Re: Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

2012-07-14 Thread Jim Dell

rick...@interfearingsounds.com wrote:

Seamonkey: 3h 09m
Opera: 4h 02m

I used http://www.internet-guide.co.uk/static-html.html in both browsers and 
let the browsers be while they had the page loaded for a couple of minutes 
before I checked the readings. Regards.


What does a blank page say for both browsers

and what sequence are you testing the browsers and do you recharge 
between each browser?



Jim

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

2012-07-13 Thread rickard
I noticed it on my new computer, an ASUS K53SV, without external AC power in 
Battery Save Mode. In this mode I can get up to 6 hours of use when I use IE 9 
and about the same with Firefox x64 nightly and Opera 12 but after a couple of 
minutes with Seamonkey the computer reports that I only have 2 hours of use 
left. I surf the same sites with all the browsers.

Do you people know why this might be the case?

Regards
Rickard G
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

2012-07-13 Thread Philip TAYLOR

What is the projected life if you open it at a single static HTML page
with no other integrated components (mail, news, IRC, WHY ...) open ?

Philip Taylor

rick...@interfearingsounds.com wrote:

I noticed it on my new computer, an ASUS K53SV, without external AC power in 
Battery Save Mode. In this mode I can get up to 6 hours of use when I use IE 9 
and about the same with Firefox x64 nightly and Opera 12 but after a couple of 
minutes with Seamonkey the computer reports that I only have 2 hours of use 
left. I surf the same sites with all the browsers.

Do you people know why this might be the case?

Regards
Rickard G
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

2012-07-13 Thread rickard
I used a single tab in both browsers and headed over to www.aftonbladet.se 
which has quite some stuff going on (flash, a lot of animated pictures) and 
these are the results I got after letting the browsers just sit still for a few 
minutes:

Opera 12 - 5h 24m
Seamonkey - 3h 01m

I then closed Seamonkey and reopened Opera and after a minute the battery time 
is up to 6h.

Regards.

Den fredagen den 13:e juli 2012 kl. 12:13:52 UTC+2 skrev Philip TAYLOR:
 What is the projected life if you open it at a single static HTML page
 with no other integrated components (mail, news, IRC, WHY ...) open ?
 
 Philip Taylor
 
 rickard wrote:
 gt; I noticed it on my new computer, an ASUS K53SV, without external AC 
 power in Battery Save Mode. In this mode I can get up to 6 hours of use when 
 I use IE 9 and about the same with Firefox x64 nightly and Opera 12 but after 
 a couple of minutes with Seamonkey the computer reports that I only have 2 
 hours of use left. I surf the same sites with all the browsers.
 gt;
 gt; Do you people know why this might be the case?
 gt;
 gt; Regards
 gt; Rickard G
 gt; ___
 gt; support-seamonkey mailing list
 gt; support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
 gt; https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
 gt;

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

2012-07-13 Thread Philip TAYLOR



rick...@interfearingsounds.com wrote:


I used a single tab in both browsers and headed over to www.aftonbladet.se 
which has quite some stuff going on (flash, a lot of animated pictures) and 
these are the results I got after letting the browsers just sit still for a few 
minutes:

Opera 12 - 5h 24m
Seamonkey - 3h 01m


OK, but that didn't really address my question, which is Does Seamonkey
use excessive resources only on dynamic pages (such as the one you
describe), or does it also use excessive resources on a single,
non-animated, no-plugin-dependencies, static HTML page ?

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

2012-07-13 Thread rickard
Oh, sorry. I missed out on exactly what you wanted me to use as reference. I 
was just about to go out and visit a friend but I will have this tab visible so 
that when I get home I won't forget to report how the new test with a simple 
static html page turns out.

Regards
Rickard G

Den fredagen den 13:e juli 2012 kl. 13:06:55 UTC+2 skrev Philip TAYLOR:
 rickard wrote:
 
 gt; I used a single tab in both browsers and headed over to 
 www.aftonbladet.se which has quite some stuff going on (flash, a lot of 
 animated pictures) and these are the results I got after letting the browsers 
 just sit still for a few minutes:
 gt;
 gt; Opera 12 - 5h 24m
 gt; Seamonkey - 3h 01m
 
 OK, but that didn#39;t really address my question, which is quot;Does 
 Seamonkey
 use excessive resources only on dynamic pages (such as the one you
 describe), or does it also use excessive resources on a single,
 non-animated, no-plugin-dependencies, static HTML page ?
 
 Philip Taylor

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Less battery time using Seamonkey (v 2.10.1) compared to IE9, Firefox and Opera.

2012-07-13 Thread rickard
Seamonkey: 3h 09m
Opera: 4h 02m

I used http://www.internet-guide.co.uk/static-html.html in both browsers and 
let the browsers be while they had the page loaded for a couple of minutes 
before I checked the readings. Regards.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey