Re: Can't see news messages when offline except with view source

[Daniel]

Gabriel wrote on 7/01/2019 9:50 PM:

Daniel wrote on 06/01/2019 09:51:

Gabriel wrote on 6/01/2019 4:41 AM:

Hi,

my ISP closed its news server, but I had the synchronization ON and 
previously downloaded all the messages.
The weird thing is I can't see them in the normal main window, I only 
can see their content with cmd-U (view message source).

Why does that happen and how to fix it?

My SM is:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4

Build identifier: 20180711181801

Thanx!


Gabriel, when you attempt to view the messages that you have 
previously downloaded in the normal main window (and fail), is your 
SeaMonkey showing as being on-line?? (there's a little connectoid 
thingee down in the bottom-right of screen, indicating if you are 
on-line (closed) or off-line (separated))


A OK :-)
I was always on-line.

If that connectiod thingee is showing you as on-line, when you select 
a message, SeaMonkey tries to get on-line and download the message ... 
and fails miserably! I don't know how your Cmd-U fits into this!!




That's why. So also the cmd-U "source" should fail, but it's not. This 
is why I didn't think about going offline :-(


Anyway now I removed that server, I'll try with another one to see if it 
has the same behaviour.


Thank you.


No prob, Gabriel.

--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418


User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't see news messages when offline except with view source

[Gabriel]

Daniel wrote on 06/01/2019 09:51:

Gabriel wrote on 6/01/2019 4:41 AM:

Hi,

my ISP closed its news server, but I had the synchronization ON and previously 
downloaded all the messages.
The weird thing is I can't see them in the normal main window, I only can see 
their content with cmd-U (view message source).

Why does that happen and how to fix it?

My SM is:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4

Build identifier: 20180711181801


Thanx!


Gabriel, when you attempt to view the messages that you have previously 
downloaded in the normal main window (and fail), is your SeaMonkey showing as 
being on-line?? (there's a little connectoid thingee down in the bottom-right of 
screen, indicating if you are on-line (closed) or off-line (separated))


A OK :-)
I was always on-line.




If that connectiod thingee is showing you as on-line, when you select a message, 
SeaMonkey tries to get on-line and download the message ... and fails miserably! 
I don't know how your Cmd-U fits into this!!




That's why. So also the cmd-U "source" should fail, but it's not. This is why I 
didn't think about going offline :-(


Anyway now I removed that server, I'll try with another one to see if it has the 
same behaviour.


Thank you.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Can't see news messages when offline except with view source

[Daniel]

Gabriel wrote on 6/01/2019 4:41 AM:

Hi,

my ISP closed its news server, but I had the synchronization ON and 
previously downloaded all the messages.
The weird thing is I can't see them in the normal main window, I only 
can see their content with cmd-U (view message source).

Why does that happen and how to fix it?

My SM is:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4

Build identifier: 20180711181801


Thanx!


Gabriel, when you attempt to view the messages that you have previously 
downloaded in the normal main window (and fail), is your SeaMonkey 
showing as being on-line?? (there's a little connectoid thingee down in 
the bottom-right of screen, indicating if you are on-line (closed) or 
off-line (separated))


If that connectiod thingee is showing you as on-line, when you select a 
message, SeaMonkey tries to get on-line and download the message ... and 
fails miserably! I don't know how your Cmd-U fits into this!!


--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171016030418


User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Can't see news messages when offline except with view source

[Gabriel]

Hi,

my ISP closed its news server, but I had the synchronization ON and previously 
downloaded all the messages.
The weird thing is I can't see them in the normal main window, I only can see 
their content with cmd-U (view message source).

Why does that happen and how to fix it?

My SM is:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.4

Build identifier: 20180711181801


Thanx!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[Ray_Net]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 22/05/2012 00:49:

Ray_Net wrote:


Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 20/05/2012 22:58:

Ray_Net wrote:

More infos about html free editors ->
http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-

editors.htm

Sorry, those are all for Windows...


Sorry those are not for windows only ->  *Operating System(s):* Windows
Macintosh Linux or UNIX

Then why, pray tell, does your link say "windowshtmleditors", and "free-
windows-editors" and the page say:

"The 10 Best Free Web Editors for Windows
Free HTML Editors for Windows"

"The following editors are the 10 best free HTML editors for Windows,
both WYSIWYG and text editors, in order from best to worst. "

I am not responsible of the choice of words inside links and/or in a web 
page written by someone else.

May i just mention that your preferred editor

Bluefish is present in the position 4. A not so bad position :-)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Ray_Net wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 20/05/2012 22:58:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> More infos about html free editors ->
>>> http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-
>> editors.htm
>>
>> Sorry, those are all for Windows...
>>
> Sorry those are not for windows only -> *Operating System(s):* Windows
> Macintosh Linux or UNIX

Then why, pray tell, does your link say "windowshtmleditors", and "free-
windows-editors" and the page say:

"The 10 Best Free Web Editors for Windows
Free HTML Editors for Windows"

"The following editors are the 10 best free HTML editors for Windows, 
both WYSIWYG and text editors, in order from best to worst. "

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[Ray_Net]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 20/05/2012 22:58:

Ray_Net wrote:


Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+

I prefer a real web authoring tool. I use Bluefish.   :-)

That's another way of doing things, but if you want to see the real
source without any modifications permitting to see
 ,& per example, a neutral editor is always a reference.

Hmmm? You don't think I see  when I type it?  Bluefish is not a
WYSIWYG editor. Are you familiar with it?





More infos about html free editors ->
http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-

editors.htm

Sorry, those are all for Windows...

Sorry those are not for windows only -> *Operating System(s):* Windows 
Macintosh Linux or UNIX


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Ray_Net wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> Ray_Net wrote:
>>> I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+
>>
>> I prefer a real web authoring tool. I use Bluefish.   :-)
>
> That's another way of doing things, but if you want to see the real
> source without any modifications permitting to see
>  ,& per example, a neutral editor is always a reference.

Hmmm? You don't think I see   when I type it?  Bluefish is not a 
WYSIWYG editor. Are you familiar with it?




> More infos about html free editors -> 
> http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-
editors.htm

Sorry, those are all for Windows...

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[Ray_Net]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote, On 20/05/2012 17:21:

Ray_Net wrote:


David E. Ross wrote:

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

I do not see this problem when I go to the SeaMonkey menu bar and
select [View>   Page Source].  Then it seems that all entity
references remain untranslated.

Then that should be the way you get your copy.

What are you using for an editor (which could also affect what is
happening)? Why don't you get the copy from the editor instead of a
viewed page? Seems backwards to me to do it your way.  :-/


I hand-code my HTML and CSS using Wordpad.

I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+

I prefer a real web authoring tool. I use Bluefish.   :-)

That's another way of doing things, but if you want to see the real 
source without any modifications permitting to see


 ,& per example, a neutral editor is always a reference.

More infos about html free editors ->  
http://webdesign.about.com/od/windowshtmleditors/tp/free-windows-editors.htm


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Ray_Net wrote:

> David E. Ross wrote:
>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> David E. Ross wrote:
 I do not see this problem when I go to the SeaMonkey menu bar and
 select [View>  Page Source].  Then it seems that all entity
 references remain untranslated.
>>> Then that should be the way you get your copy.
>>>
>>> What are you using for an editor (which could also affect what is
>>> happening)? Why don't you get the copy from the editor instead of a
>>> viewed page? Seems backwards to me to do it your way.  :-/
>>>
>> I hand-code my HTML and CSS using Wordpad.
>
> I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+

I prefer a real web authoring tool. I use Bluefish.   :-)

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[Ray_Net]

David E. Ross wrote, On 20/05/2012 08:04:

On 5/19/12 5:47 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:


I do not see this problem when I go to the SeaMonkey menu bar and select
[View>  Page Source].  Then it seems that all entity references remain
untranslated.

Then that should be the way you get your copy.

What are you using for an editor (which could also affect what is
happening)? Why don't you get the copy from the editor instead of a
viewed page? Seems backwards to me to do it your way.  :-/


I hand-code my HTML and CSS using Wordpad.



I prefer a more neutral editor like notepad or notepad+
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[David E. Ross]

On 5/19/12 5:47 PM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
> 
>> I do not see this problem when I go to the SeaMonkey menu bar and select
>> [View > Page Source].  Then it seems that all entity references remain
>> untranslated.
> 
> Then that should be the way you get your copy.
> 
> What are you using for an editor (which could also affect what is 
> happening)? Why don't you get the copy from the editor instead of a 
> viewed page? Seems backwards to me to do it your way.  :-/
> 

I hand-code my HTML and CSS using Wordpad.

Part of my Web site is a diary of my gardening activities.  Even if no
one else is really interested, I find it handy.

When I mention a plant, I include its botanical name because the same
common name can apply to quite different plants.  A lime tree can be
Citrus aurantifolia (or other Citrus species) or it can be Tilia cordata
(or other Tilia species), Citrus and Tilia being two completely
unrelated genera.  Also different common names can apply to the same
plant.  Thrift and sea pink are both Ameria maritima.  Botanical names
are generally written in Italics.

So when I make an entry in the diary for May about a plant previously
cited in January, I bring up the January page, mark the name -- common
and botanical -- and select View Selection Source on the pull-down
context menu.  The source -- with markup to put the botanical name in
Italics -- is thus already marked for copying.

A problem arises when I want to copy the botanical name of a hybrid.
'Goodwin Creek Grey' lavender is a cross between wooly and French
lavender, between Lavandula lanata and Lavandula dentata.  This is
written as Lavandula lanata × dentata, with the × coded in HTML as
×.  However, View Selection Source on the pull-down context menu
shows × while Page Source from the View menu shows the entity reference.
 On the other hand, both displays show the entity references for  
and &.

If I were merely to copy from the Web page, I would not get the markup
for the botanical name in italics or any entity references.  I would not
display the entire source from the Web page because I already have the
source readily available; but if I were to display the HTML file from my
hard drive, I would have to do a search for the term and mark it before
copying.

The issues are (1) that View Selection Source from the pull-down context
menu is inconsistent with Page Source from the View menu and (2) View
Selection Source from the pull-down context menu is internally
inconsistent by translating some entity references but not translating
others.

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

David E. Ross wrote:

> I do not see this problem when I go to the SeaMonkey menu bar and select
> [View > Page Source].  Then it seems that all entity references remain
> untranslated.

Then that should be the way you get your copy.

What are you using for an editor (which could also affect what is 
happening)? Why don't you get the copy from the editor instead of a 
viewed page? Seems backwards to me to do it your way.  :-/

-- 
   -bts
   -My web sites are on my drive too
   -because that is the master copy
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[David E. Ross]

On 5/19/12 10:31 AM, Michael Lueck wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> Can the display of a page source be made consistent, preferably with the
>> entity references untranslated?
> 
> I would think that "View Source" should do exactly that... Show the
> actual Source code which produces the page, errors or otherwise left as-was.
> 
> No "search and replace" type translation should be performed on the
> output of View Source.
> 
> So is SM actually translating anything? Have you done a wget of the
> URL in question and compare outputs?


I don't have to do a wget.  I tried it on one of my own pages.  I keep a
complete copy of my Web site on the hard drive of my PC.

I see this problem when I want to copy some markup from an existing Web
page into another page.  This is easily done by marking the content in a
rendered page and then viewing the source (right-click, View Selection
Source on the pull-down context menu).  The marked content is then
marked in the source, so all I have to do is copy and paste.

I do not see this problem when I go to the SeaMonkey menu bar and select
[View > Page Source].  Then it seems that all entity references remain
untranslated.

-- 

David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source

[Michael Lueck]

David E. Ross wrote:

Can the display of a page source be made consistent, preferably with the
entity references untranslated?


I would think that "View Source" should do exactly that... Show the actual 
Source code which produces the page, errors or otherwise left as-was.

No "search and replace" type translation should be performed on the output of 
View Source.

So is SM actually translating anything? Have you done a wget of the URL in 
question and compare outputs?

--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

View Source

[David E. Ross]

When I view the source of a Web page, entity references are
inconsistently displayed.  Some such as × show as the translated
characters while others such as & are not translated.

My old bug report #591114 was closed as WontFix with the assertion that
> Since the DOM doesn't contain entity references, only characters,
> the best we can do for any given character is to either output it
> as-is or entity-encode it, no matter where it came from originally.
However, the display does indeed show  , &, and some other
entity references.

Can the display of a page source be made consistent, preferably with the
entity references untranslated?

See .

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source With on SeaMonkey

[David Wilkinson]

WLS wrote:

Sorry, we are talking apples and oranges here.

I didn't come across VSW 0.8.1.1 in my search, but VS 2.1 from AMO.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/view-source/

I guess that one won't help.


Ah, yes. View Source With is a different extension:

<https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/dafizilla-viewsourcewith/>

--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source With on SeaMonkey

[WLS]

David Wilkinson wrote:

WLS wrote:

Never heard of View Source With, but I just installed it on SeaMonkey
2.5b2. I
do have the Add-on Compatibility extension installed.

What is not working in View Source With? I'll test it and see if it
works in 2.5b2


That's interesting. As I said I only tried the latest version 0.8.1.1 of
VSW on SeaMonkey 2.0.14 (after hacking the .xpi file). It did not work,
but I have contacted the author of VSW, and he suggested I add the
following field in about:config

extensions.dafizilla.viewsourcewith.useWinProcess = false

Then it worked on SM 2.0.14, and then I found that it worked on SM 2.4
also. Maybe 2.4 did not need this change, I don't know.

I need VSW because I use it to launch a helper application that I wrote
myself (it's a long story).



Sorry, we are talking apples and oranges here.

I didn't come across VSW 0.8.1.1 in my search, but VS 2.1 from AMO.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/view-source/

I guess that one won't help.
--

SeaMonkey 2.5b2 on openSUSE 11.3 Linux
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source With on SeaMonkey

[David Wilkinson]

WLS wrote:

Never heard of View Source With, but I just installed it on SeaMonkey 2.5b2. I
do have the Add-on Compatibility extension installed.

What is not working in View Source With? I'll test it and see if it works in 
2.5b2


That's interesting. As I said I only tried the latest version 0.8.1.1 of VSW on 
SeaMonkey 2.0.14 (after hacking the .xpi file). It did not work, but I have 
contacted the author of VSW, and he suggested I add the following field in 
about:config


extensions.dafizilla.viewsourcewith.useWinProcess = false

Then it worked on SM 2.0.14, and then I found that it worked on SM 2.4 also. 
Maybe 2.4 did not need this change, I don't know.


I need VSW because I use it to launch a helper application that I wrote myself 
(it's a long story).


--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source With on SeaMonkey

[WLS]

Ray_Net wrote:

David Wilkinson wrote:

The author of the excellent View Source With extension has decided to
cease support for SeaMonkey, due to the rapid release cycle.

And indeed there is a very real problem, because hacking the .xpi file
of the latest VSW to allow installation on SeaMonkey does not give a
working extension even on SeaMonkey 2.0.14 (I have not tried on later
versions).

For me this is a very serious issue, because VSW is a must-have
extension for me.



You have to forgot about your "View Source With extension" because you
will never been able to convince the SM developpers that the "rapid
release cycle" is a very bad decision. They are dreaming in their world.


So what is wrong with the extension? It installed and works in SM 2.5b2.

What does the OP need the developer of the extension to add, to make it 
better, or does it already do everything they could want?


Why is it a must have extension?

--

SeaMonkey 2.5b2 on openSUSE 11.3 Linux
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source With on SeaMonkey

[Ray_Net]

David Wilkinson wrote:

The author of the excellent View Source With extension has decided to
cease support for SeaMonkey, due to the rapid release cycle.

And indeed there is a very real problem, because hacking the .xpi file
of the latest VSW to allow installation on SeaMonkey does not give a
working extension even on SeaMonkey 2.0.14 (I have not tried on later
versions).

For me this is a very serious issue, because VSW is a must-have
extension for me.



You have to forgot about your "View Source With extension" because you 
will never been able to convince the SM developpers that the "rapid 
release cycle" is a very bad decision. They are dreaming in their world.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source With on SeaMonkey

[Petr Voralek]

   Hello!

   On 10/11/2011 11:36 AM, *David Wilkinson* wrote, and I quote (in part):

> The author of the excellent View Source With extension has decided to cease 
> support for SeaMonkey, due to the rapid release cycle.

  I recommend you try out launchy extension...
http://gemal.dk/mozilla/launchy.html
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/launchy/
  I use it happily for years, is compatible with version 2.4, can be
configured according to my needs (launchy.xml)...
http://gemal.dk/mozilla/launchy-xmlfile.html

-- 
Petr Voralek(JabberID: na...@jabber.cz)

... Objects are closer than they appear...



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: View Source With on SeaMonkey

[WLS]

David Wilkinson wrote:

The author of the excellent View Source With extension has decided to
cease support for SeaMonkey, due to the rapid release cycle.

And indeed there is a very real problem, because hacking the .xpi file
of the latest VSW to allow installation on SeaMonkey does not give a
working extension even on SeaMonkey 2.0.14 (I have not tried on later
versions).

For me this is a very serious issue, because VSW is a must-have
extension for me.



Never heard of View Source With, but I just installed it on SeaMonkey 
2.5b2. I do have the Add-on Compatibility extension installed.


What is not working in View Source With? I'll test it and see if it 
works in 2.5b2



--

SeaMonkey 2.5b2 on openSUSE 11.3 Linux
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

View Source With on SeaMonkey

[David Wilkinson]

The author of the excellent View Source With extension has decided to cease 
support for SeaMonkey, due to the rapid release cycle.


And indeed there is a very real problem, because hacking the .xpi file of the 
latest VSW to allow installation on SeaMonkey does not give a working extension 
even on SeaMonkey 2.0.14 (I have not tried on later versions).


For me this is a very serious issue, because VSW is a must-have extension for 
me.

--
David Wilkinson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey