Re: Anyone else see SeaMonkey mail folders loose their children folders?
Michael Lueck wrote: Daniel wrote: So does your SM lose sub-folders just after you've done a Compact?? The next day?? Day three after the compaction?? Or is it always day six or seven before you start losing sub-folders? The only logical connection I can come up with is related to message filtering. And I have MANY filter rules, all to move xyz message type to abc folder. I can loose folders the first new message that comes in after a compact. I see no connection between duration from last compact and the folder bug. Sincerely, O.K., well, that's me done then, sorry! -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anyone else see SeaMonkey mail folders loose their children folders?
Daniel wrote: So does your SM lose sub-folders just after you've done a Compact?? The next day?? Day three after the compaction?? Or is it always day six or seven before you start losing sub-folders? The only logical connection I can come up with is related to message filtering. And I have MANY filter rules, all to move xyz message type to abc folder. I can loose folders the first new message that comes in after a compact. I see no connection between duration from last compact and the folder bug. Sincerely, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anyone else see SeaMonkey mail folders loose their children folders?
Michael Lueck wrote: Daniel wrote: reading the Bugzilla report you quoted, in the first entry the poster said he had 7.6GB Inbox (including all his sub-inboxes). 7.6GB...what the heck for?? I am not such a pack rat. My entire SM profile is running around 2GB. The two main accounts I use, have MANY folders under - thus that are seeing this problem - have an InBox size of 27.2 MB and 66 MB. (That is just the inbox size) In total I have around 1500 folders, most heavily / deeply nested. I'd still ask what the heck for??, but I suppose it's your right!! I wonder if SM is having troubles indexing the sub-folders and indexing the sub-sub-folders, and is not so much losing their children but rather taking it's time re-indexing them. I switched off automatic compact back during use of TB. Why?? It seems to me to be related to my use of filters to move messages to the correct folder. The folders will be fine, a message comes in, and suddenly when I expand out a folder at InBox level to see the new message (several folders deep), then sometimes the destination folder is not visible (along with many other folders loosing their children). I then open a new instance of SM Mail, close the old one, and read my message I received. When you create the new instance of SM Mail, I'm guessing this new instance creates a new set of index files (the .msf files) which are clean, sort of like what would result if you used File-Compact Folders more often.Does your machine often stall just after you've done one of your weekly profile clean ups and back-ups?? I collapse folder trees at the folder just under the InBox. Both TB and SM are able to remember which subfolders I wanted open/closed within each subtree, thus I use that to my advantage and leave critical path sub,sub-sub,sub-sub-sub branches always open and simply collapse the folder directly off the InBox. When I want to reopen that subtree, I click the folder just off the InBox, and to my annoyance SM FREQUENTLY is unable to correctly display the entire subtree correctly. Additionally, I wonder how often you File-Compact Folder on each of your mail accounts, sub-accounts, sub-sub... Weekly, when I do my SM profile backups I do: 1) Delete all Junk mail 2) File \ Empty Trash 3) File \ Compact Folders on each account's InBox folder. I see the compact operation enumerate correctly through each accounts folder tree structure via the status bar. Sincerely, -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anyone else see SeaMonkey mail folders loose their children folders?
Daniel wrote: Michael Lueck wrote: In total I have around 1500 folders, most heavily / deeply nested. I'd still ask what the heck for?? Because I like to be organized. I wonder if SM is having troubles indexing the sub-folders and indexing the sub-sub-folders, and is not so much losing their children but rather taking it's time re-indexing them. I switched off automatic compact back during use of TB. Why?? I heard that was a good way to get corrupted .msf index files for one thing. When you create the new instance of SM Mail, I'm guessing this new instance creates a new set of index files (the .msf files) which are clean Rebuilding .msf files takes quite a while. Double clicking any folder opens a second instance of Mail INSTANTLY. It could not possibly rebuild 1500 .msf files INSTANTLY. Perhaps since I leave folders \ subtrees open way down the tree and close the tree at the top level folder, when SM moves a message into that folder the UI gets confused. Worked just fine on TB 2.0.x. Never had this trouble. It is unique to the SM code base. File-Compact Folders more often.Does your machine often stall just after you've done one of your weekly profile clean ups and back-ups?? Stall after clean/compact!?!? It always runs snappy and great. I have no idea what you might be referring to. Sincerely, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anyone else see SeaMonkey mail folders loose their children folders?
Michael Lueck wrote: Daniel wrote: Michael Lueck wrote: Snip File-Compact Folders more often.Does your machine often stall just after you've done one of your weekly profile clean ups and back-ups?? Stall after clean/compact!?!? It always runs snappy and great. I have no idea what you might be referring to. Sincerely, So does your SM lose sub-folders just after you've done a Compact?? The next day?? Day three after the compaction?? Or is it always day six or seven before you start losing sub-folders? -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anyone else see SeaMonkey mail folders loose their children folders?
Michael Lueck wrote: Greetings, Right along since switching to SM from TB 2.0.x, I have been reporting that POP account mail folders loose their children randomly. I think I found a bug documenting others seeing the same thing here: [Bug 593519] Unable to expand a folder's subfolders without opening the folder first in a new email window https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593519 Am I the only one that has this happening? Or does it not bother others? I would like to get it resolved. I am holding up migrating other users from TB 2.0.x pending a resolution to this one bug. Currently I am running the official Linux x64 builds. It was happening right along with the official Linux x86 builds as well. How could I help get some action on this bug? Thanks! Sincerely, Michael, reading the Bugzilla report you quoted, in the first entry the poster said he had 7.6GB Inbox (including all his sub-inboxes). 7.6GB...what the heck for?? I wonder if SM is having troubles indexing the sub-folders and indexing the sub-sub-folders, and is not so much losing their children but rather taking it's time re-indexing them. Additionally, I wonder how often you File-Compact Folder on each of your mail accounts, sub-accounts, sub-sub... -- Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Anyone else see SeaMonkey mail folders loose their children folders?
Daniel wrote: reading the Bugzilla report you quoted, in the first entry the poster said he had 7.6GB Inbox (including all his sub-inboxes). 7.6GB...what the heck for?? I am not such a pack rat. My entire SM profile is running around 2GB. The two main accounts I use, have MANY folders under - thus that are seeing this problem - have an InBox size of 27.2 MB and 66 MB. (That is just the inbox size) In total I have around 1500 folders, most heavily / deeply nested. I wonder if SM is having troubles indexing the sub-folders and indexing the sub-sub-folders, and is not so much losing their children but rather taking it's time re-indexing them. I switched off automatic compact back during use of TB. It seems to me to be related to my use of filters to move messages to the correct folder. The folders will be fine, a message comes in, and suddenly when I expand out a folder at InBox level to see the new message (several folders deep), then sometimes the destination folder is not visible (along with many other folders loosing their children). I then open a new instance of SM Mail, close the old one, and read my message I received. I collapse folder trees at the folder just under the InBox. Both TB and SM are able to remember which subfolders I wanted open/closed within each subtree, thus I use that to my advantage and leave critical path sub,sub-sub,sub-sub-sub branches always open and simply collapse the folder directly off the InBox. When I want to reopen that subtree, I click the folder just off the InBox, and to my annoyance SM FREQUENTLY is unable to correctly display the entire subtree correctly. Additionally, I wonder how often you File-Compact Folder on each of your mail accounts, sub-accounts, sub-sub... Weekly, when I do my SM profile backups I do: 1) Delete all Junk mail 2) File \ Empty Trash 3) File \ Compact Folders on each account's InBox folder. I see the compact operation enumerate correctly through each accounts folder tree structure via the status bar. Sincerely, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Anyone else see SeaMonkey mail folders loose their children folders?
Greetings, Right along since switching to SM from TB 2.0.x, I have been reporting that POP account mail folders loose their children randomly. I think I found a bug documenting others seeing the same thing here: [Bug 593519] Unable to expand a folder's subfolders without opening the folder first in a new email window https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593519 Am I the only one that has this happening? Or does it not bother others? I would like to get it resolved. I am holding up migrating other users from TB 2.0.x pending a resolution to this one bug. Currently I am running the official Linux x64 builds. It was happening right along with the official Linux x86 builds as well. How could I help get some action on this bug? Thanks! Sincerely, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
