrote: Paul B. Gallagherpau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote in message news:dzwdndeafp3kjcjsnz2dnuvz_oadn...@mozilla.org... Desiree wrote: Paul B. Gallagherpau...@pbgdashtranslations.com wrote in message news:45-dnfbd97liec3snz2dnuvz_rsdn...@mozilla.org... Desiree wrote: I'm curious. Do you have many bookmarks? I never use Bookmarks in SM from drop down. I have a lot and no way I can access them from drop down. With Fx, I have an extension, Multicolumn Bookmarks, that makes bookmarks from drop down just like the vastly superior bookmarks in Opera. But that extension doesn't work on SM so I always click on Manage Bookmarks if I need a bookmark (or I just rely on the address bar to show me the bookmark in drop down menu after I type the first few letters). The extremely poor bookmarks in SM is barrier to my using it as my default browser. I wouldn't be using Fx as my default browser without Multicolumn Bookmarks. I have 8 columns of bookmarks on Fx and the same on SM except on SM it is one extremely long Unmanageable column. The reason it's one long unmanageable column is that you haven't organized it into folders. You can't just throw everything into Bookmarks and expect to make sense of it. Whenever you save a bookmark, you have to classify it or you'll never find it. Why in the world would you be so presumptuous as to assume that I have no folders for bookmarks? Geez. Uh, because you said so? What did you mean by this? ... except on SM it is one extremely long Unmanageable column. On my machine, if I classify bookmarks into folders, then I have a reasonably short list of folders, each of which opens to a reasonably short list of bookmarks when I mouse over it. If that were your situation, why would you describe it this way? Err...because I have HUNDREDS of folders? About 50 per column and subfolders inside some folders some with with hundreds of bookmarks. I also have some bookmarks that simply don't fit into any folder so they are loose ones. Actually, I have found that the best way to find a bookmark, if you can remember any part of it, is to type a few words in the address bar. The folders are for when you can't recall anything to type to trigger Fx or SM bookmark and history search. My SM history goes back to 2009 but there is a gap of about 1.5 years (2010) when I didn't use SM. My Fx 4 history has every page visited since I installed 4.0 a year ago (I installed it in a separate folder or it would have even more history if I had upgraded on top of my 1.5 version which I probably could not have done anyway as too large a leap between versions). So, the easiest way to find a bookmark, or visited page, is to type a few words that describe it in the address bar. Thus, I don't use bookmarks per se today nearly as much as I did before Mozilla so greatly increased history storage and made it an automatic calculation. But I still am irritated by SM having one very long Bookmarks column instead of multicolumns when I do want to use bookmarks to find a bookmark. War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher Desiree, I would agree with you that it would be nice if there were columns available in the bookmarks screen (I'm getting close to full screen length on a couple of my folders!!) I'll ask the next, logical, question, though..What happens when the columns are created ... and we fill the screen with columns?? Buy wider screens?? Install second/third/etc. screens?? -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks pull-down
My bookmark pulldown has looked about the same since NetScrape4.04; it has grown to mostly a list of folders that one sees, and some of those folders have folders in them. There are over a hundred references in the total list; the folders help group them by subject. Example: .. .. Electronic stuff | +--Companies | | | +--Advanced Linear Devices | +--Aerovox | .. | +--Mouser | .. | +--Vishay | .. | +--Kits (shorter folder) +--References(long folder) .. Etc, etc etc (ref Yul Brynner, King and I) Quoting Desiree melel...@medscape.com: robertb...@localnet.com wrote in message news:mailman.12144.1330631412.31724.support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org... Thanks for showing how to get rid of the extra separators; that helps some. So you are saying there is no way to get rid of the subscribe or the personal entries. They are extra garbage as far as i am concerned. It is bad enough to have the File Bookmark (why have it - useless), the Bookmark This Group of Tabs (for some, the OPTION may be useful but allow it to be hidden from this menu), and the Manage Bookmarks (ditto, may be useful but allow it to be hidden from this menu). I want absolute minimum, not (to slightly exaggerate) bloat. I'm curious. Do you have many bookmarks? I never use Bookmarks in SM from drop down. I have a lot and no way I can access them from drop down. With Fx, I have an extension, Multicolumn Bookmarks, that makes bookmarks from drop down just like the vastly superior bookmarks in Opera. But that extension doesn't work on SM so I always click on Manage Bookmarks if I need a bookmark (or I just rely on the address bar to show me the bookmark in drop down menu after I type the first few letters). The extremely poor bookmarks in SM is barrier to my using it as my default browser. I wouldn't be using Fx as my default browser without Multicolumn Bookmarks. I have 8 columns of bookmarks on Fx and the same on SM except on SM it is one extremely long Unmanageable column. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks pull-down
Thanks for showing how to get rid of the extra separators; that helps some. So you are saying there is no way to get rid of the subscribe or the personal entries. They are extra garbage as far as i am concerned. It is bad enough to have the File Bookmark (why have it - useless), the Bookmark This Group of Tabs (for some, the OPTION may be useful but allow it to be hidden from this menu), and the Manage Bookmarks (ditto, may be useful but allow it to be hidden from this menu). I want absolute minimum, not (to slightly exaggerate) bloat. Quoting MCBastos myemail@example.invalid: Interviewed by CNN on 01/03/2012 02:40, robertb...@localnet.com told the world: In the old 1.1.16 version of SeaMonkey one could make this fairly clean and manageable. In the newer 2.7 version, there is extra junk i would like to remove. Mine sort-of looks like this: Bookmark This Page Ctrl+Shift+D File BookmarkCtrl+D (Bookmark This Group of Tabs) ---(...) means greyed out Manage Bookmarks Ctrl+B - --- dividing line (Subscribe to This Page ) --- the signifies a solid arrow - Personal Toolbar - - - Investing Electronic stuff etc, etc etc Now, the extra junk i would like to remove is from the Subscribe thru and including all of those dividers, to Investing which i want. That way, there would still be a dividing line between Manage Bookmarks and Investing and would look like my pull-down in ver 1.1.16. Help? Bookmark this group of tabs and Subscribe to this page are greyed out if they don't apply at the moment, that is, if there aren't more than one tab open (on the first case) or if there isn't an RSS/Atom feed available to be subscribed as a Live Bookmark (on the second case). Personal Toolbar is the bookmarks toolbar. I don't think you can remove this feature. You are free not to use it, of course, and hide the toolbar. But I don't think you can remove the special folder from the database. I'm not sure you can even *move* it; in the Bookmarks Manager, it's located *outside* the main Bookmarks tree. (Funnily enough, in the Bookmarks Manager it appears with the name Bookmarks Toolbar, which is a bit inconsistent -- and when I tried to drag it, it got copied, not moved). The extra/undesired separators can be deleted from the Bookmarks Manager (Ctrl-B). Just click on Bookmarks Menu on the left pane and you will see them at right, where they can be deleted, moved or whatever. Two items I have in my Bookmarks menu you haven't mentioned are the default saved searches for Recently Bookmarked and Recent Tags. I guess you managed to delete those. Personally, I wouldn't have deleted them, just moved them to some subfolder out of the way. But to each his own. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my IBM System/360. * Added by TagZilla 0.7a1 running on Seamonkey 2.7.2 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Bookmarks pull-down
In the old 1.1.16 version of SeaMonkey one could make this fairly clean and manageable. In the newer 2.7 version, there is extra junk i would like to remove. Mine sort-of looks like this: Bookmark This Page Ctrl+Shift+D File BookmarkCtrl+D (Bookmark This Group of Tabs) ---(...) means greyed out Manage Bookmarks Ctrl+B - --- dividing line (Subscribe to This Page ) --- the signifies a solid arrow - Personal Toolbar - - - Investing Electronic stuff etc, etc etc Now, the extra junk i would like to remove is from the Subscribe thru and including all of those dividers, to Investing which i want. That way, there would still be a dividing line between Manage Bookmarks and Investing and would look like my pull-down in ver 1.1.16. Help? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Username / Password Q
My experience has shown that It DOES NOT work the same way as for http sites. So far,all http sites are accepted and (i think - because i have so few) all https sites are ignored. So i have downloaded that add-on and as they say, We Shall See. THANKS. Quoting David E. Ross nobody@nowhere.invalid: On 2/24/12 7:49 PM, robertb...@localnet.com wrote: How do i get the username / password capture to work for https sites? It works the same way as for http sites. The problem is that some http and https sites have code that blocks the saving of passwords. This can be overcome in most (not all) cases with the Remember Passwords extension from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/remember-passwords/. For a few sites that use a JavaScript-generated window for login (e.g., Slashdot), I disable JavaScript before selecting the Login link to get an alternative login Web page. I then enable JavaScript before selecting the Login button on that page. I use the PrefBar extension to toggle between enable and disable for JavaScript; there is a checkbox for this on the PrefBar toolbar. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/. Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Username / Password Q
How do i get the username / password capture to work for https sites? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
